VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT Archives

Why Normalize, and Is a ‘Still Air’ Cool Really Important? Part 2

The Heat Treat Doctor® has returned to offer sage advice to Heat Treat Today readers and to answer your questions about heat treating, brazing, sintering, and other types of thermal treatments as well as questions on metallurgy, equipment, and process-related issues.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s March 2025 Aerospace Heat Treating print edition.

Last time (Air & Atmosphere Heat Treating, February 2025) we addressed the question of why normalizing is necessary. Here we look at the importance of a “still air” cool on the final result. Let’s learn more.

What Is a “Still Air” Cool?

As we learned last month, the term “cooling in air” is associated with normalizing but poorly defined in the literature or in practice, either in terms of cooling rate or microstructural outcome. This lack of specificity has resulted not only in many different interpretations of what is needed, but in a great deal of variability in the final part microstructure.

By way of example, this writer has on multiple occasions asked what changes are made to car bottom furnace cycles where cars are pulled outside of the plant for “air cooling” (Figure 1). Questions such as, is the furnace opened and the car pulled out in inclement weather? And, is this practice done on a particularly windy day, or in a rain or snowstorm or when the temperature is below zero? An all-too-common response is, “Only if it isn’t raining ‘too hard’ or snowing ‘too much’; then, we wait a while.” No wonder part microstructures are often found to vary from part to part and load to load!

Most heat treaters agree, however, that normalizing is optimized by a cooling in “still air.” This term also hasn’t been clearly defined, but it will be here based on both an extensive survey of the literature and the most common heat treat practices. In Vacuum Heat Treatment, Volume II, I define a still air cool as: “Cooling at a rate of 40°F (22°C) per minute … to 1100°F (593°C) and then at a rate of 15°F–25°F (8°C–14°C) per minute from 1100°F (593°C) to 300°F (150°C). Any cooling rate can be used below 300°F (150°C).”

Typical car bottom normalizing furnace opening to the outside environment

In addition, many consider nitrogen gas quenching in a vacuum furnace at 1–2 bar pressure to be equivalent to a still air cool. But again, so many factors are involved that only properly positioned workload thermocouples can confirm the above cooling rates are being achieved.

Also, many use the term “air cooling” to differentiate the process from “air quenching,” “controlled cooling,” and “fan cooling.”

Recall from the previous installment of this column that any ambiguity with respect to cooling rate ought to be defined in engineering specifications and/or heat treat instructions so that the desired outcome of the process can be firmly established.

From the literature, several important observations will serve as cautionary reminders. In STEELS, George Krauss points out that: “Air cooling associated with normalizing produces a range of cooling rates depending on section size [and to some extent, load mass]. Heavier sections air cool at much lower cooling rates than do light sections because of the added time required for thermal conductivity to lower temperatures of central portions of the workpiece.”

George Totten’s work in Steel Heat Treatment indicates: “Cooling … usually occurs in air, and the actual cooling rate depends on the mass which is cooled.” He goes on to state:

After metalworking, forgings and rolled products are often given an annealing or normalizing heat treatment to reduce hardness so that the steel may be in the best condition for machining. These processes also reduce residual stress in the steel. Annealing and normalizing are terms used interchangeably, but they do have specific meaning. Both terms imply heating the steel above the transformation range. The difference lies in the cooling method. Annealing requires a slow [furnace] cooling rate, whereas normalized parts are cooled faster in still, room-temperature air. Annealing can be a lengthy process but produces relatively consistent results, where normalizing is much faster (and therefore favored from a cost point of view) but can lead to variable results depending on the position of the part in the batch and the variation of the section thickness in the part that is stress-relieved.

In “The Importance of Normalizing,” this writer offers the following caution: “It is important to remember that the mass of the part or the workload can have a significant influence on the cooling rate and thus on the resulting microstructure.”

Finally, Krauss again observes: “The British Steel Corporation atlas for cooling transformation (Ref. 13.7) establishes directly for many steels the effect of section size on microstructures produced by air cooling.” (Note: Interpretation of continuous cooling transformation (CCT) curves will be the subject of a future “Ask The Heat Treat Doctor” column.)

Since hardness is one of the most commonly used criteria to determine if a heat treat process has been successful, it should also be noted that one can usually predict the hardness of a properly normalized part by looking at the J40 value when Jominy data is available.

The Metallus (formerly TimkenSteel) “Practical Data for Metallurgists” provides an example of the type of data available to metallurgists and engineers to help define a required cooling rate for normalizing (Figure 2).

All literature references to normalizing agree (or infer) that the resultant microstructure produced plays a significant role in both the properties developed and their impact on subsequent operations.

Figure 2. Combined hardenability chart for normalized and austenitized SAE 4140 steel showing approximate still air cooling rates and resultant hardness (data based on a thermocouple located in the center of the bar diameter indicated)

Final Thoughts — The State of the Industry

It is all too common within the industry for some companies who wish to have normalizing performed on their products to specify only a hardness range on the engineering drawing or purchase order callout that is given to the heat treater.

Industry normalizing practice here in North America varies considerably from company to company. Normalizing instructions are sometimes, but not often enough, provided on either purchase orders, engineering drawings, or in specifications (industry standards or company-specific documents). These instructions range from, in the case of certain weldments, absolutely nothing (i.e., no hardness, microstructure, or mechanical properties) to referencing industry specifications (e.g., AMS2759/1) or specifying complete metallurgical and mechanical testing including hardness and microstructure.

Most commercial heat treaters often perform normalizing to client or industry specifications provided to them. Others prefer so-called “flow down” instructions in which the process recipe is provided to them. It is a common (and mistaken) belief that this removes the obligation of achieving a given set of mechanical or metallurgical properties even if they are called out by specification, drawing, or purchase order.

Also, the final mechanical properties that result from normalizing are seldom verified by the heat treater. Rather, a hardness value (or range) is reported, but hardness is not a fundamental material property, rather a composite value, one which is influenced by, for example, the yield strength, work hardening, true tensile strength, and modulus of elasticity of the material.

References

ASM International. “ASM Handbook, vol. 4, Heat Treating,” 1991.

ASM International. “ASM Handbook Volume 4A, Steel Heat Treating, Fundamentals and Processes,” 2013.

Chandler, Harry, ed. Heat Treater’s Guide: Practices and Procedures for Irons and Steels. 2nd ed, ASM International, 1995.

Grossman, M. A., and E. C. Bain. Principles of Heat Treatment, 5th ed, ASM International, 1935.

Herring, Daniel H. Atmosphere Heat Treatment, vol. I, BNP Media, 2014.

Herring, Daniel H. Atmosphere Heat Treatment, vol. II, BNP Media, 2015.

Herring, Daniel H. Vacuum Heat Treatment, vol. I, BNP Media, 2012.

Herring, Daniel H. Vacuum Heat Treatment, vol. II, BNP Media, 2016.

Herring, Daniel H. “The Importance of Normalizing,” Industrial Heating April 2008.

Krauss, George. STEELS: Heat Treatment and Processing Principles, ASM International, 1990. 463.

Krauss, George. STEELS: Processing, Structures, and Performance, ASM International, 2005.

Practical Data for Metallurgists, 17th ed. TimkenSteel, 2011

Totten, George E., ed. Steel Heat Treatment Handbook, vol. 2, 2nd ed., CRC Press, 2007.

About the Author

Dan Herring
“The Heat Treat Doctor”
The HERRING GROUP, Inc.

Dan Herring has been in the industry for over 50 years and has gained vast experience in fields that include materials science, engineering, metallurgy, new product research, and many other areas. He is the author of six books and over 700 technical articles.

For more information: Contact Dan at dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com.

For more information about Dan’s books: see his page at the Heat Treat Store.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Why Normalize, and Is a ‘Still Air’ Cool Really Important? Part 2 Read More »

What Is Thermal Expansion?

January 20, 2025 / Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content, OP-ED, STRESS RELIEVING TECHNICAL CONTENT, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s December 2024 Medical & Energy Heat Treat print edition.

