American titanium producer Perryman Company, in Houston, PA, has placed an order for the supply of two forging machines: a high-speed open-die forging press in the pull-down design and a hydraulic radial forging machine with two forging manipulators as well as the order and production control system for the entire forging line. The titanium materials are intended for parts in the aerospace industry and for medical applications.
The open-die forging press from SMS group will be used to forge cast titanium billets first to the required size. After that, they can be finish-forged in the radial forging machine to produce bars – round, square or flat – up to a maximum length of 14,000 millimeters.
Dr. Thomas Winterfeldt Head of Forging Plants SMS Group SMS Group
"We see strong growth in the aerospace industry and medical sector," emphasized Frank Perryman, president and CEO of Perryman Company. "This [new forging line] enables us to produce forgings for turbines and safety-relevant structures that comply with our high quality standards."
"With the whole SMS plant package, including digitalization tools and technology packages, Perryman is able to increase its production efficiency and maintain consistent quality levels," said Dr. Thomas Winterfeldt, head of forging plants at SMS group.
The forging line is scheduled to go on stream in Q1 2024.
Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com
General Atomics has heat treated the seventh and final module for a large superconducting magnet for ITER, a multi-national science experiment, with a vacuum furnace from a heat treat furnace supplier in Pennsylvania.
In order to convert the 6 km long stainless-steel-jacketed coil of Niobium-Tin conductors into superconductors for the ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) experiment, each of these 4-meter by 2-meter 110-ton solenoid sections had to be heat treated for five weeks, exceeding 650°C (1202°F) at its peak. The heat treatment served to alloy the Niobium and Tin strands together into Nb3Sn, which becomes a superconductor when chilled with liquid helium to 4 Kelvin.
No such heat-treating furnaces existed, so General Atomics turned to SECO/VACUUM, a SECO/WARWICK Group company in Meadville, PA, to build a heat-treating furnace large enough to fit these solenoids and packed with all the technology needed to meet the strict quality control standards of this experiment.
Peter Zawistowski Managing Director SECO/VACUUM TECHNOLOGIES, USA Source: secowarwick.com
"SECO/WARWICK Group did a great job designing in backup systems and robust design," commented Nikolai Norausky, program manager at General Atomics. "Any time we had questions or needed maintenance they were there to help."
The vacuum furnace that the supplier provided had to perform multiple tasks, including to bake off residual impurities from coil fabrication and to anneal internal stresses introduced at different stages of part fabrication. “General Atomics put so much time and money into these coils we really didn’t have any room for error," added Peter Zawistowski, managing director of SECO/VACUUM, "so nearly every component had to be doubly redundant."
Explore the experiment in Heat Treat Today original content article.
Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com
Today's episode delves into the term "austempering". What is it? Why do heat treaters need to use it? For what applications is it necessary? Join Doug Glenn, publisher of Heat Treat Today and host of this podcast, as he talks with "The Heat Treat Doctor", Dan Herring, about all things austempering.
Below, you can watch the video, listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or read an edited transcript.
The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.
Earlier Episode of Lunch & Learn
Doug Glenn (DG): Alright, welcome everyone. We’re here with another Lunch & Learn with Dan Herring. Today, we’re going to be talking about the principles of austempering. We do these Lunch & Learns really for the benefit of our Heat TreatToday team and we knew that learning from Dan would also be educational for the entire industry. We are just really happy to be able to have Dan Herring with us once again to educate us a bit. We’re going to try to spend about 30 minutes or so learning about some of the very basic principles of austempering. So, the ball is over the fence to you, Dan.
Dan Herring (DH): Well, welcome everyone. It’s my pleasure to discuss the heat treat topic that we call austempering. One of the things we’re going to do today is we’re going to recall from a previous Lunch & Learn the definition of heat treating. We called it the controlled application of time, temperature, and atmosphere to produce a predictable change in the internal structure of what metallurgists call the microstructure of a material. So, we’re going to introduce various words that are related to different types of microstructures today or these internal structures.
