ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Ask The Heat Treat Doctor®: Why and How Do We Heat Treat Gears? Part One

/ ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, CARBURIZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, NITRIDING TECHNICAL CONTENT, NITROCARBURIZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, OP-ED

Ask The Heat Treat Doctor® has returned to bring sage advice to Heat Treat Today readers, answer questions about heat treating, brazing, sintering, and other types of thermal treatments, as well as metallurgy, equipment, and process-related issues. In this installment, Dan Herring examines the essential role of heat treatment in gear performance: exploring the key material and design considerations for power transmission gears, the difference between through hardening and case hardening, and the atmosphere heat treatment processes — from carburizing and carbonitriding to nitriding and nitrocarburizing — that determine how well a gear handles load, wear, and fatigue in heavy-duty applications.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s February 2026 Annual Air & Atmosphere Heat Treating print edition.

Have questions or feedback? We’d love to hear from you — reach out to our editorial team at editor@heattreattoday.com.

Gears play an essential role in the performance of many products that we rely on in our everyday lives. When we think about gears, we generally separate them into two categories: motion-carrying and power transmission. Motion-carrying gears are generally nonferrous alloys or plastics, while load bearing power transmission gears (Figure 1) are usually manufactured from ferrous alloys and are intended for heavy-duty service applications.

Figure 1. Typical off-highway truck power transmission gears | Image Credit: The Heat Treat Doctor®

Gear Materials & Engineering

Power transmission gears involve a wide variety of steels and cast irons. In all gears, the choice of material must be made only after careful consideration of the performance demanded by the application end-use and total manufactured cost, taking into consideration such issues as pre- and post-machining economics.

Key design considerations require an analysis of the type of applied load, whether gradual or instantaneous, and the desired mechanical properties, such as bending fatigue strength or wear resistance — all of which will define core strength and heat treating requirements.

Figure 2. Stress profile in a heavy-duty transmission gear | Image Credit: The Heat Treat Doctor®

It is important for the designer to understand that each area in the gear tooth profile sees different service demands (Figure 2). Consideration must be given to the forces that will act on the gear teeth with tooth bending and contact stress, resistance to scoring and wear, and fatigue issues being paramount. For example, in the root area, good surface hardness and high residual compressive stress are desired to improve endurance or bending fatigue life. At the pitch diameter, a combination of high hardness and adequate subsurface strength are necessary to handle contract stress and wear and to prevent spalling.

Some of the factors that influence fatigue strength are:

  • Hardness distribution, a function of:
    • Case hardness
    • Case depth
    • Core hardness
  • Microstructure, a function of:
    • Retained austenite percentage
    • Grain size
    • Carbide size, type, and distribution
    • Non-martensitic phases
  • Defect control, a function of:
    • Residual compressive stress
    • Surface finish and geometry
    • Intergranular toughness

In the total manufacturing scheme, a synergistic relationship must exist between the material selection process, engineering design, and manufacturing (including heat treatment). A balance of the priorities in each discipline must be reached to achieve the optimization necessary for the ultimate performance of the gear design. This is often not an easy task.

Various atmosphere heat treatment methods are used for most types of gears including pre-hardening steps (e.g., annealing, normalizing, stress relief) and hardening processes (e.g., neutral hardening and case hardening).

Hardening

Neutral (aka through hardening) refers to heat treatment methods that do not produce a case. Examples of commonly through-hardened gear steels are AISI/SAE grades 1045, 4130, 4140, 4145, 4340, and 8640. It is important to note that hardness uniformity should not be assumed throughout the gear tooth. Since the outside of a gear is cooled faster than the inside, there will be a hardness gradient developed. The final hardness is dependent on the amount of carbon in the steel. The depth of hardness depends on the hardenability of the steel.

Through hardening can be performed either before or after the gear teeth are cut. When gear teeth will be cut after the part has been hardened, machinability becomes an important factor based on final hardness. The hardness is achieved by heating the material into the austenitic range, typically 815°C–875°C (1500°F–1600°F), followed by quenching and tempering.

Case Hardening

By contrast, case hardening is used to produce a hard, wear resistant case (surface layer) on top of a ductile, shock resistant interior (core). The idea behind case hardening is to keep the core of the gear tooth at a level under 40 HRC to avoid tooth breakage while hardening the outer surface to increase pitting resistance.

Carburizing

Figure 3. Atmosphere carburizing of large gears | Image Credit: Photograph courtesy of Aichelin Group

Atmosphere carburizing is the most common of the case hardening methods in use today and can handle a diverse range of part sizes and load configurations (Figure 3). In general, a properly carburized gear will be able to handle somewhere between 30–50% more load than a through-hardened gear. Examples of commonly carburized gear steels include AISI/SAE grades 1018, 4320, 5120, 8620, and 9310, as well as international grades, such as 20MnCr5, 17CrNiMo6, 18CrNiMo7-6, and 20MoCr4.

Atmosphere carburizing is typically performed in the temperature range of 870°C–955°C (1600°F–1750°F) although temperatures up to 1010°C (1800°F) are used for deep case work. Carburizing case depths can vary over a broad range, typically 0.13–8.25 mm (0.005–0.325 inches).

Carbonitriding

Carbonitriding is a modification of the carburizing process, not a form of nitriding. This modification consists of introducing ammonia into the carburizing atmosphere to add nitrogen to the carburized case as it is being produced. Examples of gear steels that are commonly carbonitrided include AISI/SAE 1018, 1117, and 12L14.

Carbonitriding is done at a lower temperature than carburizing, typically between 790°C–900°C (1450°F–1650°F), and for a shorter time. Combine this with the fact that nitrogen inhibits the diffusion of carbon, and what generally results is a shallower case than is typical for carburized parts. A carbonitrided case is usually between 0.075–0.75 mm (0.003–0.030 inches) deep.

Nitriding

Nitriding is another surface treatment process that has as its objective increasing surface hardness. One of the appeals of this process is that rapid quenching is not required, hence dimensional changes are kept to a minimum. It is not suitable for all gear applications; one of its limitations is that the extremely high surface hardness case produced has a more brittle nature than say that produced by the carburizing process. Despite this fact, in a number of applications, nitriding has proved to be a viable alternative. Examples of commonly nitrided gear steels include AISI/SAE 4140, 4150, 4340, and Nitralloy® 135M.

Nitriding is typically done in the range of 495°C–565°C (925°F–1050°F). Case depth and case hardness properties vary not only with the duration and type of nitriding being performed but also with steel composition, prior structure, and core hardness. Typically, case depths are between 0.20–0.65 mm (0.008–0.025 inches) and take from 10 to 80 hours to produce.

Nitrocarburizing (Ferritic or Austenitic)

Nitrocarburizing is a modification of nitriding, not a form of carburizing. In the process, nitrogen and carbon are simultaneously introduced into the steel while it is in a ferritic or at times an austenitic condition. A very thin “white” or “compound” layer is formed during the process, as well as an underlying “diffusion” zone. Like nitriding, rapid quenching is not required. Examples of gear steels that are commonly nitrocarburized include AISI/SAE grades 4140, 5160, 8620, and certain tool steels, such as H11 and H13.

Nitrocarburizing is normally performed at 550°C–600°C (1025°F–1110°F) and can be used to produce a 58 HRC minimum hardness, with this value increasing dependent on the base material. White layer depths range from 0.0013–0.056 mm (0.00005–0.0022 inches) with diffusion zones from 0.03–0.80 mm (0.0013–0.032 inches) being typical.

In Summary

There are many ways to heat treat gears. While atmosphere heat treatment (discussed above) is perhaps the most widely used technology today, other types of heat treatments, namely vacuum and induction hardening, are becoming more and more common methods. These will be discussed in Part Two.

About the Author

Dan Herring
“The Heat Treat Doctor”
The HERRING GROUP, Inc.

Dan Herring has been in the industry for over 50 years and has gained vast experience in fields that include materials science, engineering, metallurgy, new product research, and many other areas. He is the author of six books and over 700 technical articles.

For more information: Contact Dan at dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com.

For more information about Dan’s books: see his page at the Heat Treat Store.

Ask The Heat Treat Doctor®: Why and How Do We Heat Treat Gears? Part One Read More »

How To Tame Your Dragon

/ ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

When a load hangs up during quenching, seconds matter and improvised decisions can escalate risk. In this Technical Tuesday installment, Bruno Scomazzon, general manager of Precision Heat Treat Ltd., outlines a step-by-step emergency response procedure for exactly this scenario, which is one of the most dangerous in atmosphere heat treating. Drawing on real-world experience, this guide is intended to help companies develop their own effective procedures for maintaining safety, controlling furnace conditions, and coordinating with emergency responders in high-risk situations.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s February 2026 Annual Air & Atmosphere Heat Treating print edition.

Scenario Overview

A load has been transferred to the quench and the elevator is lowering into the oil, but the load becomes hung up and fails to fully submerge. The inner door successfully closes, and the outer (front) door remains closed.

This is an extremely high-risk situation requiring strict adherence to emergency procedures. The goal is to protect: first the personnel (minimize the chance of injury or escalation of the situation), then the facility, and finally the equipment.

1. Immediate Actions

DO NOT Open Outer Door

There may be a natural urge to assess the situation but resist temptation. DO NOT stand in front of or directly beside the outer door and never open it during an active hang-up. Opening this door can introduce oxygen to a hot chamber, causing:

  • Explosions or flash fires.
  • Loss of containment due to door warping or mechanical failure.

In extreme cases, the outer door may be compromised (blown off, stuck open, or partially open) with visible flames. This warrants immediate escalation to the fire department.

If Outer Door Cannot Be Closed

In this scenario, immediately notify the fire department and advise them to prepare for a foam response. DO NOT allow the use of water. This may trigger violent reactions with oil or atmosphere and spread the fire!

Internal trained responders should:

  • Don PPE.
  • Retrieve fire suppression gear.
  • Be ready to protect critical systems until responders arrive.

DO NOT shut down the furnace.

Figure 1. Atmosphere furnace during normal
operation | Image Credit: Precision Heat Treat
Ltd.
Figure 2. Vestibule door partially opened during a
controlled simulation to illustrate gas release
behavior — not an actual incident | Image Credit:
Precision Heat Treat Ltd.

2. Maintain Electrical Power

To ensure essential systems stay active, you must maintain electrical power. Ensure these systems stay active:

  • Set the furnace cycle to manual mode from auto mode. This will bypass any PLC sequencing from auto cycling doors, elevators, and handlers.
  • Keep the pilots lit.
  • Keep the oil cooler running to prevent tank overheating.
  • Shut off oil heaters to prevent additional heat loading in the quench tank.
  • Keep quench agitation on low during the entire period to assist in lowering the temperature at the interface surface area between the hot load and the oil. This prevents stratification and dissipates radiant heat into the oil.
  • Keep the recirculating fan running.
  • Keep the instrumentation functioning for monitoring.

NOTE: Loss of these systems eliminates visibility, atmosphere control, and safe response options.

3. Atmosphere Management

Maintain a protective atmosphere and positive furnace pressure to prevent oxygen ingress and uncontrolled combustion:

  • Set the carbon control to “0”.
  • Shut off the enriching gas.
  • Shut off the ammonia.
  • Shut off the dilution air.

Nitrogen Purge

These steps depend on whether a nitrogen purge is available; it is highly advised that nitrogen purge be available for all IQ or straight through units. Be sure you understand how long it takes for your specific furnace to fully purge endothermic gas. While NFPA 86 recommends five volume turnovers, some experts advise planning for up to ten per hour in an emergency. Each furnace should have established purge data under normal conditions so operators can act with confidence when time is critical.