The subject of thermal expansion and contraction is a very important one to most heat treaters given that the materials of construction of our furnaces and our fixtures experience these phenomena every day. However, to find a simple explanation of what it is and how we can help minimize the issues caused by it can be difficult. What we need is an explanation in laymen’s terms, along with some simple science and a few examples. Let’s learn more.

Thermal Expansion Effects

When exposed to a change in temperature, whether heating or cooling, materials experience a change (increase or decrease) in length, area, or volume. This not only changes the material’s size but also can influence its density. The freezing of ice cubes is a common example of a volume expansion (on freezing or cooling), while as they melt (on heating), we see a volume contraction.

As most of us recall from our science classes, as temperature increases, atoms begin to move faster and faster. In other words, their average kinetic energy increases. With the increase in thermal energy, the bonds between atoms vibrate faster and faster creating more distance between themselves. This relative expansion (aka strain) divided by the change in temperature is what is known as the material’s coefficient of linear thermal expansion.

We must also be aware, however, that a number of materials behave in a different way upon heating. Namely, they contract. This usually happens over a specific temperature range. Tempering of D2 tool steel is a good example (Figure 1). From a scientific point of view, we call this thermal contraction (aka negative thermal expansion).

Figure 1. Change in length of D2 tool steel as a function of tempering temperature (Image courtesy of Carpenter Technology — www.carpentertechnology.com)

A related fact to be aware of is that thermal expansion generally decreases with increasing bond energy. This influences the melting point of solids, with higher melting point materials (such as the Ni-Cr alloys found in our furnaces and fixtures) more likely to have lower coefficient of thermal expansion. The thermal expansion of quartz and other types of glass (found in some vacuum furnaces) is, however, slightly higher. And, in general, liquids expand slightly more than solids.

Effect on Density

As addressed above, thermal expansion changes the space between atoms, which in turn changes the volume, while negligibly changing its mass and hence its density. (In an unrelated but interesting fact, wind and ocean currents are, to a degree, effected by thermal expansion and contraction of our oceans.)

What Is the Effect of the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion?

In laymen’s terms, the coefficient of thermal expansion (Table 1) tells us how the size of an object changes with a change in temperature. Specifically, it measures the fractional change in size per degree change in temperature at a constant pressure. Lower coefficients describe lower tendency to change in size. There are several types of thermal expansion coefficients — namely linear, area, and volumetric. For most solid materials, we are typically concerned in the heat treat industry with the change along a length, or in some cases a change in volume (though this is mainly of concern in liquids).

Table 1. Comparative values for linear and volumetric expansion of selected materials

Heat Treat Furnace Examples

When calculating thermal expansion, it is necessary to consider whether the design is free to expand or is constrained. Alloy furnace muffles, retorts, mesh and cast link belts, and radiant tubes are good examples. The furnaces that use them must be designed to allow for linear growth and changes in area or volume. If not, the result is premature failure due to warpage (i.e., unanticipated movement).

If a component is constrained so that it cannot expand, then internal stress will result as the temperature changes. These stresses can be calculated by considering the strain that would occur if the design were free to expand and the stress required to reduce that strain to zero, through the stress/strain relationship (characterized by Young’s modulus). In most furnace materials it is not often necessary to consider the effect of pressure change, except perhaps in certain vacuum furnaces or autoclave designs.

A Little Science

For those that are interested, here are the formulas most often used by heat treaters to calculate the coefficient of thermal expansion.

Estimates of the Change in Length (L), Area (A), and Volume (V)

Linear expansion is best interpreted as a change in only one dimension, namely length. So linear expansion can be directly related to the coefficient of linear thermal expansion (α_L) as the change in length per degree of temperature change. It can be estimated (for most of our purposes) as:

where:

ΔL is the change in length
ΔT is the change in temperature
α_L is the coefficient of linear expansion

This estimation works well as long as the linear expansion coefficient does not change much over the change in temperature and the fractional change in length is small (ΔL/L <<1). If not, then a differential equation (dL/dT) must be used.

By comparison, the area thermal expansion coefficient (α_A) relates the change in a material’s area dimensions to a change in temperature by the following equation:

where:

ΔA is the change in area
ΔT is the change in temperature
α_A is the coefficient of area expansion

Again, this equation works well as long as the area expansion coefficient does not change much over the change in temperature ΔT(ΔT), if we ignore pressure and the fractional change in area is small (ΔA/A <<1)ΔA/A<<1. If either of these conditions does not hold, the equation must be integrated.

For a solid volume, we can again ignore the effects of pressure on the material, and the volumetric (or cubical) thermal expansion coefficient can be written as the rate of change of that volume with temperature, namely:

where:

• ΔV is the change in volume
• ΔT is the change in temperature
• α_V is the coefficient of volumetric expansion

In other words, the volume of a material changes by some fixed fractional amount. For example, a steel block with a volume of 1 cubic meter might expand to 1.002 cubic meters when the temperature is raised by 90°F (32°C). This is an expansion of 0.2%. By contrast, if this block of steel had a volume of 2 cubic meters, then under the same conditions it would expand to 2.004 cubic meters, again an expansion of 0.2% for a change in temperature of 90°F (32°C).

Thermal Fatigue

In many instances, we must consider the effect of thermal fatigue as well as thermal stress. One example is on the surface of a hot work die steel as H11 or H13: one must ensure that in service, when it experiences a (rapid) change in temperature, it will avoid cracking.

The equation for thermal stress is:

where:

σ is the thermal stress
E is the Young’s modulus of the material at temperature
α is the coefficient of linear thermal expansion at temperature
ΔT is the change in temperature

Here both E and α depend on temperature and the resultant stress will either be compressive if heated or tensile if cooled, so we must use these constants at both maximum and minimum temperatures. Considering the temperature dependent stress-strain curve, this stress may exceed the elastic limit (tensile or compressive) and contribute eventually to thermal fatigue failure. There are software programs to aid in the calculation of the resultant thermal stresses. Thermal expansion at a surface at a higher temperature than the core results in a compressive stress, and vice versa.

Final Thoughts

The effects of thermal expansion will be highlighted in a forthcoming article in Heat Treat Today, but it suffices for all heat treaters to remember that this phenomenon is responsible for a great deal of downtime and maintenance in our equipment. It also can affect the end product quality (disguising itself as distortion) and hence create additional cost or performance issues for our clients.

References

Chandler, Harry, ed. Heat Treater’s Guide: Practices and Procedures for Irons and Steels, 2nd Edition. ASM International, 1995.

Herring, Daniel H. Vacuum Heat Treatment. BNP Media, 2012.

Herring, Daniel H. Vacuum Heat Treatment Volume II. BNP Media, 2016.

Special thanks to Professor Joseph C. Benedyk for his input on the topic.

About the Author

For more information: Contact Dan at dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com.

For more information about Dan’s books: see his page at the Heat Treat Store.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

What Is Thermal Expansion? Read More »

The Heat Treat Robotic Paradigm Shift

January 14, 2025 / Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content, TECHNOLOGY, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

As Thomas Bauernhansl, professor of Production Technology & Factory Operations at the University of Stuttgart, aptly states, “We are going from more supply-oriented production to a demand-oriented one. In many cases, the customer determines which version he wants to have [of] a product — the manufacturer adapts to this and his processes accordingly.”

This shift is critical for the heat treat industry, where the need for advanced automation and robotics integration is paramount to achieve higher efficiency, consistent quality, and reduced costs. In this Technical Tuesday, Dennis Beauchesne, general manager at ECM USA, discusses the increase in use and installation of automation and robotics in manufacturing and specifically how companies within the heat treat industry have adapted to their implementation—and become innovators in their usage.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s January 2025 Technologies To Watch in Heat Treating print edition.

Industry Automation

In the last 10–15 years, an upward trend is consistent with the increased investment value of integrated automation within a heat treatment plant. At the beginning of the 2000s, it was common to have an automatic transport car transporting batches to different stations, but, in the last five years, far more complex automation solutions are in demand. In order to meet the requirements of future industry robotics and automation, our industry must adapt to the new and improved technology offerings and standards that are being used in other industries.