But before we do, I’ve put on the screen a brief definition of austempering. It’s certainly a heat treat process. It’s used in medium to high carbon, both plain and alloy steels, as well as cast irons (an example being ductile iron) and we’re trying to produce a microstructure called bainite which is probably a foreign word to most of you and I’ll endeavor to explain it in a moment.
But to give you just a view from about 30,000-feet, you might be asking yourself, “Well, what types of products are austempered and why?” So, I put a couple of examples here. I’ve put an example of a lawnmower blade, seat belt components like the tongue and receptacle, and some tractor parts, as well.
A good example of this might be the seatbelt components. We’ve learned to put on seatbelts (in my day, we didn’t have them, but now we do) and we all learned to buckle up. And, if you get into an accident, you discover why your seatbelt is really your friend. We want something that’s strong, that if we get into an accident, it will not shatter and break. But, at the same time, we want something that’s tough and slightly ductile so it will bend and not break.
Austempering is a process that’s used to produce all seatbelt components, that I’m aware of. Similarly, with lawnmower blades- we don’t want a blade, if it hits a rock as we’re mowing the lawn, (I don’t expect most of the people on the call to have mowed the lawn), but if we hit a rock or a hard object as we’re mowing the lawn, we might want that lawnmower blade to get a ding in it, but we don’t want it to shatter. So, those are some typical examples.
You might ask yourself, why do you austemper? What we’re seeing here is that if you need increased ductility, toughness, and strength at a given hardness level, austempering is right for you. We’re typically talking about parts that are in the range of, maybe, 35-55 Rockwell C. We are developing, as I said, a bainitic structure as opposed to a martensitic structure, which is what’s produced when we harden a steel and quench into something like oil or water.
So, we get improved toughness. And we get some superior properties related to that, as well. And some of the properties don’t change very much but they’re equal to what we get when we harden the steel, when we get this martensitic structure.
The bottom line is we typically get less distortion, we get better wear resistance, we don’t suffer from cracking as some of the high carbon steels are prone to do, and, interestingly enough, with cast irons, we get some, what are called "improved dampening characteristics" -- noise and vibration. So, wire is an important like, for example, in an automotive engine to have dampening characteristics because we want the engine to run quietly.
What types of materials can be austempered? This is just a partial list, but mostly it’s medium carbon steels. That’s carbon steels with anywhere from .5 carbon to .95 carbon or, in other words, an AISI 1050 to 1095 grade. We can also do medium alloy steels -- the 4130’s, the 4140’s, the 5140’s, the 5160’s, etc. Certain stainless steels can be austempered although not many of them. And, as I said, cast irons, the example being ductile iron, can also be austempered.
And I wanted to give you some idea of the mechanical and different properties of steel. We talked in an earlier Lunch & Learn about the fact that steel is an alloy of iron and carbon and manganese. And we add other elements to the mix in order to get various either mechanical properties, chemical properties, electrical or magnetic properties, and certain other advantages.
So, an example of mechanical properties that we’re typically interested in is hardness and strength, brittleness, ductility, elongation, wear, and shock resistance. Now, strength is measured a number of ways. There are things called "fatigue strength" and "flexure" and "impact strength" and "sheer strength" and "tensile strength" and "torsion strength" and "yield strength."
This is a metallurgist’s rendition of a teeter totter in a schoolyard. Now, don’t laugh. This is what defines the difference between a metallurgist and a mechanical engineer. For all the mechanical engineers out there, metallurgists draw cartoons -- that’s the easiest way to say it. Howsoever, at one point in all of our lives, we’ve probably been on a teeter totter. We know that, in this particular teeter totter, we have strength properties on one side of the teeter totter and ductility properties on the other. We know that as the strength goes up, the ductility will go down and as the ductility will go up, the strength will go down. As a result of this, we decide what we want for properties and we realize that there’s a compromise going on. If we make them extremely strong, they’ll be brittle because they’ll have very, very low ductility. If we make them extremely ductile, they’ll have very low strength. So, this balancing act is what we’re trying to do when we look at the properties we’re trying to achieve. And, if you remember, the microstructure is what gives us these properties.