Figure 3. Bulk nitrogen supply used for emergency purging and atmosphere control | Image Credit: Precision Heat Treat Ltd.
  • Begin a nitrogen purge immediately (if available) and maintain it throughout the event.
  • Use at least the minimum flow rate specified in your documentation. If safe, higher flow may be used to help displace flammable gases from the heating and quench chambers.
  • Maintain furnace temperature at 1500°F during the purge.

Residual pockets of Endo gas may remain trapped in less ventilated areas. If the chamber temperature drops below the ignition point before all flammable gas has been displaced, the introduction of oxygen could trigger an explosion. In some cases, trapped Endo and pressure imbalances can lead to sudden releases (“furnace burp”), where oil or gas is expelled due to internal pressure buildup.

After the Purge

The goal of the nitrogen purge is to displace Endothermic gas with an inert atmosphere while maintaining elevated temperature to assist in burning off residual flammable gases and preventing dangerous mixtures. This process must ensure positive pressure throughout the furnace.

  • A purge followed by plunge cooling in nitrogen is a valid approach if the purge is verifiably complete.
  • Depending on furnace size and cooling rate:
  • Larger furnaces may cool slowly enough for a complete purge.
  • Smaller or faster-cooling units may require a brief temperature hold before controlled cooling or plunge cooling.

NOTE: Once the hung-up load cools to a safe temperature (~150°F), perform a standard shutdown.

Without Nitrogen (in Endo)

If there is no nitrogen purge, or it is insufficient, the only option is to let the hung-up load cool in the vestibule while continuing to burn Endo and maintain the furnace temperature at 1500°F. Once the vestibule/oil tank cools below 150°F and the danger has passed, initiate a standard furnace shutdown.

4. Safety Management

  • Alert the local fire department immediately. If the situation becomes unmanageable, or if there is any doubt about the ability to maintain control, evacuate the facility and wait for trained professionals. The safety of plant personnel is paramount.
  • Notify plant safety and site management.
  • Evacuate all non-essential personnel from the heat treat area.
  • Inform all departments that a high-risk incident is in progress.

Fire departments are most effective when they are familiar with your facility before an emergency occurs. Make sure they know the layout of your operation, including:

  • Oil tank locations and sizes
  • Electrical panels
  • Gas shutoffs
  • Hot zones

5. Controlled Cooling Period

  • Maintain atmosphere protection throughout the event.
  • DO NOT open doors until the vestibule’s temperature is low and stable.
  • Cooling time will depend on load mass and heat retention. Expect five or more hours.
  • Use furnace pressure stability, effluent observations, and gas behavior as indirect temperature indicators.

6. Load Recovery Procedure

  • Once cooled and stabilized, perform a standard shutdown, starting with the removal of endothermic gas if applicable.
  • DO NOT attempt manual load removal until the system is verified safe.
  • Only maintenance personnel may retrieve the load, using PPE and appropriate tools.

7. Fire Department Familiarization

Every facility should build rapport with the local fire department before an emergency ever happens. Schedule annual walkthroughs and identify the following:

  • Number of furnaces
  • Quench oil tank volumes
  • Hot zone and live panel locations
  • Emergency shutoff points

Stuck doors are commonly caused by failed pneumatic valves. Shutting off and bleeding compressed air may allow the mechanism to reset. Always consult your equipment manual or the manufacturer before attempting corrective action.

The fire inspector conducting walkthroughs is not the one coming to fight your fires — train the ones who are.

8. Post-Incident Protocol

Before returning the furnace to service:

  • Conduct a formal investigation.
  • Identify and correct root cause(s).
  • Document all key parameters and actions taken.
  • Re-train operators as needed.

Furnace Signage

An operator is likely to read your safety plan but may forget a vital protocol during an emergency. Having bold, brightly colored warnings printed and posted at the panel that the operator can remove and use in an emergency can be invaluable.

Final Reflections

We cannot predict every consequence. No procedure can account for every possible variable in a live emergency. Once an event is in motion, all we can do is respond with the best judgment, training, and intentions — always with the safety of people as the highest priority.

This document is intended as a working reference: a structured reference developed with care, real-world experience, and best practices. It is not a one-size-fits-all solution, but a tool to help teams create or enhance their own effective procedures and respond adaptively in high-risk situations.

Fire preparedness is essential in every heat treating facility. Fires happen, and they are not always small. It is critical to know when to act, when to evacuate, and when to call for help. Equipment manuals provide a foundation, but preparedness through training and planning is the best defense.

Acknowledgments: The author would like to thank Daniel H. Herring, “The Heat Treat Doctor,” The HERRING GROUP, Inc., and Avery Bell with Service Heat Treat in Milwaukee for their valuable input.

About The Author:

Bruno Scomazzon
General Manager
Precision Heat Treat Ltd.

Bruno Scomazzon is the general manager of Precision Heat Treat Ltd. in Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, with over 40 years of experience in metallurgical processes and heat treating operations.

For more information: Contact Bruno at bruno@precisionheattreat.com.

How To Tame Your Dragon Read More »

Normalizing and Isothermal Annealing: Which Furnace Is Best?

/ ANNEALING TECHNICAL CONTENT, ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH

Selecting the right furnace is critical to achieving consistent results in normalizing and isothermal annealing of forged steel components. In this Technical Tuesday installment, Arturo Archavaleta of NUTEC Bickley, examines the thermal principles behind each process and evaluates common continuous furnace types to help heat treaters select the best solution for their specific applications and production goals.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s February 2026 Air & Atmosphere Heat Treating print edition.

Introduction

Industrial furnace manufacturers support a wide range of thermal processes across the ferrous and non-ferrous metals industries, including forging, heat treatment, and low-temperature curing and drying applications. Within these areas, furnace design and process selection play a critical role in achieving consistent metallurgical results and efficient production.

This article focuses on continuous furnace systems used for the normalizing and isothermal annealing of forged steel parts, examining how different furnace configurations support the thermal and metallurgical requirements of these heat treatment processes.

Normalizing

From a thermal point of view, normalizing is an austenitizing process followed by slow air cooling. Normalizing steel is carried out by heating it to approximately 30°C–50°C (54°F–70°F) above the critical Ac3 temperature — the temperature at which the transformation to a homogeneous austenitic structure is complete — and then cooling with air to room temperature.

Figure 1. Partial iron-iron carbide
phase diagram showing the typical
normalizing temperature range for
plain carbon steel. (ASM Handbook
1991, p. 35)
Figure 2. Normalizing temperature curve | Image Credit: NUTEC Bickley
Figure 3. Example of a continuous furnace for normalizing forged parts | Image Credit: NUTEC Bickley

Why Normalize?

  • Reduces internal stresses after forging
  • Improves dimensional stability
  • Produces a homogeneous microstructure
  • Ensures a consistent structure across batches of forged parts
  • Helps better control potential problems in subsequent hardening or surface heat treatment processes

Isothermal Annealing

Isothermal annealing is a heat treatment applied to steels to soften their structure, improve machinability, and standardize their mechanical properties. It consists of heating the steel to the austenitizing zone — above Ac3 for hypoeutectoid steels (<0.8% carbon) and above Ac1 for eutectoid steels (≥0.8% carbon) — holding it until the desired austenite is achieved. The parts are then rapidly cooled to an isothermal temperature (usually 550°C–650°C/1020°F–1200°F) and held there until the transformation of the austenite to a fine pearlite is complete. Finally, parts are cooled in air.

Figure 4. Typical isothermal annealing curve | Image Credit: NUTEC Bickley

It is essential to understand the isothermal transformation (IT) diagrams of the steels treated by these processes, as the ITs predict the desired microstructure after transformation, the transformation temperature, and the time required for this to occur.

Figure 5. Example of an isothermal annealing furnace for forged parts | Image Credit: NUTEC Bickley

Main Objectives of Isothermal Annealing

The principal aim is to achieve a more homogeneous and softer structure than that obtained with conventional annealing. This helps:

  • To reduce internal stresses
  • To improve machinability and ductility
  • To achieve reproducible properties (by eliminating variability in the cooling rate during furnace annealing)
Table A. Comparative Summary — Normalizing v. Isothermal Annealing

Types of Furnace

The most typical continuous furnaces used for normalizing and isothermal annealing are as follows:

  • Pusher tray system
  • Roller hearth conveyor
  • Cast-link belt conveyor
  • Rotary hearth system

Let’s look at each one in turn and consider the advantages and disadvantages.

Pusher Tray Furnace

Figure 6. Pusher tray furnace | Image Credit: NUTEC Bickley

Pusher tray furnaces (Figure 6) offer many advantages, including a lower initial investment cost than other options. They have fewer mechanical components exposed to high temperatures requiring extensive maintenance, and the main equipment (tray pusher and puller) requires less maintenance. Short trays can be used in the direction of movement with good stability, and parts can also be loaded hung on the trays. Because the trays are closer together, the length of the furnace is shorter.

There are, however, some drawbacks. Most pusher tray furnaces only have burners firing above the load, which can affect temperature uniformity. Because of this, heating times can increase and there is less space for burners in areas of high heat demand. While main equipment maintenance is low, the trays tend to warp, resulting in additional costs. Finally, loading can be difficult and is not easily automated.

Roller Hearth Furnaces

Figure 7. Roller hearth furnace | Image Credit: NUTEC Bickley

Unlike pusher tray furnaces, roller hearth furnaces (Figure 7) have burners that fire both above and below the load, making it easier to achieve uniform temperature. There is also more space for burners in areas of high heat demand. As with pusher tray furnaces, parts can also be loaded hung on trays.

In contrast, the initial investment for roller hearth furnaces is higher. There is additional maintenance due to the roller conveyor, including lubrication of bearings, chains, and roller replacement costs based on lifespan. Longer trays are also needed for good stability, increasing the furnace length.

Figure 8. Cast-link belt furnace | Image Credit: NUTEC Bickley

Cast-link belt roller hearth furnaces (Figure 8) offer a simplified loading system using automation to place parts directly on the conveyor belt (with parts lying flat only) or even in bulk. The configuration also allows for shorter furnaces, distributing more load width-wise.

Conversely, there are several disadvantages, including a very high initial investment cost due to the alloy belt, along with costs associated with belt replacement. These furnaces require more energy because the belt must be reheated as it cools down on its return. They also require maintenance for the roller conveyor, bearings, chains, and the belt traction system. Like pusher tray furnaces, they only have burners firing above the load, making temperature uniformity more difficult to obtain.

Rotary Hearth Furnaces

Figure 9. Rotary hearth furnace | Image Credit: NUTEC Bickley

Rotary hearth furnaces (Figure 9) have a moderate initial investment and carry many advantages. They allow for manual or automatic loading since parts are placed directly on the hearth (flat or in bulk), or can be loaded hung on trays using automatic loaders or robots. They occupy less floor space and have better thermal efficiency, since all the heat is directed to the product.

As with pusher tray and cast-link belt furnaces, most rotary hearth furnaces only have burners firing above the load, which can affect temperature uniformity. They typically require robots or loaders for high-volume, continuous production. While they occupy less floor space, the layout is unconventional because loading and unloading occur from the same side.

In Summary

Selecting the appropriate furnace for normalizing or isothermal annealing ultimately depends on the desired material properties, production volume, parts, and operational priorities. Each furnace type offers distinct advantages and trade-offs in terms of temperature uniformity, flexibility, maintenance, and cost, making it essential to evaluate both metallurgical requirements and practical plant constraints (Table B).