Figure 1. Annual robotics installation by industry 2021-2023

According to World Robotics, there has been a significant increase in robotics usage and installations since 2020 (Figure 1). For example, the automotive industry shows installations almost doubled from 2020 to 2022 with 83,000 installations in 2020, compared to 136,000 installations in 2022. The industrial robot market was expected to grow by 7% in 2023 to more than 590,000 units worldwide. Although it exceeded 500,000 installations, robotics were down 2% (possibly due to COVID-19) compared to the prior record year. Of interest to note for the automotive industry, the industry increased its robotics demand in 2023 to surpass electronics with a 25% share (electronics was close with 23%, down by 5% due to inventory levels stabilizing after supply chain bottlenecks mostly vanished).

Table 1. North America’s robotics comparison 2022 to 2023
Source: World Robotics

Specifically for the United States and Mexico, peak robotics installation demand was documented in 2022, but demand has been consistent within +/-5% (Table 1). The future of robot installations is trending to grow and exceed 50,000 units in North America for 2024. Nearshoring of supply chains will create demand for automation technology in the years to come, according to Christopher Müller in his World Robotics 2024 – Industrial Robots presentation.

Manufacturing Concepts

The company SEW has previously published its ideas and concepts of autonomous transporters distributing the raw parts to the production cells, after the soft processing to the hardening plant, and finally the hard machining (Figure 2). All steps are configured within the component so the process steps can be well documented on a component basis.

Figure 2. SEW concept from Hiller, “The networked hardening shop,” 2019
Source: ECM GmbH

As can be seen in the SEW Figures, the original hardening plant is shown as a continuous furnace. However, this type of plant technology can be seen as contradictory to current production needs. To be compliant with this new philosophy, plant technology must be as modular, flexible, and automatable as the rest of the production layout and components. Heat treatment must also be controllable and unloadable with automatic transport units. Robots must be able to load batches and navigate the plant (according to CHD, steel, part numbers, etc.). The smaller the batch size, the larger the value of robotic component documentation. Furthermore, a reduction in batch size is advantageous for flexibility, costs, and heat treatment of many requirements for production runs.

Heat Treatment & Robotics

A heat treatment plant can implement
recommendations for the future of industry
automation by acquiring technology for:

Automatic loading/unloading
Component recognition systems
Automatically loaded/read recipe systems
Smaller batch sizes with a wide variety of variants
Heat treatment of different applications or steels in small quantities
Maintenance/repair detection

Benefits of automating part or all production line steps include:

Shorter process times
High CHD (Case Hardening Depth) uniformity and lower distortion
Lower operating costs and labor reduction

These technologies have existed and are being implemented in heat treat operations for a few years now. The results are clear and the benefits are proven through higher quality parts, highly efficient heat treat operations, and overall more efficient production facilities.

As many machining operations have been robotized, this allows the downstream heat treat operations to easily take advantage of part placement in dunnage and plant transport systems, whether manual or automated.

Figure 3. ECM Vision System
Source: ECM Robotics

Batch Loading with Robotics

Bulk goods-loading (such as clips, links, and other small parts via weight detection) as well as loading and unloading of truck shafts in fixtures and in straightening machines are just a few examples of production areas that can benefit from robotics/automation. Visual recognition systems can identify gears/parts based on the diameter or by the number of teeth on the gear and can then sort them by these features (Figure 3).

Like the visual locating of the parts by cameras, they can also be used for tracking parts and loads within a heat treatment cell. A good amount of work has been done in this area for heat treating. This work covers part marking, tray/fixture encoding, and part weighing scenarios, and allows the heat treat system to accurately process all the different parts coming through the heat treat system with the correct process recipe.

Some of the work being done has been implemented with a QR code marking system for each part before heat treatment. To ensure the correct recipe or heat treatment is performed on the proper part, this scanned code works with the heat treatment system controls to upload the correct recipe to the proper cell. This information can be further analyzed to indicate precise placement in the heat treat tray through virtual tracking.

Figure 4. QR code heat treat test picture
Source: ECM USA Synergy Center

In Figure 4, you can see in the details that this client has reviewed and tested to assure the code is visible before and after heat treating with a carburizing and hardening process.

These parts are tracked when entering the system and also noted as to which heat treat tray they are on by using a binary code with holes in a tray or on a strategically placed bar code plate on the tray. With this system, they can be scanned by a camera before entry and upon exit of the furnace (Figure 5). This tray scanning can also indicate how many cycles the trays have on them to ensure the trays stay in good condition and can be cycled efficiently.

Figure 5. Lohmann Steel barcode scan plate (Images courtesy of Lohmann Steel, heat resistant castings — grates, trays, baskets, fixtures and more)
Source: Lohmann Steel

Networked Hardening

Let’s look at the SEW production concept again and re-imagine it with a more efficient vacuum furnace technology with robotic integration. In this concept, the vacuum furnace system forms the “spatially distributed production reserve” which helps autonomous transport units as “situationally self-controlling” material is delivered.

The QR code on the component represents the “knowledge-based” running card. The robots recognize the components by means of the QR code and are loaded onto the appropriate heat treat trays. The heat treatment can then be carried out on a component-related, flexible, and documented basis. Traceability of production can also be ensured (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Robotics concept
Source: ECM Technologies

Loading of the parts can be done efficiently through a series of dunnage that hold the part in specific locations which assist the robot to locate, lift, and place the parts in the heat treat tray. This method doesn’t always need to be a perfect location for the incoming work as we now have 2D and 3D cameras that can work in tandem to locate parts, even in odd stacking or randomly loaded bins.

In a recent installation, a heat treater automated their gear cutting operation to prepare the dunnage before heat treat. Therefore, the heat treat robotics phase was simplified by storing each part in a specification location for the robot to “see” with its vision system. These parts are then scanned and automatically connected to the part’s recipe as stored in the system. In a modular system using low pressure carburizing, individual cells are utilized, and production is recipe driven. These recipes are pre-developed and stored to allow each cell to utilize the recipes for many different parts. In this case, after a part is scanned, the recipe is uploaded into the next available cell and the scanned parts and heat treat fixture is moved to the cell (Figure 7).

Figure 7. Modular vacuum furnace for low pressure carburizing
Source: ECM USA

Figure 8 was designed to use over 175 different parts with nine different heat treat processes which included carburizing and slow cooling, hardening, tempering, cooling after tempering and cryogenic treatment.

With further considerations for additional benefits of the automated system, fixtures were optimized by using CFC (carbon fiber composite) base trays. These trays are not only extremely stable and have non-existent growth/warpage, but they also help with robotic placement before and after heat treatment. CFC trays are flat, or can be machined to conform to part geometry, which helps to reduce or minimize distortion related to fixture warpage or creep.

Figure 8. LPC and robotics configuration
Source: ECM USA

Many system designs have been proposed to a variety of clients; however, the end goal is to design a system that is “standard.” This standard design needs to incorporate different forms of dunnage, bins, boxes, and pallets to allow a commercial heat treater to easily program the system whenever the next part comes in from their client, whatever it may be. This is a challenging task and needs to be broken out by weight category to design the robot’s reach and end tool design. In this case a robot cell offline of the heat treat furnace can be built and utilize, and ultimately use, an AMR (automated mobile robot) or AGV (automated guided vehicle) to bring the built loads to the furnaces (Figure 9).

Figure 9. AGV configurations
Source: ECM GmbH & ECM Technologies

Vacuum Advantages

Vacuum furnace systems have a clear advantage over traditional atmospheric systems with many features which lend themselves to integrate into the machining area with robotics and automation.

The fact that an LPC (low pressure vacuum) furnace system can process loads via a recipe input and each cell can be used to process a different case depth, or hardening cycle is highly advantageous when processing a wide variety of parts. In addition, the LPC process provides a more uniform case depth throughout the part to make a stronger part along with high quality processing. The vacuum furnace cells can be arranged in many ways to fit into existing facilities and to be able to use many methods of automation especially including robotics.