Now, this is something that is not intended to confuse, but I thought I’d add a little metallurgy into the mix because we are going to talk about several microstructures. This is what metallurgists call a "time temperature transformation" or "TTT diagram." This is really an artist’s rendition of one. There is a lot more information typically contained in one of these diagrams. But for our purposes, it isn’t too important. We can use this artist’s rendition to get the essence of what we’re trying to do.
We start off by heating steel to austenitizing temperature. And that’s above the dotted line shown in this particular diagram, so, at the very top of those turquoise lines and temperature. And then what we do is we make sure that the component part is uniformly up to temperature and now we get ready to harden it. We get ready to quench it. What we’re dealing with is we’re rapidly cooling, and under normal hardening, you’ll notice that there are two lines there- one called MS and one called MF. MS is the martensite start line and MF is the martensite finish line.
Typically, in hardening, our goal is to produce martensite. In order to do so, we want to cool rapidly enough to miss what we call "the nose of the curve" because if you look at this type of diagram, you’ll see that it, on profile, looks like somebody’s nose and the turquoise lines are missing the "nose" of the curve. As a result of that, we’re cooling rapidly. But the difference between hardening and austempering is that we don’t cross the MS point, we don’t cross into the martensite range. We don’t transform to martensite, instead what we do is we put the brakes on, we stop, and then we introduce a long soak or hold period and we cross into the banitic range of the curve.
And, so, austempering is typically performed about 25-50 degrees Fahrenheit above the martensite start temperature of steel. Now, there are some exceptions, but that’s a very typical range. If we’re not controlling the process properly, we might get a microstructure that’s both bainite and martensite. But if we do our job right, we’ll get a fully bainitic structure, which is often what we desire.
Read More in Dan Herring's Books
Now (and I realize this has words that some people may be unfamiliar with) but we’ve heated the part up until we’re austenitic- we’re in the austenite range, and there are three various methods of cooling that can be employed. On the far righthand side, if we rapidly quench a part into oil or into water, we might produce a microstructure that’s called martensite. It’s a body-centered tetragonal microstructure. We get something that’s very hard, but brittle. That’s why we have to reheat it and perform a process called ‘tempering’ in order to take some of the brittleness away and add some ductility back in.
Now, on the far lefthand side, we may slow cool the part rather than rapidly quench it and we produce a microstructure that is both ferrite and pearlite, the result of slow cooling. So, instead of getting something that’s very hard, we get something that is very soft. You might say, “My gosh, why do we want to do that?” Well, we like to do that sometimes because we like to take a steel and, for example, machine it into a final form before we go back in and reharden it. So, as a result of that, we form a ferrite/pearlite microstructure, we’re able to machine the part, then we can go back in and reharden it.
So, slow cooling gives us a ferrite/pearlite microstructure, rapid quenching gives us a martensitic microstructure, and a moderate cooling rate (the one shown in the center) gives us a bainitic microstructure. Bainite is a mixture of ferrite and cementite. Again, words that you’re perhaps not familiar with. But the way I like to say it is martensite gives us a microstructure that is not as hard as martensite but tougher, in general, than martensite, and we’ll explain that as we move forward.
But I thought before we do, you might want to see some typical type of heat-treating equipment that is used to austemper parts. A lot of parts are done in a mesh belt conveyer line. The one that is shown on the left, where parts are loaded onto a table, sent through the furnace, and dropped at the end of the furnace into a salt quench which is located in the floor, in this particular drawing. Salt is the primary medium that we quench parts that will be austempered in because salt gives us the temperature-range we need to be above the martensite start point.
Now, a number of people have asked me in the past: Can I use oil rather than molten salt to perform this operation? There are certain oils that can be used at extremely high temperature, but there are fire hazards and other hazards associated with them so the typical answer is ‘no’; molten salt is typically used to perform the quenching.
So, you have a mesh belt conveyer system for high volume, shown on the left. On the right, you’re showing a typical Shaker Hearth furnace where what happens is you load parts onto a pan that vibrates and the parts are moved down the length of the furnace and then drop into a salt quench at the back end.