Table B. Comparative Summary

By understanding how heat treatment objectives align with furnace design — and partnering with a supplier who understands as well — you can make informed decisions to select and customize the most suitable furnace for your specific applications.

About The Author:

Arturo Arechavaleta
Vice President, Metal Furnaces
NUTEC Bickley

Arturo Arechavaleta, VP of Metal Furnaces at NUTEC Bickley, is a mechanical and electrical engineer (AA) and holds an MBA. He has 35 years of experience in the furnace industry, including the field of engineering, working on challenging projects, leading multidisciplinary teams, and managing business units.

For more information: Contact Arturo Arechavaleta at arturoarechavaleta@nutec.com.

Normalizing and Isothermal Annealing: Which Furnace Is Best? Read More »

Ask The Heat Treat Doctor®: Hot Topic for a Cold Day — Why Is Hot Gaseous Corrosion So Devastating?

/ ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, CARBURIZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, OP-ED

Ask The Heat Treat Doctor® has returned to bring sage advice to Heat Treat Today readers, answer questions about heat treating, brazing, sintering, and other types of thermal treatments, as well as metallurgy, equipment, and process-related issues. In this installment, Dan Herring examines the devastating effects of hot gaseous corrosion on furnace alloys: exploring the mechanisms behind metal dusting, the gas-solid reactions that drive catastrophic carburization, and the mitigation strategies to extend the life of heat treaters’ most valuable furnace components.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s January 2026 Annual Technologies To Watch print edition.

Have questions or feedback? We’d love to hear from you — reach out to our editorial team at editor@heattreattoday.com.

Corrosion is a concern experienced by everyone involved in manufacturing industrial products. While there is a plethora of data and information on the effects of corrosion on engineered materials available (sources provided in the references section of this column), most corrosion engineers are focused on aqueous corrosion. By contrast, heat treaters must understand the effects of hot gaseous corrosion, especially on our furnace alloys. Let’s learn more.

Corrosion Basics

It is important to understand that all materials are chemically unstable in some environments and corrosive attack will always occur. In the scientific world, it can often be modeled and its effects predicted by studying thermodynamic data and knowing which of the many corrosion-related chemical states are active. In our world, however, it is equally important to understand the various forms of corrosion, namely:

  • Dezincification (aka selective leaching)
  • Electrolytic
  • Erosion
  • Galvanic (or two metal) action
  • General (aka uniform) attack
  • Intergranular attack
  • Pitting
  • Stress corrosion

The greater the metal’s solubility, the greater the degree and severity of the corrosive attack. There are many important variations of these forms of corrosion; two of the most important are 1) localized corrosive attack (e.g. pits, intergranular attack, crevices) and 2) interaction with mechanical influences (e.g., stress, fatigue, fretting). These actions are frequently rapid and have catastrophic effects.

The number of ways to combat corrosion have been well-documented, including alloying to produce better corrosion resistance materials; cathodic protection (via sacrificial anodes); coatings (metallic or inorganic); organic coatings (e.g. paints); metal purification; alteration of the environment; and nonmetallic or design (i.e., physical) changes.

Heat Resistant Alloys

Furnace interiors contain numerous examples of heat-resistant nickel-chromium-iron (Ni-Cr-Fe) alloys, including radiant tubes, fans, heating elements, roller rails and rollers, thermocouple protection tubes, chain guides, and atmosphere inlet tubes, to name a few. Baskets, grids, and fixtures are other examples. These alloys are normally selected based on their strength (at temperature) rather than resistance to corrosive attack.

Since these heat-resistant alloy parts are often the most expensive furnace components, heat treaters must understand how they can be attacked and what can be done to extend their life by minimizing or preventing corrosion.

Gas-Solid Reactions

A chemical reaction involving a (non-equilibrium) gas or gas mixture and a solid is classified as a gas-solid reaction. Examples of intermediate and high temperature reactions of this type include oxidation, sulfidation, carburization, and nitriding. Effects of gases containing vapors of chlorine, fluorine, and effluents from deposits of various alkaline chemicals (from cleaning compounds) and even phosphates are also problematic. The principles are the same for all types — only the details differ. As heat treaters, our interest is in controlling, retarding, or suppressing these reactions to prevent unwanted corrosion, gasification, or embrittlement of the furnace alloy or materials being processed.

Examples of Catastrophic Carburization (a.k.a. Metal Dusting)

Figure 1. Pusher furnace alloy fan and shaft assembly | Image Credit: The Heat Treat Doctor®

Metal dusting (Figure 1) is a hot gaseous corrosion phenomenon in which a metallic component disintegrates into a dust of fine metal and metal oxide particles mixed with carbon.

Generally, metal dusting occurs in a localized area, and how rapidly the disintegration progresses is a function of temperature, the composition of the atmosphere and its carbon potential, and the material. Other significant factors include the geometry of the system, reaction kinetics, diffusivities of alloy components, the specific-volume ratio of new and old phases, and the ultimate plastic strain.

Metal dusting usually manifests itself as pits or grooves on the surface, or as an overall surface attack in which the metal can literally be eaten away in a matter of days, weeks, or months. As an example, this writer has seen a 330-alloy plate mounted underneath a refractory-lined inner door of an integral quench furnace (where atmosphere passes underneath the door and into the quench vestibule) reduced in thickness from 12.5 mm (0.50 in) to less than 0.75 mm (0.03 in) in a little over two months.

Figure 2. 330 alloy radiant tube removed after six months of use (rotary retort furnace) | Image Credit: The Heat Treat Doctor®
Figure 3. Microstructural view: catastrophic carburization | Image Credit: The Heat Treat Doctor®

In another example, a metallographic investigation performed by this writer on a failed wrought 330 alloy radiant tube (Figure 2) was conducted. Optical microscopy of the inside (Figure 3) and outside diameter surfaces in the attacked area revealed evidence of massive carbides. These carbides are formed by the reaction of carbon with chromium, depleting the matrix of chromium in regions adjacent to the carbides. Grain detachment and subsequent failure by erosion then occurred.

How Does It Occur?

In general, catastrophic carburization of ferrous alloys proceeds via the formation and subsequent disintegration of metastable carbide. The first step in the process is absorption of the gaseous phase on the surface of the metal; the more reactive this phase, the easier it decomposes or is catalytically decomposed (in the case of iron) on the surface. This step is followed by diffusion of carbon atoms from the surface into the bulk metal.

As a result, there is a continuous buildup of carbon within the surface layer. As this layer becomes saturated with carbon, a stable carbide, metastable carbide, or an active carbide complex forms, which then grows until it reaches a state of thermodynamic instability, at which point it rapidly breaks down into the metal plus free carbon.

It’s at this stage that the metal disintegrates to a powder as the result of plastic deformation and subsequent fracture in the near-surface layer. The process is controlled by internal stresses due to phase transformation; in other words, competition between stress generation and relaxation exceeds the ultimate strength in this near-surface layer and causes fracture to occur.

In Ni-Cr-Fe alloys, the phenomenon occurs slower (but does not stop) since the disintegration leads to larger metal particles, which are less active catalysts for carbon deposition than the fine iron particles that form with ferrous metals. Therefore, the mass gain from carbon depositing onto high-nickel alloys is much lower. Also, the decomposition of high-nickel alloys occurs by graphitization and not via unstable carbides.

Pourbaix-Ellingham Diagrams

Thermodynamics can be applied to solid-gas reactions to obtain equilibrium dissociation pressures below which no reactions occur. Data and diagrams are available for the free energies of formation versus temperature for most metallic compounds. An interesting use of Pourbaix diagrams (generally reserved for mapping out possible stable equilibrium phases of an aqueous electrochemical system) as a predictor of stable alloy systems is found by superimposing the various elemental constituents. These diagrams are read much like a standard phase diagram (with a different set of axes).

In Summary

Hot gaseous corrosion should be an area of focus for every heat treater to extend the life of alloy components, reduce downtime, and save money. Mitigation in the form of alloy selection, equipment design, type of atmosphere, process/cycle selection, and idling temperatures will play a huge role in extending the life of our furnace alloys, baskets, and fixtures.

References

ASM International. 1971. Oxidation of Metals and Alloys.

ASM International. 2003. ASM Handbook. Vols. 13A–C.

Fontana, Mars G., and Norbert D. Greene. 2008. Corrosion Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Herring, D. H. 2003. “What to Do About Metal Dusting.” Heat Treating Progress, August.

Herring, Daniel H. 2015. Atmosphere Heat Treatment. Vol. 2. Troy, MI: BNP Media Group.

Javaheradashti, Raza. 2008. Microbiologically Induced Corrosion. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

NACE International. www.nace.org.

Nateson, K. 1980. Corrosion–Erosion Behavior in Metals. Warrendale, PA: Metallurgical Society of AIME.

National Bureau of Standards. 1978. Gas Corrosion of Metals.

Pourbaix, Marcel. 1974. Atlas of Chemical and Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions. Houston, TX: NACE International.

Pourbaix, Marcel. 1998. Atlas of Chemical and Electrochemical Equilibria in the Presence of a Gaseous Phase. Houston, TX: NACE International.

Schweitzer, Philip A. 1996. Corrosion Engineering Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Staehle, R. W. 1995. “Engineering with Advanced and New Materials.” Materials Science and Engineering A 198 (1–2): 245–56.

Stempco, Michael J. 2011. “The Ellingham Diagram: How to Use It in Heat-Treat-Process Atmosphere Troubleshooting.” Industrial Heating, April.

Uhlig, Hubert H. 2008. Corrosion and Corrosion Control. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

Fabian, R., ed. 1993. Vacuum Technology: Practical Heat Treating and Brazing. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.

The Boeing Company. n.d. “Practical Vacuum Systems Design Course.”

About the Author

Dan Herring
“The Heat Treat Doctor”
The HERRING GROUP, Inc.

Dan Herring has been in the industry for over 50 years and has gained vast experience in fields that include materials science, engineering, metallurgy, new product research, and many other areas. He is the author of six books and over 700 technical articles.

For more information: Contact Dan at dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com.

For more information about Dan’s books: see his page at the Heat Treat Store.

Ask The Heat Treat Doctor®: Hot Topic for a Cold Day — Why Is Hot Gaseous Corrosion So Devastating? Read More »

CO2-Neutral Heat Generation Technology Progress

/ ANNEALING TECHNICAL CONTENT, ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, FOUNDRY CASTING TECHNICAL CONTENT, HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH

A new study from the Umweltbundesamt (the Federal Environment Agency in Germany) outlines a clear, technically grounded pathway for achieving CO2-neutral process heat across energy-intensive industries. This Technical Tuesday installment highlights the study’s key findings, offering North American heat treaters a concise look at the technical feasibility, economic pressures, and strategic choice involved in moving beyond fossil-fuel-based thermal processing.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s January 2026 Annual Technologies To Watch print edition.

Introduction

Figure 1. Metal Industry – distribution of total annual energy consumption by energy source | Image Credit: Schwotzer
Figure 2. Mineral industry – distribution of total annual energy consumption by energy source | Image Credit: Schwotzer
Table A. Overview Examined Dectors, Associated Reference Technologies, and Thermal Processing Systems | Image Credit: Schwotzer

Efforts to mitigate climate change are crucial, particularly in Germany where there is a significant amount of energy-intensive industry, to achieve ambitious climate targets while preserving jobs and international competitiveness. Currently, process heat generation is heavily dependent on the use of fossil fuels, especially natural gas, with a low utilization of renewable energies. Fossil energy sources dominate the metal industry, accounting for 87.3%, while electricity represents 10.8%, and hybrid heating systems make up 2.0%. The mineral industry shows an even stronger dependence, with fossil fuels accounting for 99.7%. These figures illustrate the challenges and potential for technological innovations to provide CO2-free process heat in these sectors.