Quenching is also a key element in any hardening heat treat process. LPC furnace systems are usually associated with high pressure gas quenching (HPGQ) in a separate chamber to provide the best quenching performance. This gas quenching technique provides a clean process for each part and allows the use of CFC fixtures. There is also no requirement for post cleaning as is necessary with oil quenching.

Providing quality low pressure carburizing, clean and precise gas quenching, CFC trays for better uniformity and keeping the parts flat, and the automation benefits of robotics makes for a state-of-the-art heat treating production operation and thus completes the heat treat paradigm shift.

Figure 10. Robot loading
Source: ECM USA

Conclusion

The heat treat industry wants and needs automation and robotics integration to advance production, reduce costs, and improve the overall quality of production. With traditional technology, process data evaluation and self-configured recipe values are not possible. Therefore, component analysis should be automated to meet and achieve consistent and reliable recipe values (mass flow, time). With the increase in robotics demand, vacuum furnace technology meets the variable requirements of “demand-oriented” production. Due to the flexibility of this technology, small batch size systems can be automated with robots or as bulk material.

References

Hiller, Gerald. “The networked hardening shop – the challenge to the hardening plant in the world of Industry 4.0.” ECM GmbH. Paper presentation, 2019.
Müller, Christopher. “World Robotics 2024 – Industrial Robots.” IFR Statistical Department, VDMA Services GmbH, presentation in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2024.

About the Author:

Dennis Beauchesne
General Manager
ECM USA

Dennis Beauchesne brings experience of over 200 vacuum carburizing cells installed on high pressure gas quenching and oil quenching installations. He has worked in the thermal transfer equipment supply industry for over 30 years, 23 of which have been with ECM USA.

For more information: Contact Dennis at DB@ECM-USA.com.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

The Heat Treat Robotic Paradigm Shift Read More »

Understanding Inductance in a Furnace Heating System

December 12, 2024 / CONTROLS TECHNICAL CONTENT, Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content, OP-ED, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

In this installment of the Controls Corner, we are addressing inductance in a furnace heating system, and the critical role it plays in various industrial systems, including furnace load systems. Impedance acts as a measure of how much a circuit resists the flow of AC current. In this guest column, Brian Turner, sales applications engineer at RoMan Manufacturing, Inc., explains how impedance applies in electrical circuits.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s November 2024 Vacuum Heat Treat print edition.

Inductance is a fundamental concept in electrical engineering, and it plays a critical role in various industrial systems, including furnace load systems. In furnaces used for heating, inductance is a key factor influencing the system’s electrical performance, energy efficiency, and overall operational behavior.

To talk about inductance, let’s first address impedance and how it applies:

In electrical circuits, impedance refers to the total opposition to the flow of alternating current (AC), which is a combination of both resistance (from resistors) and reactance (from inductors), essentially acting as a measure of how much a circuit resists the flow of AC current, taking into account both the resistive component (like a resistor) and the reactive component (like an inductor at a specific frequency) within the circuit.

Load configuration, power source (IGBT, VRT, ERT) to the furnace feedthrough
Source: RoMan Manufacturing Inc.

Inductance

Inductance is the property of an electrical conductor that opposes a change in the current flowing through it. It arises from the magnetic field generated around the conductor when an electric current passes through it. The unit of inductance is the Henry (H).

In an AC circuit, inductance creates a phenomenon known as inductive reactance, which resists the flow of current. Inductive reactance (X_L) is given by the formula:

X_L = 2πƒL

Where:
• X_L is the inductive reactance (in ohms)
• f is the frequency of the AC supply (in hertz)
• L is the inductance (in Henrys)

This reactance influences how the current behaves in the system, which is particularly important in furnace load systems where high current flows are common.

Resistance

Electrical resistance is the opposition that a material offers to the flow of electric current. It is measured in ohms (Ω) and depends on factors such as the material’s properties, its temperature, and the geometry of the conductor (length, cross-sectional area). In heating systems like vacuum furnaces, resistance is harnessed to convert electrical energy into heat through Joule heating (also known as resistive heating).

The relationship between electrical power, voltage, current, and resistance is governed by Ohm’s law:

V = IR

Where:
• V is the voltage across the heating element(in volts)
• I is the current through the element (inamperes)
• R is the electrical resistance of theelement (in ohms)

The heat generated by the furnace’s heating elements is a function of the power dissipated in the resistance, given by the equation:

P = I² x R

This shows that the heat produced is directly proportional to the resistance and the square of the current flowing through the heating elements

Close Couple

Reducing the material in the secondary* reduces resistance (HEAT = I² x R)
Reducing the area in the secondary reduces inductive reactance increasing power factor

To be most efficient, use the shortest amount of conductor material from the electrical system secondary to the furnace feedthrough. Additionally, keep the distance between those conductors as small as possible.

Power Factor and Efficiency

Inductance in a furnace load system causes the current and voltage to be out of phase. This phase difference results in a lower power factor, which is a measure of how effectively the system converts electrical power into useful work. A lower power factor means that more apparent power (the combination of real power and reactive power) is required to achieve the same level of heating.

In practical terms, a furnace with a high inductive load will draw more current from the power supply for a given amount of heating, leading to increased energy losses and inefficiency.

In practical terms, a furnace with a high inductive load will draw more current from the power supply for a given amount of heating, leading to increased energy losses and inefficiency. Power factor correction techniques, such as the use of capacitors, are often employed to counteract the effects of inductance and improve system efficiency.

Conclusion

Inductance is a fundamental factor in the operation of furnace load systems, influencing everything from heating performance to energy efficiency and power quality. By understanding and managing inductance, furnace operators can optimize their systems for maximum performance while minimizing energy losses and operational costs. Controlling inductance is essential for ensuring that furnace load systems operate reliably and efficiently in demanding industrial environments.

*The connection from a vacuum power source to the furnace’s feedthroughs, this connection can be made using air-cooled cables, water-cooled cables, or copper bus.

About the Author:

Brian Turner
Sales Applications Engineer
RoMan Manufacturing, Inc.

Brian K. Turner has been with RoMan Manufacturing, Inc., for more than 12 years. Most of that time has been spent managing the R&D Lab. In recent years, he has taken on the role as applications engineer, working with customers and their applications.

For more information: Contact Brian at bturner@romanmfg.com.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Understanding Inductance in a Furnace Heating System Read More »

Anatomy of a Front-Loading Vacuum Furnace

November 26, 2024 / MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

How well do you know the “anatomy” of your key heat treat equipment? In this “Anatomy of . . .” series, industry experts indicate the main features of a specific heat treat system. In this installment, the full-page spread identifies main features of a front-loading vacuum furnace.

The mark-ups for these reference images are provided by Jim Grann, technical director, Ipsen.

View the full graphics by clicking the image below.

This Technical Tuesday article is drawn from Heat Treat Today’s November 2024 Vacuum print edition with a special focus on vacuum furnace technologies.

Search www.heattreatbuyersguide.com for a list of vacuum furnace providers to the North American market. If you are a vacuum furnace supplier and are not listed here, please let us know at editor@heattreattoday.com.

This series will continue in subsequent editions of Heat Treat Today’s print publications. Stay tuned!

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Anatomy of a Front-Loading Vacuum Furnace Read More »

The Future of Vacuum Oil Quenching

November 19, 2024 / AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Despite years of research and development that resulted in several important technological innovations, the constraints of high-pressure gas quenching are ever more evident. In today’s Technical Tuesday, Robert Hill, FASM president of Solar Atmospheres of Western PA, addresses the creation of a new, robust style of vacuum oil quench furnace. The results challenge the schematics in how the next generation of oil quench furnaces should be designed, built, and operated.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s November 2024 Vacuum print edition.

Introduction

After decades of research and development that resulted in several important technological innovations, the constraints of high-pressure gas quenching are ever more evident. Gas cooling runs into efficacy issues when compared to liquid quenchant cooling, chiefly for heavier cross sections. This stays true even when using specialized inert gas blends and heightened gas pressures.