I thought you might want to see some pictures of some stampings and things that are going into one of these mesh belt conveyer furnaces. You see the endothermic gas in this particular picture burning out the front of the furnace and the stampings moving on a conveyor belt, a mesh belt, in through the furnace. All sorts of different types, shapes, and sizes of stampings. One thing you’ll notice is that these parts are, typically, not single layer loaded; they’re loaded, perhaps, one to three to five parts thick, somewhere between anywhere from a half inch to about two or three inches thick as they’re moving through this conveyor belt.
And to complete the metallurgy aspect of it, you might say, “Hey, what type of microstructure am I actually seeing?” The picture on the left is a primarily bainitic microstructure with some martensite and its hardness is 44 Rockwell C. The microstructure on the righthand side is a combination of bainite and ferrite. The ferrite in this microstructure shows up as white or very light in color, exactly. This hardness, because you have ferrite present, is about 36 HRC. So, depending on the hardness you’re trying to achieve, you will get different types of microstructures- that’s the purpose of this slide.
Now, as far as molten salt goes, a typical austempering bath consists of either a sodium nitrate or a potassium nitrate salt, typically in a 50/50 mixture, and this salt is operating somewhere between 300 degrees Fahrenheit and 650 degrees Fahrenheit, depending on, again, the desired, not only the composition in the salt, but the desired temperature that we would want to hold to.
Let me back up for a second, Doug. So, to kind of summarize this: What we’re trying to put the brakes on as we’re rapidly cooling down, missing the nose of the transformation curve, we want to fall into this bainitic region and, in order to do so, we need to stay above that martensite start temperature which for many steels is in the 400–450-degree Fahrenheit range. So, our molten salts will typically run at 475, 500, even 550 degrees, all the way up to 650 degrees. So, we pick our salt temperature, not only depending on the salt, but also depending on the temperature that we want to hold the bath in.
Some of the reasons for selecting a salt quench are that the temperature of the salt bath dictates the ultimate hardness that we’re going to achieve. You might find this interesting: If I didn’t mention it in a previous Lunch & Learn, but I did, it’s that when we quench into the martensite range or field, martensite is the instantaneous sheer transformation. It really progresses at the speed of sound. So, martensite forms almost instantaneously, but bainite requires time for the transformation to take place.
So, a typical time in the salt is somewhere in the range of 18-20 minutes. I’ve seen parts held in salt for as short as 10 or 12 minutes and for as long as 30 minutes, but it depends on the thickness of the part, the material and, ultimately, the desired hardness we are going to reach. Now, interestingly enough, as opposed to a part that we harden to martensite and have to retemper or temper to balance the teeter totter, so to speak, with an austempering process, we do not need to temper afterwork because the parts are effectively tempered, so to speak, in the salt. So, we have a hardening operation that results in a banitic structure but we don’t need to temper. So, that’s one of the differences between hardening and austempering.
Again, the time in the salt will decrease as the transformation temperature increases and the time in the salt is similarly associated with the carbon content in the steel.
Let me give you a couple of examples: I mentioned in an earlier slide that SAE 1050, 1055, 1075 steel are typical steels that are austempered. Again, your austempering goes to put the hardness typically in the range of 40-45 Rockwell C, not nearly as hard as if we harden and quench them into oil or water, but certainly hard enough to give you a properly austempered part, giving you this part that is a combination of good hardness and yet a lot of ductility.
This, in a nutshell, is a brief summary of austempering. We’ve kind of said what it is -- it’s a process that’s going to get us a bainitic microstructure. We’ve looked at a little of the metallurgy of what we’re dealing with here and we’ve seen that it’s a different type of microstructure than is something like annealing or normalizing which gives you a primarily ferritic and pearlitic microstructure. And it’s different than hardening that gives you primarily a martensitic or tempered martensitic structure.
So, for those parts that require not only hardness but toughness, austempering is a process that should be considered by heat treaters.