Although some sectors are already either using technologies for CO2-neutral process heat supply or are planning to do so, there is no comprehensive overview of the technical possibilities for generating process heat in energy-intensive industries in the context of future economic framework conditions.

In this study, technologies for the CO2-neutral supply of process heat are considered from a technical, economic, and ecological perspective. The study was conducted for thirteen industries and thirty-four exemplary applications in the metals and minerals industries, as well as for the cross-cutting technology steam generation industry (Table A). For each application, alternative CO2-neutral technologies are examined for their technical feasibility, economic viability, and ecological impact. The focus is on the electrification of plant technology, the use of hydrogen, but also hybrid systems, and, in some cases, the use of biomass. From this comprehensive review of the current situation and the possible alternative technologies, findings and recommendations for implementation will be developed for industry, policymakers, and researchers to support the transformation to CO2-neutral process heat generation.

Study Method

Figure 3. Study approach | Image Credit: Schwotzer

The study is based on an industry and technology assessment of the state of the technology (Figure 3). The results from the metal and mineral industries and the cross-sectional technology of steam generation were analyzed and summarized in consultation with experts. The central process chains were examined for each sector and the most important processes in terms of energy were identified. Each process chain contains several processes in which specific thermal process plants (industrial furnaces) are used, which are grouped into plant types. Based on the selected processes and plant types, applications are defined for further consideration. A reference technology and two to four CO2-neutral alternative technologies (new technologies) are assigned to each application. Key figures such as specific energy requirements, process-related emissions, or investment costs are used for comparison.

Table B. Theses Summary of Study Results | Image Credit: Schwotzer

The central findings of the study are summarized in eleven theses on the transformation of process heat generation (Table B). In this article, Theses 1, 2, 6, and 9 are presented in detail, providing a broad overview of the essential findings. For a more in-depth examination of the theses, see the link to the original study.

The Plant Fleet of Industrial Furnaces is Heterogeneous

The metal and mineral industries are characterized by numerous small process plants (throughput of less than 20 tons per hour and plant capacity of less than 20 MW). At the same time, there are large facilities with significantly higher throughput and corresponding higher plant capacities. Figure 4 shows a selection of technical examples from the study. Examples of large plants include heating and annealing furnaces in the steel industry with capacities of up to 170 tons per hour or cathode shaft furnaces in the copper industry with throughputs of up to 80 tons per hour. It is observed that the specific energy requirement of a plant correlates with the process temperature. The higher the required temperature of a process, the higher the specific energy requirement.

Figure 4. Classification of the considered applications and reference technologies in the plant fleet in Germany based on characteristic parameters | Image Credit: Schwotzer

Additionally, the cross-sectional technology of steam generation was examined. The most up to date technology includes natural gas boilers or combined heat and power (CHP) systems. Industry-specific characteristics play a minor role in the selection of technology for achieving CO2 neutrality. The technical requirements for end applications are less different compared to industrial furnaces. This includes performance, throughput, pressure, and temperature.

A transition to CO2-neutral process heat generation encompasses various technical possibilities and obstacles, as well as investment costs and space requirements, depending on the industry and application. Accordingly, the necessary adaptation measures require a differentiated approach to the transition to CO2-neutral process heat generation. An effective strategy to achieve CO2 neutrality should take into account the unique characteristics of each industry’s production processes, as well as the specific challenges and opportunities they present.

Technical Transformation to CO2-Neutral Production is Feasible

Despite the wide variety of plants and specific challenges, the transition to CO2-neutral process heat generation is technically feasible by 2045. The solutions will vary depending on the industry and application, and the effort required to transition from currently used reference technologies to CO2-neutral alternatives varies significantly.

The heterogeneity of industrial furnaces has a significant impact on the feasibility of deploying CO2-neutral technology in the future. While electrification is already highly advanced and most up to date in applications such as the foundry industry, bulk forming, or melting of aluminium with induction furnaces, it shows comparatively low technological maturity in sectors like the lime and cement industry, which are associated with fundamental technical challenges; see Figure 5. This significant heterogeneity in the existing plant stock and terms of technology readiness level (TRL) (European Commission 2014) requires consideration in transformation strategies.

Figure 5. Technology readiness level (TRL) of the alternative technologies (summarized) | Image Credit: Schwotzer

Both hydrogen and electrification can have a significant impact, although further research and development are needed in many areas. Across applications, it is evident that electrification generally requires the construction of new facilities. Transitioning from natural gas-operated reference technology to hydrogen involves less technical effort in terms of plant technology and can be accomplished by retrofitting the burner technology. Additionally, using hydrogen requires local infrastructure (pipes, valves) and its impacts on process and product quality need to be tested. Industrial-scale facilities are not yet available, resulting in a TRL of < 5, according to the study. However, with ongoing research and development in many projects, the TRL for many applications is expected to rise quickly in the coming years.

Scaling all alternative technologies to an industrial level and testing them in operational deployments are crucial. Some technologies face significant technical barriers, such as the continuous heating in steel rolling mills. These processes and their plant technology are characterized by very high process temperatures and production capacities, requiring heating technologies with a high energy density, which are not possible with current most cutting-edge electrical heating technologies. The use of hydrogen also presents a particular technological challenge, especially in areas where solid fuels like coke are currently used, such as in shaft kilns for lime burning or in cupola furnaces of iron foundries. As a result, alternative, bio-based fuels are being considered for these applications.

However, for these fuels to be a viable option, they need to be produced in sufficient quantity and quality. On the other hand, CO2-neutral techniques for steam generation using hydrogen and for electrification are already available for industrial use today.

The continuation of this article will be released in Heat Treat Today’s Sustainable Heat Treating Technologies edition (May 2026) where electrification versus hydrogen and a frank reckoning with the cost of new investments will be examined.

References

European Commission. 2014. Annex G – Technology Readiness Levels (TRL). Extract from Part 19 – Commission Decision C(2014)4995, “Horizon 2020 – Work Programme 2014–2015. General Annexes.” Brussels: European Commission.

Fleiter, Tobias, et al. 2023. CO2-Neutrale Prozesswärmeerzeugung: Umbau des industriellen Anlagenparks im Rahmen der Energiewende. Dessau-Roßlau: German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt).

All results in this article derive from the study “CO2-neutral process heat generation” (German: „CO2-neutrale Prozesswärmeerzeugung – Umbau des industriellen Anlagenparks im Rahmen der Energiewende: Ermittlung des aktuellen SdT und des weiteren Handlungsbedarfs zum Einsatz strombasierter Prozesswärmeanlagen”). The authors of this article would like to thank everyone who contributed to the study, listed in the published study. The study and further documents are on the website of the Federal Environment Agency in Germany (Umweltbundesamt).

This editorial is published with permission from Heat Treat Today’s media partner heat processing, which published this article in March 2024.

About The Authors:


Dr. Christian Schwotzer
Department for Industrial Furnaces and Heat Engineering
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
schwotzer@iob.rwth-aachen.de

Katharina Rothhöft, M.Sc.
Department for Industrial Furnaces and Heat Engineering
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
rothhoeft@iob.rwth-aachen.de

Dr. Tobias Fleiter
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research
Karlsruhe, Germany
tobias.fleiter@isi.fraunhofer.de

Dr. Matthias Rehfeldt
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research
Karlsruhe, Germany
matthias.rehfeldt@isi.fraunhofer.de

Dr. Fabian Jäger-Gildemeister
Federal Environment Agency of Germany (Umweltbundesamt)
Dessau-Roßlau, Germany
fabian.jaeger-gildemeister@uba.de

CO2-Neutral Heat Generation Technology Progress Read More »

Austenización Insuficiente en el Tratamiento Térmico: Causas, Efectos y Cómo evitarla

/ ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

Un austenizado insuficiente afecta mucho más que la dureza final. Interrumpe la transformación de fase, debilita el rendimiento mecánico y aumenta el riesgo de deformación o fallo en condiciones de servicio exigentes. En esta entrega de Technical Tuesday, Ana Laura Hernández Sustaita, fundadora de Consultoría Carnegie, explica los orígenes metalúrgicos de la formación incompleta de la austenita; como la uniformidad del horno, la velocidad calentamiento, la composición química del acero y la geometría de la pieza, contribuyen a ese problema; y las estrategias modernas de control de procesos y simulación que garantizan una transformación completa y resultados repetibles de alta calidad.

Este artículo informativo se publicó por primera vez en Heat Treat Today’s January 2026 Annual Technologies To Watch print edition.

To read this article in English, click here.

Introducción

En inglés, el término underhardening se utiliza para describir aceros que no alcanzan una austenización completa, lo que se traduce en una pérdida de dureza después del temple. Sin embargo, en este artículo ampliaremos el análisis más allá de la dureza, centrándonos en el fenómeno de la austenización insuficiente, analizando sus causas, su influencia directa en la microestructura y en las propiedades mecánicas, así como las acciones que podemos implementar en el proceso para prevenirla.

El rol del proceso de austenización

El objetivo principal del tratamiento térmico es obtener una microestructura homogénea o mixta que garantice las propiedades mecánicas requeridas para las condiciones de servicio establecidas: resistencia a la tracción, resistencia al impacto, límite elástico, entre otras.

El proceso de austenización es el primer paso crítico para muchos procesos. Consiste en calentar el acero por encima de la temperatura A3 (normalmente entre 30 y 50°C/85 y 120°F adicionales) para obtener una microestructura con red cúbica centrada en las caras (FCC) durante un tiempo determinado. Este paso es fundamental después de procesos como solidificación, forja o laminado, ya que “reinicia” la historia microestructural del acero.

¿Qué es la austenización insuficiente?


Figura 1. Diagrama tiempo-temperatura de austenización para acero Ck 45 (SAE/AISI 1045). | Image Credit: Figure 7, ASM International 2013

La formación de austenita implica cambios estructurales y composicionales influenciados tanto por la microestructura inicial como por la composición química del acero. Cuando los parámetros de austenización no se establecen adecuadamente: temperatura insuficiente, tiempo de permanencia corto o problemas de desempeño del equipo, como la falta de uniformidad térmica del horno, la transformación no se completa. El resultado es una microestructura que conserva fases no deseadas, lo que afecta la dureza, la estabilidad dimensional y la resistencia mecánica. Por lo tanto, cualquier microestructura que no logre transformarse completamente a austenita debido a los factores mencionados puede considerarse un caso de austenización insuficiente.

Causas de la Austenización Insuficiente:

  • Temperatura de austenización inadecuada: si la temperatura es demasiado baja, no se logra la disolución completa de ferrita o carburos.
  • Tiempo de empape insuficiente: un tiempo de empape (permanencia) demasiado corto impide la difusión homogénea del carbono en la austenita.
  • Distribución térmica no uniforme en el horno: produce zonas con distintos grados de transformación.
  • Composición química del acero: los elementos de aleación modifican la cinética de difusión y desplazan las temperaturas críticas de transformación.
  • Geometría y dimensiones de la pieza: las secciones más grandes demandan mayor tiempo de empape, para alcanzar el calentamiento completo.
  • Velocidades de calentamiento rápidas: pueden impedir la homogeneización de la microestructura y generar una transformación incompleta, especialmente en procesos por inducción.