Additionally, it is undeniable that stringent liquid quench Aerospace Material Specifications (AMS) standards for certain aerospace alloy steels will never change. In fact, many industry standards (e.g., SAE/AMS and U.S. defense standards) and client specifications often mandate oil quenching of alloys or component parts.

To meet the demand for an effective, sustainable liquid quench solution, Solar Manufacturing with Solar Atmospheres engineers worked through the tumultuous period of the pandemic to create a new, robust style of vacuum oil quench furnace. Their work culminated in a vacuum oil quench furnace with a 36″ x 36″ x 48″ hot zone that operates up to 2000°F and can accommodate a weight capacity of 2000 lbs. With high uptime reliability and excellent metallurgical results, the NEO™ represents a paradigm shift in how the next generation of oil quench furnaces should be designed, built, and operated.

Figure 1. No decarburization, carburization, or surface contamination when tested in accordance with AMS2759/2 Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Rigorous Design for Metallurgical Excellence

The next generation of oil quench furnaces heralds an era of metallurgical excellence. This is made apparent across three key measures: control over surface contamination, prevention of parts cracking, and flexible processing of dissimilar materials.

No Surface Contamination

Figure 2. Loading in the NEO furnace
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

By implementing a vacuum design to the oil quench furnace, the research team avoided issues faced by traditional atmosphere oil quench furnaces, such as surface contamination and intergranular oxidation/intergranular attack (IGO/IGA). Additionally, they meticulously addressed design concerns regarding oil backstreaming in the new multichambered vacuum system. After two years of usage, the hot zone has remained pristine and oil-free.

By effectively removing the possibility of any surface contamination, both IGO and decarburized or carburized surfaces on oil quenched components are eliminated. These critical metallurgical features are unattainable in traditional gas-fired Endothermic batch furnace equipment.

Precision Prevents Part Cracking

To eliminate the potential of part cracking, quench oil temperatures should be able to be maintained between 140°F to 180°F ±5°F, which enhances consistent and repeatable metallurgical results. Furthermore, having the furnace designed so that quench oil recirculates within a closed loop oil to air cooling system keeps water contamination from infiltrating the oil.

No Carbon Content Matching

The next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces should also have highly controllable atmospheres, devoid of oxygen, which will remove the need to mechanism, which has demonstrated flawless performance for over two years.

Additionally, it is imperative that these furnaces be capable of using more conventional quench oil. A good quench needs excellent vapor pressure, powerful enough to allow the oil to vaporize. Furnaces can be designed with this in mind, allowing operators to save costs by using more conventional quench oils. For example, after rigorous laboratory experimentation into the vaporization of various quench oils at different pressures and temperatures, it was decided to purchase 3000 gallons of Houghton G quench oil, versus the “vacuum only” quench oils that are currently on the market today.

Figure 3. A display of a variety of parts which can be processed in the same run
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

The next generation of oil quench furnaces should also finally provide metallurgical and quality engineers the ability to thermocouple the oil quenched parts in accordance with AMS2750 Rev H standards. Being able to monitor part temperature with up to twelve (12) data points, as defined by the latest AMS2750 revision, ensures thorough and precise thermocouple monitoring, bolstering control and repeatability.

Lastly, in a hermetically sealed furnace, another layer of control should be established through installing an internal camera. With “eyes” into the furnace, the operator will be able to watch the load transfer in real time from a control panel.

Figure 4a and 4b. Thermocoupled parts Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

These operational attributes are on full display in the example of an automated austenitized cycle: At the completion of the cycle, the specially-designed transfer mechanism delivers precisely heated parts from the hot zone to the 3000-gallon oil quench chamber consistently within 20 seconds — all without the expulsion of flames and the discharge of smoke.

Oil flames and smoke are no longer acceptable realities in heat treatment operations. Unfortunately, the heat treating industry has been misled in the belief that a catastrophic disaster will never happen to them. There have been multiple “total losses,” mostly due to oil quench fires and explosions. Recently, it is well known that if an insurance adjuster sights a flame or smoke within a plant, they are reluctant or may even refuse to write the policy.

Vacuum furnaces offer a safe, contained alternative to the harmful open emissions and dangerous working conditions. For operations where the safety and the well being of the workforce are paramount, vacuum furnaces eliminate the risks associated with open flame exposure, explosivity, and skin burns.

Yet the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces should also open at both ends at the end of a cycle to expose it to atmosphere. Full air exchange mitigates the potential hazards of confined spaces.

Figure 5. Top view showing innovative design features for the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Meeting Environmental Demands

With ever more stringent environmental regulations, the next generation of vacuum oil quench furnaces will play a pivotal role in reducing the carbon footprint of the heat treating industry. It has been estimated that 80% of fuel used for heat treatment could be replaced by electricity, thus drastically reducing CO2 emissions: “When you burn something that contains carbon, you get carbon dioxide that you either must take care of or release into the atmosphere. With electric heating, you do not have any exhaust.”

The second column in the chart on page 30 addresses the multiple environmental concerns associated with traditional batch IQ gas-fired oil quenching furnaces. The third column outlines the advantages of the design for the next generation of oil quench furnaces, which embraces electric heating as a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. As sustainability pressures continue to mount, governments, clients, and primes alike will continue to flow down requirements on how heat treaters plan to reduce their carbon footprints.

Figure 6. Safety hazards in operating atmosphere furnaces
Source: The Monty

Conclusion

As the demands for metallurgical precision, safety, and environmental sustainability continue to mount, Solar’s new vacuum oil quench furnace emerges as a representative of the next generation of vacuum oil quenching technology. Characterized by unparalleled efficiency, precision, and sustainability, such furnaces will continue to lead the industry toward a future defined by cleanliness, safety, and environmental stewardship.

Table 1. Data from the AICHELIN Group
Source: Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

References

Kanthal, “Heat Treatment CO2 Emissions cut by 50 percent by using electricity” (April 2019), https://www.kanthal.com/en/knowledge-hub/inspiring-stories/heat-treatment-co2-emissions-cut-by-50-percent-by-using-electricity/.

Aichelin Group, “CO2 Footprints and the Heat Treat Industry,” The Monty (January 2024).

About the Author:

Robert Hill, FASM
President
Solar Atmospheres of Western PA
Solar Atmospheres of Western PA

Robert Hill, FASM, began his career with Solar Atmospheres in 1995 at the headquarters plant in Souderton, PA. In 2000, Hill was assigned the responsibility of starting the second plant in Hermitage, PA, where he has specialized in the development of large furnace technology and titanium processing capabilities. Additionally, he was awarded the prestigious Titanium Achievement Award in 2009 by the International Titanium Association.

For more information: Contact Robert at bob@solaratm.com.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

The Future of Vacuum Oil Quenching Read More »

Evolving Efficiency: Advantages of Multi-Chamber Isolated Heat Vacuum Furnaces

November 12, 2024 / MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Adapting to new processing demands puts traditional equipment to the test. Can single-chamber solutions keep up, or will applications require different equipment options for efficient processing? In today’s Technical Tuesday, Bryan Stern, product development manager at Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems, addresses the advantages multi-chamber isolated heat vacuum furnaces bring to the floor.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s November 2024 Vacuum print edition.

Do You Hear That? It’s the Sound of Change . . .

In the evolving landscape of vacuum heat treatment, single-chamber batch furnaces have long been the cornerstone of material processing. However, with more traditional processes shifting to vacuum, rising energy costs, and increasing environmental pressure, the disadvantages of that approach are emphasized, enhancing the appeal of alternative technologies. Multi-chamber vacuum equipment, while not new to the industry, offers significant solutions to inefficiencies and challenges faced by single-chamber systems. With advances in technology, improved operational planning, and an increasingly competitive market, multi-chamber isolated heat furnaces are becoming a more viable choice.

What Is an Isolated Heat Vacuum Furnace?