Doug, that’s really the end of the presentation that I’ve prepared. We can certainly discuss it a little bit more if anyone has any questions.
DG: At the beginning, you were talking about pearlite and all that stuff, did we talk about austenite?
DH: Well, we talked about austenite because, again, that’s the temperature to which we heat the parts up to at the very beginning. In other words, to start the process, we heat the parts up to the austenite field, if you will. In other words, the parts are essentially red hot. They are above the proper transformation point that they turn into austenite.
DG: So, I assume that’s here, if you guys can still see the images: That’s austenite. The austenitic temperature is up above this dash line, right?
DH: That’s correct.
DG: And as you bring it down, you come through, perhaps, other, there’s a lot of different "ites" in heat treating, right? There’s austenite, pearlite, ferrite, bainite, martensite, you know, it sounds like a stalagmite and whatever those other things are in the caves, but all of those things basically are telling us about the orientation of the molecules inside the metal.
DH: Well, think of it this way, Doug: When we have a steel, its microstructure, if it isn’t hardened, its microstructure is typically body-centered cubic, which means the atoms are all lined up in a certain structure. Now, what we do when we heat it up is -- when it gets above the transformation temperature (that dotted line, for simplicity, in this example) the atoms will realign themselves from body-centered cubic to face-centered cubic and a face-centered cubic structure is called austenite. Then, when we quench it, until we move into the nose of the curve or past those red lines, we still maintain an austenitic crystal structure as we’re cooling. The ferrite, the pearlite and things occur when we cross over into those reddish lines in that area there.
I think you can do this- if we start off as austenite, and we slow, slow cool.
Slow, slow cool. We go all the way down like that. Keep going down, down, down, down, down. Okay, if we do something like that, (and I’ve got some pictures to show it better), but the idea being the fact that because we’ve fallen into the nose of the curve, we form a microstructure that is typically ferrite and pearlite. The first line you’ve drawn is indicative of an annealing process where we’re slow cooling inside the furnace. The second line you’ve drawn is more indicative of a normalizing process where we’ve cooled at a faster rate but still, in this case, we’ve fallen into the nose of the curve because it’s not that quick.
And to give everyone a perspective of the time element involved here, and I haven’t shown numbers, but the time element is for plain carbon steels, you may only have a few seconds to reach the nose of the curve. So, as a result of that, you have to move very rapidly where those turquoise lines are shown; you’re cooling at a very, very, very rapid rate to try to miss the nose of that transformation curve.
The secret with austempering is that you have to put the brakes on before you form martensite, and that’s not as easy as you might think it is. But that’s one of the reasons why molten salt is an excellent medium to quench into.
Don’t mix up crystal structures with microstructures. The ferrite, the pearlite, the bainite, the martensite are microstructures whereas the crystallographic structures -- body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic, body-centered tetragonal- represent how the atoms realign themselves.
DG: Does anybody have questions for Dan?
Bethany Leone (BL): I was thinking about asking you, Dan, but you have already essentially answered it: How difficult is it to have that rapid cooling and then control it to remain quite stable for a long period of time? You hit on the first part of the question which is the salt quench does a good job in this instance. But how does a heat treater maintain that stability of temperature for such a long time?
DH: That’s a great question because one of the interesting properties of salt, molten salt, is the fact that it is a bath that’s extremely uniform in temperature. So, when, for example, the parts, the stampings, and other parts are conveyed through a furnace, they then drop off into a quench and there is a conveyer belt in the quench, under the salt, that the parts drop on to this conveyor belt and then move through the salt. So, if I want 20 minutes in the salt bath, I have to run the speed of the conveyor slow enough to allow that time to take place.
Now, not to confuse everyone, but there are other ways you can austemper: You can heat in molten salt and then quench in the molten salt. So, there is a molten salt you can actually preheat in molten salt, have a high heat in molten salt and then a quench in molten salt. A lot of people don’t use that for high volume production work, but they still use that.
But, yes, you need time in the salt for that transformation to fully take place.
DG: Any other questions?