Efectos de una austenización insuficiente

Microestructura heterogénea

Tal como se ilustra en el ASM Handbook, Volume 4A: Steel Heat Treating Fundamentals and Processes, la cinética de formación de la austenita depende fuertemente de la velocidad de calentamiento. A bajas velocidades, la homogeneización por difusión ocurre a temperaturas relativamente menores; en contraste, los calentamientos rápidos generan heterogeneidad microestructural, un efecto especialmente crítico en procesos como el endurecimiento por inducción o el calentamiento directo por flama. En otras palabras, la austenización insuficiente se presenta con mayor frecuencia cuando se emplean altas velocidades de calentamiento.

En consecuencia, una microestructura con composición heterogénea provoca variaciones en las temperaturas de transformación martensítica (Ms y Mf) a lo largo de la pieza. Durante el temple, las regiones con menor contenido de carbono transforman primero, originando una martensita más suave, mientras que las zonas más ricas en carbono transforman a menores temperaturas, generando tensiones internas y una microestructura inconsistente.

Mayor riesgo de deformaciones y fallas prematuras en servicio

Anteriormente se mencionó que el proceso de austenización implica un cambio en la estructura cristalina del material. Si este cambio no es homogéneo a lo largo de la pieza, se presentarán diferentes fases, resultando en un arreglo cristalográfico variado y, por ende, un cambio volumétrico. Por otra parte, calentar una pieza muy rápidamente provoca que el calor no se distribuya ni penetre de manera uniforme, causando transformaciones heterogéneas y, por lo tanto, tensiones debido a los cambios volumétricos en la estructura cristalina.

Reducción en la dureza y resistencia mecánica

Una austenización incompleta deja restos de ferrita o carburos no disueltos en la microestructura, que impide la transformación completa a martensita durante el temple, reduciendo la dureza final. Además, una menor cantidad de carbono en solución afecta negativamente la resistencia mecánica.

Aumento de la fragilidad y menor tenacidad

Una microestructura heterogénea (ferrita y perlita con martensita parcial y austenita retenida) disminuye la resistencia mecánica. Esto se traduce en menor capacidad para soportar cargas sin fracturarse.

Como prevenir la austenización ineficiente

Control preciso de temperatura y tiempo del horno

Figura 2. Ejemplo de un análisis de carga | Image Credit: Consultoría Carnegie

Para garantizar un control adecuado durante el mantenimiento, es fundamental utilizar termopares calibrados y ubicarlos estratégicamente dentro del horno para asegurar mediciones precisas. La calibración periódica previene errores en la lectura de temperatura, lo que contribuye directamente a la calidad del proceso. Además, es indispensable contar con la asesoría de un experto para determinar la vida útil recomendada de los termopares. Mantener una trazabilidad adecuada y realizar los reemplazos en tiempo y forma asegurará un funcionamiento óptimo del sistema.

Por otra parte, el uso de ventiladores internos en hornos de convecciones nos ayudara a mantener una uniformidad térmica dentro del horno, evitando zonas frías o calientes.

Otra forma de poder controlar la temperatura del proceso es el uso de registradores de temperatura o graficadores de temperatura. Estos dispositivos, conectados a termopares de contacto instalados directamente en las piezas, son especialmente recomendables para componentes con geometrías complejas con grandes espesores. Su función es registrar la temperatura en tiempo real y verificar que no existan fluctuaciones durante el tiempo de mantenimiento.

Distribución adecuada de la carga

En cargas donde es necesario realizar el tratamiento térmico de una cantidad considerable de piezas, es recomendable llevar a cabo un estudio para determinar la altura máxima de apilamiento que permita un flujo de calor adecuado y un calentamiento homogéneo. Un análisis preliminar puede realizarse colocando termopares estratégicamente en diferentes ubicaciones y en distintas piezas: por ejemplo, en la primera pieza de la carga, otra en la parte media y una más en la parte inferior de la torre de apilamiento.

Una vez que las piezas ingresan al proceso, es posible monitorear el comportamiento térmico de cada una de ellas, verificando que el tiempo de empape sea suficiente para que todas alcancen la transformación requerida al llegar a la temperatura objetivo, o bien, determinar si es necesario realizar ajustes en la configuración de la carga.

Uso simulación termodinámica para optimizar los parámetros del proceso

Cada grado de acero tiene una temperatura óptima de austenización determinada por su composición química. En los aceros al carbono (serie 10xx), estas temperaturas pueden estimarse mediante el diagrama Fe–C; sin embargo, cuando se incorporan elementos de aleación, dicho diagrama deja de ser suficiente. En esos casos, es necesario recurrir al cálculo de temperaturas críticas o al uso de herramientas más precisas, como simulaciones termodinámicas mediante software especializado, por ejemplo, Thermo-Calc®.

Aunque lo ideal sería tratar cada material a su temperatura específica, en la producción industrial esto no es eficiente, ya que implicaría procesar cada pieza de manera individual, lo cual ralentizaría la línea de fabricación y aumentaría el consumo de recursos, como tiempo y gas.

El uso de herramientas termodinámicas como ThermoCalc software ® permite evaluar cómo las variaciones en la composición química (debidas a tolerancias de colada o ajustes en elementos de aleación) afectan las temperaturas de transformación. Esto facilita la selección de una temperatura óptima de proceso que garantice que, para cada composición posible dentro de las especificaciones, las temperaturas de austenización sean las adecuadas. Con ello se optimiza el rendimiento del tratamiento térmico y se mejora la reproducibilidad del proceso.

Por ejemplo, en la figura 3, si un acero 4140 se calienta únicamente a 750°C (1380°F) en lugar de 850°C (1560°F), la ferrita no se disolverá por completo. Como resultado, después del temple se obtendrá una microestructura compuesta por martensita blanda y ferrita residual, en lugar de una martensita homogénea y dura. Esto reduce significativamente la dureza y la resistencia mecánica del material.


Figura 3. Diagrama de un eje para un acero 4140, (Fe, 0.4C, 0.8Mn, 0.2Si, 0.8Cr, 0.2Mo, 0.02Ni) | Image Credit: Consultoría Carnegie

Figura 4. Histograma de la temperatura de transformación Ac3 para un acero AISI 4140 dentro del rango
de especificación. | Image Credit: Consultoría Carnegie

En el histograma (figura 4) podemos observar que, incluso tratándose del mismo grado de acero, la temperatura A₃ puede variar aproximadamente 760−776°C (1400−1429°F) únicamente debido a las tolerancias químicas establecidas en la especificación. Si además consideramos la presencia de elementos residuales o microaleantes, es evidente que no podemos esperar el mismo comportamiento durante el tratamiento térmico ni las mismas propiedades mecánicas en todas las coladas.

En estos casos, herramientas termodinámicas como ThermoCalc software® permiten evaluar un conjunto amplio de posibles composiciones químicas y determinar una temperatura de austenización óptima que sea adecuada para todas las variaciones permitidas dentro de la especificación.

Diseño de curvas/rampas de calentamiento

Para asegurar que las temperaturas de transformación se alcancen de manera homogénea (tanto en procesos con cargas de alto volumen, como en piezas con geometrías variables) es recomendable implementar un calentamiento controlado. Aunque esto puede aumentar el tiempo de procesamiento, los beneficios incluyen una menor probabilidad de distorsión y la garantía de lograr una transformación austenítica completa.

La clave radica en diseñar un perfil adecuado de tiempo–temperatura, el cual dependerá de factores como las dimensiones de la pieza y las propiedades del material, entre ellas: difusividad térmica, capacidad calorífica, densidad y conductividad térmica.

Conclusión

La austenización insuficiente, conocida como underhardening, representa mucho más que una simple pérdida de dureza. Es una deficiencia metalúrgica que afecta la homogeneidad microestructural, la estabilidad dimensional y el desempeño mecánico.

Mediante un control riguroso de la temperatura, el tiempo y la uniformidad del horno, combinado con herramientas modernas de simulación, los ingenieros pueden asegurar transformaciones confiables, minimizar la distorsión y lograr resultados constantes y de alta calidad en el tratamiento térmico de los aceros.

Referencias

ASM International. 2013. ASM Handbook. Vol. 4A: Steel Heat Treating Fundamentals and Processes.

Callister, W. D. 2019. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Herring, Dan. Metallurgical Fundamentals of Heat Treatment. Industrial Heating.

Krauss, G. 1980. Principles of Heat Treatment of Steel. ASM International.

Nuñez González, G. 1990. Fallas en los Tratamientos Térmicos para Aceros Herramienta.

Thomas, L. 2018. “Austenitizing Part 2: Effects on Properties.” Knife Steel Nerds. https://knifesteelnerds.com/2018/03/01/austenitizing-part-2-effects-on-properties/.

Totten, G. E. 2007. Steel Heat Treatment: Metallurgy and Technologies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Acerca de la autora:

Ana Laura Hernández Sustaita
Fundadora
Consultoría Carnegie

Ana Laura Hernández Sustaita cuenta con Maestría en Ciencia e Ingeniería de los Materiales, Es fundadora de Consultoría Carnegie, una firma de consultoría y capacitación técnica especializada en el tratamiento térmico de aceros en México. Asimismo, se desempeña como Ingeniera de Soporte Técnico en Thermo-Calc Software, brindando asistencia a clientes en México, Canada y Estados Unidos de América. Ana promueve activamente la educación metalúrgica en Latinoamérica y fomenta la integración de herramientas computacionales en la práctica industrial del tratamiento térmico.

Para más información: Contacte con Ana Hernández en anahdz@consultoriacarnegie.com.

Austenización Insuficiente en el Tratamiento Térmico: Causas, Efectos y Cómo evitarla Read More »

Insufficient Austenitizing in Steel Heat Treatment: Causes, Effects, and How to Prevent It

/ ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

Insufficient austenitizing affects far more than final hardness. It disrupts phase transformation, weakens mechanical performance, and increases the risk of distortion or failure in demanding service conditions. In this Technical Tuesday installment, Ana Laura Hernández Sustaita, founder of Consultoría Carnegie, explains the metallurgical origins of incomplete austenite formation, how furnace uniformity, heating rate, steel chemistry, and part geometry contribute to the problem, and modern process-control and simulation strategies that ensure full transformation and repeatable, high-quality results.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s January 2026 Annual Technologies To Watch print edition.

Para leer el artículo en español, haga clic aquí.

Introduction

When a steel part is insufficiently austenitized, it is commonly referred to as underhardening, the resulting loss of hardness after quenching. However, in this article, we will extend the discussion beyond hardness alone, exploring the phenomenon of insufficient austenitizing, analyzing its causes and direct influence on microstructure and mechanical properties, and discussing modern strategies to prevent it.

The Role of Austenitizing in Heat Treatment

The main purpose of heat treatment is to produce a homogeneous or a desired mixed microstructure that ensures the required mechanical properties for the intended service conditions: tensile strength, impact resistance, yield strength, etc. Austenitizing is the first critical step for many processes. It involves heating the steel above the A3 temperature (typically 30–50°C or 85–120°F higher) to transform its microstructure into a face-centered cubic (FCC) lattice for a certain period of time. This step resets the steel’s structural history, particularly after casting, forging, or rolling, and defines the baseline for subsequent quenching and tempering operations.

What Is Insufficient Austenitizing?

Figure 1. Time-temperature-austenitization diagram for Ck 45 (SAE/AISI 1045) steel. | Image Credit: Figure 7, ASM International 2013

Austenite formation involves structural and compositional changes influenced by the initial microstructure and the steel’s chemical composition. When austenitizing parameters are not properly established, such as insufficient temperature, inadequate soaking time, or poor furnace performance (e.g., lack of thermal uniformity), the transformation remains incomplete. The result is a microstructure containing undesired residual phases that compromise hardness, dimensional stability, and mechanical strength. Therefore, any microstructure that fails to fully transform to austenite due to these factors can be directly associated with insufficient austenitizing.