An isolated heat vacuum furnace keeps the heat chamber separate from the ambient atmosphere throughout the process, including loading and unloading. This allows the heated zone to maintain a stable temperature and vacuum between cycles, unlike single-chamber furnaces, which must heat up and cool down for each new load. Key components of this furnace type include an additional evacuation chamber, a dynamic sealing door, and a mechanism for moving the workload between chambers. While multi-chamber isolated heat furnaces may be batch or continuous, the above features fundamentally distinguish them from single-chamber batch equipment. This difference is more than just a technical nuance; it has profound implications for operations and efficiency.

The widespread use of single-chamber vacuum furnaces has significantly shaped the design and operation of vacuum furnaces today. But it is important to remember some of the challenges to this approach that we often take for granted.

Energy Efficiency Has Entered the Chat

Single-Chamber Challenge

In single-chamber systems, the entire furnace must go through a full cycle of loading, evacuation, ramping, soaking, cooling, and unloading for every batch of parts. This adds significant “dead time” on either side of the thermal process. In addition to pump-down time, ramping from room temperature typically adds 1–2 hours to the cycle time before soaking which creates a barrier to throughput. Another drawback is that the energy required to heat the furnace is thrown away after every cycle. Due to the high thermal capacity of materials like graphite and molybdenum, this is not inconsequential. With 100% thermal efficiency defined as only consuming the energy required to heat the work and fixturing, single-chamber batch furnaces typically operate in a thermal efficiency range of around 30%–50%.

Isolated Heat Advantage

In an isolated heat furnace, the work zone remains at temperature and the energy required to heat the furnace is not thrown away. Additionally, the introduction of work to a preheated work zone allows the load to be heated more quickly, reducing the time required to achieve temperature and reducing holding losses. While multi-chamber batch furnaces experience some savings, they still consume excess energy since the heat cage is empty during unloading, loading, and evacuation. Continuous configurations, however, see significant improvement with only holding losses and the energy required to heat the work and fixturing being consumed. These advantages mean that continuous furnaces typically operate in a thermal efficiency range of 45%–65%. The result is a 15%–35% energy efficiency improvement over the majority of existing equipment.

Figure 1. Single-chamber batch gas-quench furnace
Source: Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems

Design Optimization: Do I Detect Some Tension?

Single-Chamber Challenge

The tension of designing a single-chamber furnace to handle both heating and cooling in the same space presents substantial challenges. Insulation pack thickness is often limited to balance the need for quick pump-down. Gas nozzle penetrations through the insulation pack create direct radiation losses. This erodes thermal efficiency, adds thermal mass, and restricts gas flow during cooling. These conflicting design priorities often lead to unsatisfactory compromises and fluctuating designs. Between the additional energy to heat and cool and increase power demand at temperature, there are a lot of energy savings being left on the table.

Isolated Heat Advantage

Because the heating and cooling take place in separate locations, multi-chamber isolated heat equipment benefits from the ability to have dedicated designs tailored at each work position. More insulation can be used as conditioning time is not a significant consideration. Additionally, the insulation can be designed without penetrations, further reducing losses. Moving the work to a dedicated cooling position removes restrictions to gas flow and allows the work to radiate directly to the cold wall. This is especially beneficial at the beginning of a quench when the work is at high temperature. This can allow cooling rates to be achieved with lower quench pressures and smaller quench motors.

Thermal Cycling: Here We Go Again . . .

Single-Chamber Challenge

A single-chamber furnace must be built to endure extreme thermal cycling again . . . and again. This requires detailed design consideration to account for thermal shock, expansion, ratcheting, creep, and low-grade oxidation — all of which contribute to maintenance and replacement cost for expensive, long lead refractory components.

Isolated Heat Advantage

Since the heated portion of the furnace remains at stable temperature and vacuum, internal components are not subject to the same destructive forces. An isolated heat cage can remain in service much longer before requiring service or replacement. It also decreases the likelihood of sudden and unexpected equipment failure. Increasing the lifespan of the most expensive consumable assembly in the furnace is an incredibly valuable advantage that is frequently overlooked.

rectangular promo of HTR, smiling bearded man, blue background, HTR banner — Find more on this topic in Heat Treat Radio episode #110. Bryan discusses the shift from single-chamber batch furnaces to isolated heat vacuum furnaces and speaks to some of the advantages mentioned in this article. Click the image to watch, listen, and learn on Heat Treat Radio.

Throughput and Load Size: Can They Help?

Single-Chamber Challenge

Single-chamber batch vacuum processing is notorious for the long cycle times and resulting limited throughput. One way to reduce the costs of the wasted energy and dead time is to increase the load size to distribute the cost over more work. While this can increase capacity and reduce the cost per part, it is counterproductive to many objectives of the heat treating process. As the load size increases, it becomes more difficult to maintain thermal and process uniformity across parts at the surface versus the center of the load. This is especially problematic for densely packed loads. Loads take longer to soak out to a uniform temperature, extending cycle times. Similarly, it is difficult to achieve rapid and uniform cooling rates which can lead to higher quench pressures, larger cooling motors, or underutilizing the work envelope.

Isolated Heat Advantage

While multi-chamber batch isolated heat furnaces experience many of the other advantages discussed in this article, throughput is where continuous configurations really shine. Because separate loads are being processed simultaneously, similar or greater throughputs can be achieved with much smaller load sizes. For instance, a process with a two-hour soak would typically require around a five-hour total cycle time in a single-chamber furnace. That same process could be segmented in a continuous furnace indexing loads in as little as 15 minutes, depending on the configuration of the equipment (see Figure 3). With a throughput ratio of 20:1, each load would only need to be 1/20^th of the batch load to achieve the same throughput. With these mechanics, it quickly becomes apparent how continuous processing is capable of achieving much greater throughput while benefiting from the uniformity of smaller load sizes as well as the other advantages discussed.

Figure 3. Multi-chamber continuous gas-quench furnace
Source: Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems

Scalability: And Another and Another . . .

Single-Chamber Challenge

Increasing the capacity of a single-chamber production line necessitates adding additional discrete furnaces. This means that all of the equipment systems are duplicated. Each furnace means another chamber, pumping system, manifolds, quench motor, VFD, control cabinet, certifications, instrument calibrations, etc. There really is no economy of scale available to help facilitate high volume production.

Isolated Heat Advantage

For most processes, increasing the capacity of a continuous multi-chamber furnace only requires adding additional heated work positions to shorten the index rate. All other auxiliary equipment and infrastructure can serve double-duty, and redundant systems and maintenance are avoided. This applies the cost directly to the necessary equipment (heat cage, elements, power supply, etc.). The resulting economy of scale often makes continuous equipment a far greater value proposition for high-volume applications that would otherwise require multiple furnaces.

Vacuum Performance: Don’t Reduce Me Like That!

Single-Chamber Challenge

Because single-chamber batch furnaces are exposed to air and humidity between each cycle, they require a higher vacuum (i.e., lower pressure) to achieve the purity required for a given process. This is because even though the furnace is evacuated to a low pressure, the remaining atmosphere is still primarily comprised of oxidizers in the form of residual air and water molecules desorbing from the internal surfaces of the furnace. Achieving the high vacuum levels required to achieve the necessary reducing atmosphere in a reasonable time can result in additional pumping equipment such as a booster or diffusion pump. This adds to system complexity, upfront cost, maintenance, and operating cost. Unfortunately, vacuum processes are often developed in, and organized around, single-chamber batch processing, so the actual purity requirement often gets distilled into an ultra-low vacuum level on the process specification. Consequently, these aggressive vacuum specifications are carried over to other types of equipment where they may not be necessary to achieve the same results.

Isolated Heat Advantage

Because the heat cage remains under vacuum throughout the process, there is less exposure to atmospheric contaminants. This allows oxidizing constituents to decay to very low levels leading to improved vacuum purity. Even though the absolute pressure is higher, the makeup of the remaining atmosphere is primarily inert. Given time for desorption to decay, it is entirely possible to have a purer environment at a higher pressure without requiring the complex pumping systems necessary in a single-chamber batch furnace. Reduction levels associated with diffusion pumping in single-chamber furnaces can be achieved at higher pressures with a two-stage or even single-stage pumping systems in an isolated heat furnace. This is one of the most overlooked and misunderstood advantages of isolated heat processing.