Let me do a couple other things and, again, we can probably put this up on the screen, but we just recently, I believe, already released this -- the Heat Treat Radio interview we did with Bill Disler regarding salt quenching. That may be of interest to people who have an interest in what about salt quenching? You might want to reference that sometime so, feel free to look into that. You also can just search our website for "bainite" or "austempering" and you may come up with some additional articles.
So, that’s it. Dan, thank you very much. I appreciate it. Unless anybody else another question, I think we’ll sign off at this point.
A manufacturer in Poland turns to in-house heat treating capabilities rather than outsourcing its nitriding for stainless steel power generation parts. Steam turbine components will now be processed at the facility in Elbląg as a result of funding help from a government program part of the European Union.
Marcin Stokłosa Project Manager Nitrex Poland LinkedIn.com
P.W.P.T. POSTEOR Sp. z o. omade the decision to stop outsourcing to commercial heat treaters its steam turbine pieces to bring the nitriding in house. The NX series furnace, model NX-620 will streamline production of these parts with its automated capabilities. The pit type furnace from NITREXmeets requirement for nitriding, nitrocarburizing, and in-process oxidation. “The turnkey system also includes remote access software, an INS neutralizer for a clean and environment-friendly process, and a custom HMI for the end-user," describes Marcin Stokłosa, project manager at NITREX. "It is entirely automated, requiring little operator attendance or involvement."
POSTEOR hopes to reduce the challenges it was facing in outsourcing the components. With the nitriding furnace the company will have more positive control of the end results.
Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com
Are you a relatively new reader in automotive heat treat? Welcome. Enjoy this archive of articles from the automotive industry, which provides years of technical knowledge to fill any information gaps. Even the "OG" readers with Heat TreatTodaywill want to investigate this Technical Tuesday original content compilation that plumbs the depths of the archives.
1. What Heat Treatment To Use for Truck Gear Boxes?
This paper reveals the investigation and conclusions of distortion potentials for case hardening processes. Mainly, the focus was on how the SyncroTherm® concept method compared to conventional case-hardening processes for gears and sliding sleeves.
Contact us with your Reader Feedback!
Read about how the results effected the bottom line: reduced costs, quicker processes, and less distortion. Also, be sure to examine each of the charts and figures for further understanding of each test.
This article entered the Automotive Heat Treat archive in 2016, and was written by Andreas Schüler, Dr.-Ing. Jörg Kleff, Dr. Volker Heuer, Gunther Schmitt, and Dr. Thorsten Leist.
Problems in heat treating result in the loss of valuable time and money. Getting to the bottom of those problems also usually takes time and money to investigate what's happening and how to fix it. What is a heat treater to do?
In this article, we follow a case study from the automotive industry to understand how to pinpoint a heat treating problem. This article specifically looks at what was causing cracking in variable valve timing (VVT) plates.
3. Carburizing: The Importance of Temperature Monitoring and Surveying
Low pressure carburizing (LPC) furnaces play an important role in the automotive heat treating industry. During LPC, it is essential that processing temperature stays consistent and critical that the processing time frame is monitored.
This article discusses the importance of collecting temperature data and what to do with the data when it's been collected.
4. Vacuum Brazing --- Back to the (Automotive) Basics
Time to brush up on a vacuum brazing furnace, but automotive industry style. Review the terms, parts, function, and more that are involved in a successful vacuum braze for automotive parts.
This study covers a semi-automatic TAV vacuum brazing furnaces, details the makeup of the furnace, and gives an idea of what happens with a load from start to finish.
5. Saving Time --- Automation Versus Manual Hardness Tests
If you've ever heat treated automotive crank pins, you're probably familiar with at least one type of hardness test that case hardened crank pins are tested against. The big question is, which hardness testing method is better: automated or manual? This article compares these two methods to make and measure Vickers indentations.
Evaluate for yourself the comparisons between an experienced operator manually entering data to Wilson VH3100 series Vickers Microhardness Tester and a DiaMet software entry. Some additional findings show that the crank pins could be examined by the Wilson tester with far less manipulation in the vice as well as reduction in data recording mistakes.