Common causes of insufficient austentizing include:

  • Inadequate austenitizing temperature: Ferrite and carbides do not fully dissolve if the temperature is too low.
  • Insufficient holding time: A short soak time prevents uniform carbon diffusion throughout the austenite.
  • Thermal non-uniformity in the furnace (cold zones): This leads to regions with different degrees of transformations.
  • Chemical composition of the steel: Alloying elements modify diffusion kinetics and impact the critical transformation temperatures.
  • Geometry and dimensions of the part: Larger cross-sections require longer soak times for full heat diffusivity.
  • Rapid heating rates: Excessive heating, especially during induction hardening, can result in structural inhomogeneity and incomplete transformation.

Effects of Insufficient Austentizing

Heterogeneous Microstructure

As illustrated in the ASM Handbook, Volume 4A: Steel Heat Treating Fundamentals and Processes (2013), the kinetics of austenite formation depend strongly on the heating rate. At lower heating rates, diffusion-driven homogenization occurs at relatively lower temperatures, whereas rapid heating produces microstructural heterogeneity, an effect that is especially critical in induction or direct-flame heating. In other words, insufficient austenitizing is more likely to occur when high heating rates are used.

Consequently, a microstructure with heterogeneous composition leads to variations in the martensite transformation temperatures (Ms and Mf) throughout the part. During quenching, regions with lower carbon content transform earlier, producing softer martensite, while areas with higher carbon content transform at lower temperatures, resulting in internal stresses and an overall inconsistent microstructure.

Risk of Distortion and Premature Failure

The transformation from BCC or BCT to FCC (Defined: BCC: body-centered cubic; BCT: body-centered tetragonal; FCC: face-centered cubic) lattice during austenitizing involves a specific volume change. If this transformation occurs unevenly, differential expansion generates internal stresses, distortion, and in severe cases, microcracks. Rapid heating or poor furnace convection exacerbates these effects by producing steep temperature gradients across the part.

Reduced Hardness and Mechanical Strength

Incomplete transformation leaves undissolved carbides and residual ferrite, reducing hardenability and the amount of carbon in solid solution. This limits the formation of martensite during quenching and lowers final hardness and strength.

Increased Brittleness and Lower Toughness

A mixed structure of ferrite, pearlite, partial martensite, and retained austenite results in mechanical anisotropy and reduced energy absorption under impact loading. This condition increases the risk of brittle fracture, particularly in high-stress or cyclic applications.

How to Prevent Insufficient Austenitizing

Accurate Furnace Control

Figure 2. Example of loading analysis | Image Credit:
Consultoría Carnegie

To ensure proper process control during the soaking stage, it is essential to use calibrated thermocouples strategically positioned inside the furnace to obtain accurate temperature measurements. Regular calibration prevents temperature reading errors and directly contributes to heat treatment quality. It is also important to get advice from an expert to determine the recommended service life of the thermocouples. Maintaining proper traceability and replacing them at the appropriate intervals ensures optimal system performance.

Additionally, the use of internal circulation fans in convection furnaces helps maintain thermal uniformity, preventing the formation of hot or cold zones.

Another method to monitor and control process temperature is using temperature data loggers. These devices, which are connected to contact thermocouples and placed directly on the parts, are especially recommended for components with complex geometries or large cross-sections. They record real-time temperature data throughout the process, allowing verification that no transient fluctuations occur during the soaking period.

Accurate Loading Distribution

For loads where heat treatment must be applied to a significant number of parts, it is recommended that a study be conducted to determine the maximum stacking height that will ensure proper heat flow and uniform heating. A preliminary assessment can be performed by strategically placing thermocouples in different locations and on different parts, for example, on the first part in the load, one in the middle section, and another at the bottom of the stacking tower.

Once the parts enter the process, their heating behavior can be monitored to verify that the soaking time is sufficient for all pieces in the stack to complete their transformation upon reaching the target temperature or to determine whether adjustments to the loading configuration are necessary.

Use of Thermodynamic Simulation to Optimize Process Parameters

Each steel grade has an optimum austenitizing temperature in function of its chemical composition. For carbon steels (10XX series), these temperatures can be estimated using the Fe–C diagram; however, once alloying elements are added, this diagram is no longer sufficient. In such cases, it becomes necessary to rely on critical temperature calculations or on more advanced tools such as thermodynamic simulations using specialized software, like Thermo-Calc®.

Although the ideal scenario would be to heat treat each material at its specific optimum temperature, this approach is impractical in industrial production; the required processing of each part individually would slow the manufacturing line and increasing resource consumption, including time and fuel.

Thermodynamic tools such as Thermo-Calc allow engineers to evaluate how variations in chemical composition (arising from casting tolerances or adjustments in alloying elements) affect transformation temperatures. This enables the selection of an optimum processing temperature that ensures complete austenitization for all possible compositional variations within the specification. As a result, the heat treatment operation becomes more robust, more reproducible, and more energy efficient.

For example, in Figure 3, if a 4140 steel is heated only to 750°C (1380°F) instead of 850°C (1560°F), the ferrite will not fully dissolve. As a result, the microstructure will consist of soft martensite and residual ferrite after quenching, rather than a fully homogeneous and hard martensitic structure. This significantly reduces the material’s hardness and mechanical strength.

Figure 3. Equilibrium diagram, AISI 4140 0.38C, 0.78Mn, 0.85Cr, 0.22Mo (%wt.) | Image Credit: Consultoría Carnegie
Figure 4. Histogram of Ac3 transformation temperature for AISI 4140 steel within the specification range. | Image Credit: Consultoría Carnegie

We can observe in the histogram (Figure 4) that even within the same steel grade, the A3 temperature can vary from approximately 760−776°C (1400−1429°F) solely due to the composition tolerances specified for the alloy. If we also consider the presence of residual or microalloying elements, it becomes clear that we cannot expect identical behavior during heat treatment or identical mechanical properties across all heats.

In such cases, thermodynamic tools allow us to evaluate a batch of possible chemistries and determine an optimal austenitizing temperature that is suitable for all compositional variations.

Heating Curve Design

To ensure that transformation temperatures are reached uniformly (whether in processes involving large loads or parts with variable geometries), it is advisable to implement controlled heating rates. Although this approach may increase processing time, the benefits include reduced distortion risk and assurance of complete austenitic transformation.

The key is to design an appropriate time–temperature profile, which depends on factors such as part dimensions and material properties, including thermal diffusivity, heat capacity, density, and thermal conductivity.

Conclusion

Insufficient austenitizing, also known as underhardening, represents far more than a loss of hardness. It is a metallurgical deficiency that affects microstructural homogeneity, dimensional stability, and mechanical performance. Through rigorous control of temperature, time, and furnace uniformity combined with modern simulation tools, engineers can ensure reliable transformations, minimize distortion, and achieve consistent high-quality results in steel heat treatment.

References

ASM International. 2013. ASM Handbook. Vol. 4A: Steel Heat Treating Fundamentals and Processes.

Callister, W. D. 2019. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Herring, Dan. Metallurgical Fundamentals of Heat Treatment. Industrial Heating.

Krauss, G. 1980. Principles of Heat Treatment of Steel. ASM International.

Nuñez González, G. 1990. Fallas en los Tratamientos Térmicos para Aceros Herramienta.

Thomas, L. 2018. “Austenitizing Part 2: Effects on Properties.” Knife Steel Nerds. https://knifesteelnerds.com/2018/03/01/austenitizing-part-2-effects-on-properties/.

Totten, G. E. 2007. Steel Heat Treatment: Metallurgy and Technologies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

About The Author:

Ana Laura Hernández Sustaita
Founder
Consultoría Carnegie

Ana Laura Hernández Sustaita holds a Master’s degree in Materials Science and engineering. She is the founder of Consultoría Carnegie, a technical consulting and training firm specializing in steel heat treatment in Mexico. Additionally, she works as a technical support engineer at Thermo-Calc Software, providing assistance to clients across México, Canada, and United States of America. Ana actively promotes metallurgical education throughout Latin America and advocates for the integration of computational tools into industrial heat treatment practice.

For more information: Contact Ana Hernández at anahdz@consultoriacarnegie.com.

Insufficient Austenitizing in Steel Heat Treatment: Causes, Effects, and How to Prevent It Read More »

Hybrid Heating Systems Unlock Heat Process Decarbonization

/ ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, FOUNDRY CASTING TECHNICAL CONTENT, INDUCTION HEATING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH

As pressure mounts to cut industrial CO2 emissions, hybrid heating systems are emerging as a compelling pathway to decarbonizing industrial process heat. In this Technical Tuesday installment, Dr.-Ing. Marco Rische and Dr. Martin Ennen of ABP Induction Systems GmbH explore how integrating induction technology at the front and end of traditional gas-fired furnace heat treating can reduce energy consumption, improve temperature control, lower operating costs, and offer a realistic bridge to full electrification.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s January 2025 Annual Technologies To Watch print edition.

The metalworking industry is undergoing a profound transformation, as the pressure to reduce emissions and replace fossil fuels continues to shape technological strategies across all areas of the value chain. In addition to melting technology, process heat is increasingly coming into focus — namely the heating, warming, and tempering of materials, which is required in virtually every production process.

With hybrid approaches that combine conventional gas furnaces with induction heating units, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and costs can be reduced simultaneously. ABP Induction, a global provider of electric heating and melting technologies, has continued to refine and expand hybrid heating concepts over the past several years. Its strategy aims to help shape the path to CO2 neutrality as a partner to the metalworking industry through holistic solutions that balance technological advances and cost efficiency.

The Pressure to Act in the Industry

The starting point is both a challenge and an opportunity; the metalworking industry ranks among the largest industrial producers of CO2 emissions worldwide. The steel industry, in particular, is at the center of the decarbonization debate, accounting for roughly one quarter of global industrial emissions. Natural gas was the preferred fuel for many years: affordable, easy to control, and simple to transport. But with rising CO2 prices and increasing political pressure to decarbonize, the balance is shifting. While primary processes like pig iron production are increasingly shifting toward direct reduction using hydrogen, heat input in downstream processing steps, such as melting, heating, or rolling, still primarily relies on fossil energy sources.

At the same time, the economic landscape is shifting; rising CO2 prices, high energy costs, and the need for stable supply chains are driving a reassessment of conventional technologies and laying the foundation for induction-based burner substitutes to gain economic traction. The megatrends of digitalization, deglobalization, demographic change, and decarbonization are now shaping business decisions across the metalworking industry. After all, the energy policy framework is creating incentives to deploy electric solutions, especially where they can be powered by green electricity. This makes induction — contactless heating of metallic materials using electromagnetic fields — a key technology on the path to CO2 neutrality.

Induction Heating as a Foundational Technology

The physical principle of induction is well established. An alternating electromagnetic field transfers energy directly into the workpiece, heating it evenly and in a controlled manner. The advantages lie in high energy efficiency, dynamic controllability, and reliable process stability. While gas burners rely on convective and radiant heat, induction applies energy directly without intermediate losses — a decisive efficiency advantage that enables practical efficiencies of up to 90%.

For many applications, the technology is already widely adopted. In foundries, induction furnaces are increasingly replacing cupola furnace systems, while in forges and aluminum plants, induction systems are used for efficient preheating and heating. New application areas are emerging in the steel sector, particularly in the fields of reheating and heat treatment.