The Shift Toward Isolated Heat Furnaces

Despite the many challenges associated with single-chamber batch processing, the prevalence of these furnaces has remained high due to their simplicity and familiarity. So, why are multi-chamber furnaces gaining traction now?

“There is a pending perfect storm of market conditions poised to tip the scales.”

There is a pending perfect storm of market conditions poised to tip the scales. More and more traditional processes are shifting to vacuum for its long list of advantages, including tighter process control, flexibility, safety, insurance liability, and improved working environment, just to name a few. This push to convert more processes is driving a need to optimize efficiency and improve cost. The existing approach has known intrinsic inefficiencies and a limited growth path for improvement.

As more heat treaters either experience or compete with the benefits of multi-chamber isolated heat equipment, adoption will continue to accelerate.

Challenges and Considerations

While isolated heat furnaces offer numerous advantages, they are not without challenges. These systems are more complex, require a detailed specification process, and may not be suitable for very large components, intermittent operations, or applications requiring a high degree of flexibility. Many of the advantages of multi-chamber equipment show up in operating and maintenance costs. These benefits can be missed if these costs are not properly accounted for in the ROI analysis phase. Overemphasizing upfront costs can mean missing out on a much better return on investment for equipment with installation life in the range of 20–30 years.

Applications and Future Prospects

Isolated heat vacuum furnaces are not industry specific; rather, they offer advantages across a wide range of applications. Processes characterized by short cycle times benefit because a greater percentage of the floor-to-floor time is dead time and can be recovered, improving equipment utilization. Processes characterized by long cycle times benefit because they can be segmented and indexed at much faster rates, increasing throughput. Surface treatments can benefit from the process uniformity of smaller load sizes without sacrificing throughput. High-volume production environments, in particular, stand to gain the most. Whenever there is a need for more than one batch furnace or where there are numerous small parts in a large work zone, the efficiency and cost savings of continuous isolated heat furnaces truly stand out.

Conclusion

The industry’s focus on efficiency, reduced emissions, and lower operating costs makes isolated heat vacuum furnaces a promising direction for the future. While single-chamber furnaces will still have their place, isolated heat furnaces are becoming more prevalent for many heat treatment processes. Offering superior energy efficiency, better process control, and a more sustainable approach to thermal processing, these furnaces will enable manufacturers to provide high quality, cost-effective solutions that meet today’s market demands and future challenges.

About the Author:

Bryan Stern
Product Development Manager
Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems

Bryan Stern has been involved in the development of vacuum furnace systems for the past eight years and is passionate about technical education and bringing value to the end-user. Currently product development manager at Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems, Bryan holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.A. in Natural Science from Covenant College. In addition to being a member of ASM, ASME, and a former committee member for NFPA, Bryan is a graduate of the MTI YES program and recognized in Heat Treat Today’s 40 Under 40 Class of 2020.

For more information: Contact Bryan at bstern@gasbarre.com.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Evolving Efficiency: Advantages of Multi-Chamber Isolated Heat Vacuum Furnaces Read More »

Voices in Heat Treat: Vacuum Brazing Revisited

October 29, 2024 / BRAZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, TITANIUM PROCESSING TECHNICAL CONTENT, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

The heat treat industry is rich with knowledgeable leaders, resourceful problem solvers, and innovative teams. One of our favorite things to do here at Heat Treat Today is to draw attention to the wealth of expertise in the field, so we are pleased to launch the Voices in Heat Treat series, pointing readers to a treasure house of recorded interviews and discussions diving into the fundamentals of thermal processing.

In this and coming articles drawn from the audio library at Solar Atmospheres, we will summarize topics on everything from basic heat treating how-tos, preventative maintenance, and troubleshooting to the history of hot zone designs, temperature uniformity surveys, and the distinctions to take into consideration when processing different kinds of metals and alloys. In today’s installment, our industry experts focus on vacuum brazing and the uniqueness of heat treating titanium.

In the premiere article of this series, Bill Jones, founder and CEO of Solar Atmospheres and Solar Manufacturing, interviews industry leaders about the advantages of vacuum furnace brazing. Read the highlights of their discussion about the process, in particular when used with stainless steel and titanium. The summary of a fourth episode recorded earlier has been added, expanding on the topic of the advantages of processing titanium in a vacuum furnace. The experts are Calvin Amenheuser, vice president of the Hatfield plant, and Mike Paponetti, sales manager of the southeast. Jim Nagy, senior vice president of Solar Manufacturing, hosts the episodes. A summary of each conversation is below, followed by links that will take you directly to that podcast episode.

Bill Jones and the Team Speak on Vacuum Brazing, a 3-Part Series

“Advantages of Vacuum Furnace Brazing”

December 2015

Brazing to form strong metallurgical bond where the brazed joint becomes a sandwich of different layers, each linked at the grain level

This episode is the first in a series on vacuum furnace brazing, with an overview of different types of brazing processes and why vacuum furnace brazing is superior to other joining methods, particularly torch brazing and welding.

The conversation explores various reasons why a vacuum furnace is well-suited to perform brazing because it provides:

a controlled, consistent atmosphere cycle after cycle
uniform heating throughout the hot zone
a controlled rate of heating
the elimination of air to prevent the formation of oxidation of the metal

Vacuum Furnace Brazing vs. Alternative Methods

Both Cal Amenheuser and Mike Paponetti speak about vacuum brazing being a superior process to alternative methods. Mike noted that torch brazing is effective for low volume loads, but the process risks flux entrapment and could produce messy, overheated and possibly carburized parts. In contrast, vacuum furnace brazing allows for higher volume loads, providing a repeatable process, precise temperature measurements, and versatility.

Brazing applications from parts to rockets

Calvin added that while welding melts the materials and produces a strong joint, the surrounding material is weaker. With vacuum furnace brazing, the brazed joint is just as strong or stronger afterward as before.

Finally, the panelists compared how batch vacuum furnace brazing eliminates distortion that is typical with torch brazing and welding because of hot zone uniformity. A batch furnace operator can modify the process to meet the demand of the load, and furnace charts provide proof of reveal what exactly happened during the run so that successful recipes can be repeated.

Click here to listen to this episode.

“Vacuum Brazing of Stainless Steel”

February 2016

In this episode, second in the series on the vacuum furnace brazing, the Solar team reconvened to discuss advantages of and concerns with nickel-based and copper-based brazing alloys.

All agree that nickel-based alloy offers a cleaner braze but emphasize precautions must be put in place to avoid metal erosion and cracking. While readily available and a good match for low carbon steel, copper flashes during the braze. Inert gas is recommended to decrease evaporation of the copper-based alloy.

Click here to listen to this episode.

“Processing Titanium in Vacuum Furnaces: Active Brazing of Titanium in a Vacuum Furnace”

April 2016

In this third and final episode on the topic of vacuum furnace brazing, Bill Jones, Calvin Amenheuser, and Mike Paponetti consider significant challenges to brazing titanium, which is the need to reduce surface oxide to allow the process to take place and why active brazing is suggested as a means to meet that challenge. What follows is an informative discussion on composites that allow producing companies add to the material, like hydrated titanium, zirconium, and indium, to help overcome oxides, which are effective at wedding to the surface.

Click here to listen to this episode.

Additional Notes on Titanium

“Processing Titanium in Vacuum Furnaces: Advantages”

February 2013

175,000 pounds of 6Al-4V titanium in Solar’s 48-foot-long vacuum furnace

Although recorded earlier than and thus separately from the series on vacuum furnace brazing, this summary of an episode is included in this article to provide context about the advantages of processing titanium in a vacuum furnace. This is a solo Bill Jones episode.