A commercial heat treater in Grand Rapids, MI is expanding its capabilities with robotic laser heat treating systems. This announcement was given with an open house invitation for the manufacturing community to witness this technology in action.
Laser Hard, Inc.'s technology is gaining momentum in automotive, mining, power generation, medical, aerospace and firearms industries, among others. Due to its low heat input and accuracy, companies request this process in place of other conventional methods that introduce a greater risk of cracking and distortion. The robot has built-in pyrometry for consistent heat at the work piece, reducing the risk of melting edges or overheating in an area that may have a thin cross section.
The open house will be on Thursday, October 13th, at 2766 3 Mile Road, Grand Rapids, MI 49534. There will be laser hardening demonstrations every hour from 2pm-6pm. Food and beverages from Pork Fat Slim's food truck will be available.
Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com
Welcome to Heat TreatToday's This Week in Heat TreatSocial Media. You know and we know that there is too much content available on the web, so it’s next to impossible to sift through all of the articles and posts that flood our inboxes and notifications on a daily basis. Today, Heat TreatToday brings you another hot take of the latest compelling, inspiring, and entertaining heat treat chatter from the world of social media. We're looking at FNA chatter, some sweet technical (and not so technical) heat treat content, and a video of some hot steps.
Typically, we have some sick video of a racecar jumping off a building to shock you into your Friday. This time, since many of us are getting off the hype of being at FNA, listen to this breakdown on the differences between gas nitriding and plasma nitriding.
2. All That Chatter
Check out some of the chatter that everyone has been posting on heat treat topics over the last few months.
Did someone say "Jominy"?
Simmering Springs
Feeling hot?
?at the shimmer on these compression springs - fresh from heat treatment ovens 'cooking' @ 450 degree c
If you think that's ?, our divisions hot coiling line reaches 900 degrees!
— Lesjöfors Heavy Springs UK (@Lesjofors_UK) July 11, 2022
"One of these cooling fans is not like the other?!"
Screen Capture from Daniel Dudar via LinkedIn
3. Bumping Shoulders with Heat Treaters
It's great to connect with other folks in the industry. This past week has been an amazing opportunity to forge new relationships and strengthen old ones at MTI events, the Furnaces North America trade show, and student-professional meet-ups.
MTI Moments
FNA Interactions
FNA Conversations
Peter Sherwin gives the best technical session highlights on his LinkedIn page.
Time to take your afternoon coffee and read a few technical articles from around the industry. Got too many things to do? Put on an episode of Heat TreatRadio to enjoy as you commute home; they're so interesting, you may even get your family to start watching these videos instead of TV this weekend!
Stay Safe Out There
Where are you at in your cybersecurity know-how? Mike Harrison from Gasbarre is one of the sharp heat treaters out there who get's it. If you need an introduction into the world of cybersecurity, check out this article written on cybersecurity by Joe Coleman, cybersecurity officer at Bluestreak Consulting™.
Mesh Belts: A Report
Heat TreatRadio #82: Gun Part Treatments, Turning Up the Heat with Steve Kowalski. Click to –> Watch | Listen | Learn
5. Hot Feet
Have you ever had a moment like this at the end of a long week? Check out these fancy footsteps as you dance from the shop or plant floor into your weekend!
Jim Oakes, president of Super Systems, has been awarded the first ever Furnaces North America (FNA) Industry Award at the trade show's opening night kickoff reception.
This award is given to an individual in recognition of their contribution(s) and current/ongoing commitment to the betterment of the heat treating industry with one or more significant accomplishments in the last five years in the area of innovation, leadership, academia, or research.
The Metal Treating Institute’s 2018 President, Pete Hushek, who gave the award to Jim stated, "[No] one has been more deserving of this award than Jim Oakes. Having served as the President of ASM for two years and immediately being elected as president, serving two years during the pandemic, along with his service in a host of other technical standards groups, Jim’s leadership shined as he led two of the major associations the last five years."