However, the limitations are equally clear; induction works optimally only where the material to be heated is electrically conductive and the electromagnetic field can be efficiently coupled. For large-volume or indirect heating processes, such as those involving gas flows or non-metallic materials, complementary concepts are required.

The Principle of Hybrid Heating

This is precisely where hybrid heating systems come into play. They combine proven induction technology with conventional furnace systems, typically gas-fired continuous or chamber furnaces. The goal is to leverage the strengths of both systems and compensate for their weaknesses.

A typical hybrid system integrates an induction section before or after the gas-fired furnace. When the induction unit is positioned upstream, it handles the rapid heating phase, bringing the workpiece to a defined temperature in a short time, which effectively reduces the load on the gas-fired furnace. It can then operate with reduced energy input. When the induction unit is positioned downstream, it ensures precise temperature control, homogenizes the temperature profile, or compensates for fluctuations in transport speed.

The benefits are multifaceted: gas consumption decreases, temperature distribution becomes more uniform, production speed can increase, and CO2 emissions are significantly reduced. Pilot projects have achieved savings of up to 60% in previous fossil energy consumption.

In addition, the hybrid solution enables a gradual transformation process. Existing furnace systems can continue to be used, keeping investments in new infrastructure to a minimum. This provides operators with an economically and technically viable path to decarbonization and allows them to stay close to the existing process without compromising production reliability.

Process Integration and Control

Hybrid heating systems are highly adaptable. The design of the induction section depends on material, geometry, throughput, and process objective. Modern control technology ensures precise coordination between induction and furnace operation.

Figure 1. Billet after induction heating process | Source: ABP Induction Systems GmbH

In the area of reheating slabs or billets in rolling mills, for example, an inductive preheating station can be installed in front of the furnace. Here, the induced power density is utilized to significantly shorten the heating time. At production rates of up to 200 tons per hour for long products and 1,000 tons per hour for flat products, induction systems achieve electrical efficiencies of 85% to 90%. Downstream of the furnace, a post-heating unit can help maintain a uniform temperature profile, a critical factor for product quality, dimensional accuracy, and potentially reduced wear on subsequent forming equipment. Process stability also benefits. Gas-fired furnaces are sluggish systems whose temperature responds slowly to process changes. Induction systems, on the other hand, can be controlled within fractions of a second, adding a dynamic component to the overall system. This allows temperature fluctuations to be compensated, which helps to prevent product defects.

A Tool for Transformation

The idea of replacing fossil fuel burners with induction systems is not new. Pioneers in the field considered this decades ago and developed alternative processes and methods, but it was never cost-effective. Fossil fuel usage remained cheaper and allowed existing processes to continue unchanged. Now the situation is different.

Figure 2. UHT Thermo Jet UHT200® — Induction heating concepts for fluids | Image Credit: TUBAF University of Freiberg

A key element in ABP Induction’s strategy for electrifying process heat is the Ultra-High-Temperature (UHT) Thermo Jet, a newly developed high-temperature hot gas technology that replaces conventional fossil fuel burners and electrifies industrial thermal processes. The innovation marks a decisive step toward fully electric process heat, demonstrating that even high-temperature applications are feasible without the combustion of fossil fuels.

The system is based on an inductively heated metallic susceptor located inside a high-temperature-resistant, thermally insulated channel. A process gas flows through it, typically air, though inert gases or exhaust gases can also be used. The induction coil generates an electromagnetic field (Figure 2) that heats the susceptor without physical contact. The susceptor then transfers the heat to the gas flowing past it. The result is a hot gas jet with temperatures well above 1000°C (1830°F), fully replicating the thermal characteristics of a natural gas flame. Industrial test series have already achieved stable temperatures of up to 1400°C (2550°F) with response dynamics that surpasses conventional burners.

The technology transfers energy in two stages: first, the susceptor is heated via induction; then, the heat is transferred to the gas stream. This decoupled structure enables precise control of temperature, gas flow, and power input. The key lies in synchronizing the electrical power control with the gas flow to ensure a consistent and reproducible hot gas quality. The system responds to load changes within seconds, offering a level of controllability for high-temperature applications that has never been achieved before.

Technologically, it operates with minimal losses, as no exhaust gases are produced and the heat is transferred almost entirely to the process. By using closed gas circuits, the residual thermal energy of the exhaust stream can be reused without generating pollutants or releasing combustion residues into the atmosphere. This not only reduces energy consumption but also improves the process atmosphere, for example, through low-oxygen conditions that enable high-quality heat treatment.

Another key feature is its ability to integrate into existing systems. The design enables direct replacement of gas burners in many industrial applications without requiring fundamental modifications to the furnace architecture. This provides a fast and cost-effective path to decarbonizing existing installations.

The concept was developed at the Foundry Institute of TU Freiberg. To bring the technology from the lab into real-world application, an alliance was formed: the university as the originator and development partner, Primetals as the system integrator, and ABP Induction for induction technology, contributing its insights in control systems, coil design, and power supply. Following successful lab trials with power levels between 10 and 35 kilowatts, an industrial demonstrator rated at 200 kilowatts is currently undergoing testing, serving as the foundation for market entry (Figure 3). The results demonstrate that the system is scalable — from compact applications to large-scale processes in the steel industry as well as glass, ceramics, and chemical.

Figure 3. UHT Thermo Jet UHT200® — test facility for 200kW heating power | Image Credit: TUBAF University of Freiberg

The UHT Thermo Jet transfers the principle of induction to indirect process heat. While previous systems exclusively heated metallic workpieces directly, the new technology now enables controlled generation of hot gas streams — a decisive step toward full electrification of industrial heat supply. By combining efficiency, responsiveness, and sustainability, this solution paves the way toward a CO2-neutral future while ensuring cost-effective operation.

3 Stages: Technical Application Development

The development of hybrid heating systems follows a clear technological logic:

  • In the short term, fossil-based systems are supplemented by complementary induction modules.
  • In the medium term, they are replaced by electric heat sources, such as the UHT Thermo Jet.
  • In the long term, they are fully electrified.

This evolution creates multiple advantages: first and foremost, a rapid entry into decarbonization through the retrofit of existing systems, resulting in lower operating costs due to reduced gas consumption and decreased maintenance requirements. This also leads to an increase in product quality thanks to precise temperature control. Companies also stand to benefit from the energy transition in the market, with long-term supply security, as electricity from renewable sources can be generated locally.

At the same time, new requirements are emerging for control and integration. Electric heating systems respond instantly to grid fluctuations and can be integrated into digital energy management systems. This makes it possible to optimize load profiles, adapt production processes flexibly to energy availability, and manage energy consumption with full transparency — a key milestone on the path to climate-neutral industrial production.

The ecological impact of hybrid heating systems is thus directly measurable. By partially replacing fossil burners, CO2 emissions can be reduced significantly. At the same time, nitrogen oxide and particulate emissions, which are typically generated during combustion, are reduced.

The economic picture is similar; while the investment costs for electric systems are higher, operating costs decrease due to lower gas consumption and improved energy efficiency. In addition, expenses for emission certificates, burner maintenance, and exhaust gas treatment are eliminated. In many cases, the investment pays off within a few years, especially when funding programs for the decarbonization of industrial processes are utilized.

In addition, the resilience of production systems improves. Electrically operated systems are less dependent on geopolitical energy imports and can potentially be powered directly by locally generated green electricity or by synthetically produced energy (via power-to-X processes) in the future. New energy storage concepts will also play a role here.

Practical Considerations

There are four key megatrends in industry: digitalization, deglobalization, demographic change, and decarbonization. Electrification of process heat is a key area of action, following the three-stage logical flow to implement fully electric, CO2-free process heat solutions. This approach reflects the reality in many industrial enterprises, which, due to their investment cycles, cannot implement an immediate transition. Hybrid solutions provide the essential bridge — both technologically and economically.

Despite these innovations, it is clear that the transformation of industrial process heat will not happen overnight. It requires time, investment, and a high degree of technical integration. Nevertheless, the electrification of thermal processes is considered an indispensable component of industrial decarbonization.

Hybrid heating systems represent a key enabling technology in this context. They enable the gradual replacement of fossil fuels, increase efficiency, and open up new degrees of freedom in production control. With innovations such as the UHT Thermo Jet, the range of applications expands significantly — reaching into areas like process gases and high-temperature applications that were previously considered the domain of fossil combustion.

Hybrid technology does not mark the end, but rather the beginning of a new generation of industrial heating systems — efficient, flexible, and climate-neutral.

About The Authors:

Dr.-Ing. Marco Rische
Chief Technical Officer and Director System Business
ABP Induction

Dr.-Ing. Marco Rische is a highly qualified professional in induction heating systems technology with over 26 years of experience as the vice president of service, chief technical officer (CTO) and director system business with ABP Induction. He has demonstrated a deep technical understanding as a leader, leveraging his management and engineering background to solve complex technical and organizational challenges.

Dr. Martin Ennen
Application and Development Engineer
ABP Induction

Dr. Martin Ennen has studied electrical engineering and obtained his PhD in the field of electrical process engineering, with a focus on inductive heating processes. He has been working for three years at ABP as an application and development engineer. He is responsible for research and development work that entails numerical process simulation leveraging state-of-the-art FEM methods.

For more information: Contact Dr.-Ing. Marco Rische at Marco.rische@abpinduction.com and Dr. Martin Ennen at Martin.ennen@abpinduction.com.

Hybrid Heating Systems Unlock Heat Process Decarbonization Read More »

Case Study: Waste Heat Recovery & Digital Innovation Cut Cycle Times

/ ANNEALING TECHNICAL CONTENT, ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH

What if your furnace could run faster, cheaper, and cleaner — without major capital investment? Carl Nicolia, president at PSNERGY, LLC, discusses how using waste heat recovery and smart combustion monitoring can cut cycle times in half, reducing gas consumption, and eliminating zone temperature variations.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s October 2025 Ferrous & Nonferrous Heat Treatments/Mill Processing print edition.

Optimizing combustion and reclaiming waste heat can dramatically improve furnace performance. A real-world bar and coil annealing case study shows how simple retrofits reduced ramp cycle time, cut gas consumption, and eliminated zone temperature variation. The results demonstrate how heat treaters can boost throughput, lower costs, and improve quality without major capital investment.

The Challenge of Industrial Furnace Efficiency

Industrial furnaces are the backbone of metals processing, enabling heat treatment, annealing, forging, and countless other applications. Despite their importance, these furnaces are inherently inefficient. In most cases, less than half of the energy generated by burning natural gas actually reaches the load. Energy is continuously lost through exhaust gases, radiant losses, opening losses, and the heating of fixtures and refractory walls.

On top of this inefficiency, combustion ratios drift over time. Burners fall out of tune, air-to-fuel ratios shift, and temperature distributions across zones become imbalanced. Even with regular maintenance, most furnaces run well below their optimal performance for a significant portion of their operating lives. See figures 1a and 1b, which illustrate how quickly furnaces drift out of tune. Therefore, regular monitoring and adjustment are essential to avoid energy losses and reoccurring performance issues.

This raises a critical question for heat treaters and metal processors: how much efficiency is being left on the table? And more importantly, what would it mean for throughput, energy costs, and product quality if some of that efficiency could be reclaimed?

The following case study of a bar and coil annealing furnace provides a compelling answer.

Figure 1a, 1b. A demonstration of temperature drift that happened in a furnace that was serviced in August 2018 and then again in May 2019. The red points represent oxygen levels measured at each burner when the PSNERGY team arrived on site, while the blue points show oxygen levels immediately after tuning. Although the furnace was optimized during the August 2018 service, the system had already shifted far from optimal conditions within a few months (May 2019). This highlights the inherent inefficiency and constant variability of combustion systems. Source: PSNERGY, LCC

The Application

The facility in this example operates a batch furnace dedicated to bar and coil annealing. The furnace is equipped with 14 non-recuperated U-tube burners across two heating zones.