Bill Jones highlights how vacuum furnaces provide a pure atmosphere for processing titanium compared to an argon atmosphere, saving machining costs and time. Additionally, vacuum processing uses forced inert gas quenching to cool titanium as opposed to water quenching which results in a more uniform result and eliminates part distortion. Finally, fixturing parts properly in a vacuum furnace with graphite allows heat treaters to preserve the part shape and avoid movement.

Click here to listen to this episode.

We share these resources from the audio library at Solar Atmospheres.

Bill Jones
Founder & CEO
Solar Atmospheres, Solar Manufacturing
Source: Solar Atmospheres

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Voices in Heat Treat: Vacuum Brazing Revisited Read More »

Humidity Got You (and Your Furnace) Down?

August 6, 2024 / VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Source: Ipsen

Here in the northern hemisphere, the dog days of summer are upon us. This folksy phrase has come to signify the months when humidity weighs heavily in the air, but it’s got a lot more history to it than that. According to the ancients of Rome and Greece, the dog days not only brought drought and heat but also caused man and his best friend to go mad. Madness may not be the result of seasonal humidity, but manufacturing disruptions could be.

Humidity affects nearly all processing environments, but some, like heat treating, are more prone to humidity-related disruptions This question was submitted to the Ask the Expert team at Ipsen: Operating a furnace in an environment that has been dealing with high heat and humidity has posed more challenges than we’ve experienced in the past. What are some things that we should be watching out for when operating our furnaces to make sure they’re running efficiently despite the temperature and humidity?

In this best of the web article, consider the damage humidity can do to your vacuum furnace and gather some tips to maintain your vacuum furnaces during hot, muggy weather.

An excerpt:

“High temperatures cause changes in electricity flows, which increase resistance. Additionally, excessive humidity reduces transformer insulation and resistance, while oxidizing electrical conductors. And the difference between cooling water temperature and ambient temperature with high humidity can cause the vacuum vessel to “sweat,” affecting the entire furnace’s electrical system and transformers’ performance.

Here are nine key things you can do to maintain vacuum furnaces during hot, muggy weather:

Clean the hot zone, check insulation and ceramics, and repair if necessary. Run periodic burnout cycles.
Check, secure, and mark all electrical connections. Apply conductive copper grease to improve electrical contact between surfaces.
Clean all vents in the control cabinet without the air-conditioning. Use silica gel to reduce moisture.”

Read the rest of the list and the entire article from Ipsen by clicking here: “Ask the Expert: Protecting Your Vacuum Furnace from Humidity (Part 2)”

Read Part 1 (about air curtains that protect equipment from humidity just like the air curtains you encounter when walking from a hot parking lot into a cold grocery store) here and Part 3 (about vacuum cool events) here.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Humidity Got You (and Your Furnace) Down? Read More »

Dual Chamber Vacuum Furnaces vs. Single Chamber Vacuum Furnaces — An Energy Perspective

July 23, 2024 / FEATURED NEWS, GUEST COLUMN, Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content, OP-ED, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

The need to understand how certain furnace designs operate comes at a time when heat treaters are weighing each energy cost and benefit of their systems and processes. Read on for a quick summary on how dual chamber furnaces preserve energy.

On April 17-19, 2024, TAV VACUUM FURNACES provided a speaker at the 4th MCHTSE (Mediterranean Conference on Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering). The speech focused on the energy aspects of vacuum heat treatment, a subject towards which all of us within the industry need to pay attention for reducing the carbon emissions aiming at a zero net emissions future.

We have already analyzed the essential role that vacuum furnaces will play in this transition, with a focus on the optimization of energy consumption in our previous article. With this new presentation, we wanted to emphasize how selecting the right vacuum furnace configuration for specific processes may impact the energy required to perform such process. For doing so, we compared two different furnace designs — single chamber vs. dual chamber vacuum furnaces — detailing all of the components’ energy consumption for a specific process.

TAV DC4, dual chamber vacuum furnace for low pressure carburizing and gas quenching
Source: TAV VACUUM FURNACES

As a sneak peek into our presentation, we will summarize below how the main features of the two vacuum furnaces design are affecting their energy performance.

Let’s start by introducing the protagonist of our comparison: a single chamber, graphite insulated vacuum furnace, model TAV H4, and a dual chamber furnace TAV DC4, both having useful volume 400 x 400 x 600 mm (16” x 16” x 24”) (w x h x d).

In a single chamber vacuum furnace, like the TAV H4, the entire process is carried out with the load inside the furnace hot zone. This represents a highly flexible configuration that can perform complex heat treatment recipes with a multiple sequence of heating and cooling stages and to precisely control the temperature gradients at each stage.

Configuration of the TAV DC4 dual chamber vacuum furnace
Source: TAV VACUUM FURNACES

Alternatively, a dual chamber vacuum furnace, like the TAV DC4, is equipped with a cold chamber, separated from the hot zone, dedicated for quenching. Despite the greater complexity of this type of vacuum furnace, the dual chamber configuration allows for several benefits.

First, in dual chamber furnaces, the graphite insulated hot chamber is never exposed to ambient air during loading and unloading of the furnace; for this reason, the hot chamber may be pre-heated at the treatment temperature (or at a lower temperature, to control the heating gradient). But in single chamber vacuum furnaces, the hot zone must always be loaded and unloaded at room temperature to avoid damages due to heat exposure of graphite to oxygen.

Because dual chamber furnaces have more controlled heating, this will result in both faster heating cycles and lower energy consumption, as a substantial amount of energy is required to heat up the furnace hot zone. This advantage obviously will be more relevant in terms of energy savings the shorter the time is between subsequent heat treatments.

View of the cold chamber of the TAV DC4 dual chamber vacuum furnace
Source: TAV VACUUM FURNACES

Secondly, since the quenching phase is performed in a separated chamber, the hot zone insulation can be improved in dual chamber vacuum furnaces by increasing the thickness of the graphite board without compromising cooling performance. This translates into a significantly lower heat dissipation, to the extent that at 2012°F (1100°C) the power dissipation per surface unit (kW/m2) is reduced by 25% compared to an equivalent single chamber vacuum furnace.

Additionally, quenching in a dedicated cold chamber allows to obtain higher heat transfer coefficients and higher cooling rates compared to a single chamber vacuum furnace. Since the cold chamber is dedicated solely to the quenching phase, it can be designed for optimizing the cooling gas flow only without the need to accommodate all the components required for heating. All things considered, the heat transfer coefficient achievable in the TAV DC4 can be, all other things being equal, even 50% higher compared to a single chamber vacuum furnace. Secondly, since the cold chamber remains at room temperature throughout the whole process, only the load and loading fixtures need to be cooled down; as a result, the amount of heat that needs to be dissipated is significantly less compared to the single chamber counterpart.

CFD simulation showing a study on the cooling gas speed in a section of the cooling chamber for the TAV DC4 dual chamber vacuum furnace
Source: TAV VACUUM FURNACES

For heat treatments requiring high cooling rates, it is possible to process significantly higher loads on the dual chamber furnace compared to the single chamber model; translated into numbers, the dual chamber model can effectively quench as much as double processable in a single chamber furnace, depending on the alloy grade, load configuration and overall process. The savings in terms of energy consumption per unit load (kWh/kg) achievable in the dual chamber furnace for such processes can be as high as 50% compared to the single chamber furnace.

In the end, the aim of the speech was to highlight how the energy efficiency of vacuum furnaces is highly dependent on the machine-process combination. Choosing the right vacuum furnace configuration for a specific application, instead of relying solely on standardised solutions, will improve significantly the energy efficiency of the heat treatment process and drive the return on investment.

About the Author

Giorgio Valseccchi
R&D Manager
TAV VACUUM FURNACES

Giogio Valsecchi has been with the company TAV VACUUM FURNACES for nearly 4 years, after having studied mechanical engineering at Politecnico di Milano.

For more information: Contact Giorgio at info@tav-vacuumfurnaces.com.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Dual Chamber Vacuum Furnaces vs. Single Chamber Vacuum Furnaces — An Energy Perspective Read More »