While reliable, the furnace faced two persistent challenges: long cycle times and inconsistent temperature uniformity across the two zones. Both issues reduced throughput and posed risks to product quality and delivery while also driving up energy costs.

The Problem

The problems facing this manufacturer were not unusual. Long cycle times limited furnace productivity, creating bottlenecks in meeting customer demand. At the same time, uneven zone temperatures made it difficult to maintain uniform metallurgical properties in the product.

With natural gas prices trending upward, energy costs compounded the problem. Every additional hour in the cycle not only resulted in lost throughput, but also higher gas consumption.

The Objective

The project set out with three clear objectives:

  1. Reduce total cycle time: By shortening ramp-up time, the furnace could complete more loads per month, increasing throughput.
  2. Improve zone uniformity: Temperature variation between zones not only affected quality but also required longer soak times to ensure the coldest parts of the load met specifications. Eliminating this variation would allow for both higher quality and shorter cycles.
  3. Lower gas consumption: With energy representing a major portion of operating costs, reducing fuel usage was essential to improving competitiveness and profitability.

The Solution

This improvement method went beyond the traditional practice of tuning a furnace every six to twelve months. Instead, it involved a broader approach utilizing waste heat recovery and digital monitoring tools to achieve optimal combustion at every burner.

The process involved:

  • Installing ceramic radiant tube insert assemblies into the U-tubes
  • Utilizing a combustion monitoring and alerting system to measure air-to-fuel ratio at all burners on the furnace
  • Adjusting all burners to operate within an optimal excess oxygen window (typically between 2.8% and 3.2%) and maintaining those settings over time
  • Ensuring balance between zones allowing the furnace to deliver uniform heating to the load

Figure 2. Before vs. after RIT installation. Source: PSNERGY, LLC

The project began with installing waste heat recovery on all 14 of the non-recuperated U-tubes. In this case, ceramic radiant tube inserts (RTIs) were used because they are quickly and easily installed and capture waste heat normally lost out the exhaust, keeping the energy inside the furnace. Additionally, the RTIs improve temperature uniformity, and reduce gas consumption (see Figure 2).

Installing combustion monitoring at each burner is key to keeping the improvements in place. Instead of waiting for issues to show up in product quality, operators can see what is happening at the burners in real time. When a burner starts drifting out of balance or tune, they have the data to correct it immediately. Constant visibility helps the furnace stay efficient and consistent.

Precision is important when considering the physics of combustion. Measuring excess oxygen at less than 1% (running rich) indicates incomplete combustion is occurring, leading to carbon monoxide and soot formation. At the other extreme, running with too much excess air (running lean) wastes energy. Even 5% excess oxygen results in roughly 13% less energy to the load, while 7% excess oxygen increases those losses to 21%, all while burning the same amount of natural gas.

The Results

The outcomes of this project were dramatic.

  • Ramp cycle reduced by 53%. Prior to any improvements, the furnace cycle time was 30 hours, with ramp-up time accounting for a major portion of the overall cycle. After optimization, ramp-up time was reduced by 8 hours, enabling faster turnaround and greater throughput.
  • Gas consumption reduced by 59% per load. Improved combustion efficiency means that less fuel is required to reach the same metallurgical results. This reduction directly lowers operating costs and CO2 emissions per ton.
  • Zone temperature variation eliminated. By balancing combustion across zones, the furnace achieves uniform heating, reducing the risk of quality issues and minimizing the need for extended soak times.

Figure 3. Graph shows Zone 1 and Zone 2 uniformity (identical curves depicted by yellow and green lines) after the combustion monitoring improvements. Source: PSNERGY, LLC

For the manufacturer, these results translated into both immediate savings and long-term operational advantages. Throughput increased while emissions and quality risks were reduced (see Figure 3).

Broader Implications for Industry

While this case study focuses on a single bar and coil annealing furnace, its implications extend across the heat treat and metals industries.

Most industrial furnaces, regardless of size or application, experience similar inefficiencies. Over time, combustion drifts away from optimal conditions, often unnoticed until performance or quality issues arise. Standard practice, tuning once or twice a year, is rarely enough to maintain proper function.

Capturing waste heat and utilizing technology to monitor and maintain combustion represent major opportunities for manufacturers. By reclaiming even a portion of the 10–30% efficiency losses that occur between tunings, facilities can realize double-digit improvements in throughput and energy consumption.

The return on investment can be substantial. In most cases for these improvements, it’s months. Additional throughput alone will often justify the investment. In many locations, natural gas providers have incentives in place for these projects as they are proven to make substantial reductions in energy use. Just as important, optimizing combustion extends the life of burners and tubes, reduces maintenance emergencies, and stabilizes furnace operation; again, reducing cost and improving efficiency.

Conclusion

Industrial furnaces are indispensable, but they do not have to be inefficient. This bar and coil annealing case study demonstrates that even established furnace systems can achieve impactful performance gains through retrofit combustion optimization.

By focusing on cycle time, energy use, and zone uniformity, manufacturers can unlock faster throughput, lower costs, and higher product quality, while also reducing emissions and operating stress.

The lesson for heat treaters is clear: combustion is not just a background process, it is the heartbeat of the operation. Maintaining combustion properly through the use of easily implemented technology can turn a productivity drain into a competitive advantage.

About The Author:

Carl Nicolia
President
PSNERGY, LLC

Carl Nicolia is president of PSNERGY, LLC, which provides modern solutions to combustion problems, improving equipment life, enhancing productivity, and reducing emissions through smart application of proprietary products, services, and technology.

For more information: Contact Carl Nicolia at cnicolia@psnergy.com.

Case Study: Waste Heat Recovery & Digital Innovation Cut Cycle Times Read More »

Answers in the Atmosphere: Nitrogen — The Swiss Army Knife for Thermal Processors

/ ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, BULK GASES & SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, OP-ED

In this installment of Answers in the Atmosphere, David (Dave) Wolff, an independent expert focusing on industrial atmospheres for heat treat applications, explores the versatile role of nitrogen gas in thermal processing.

This informative piece on nitrogen’s critical functions in safety, as a diluent, and as an atmosphere component — including production methods and purity requirements — was first released in Heat Treat Today’s November 2025 Annual Vacuum Heat Treating print edition.

As discussed in the introduction for this series of gas-focused columns, nitrogen gas is ubiquitous in thermal processing — by far the most-used delivered or generated gas in secondary metallurgy. This column covers many important considerations for the use and availability of nitrogen gas, featuring the insights from my recent interview with Air Products experts: John Dwyer, principal engineer; Bryan Hernandez, commercial technology sales engineer; and Emily Phipps, strategic marketing manager. Because of its key role in thermal processing, we expect to have additional columns on nitrogen gas in this series.

Nitrogen serves three important purposes in secondary metallurgy:

  1. Safety
  2. Diluent
  3. Atmosphere

Regarding safety, the Air Products experts shared important attributes of nitrogen and several applications it is most often used in. According to them, nitrogen:

  • will not react with most metals used in fabrication applications until reaching extremely high temperatures
  • will not support combustion or oxidation
  • has about the same density as air (which is 78% nitrogen)
  • is the least expensive industrial gas on a volumetric basis.

For those reasons, nitrogen is used as a purging and inerting gas in metallurgical applications, such as inerting the furnace in preparation for a flammable atmosphere to be introduced, as well as expelling flammable atmosphere at the end of a furnace cycle. They further noted that the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 86 for Ovens and Furnaces mandates that nitrogen be always available for furnace inerting except for very specific exceptions where alternative approaches are used (burn in and burn out). Beyond the strict safety considerations, nitrogen protects furnace linings and components from high temperature oxidation.

Dwyer, Hernandez, and Phipps emphasized that when used as a diluent, nitrogen makes it possible to use relatively small volumes of a more expensive reactive gas or gas blend and ensure that the diluted active gas can provide benefits for an entire furnace load of parts. Examples include nitrogen/hydrogen atmospheres where nitrogen gas can enable a relatively small volume of very powerful reducing gas hydrogen to be mixed with a higher volume of nitrogen to fill the furnace interior. I would add that a blended atmosphere of nitrogen/hydrogen will have a higher density than hydrogen alone, and hence may distribute more widely in the furnace rather than just pooling at the ceiling level.

They further discussed how nitrogen can be used as a sole constituent in a furnace atmosphere in many cases, especially at lower temperature ranges, such as tempering and stress relief. In situations where surface finish is a secondary consideration, or where additional operations are going to be performed, they note that the part lower finish quality provided under inert nitrogen alone might be acceptable.

The team then reported that nitrogen forms the bulk of the atmosphere and cryogenic air separation is now available virtually worldwide; because of this, liquified or gaseous compressed nitrogen can also be delivered to clients virtually worldwide. Cryogenically separated nitrogen is, by the nature of the process, extremely pure, and can be assumed to be 99.999% or purer as delivered into the client’s storage vessel. Nitrogen can also be made at the client’s site, using non-cryogenic or cryogenic air separation techniques. For secondary metallurgy, non-cryogenic techniques are the most common because the volumes of nitrogen required are too low for a dedicated cryogenic air separation unit.

Continuing along this line, they explained that while both pressure swing adsorption (PSA) and hollow fiber membrane techniques can be employed to generate nitrogen for a single customer site, the PSA technology is the one primarily used to supply generated nitrogen for thermal processes. This is because the membrane technique for non-cryogenic nitrogen generation makes relatively impure nitrogen, with too much oxygen to achieve the desired surface properties sought by heat treaters. As such, membrane generated nitrogen is primarily used for chemical blanketing and similar low temperature air displacement applications.

The final discussion point I will share from the interview today is about the variability in accepted purity based on the planned usage of nitrogen. The three Air Products experts pointed out that NFPA86 mandates that the atmosphere in a furnace must be below 1.0% oxygen before any flammable gas species can be introduced. So, they continued, nitrogen used solely for safety purging can be relatively impure and still achieve the 1.0% maximum oxygen allowed. When used as the sole atmosphere component (i.e., 100% N₂), or as a carrier gas blended with an active gas like hydrogen, they explained that nitrogen purity must be much higher in order to achieve acceptable surface quality. In general, for atmosphere uses, it should be assumed as a general rule that the purer the nitrogen is, the easier it is to achieve satisfactory heat treat results. The three concluded this thought noting that in blended atmospheres it may be possible to use slightly higher levels of active gases (like hydrogen) to react with excess oxygen in the nitrogen supply, but that approach is unlikely to make sense economically since nitrogen is typically far less expensive than an active gas.

In the December 2025 installment of Answers in the Atmosphere, I’ll share further insights that my interview uncovered. Until then, consider your unique nitrogen needs and therefore whether having direct access to this gas for the benefit of your heat treat operations is essential.

About The Author:

David (Dave) Wolff
Independent expert focusing on industrial atmospheres for heat treat applications

Dave Wolff has over 40 years of project engineering, industrial gas generation and application engineering, marketing, and sales experience. Dave holds a degree in engineering science from Dartmouth College. Currently, he consults in the areas of industrial gas and chemical new product development and commercial introduction, as well as market development and selling practices.

For more information: Contact Dave Wolff at Wolff-eng@icloud.com.

Answers in the Atmosphere: Nitrogen — The Swiss Army Knife for Thermal Processors Read More »

Skip to content