Jim Oakes (pictured above in the center) stated upon receiving the award, "This is truly an incredible honor to be recognized by my peers. We don’t do what we do for awards. We do it to make a difference. It is through that difference that we make a better future for everyone. It has always been a pleasure to serve this great industry."
The FNA trade show is produced by the Metal Treating Institute in partnership with its media partner, Heat TreatToday.
Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com
Furnaces North America 2022, the premier trade show and technical conference in the North American heat treating industry, attracted over 1,200 attendees from around the world. The show is produced by the Metal Treating Institute in partnership with its media partner, Heat TreatToday.
While attendees were in Indiana at the Indianapolis Convention Center, they experienced connection with 125+ top suppliers in the heat treating industry, 35 educational sessions in 10 tracks, and two packed social networking events.
Technical sessions and many exhibitors and attendees Source: MTI
Exhibitors and attendees alike contributed to the energy and quality of attendance on the show floor, with robust networking and connections flowing over the course of the three days. Topics that were top-of-mind included automation, labor shortages, and the current challenges with supply chain issues.
“When the show doors opened up, it was so exciting the see the reconnection of supplier and customer,” stated Tom Morrison, FNA show producer. “FNA is a big success because of a lot of people, including the Metal Treating Institute volunteers, sponsors, and management, who put their heart and soul into delivering a world class event. It was exciting to see that hard work payoff this week.”
FNA Show Management announced it will host FNA 2024 in Columbus, OH on October 14-16 at the Columbus Convention Center with the Hilton Columbus serving as the host hotel.
(Pictured above is the Heat Treat Today team left to right: Michelle Ritenour, Ellen Porter, Sarah Maffet, Bethany Leone, Lauren Porter, and Alyssa Bootsma; Karen Gantzer, Doug Glenn, and Mary Glenn)
Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com
Modern industry trends and expectations pose new challenges to heat treating equipment; in addition to the expected requirements (e.g., safety, quality, economy, reliability, and efficiency), factors like availability, flexibility, energy efficiency, environmental, and the surrounding carbon neutrality are becoming increasingly important.
Maciej Korecki, vice president of Business Development and R&D at SECO/WARWICK, presents this special Technical Wednesday case study for the last day of FNA 2022 to focus on an equipment solution that meets these modern industry demands: a semi-continuous vacuum furnace for low-pressure carburizing (LPC) and high-pressure gas quenching (HPGQ).
Maciej Korecki Vice President of Business of the Vacuum Furnace Segment SECO/WARWICK
Introduction
At least 60 years ago, vacuum furnaces first appeared in the most demanding industries (i.e., space and aerospace), then spread to other industrial branches, and are now widely implemented in both mass production and service plants. Use of vacuum technology does not look like it is slowing down anytime soon.
Contact us with your Reader Feedback!
The driving forces behind this growth in vacuum technology are two-fold: first, the increasing heat treatment requirements that result from the directions of industrial development and production systems, and second, environmental protection, where the advantages of vacuum technologies are undeniable.
Traditional Atmospheric Technology
Case hardening by carburizing is one of the most widely used heat treatment technologies. It consists in carburizing (introducing carbon to the surface) followed by quenching of the carburized layer. Typically, the work is carburized in a mixture of flammable gases (CO, H2), and quenched in oil in an atmosphere furnace, using methods developed in the 1960s.
These methods have a history of development, though the question remains if the technological developments can keep up with the requirements of modern industry. Safety is an issue with this method due to the use of flammable (and poisonous) gases and flammable oil, as well as open flame, which in the absence of complete separation from the air can lead to fire, or poisoning.
In addition, they affect their environment by releasing significant amounts of heat, polluting the surroundings with quenching oil and its vapors. They require the use of washers and cleaning chemicals, emit annually tens or even hundreds of tons of CO2 (greenhouse gas, the main culprit of global warming and dynamic climate change) coming from the carburizing atmosphere, and for these reasons, they need to be installed in dedicated so-called “dirty halls” separated from other production departments.
The resulting requirement to limit the temperature of the processes to 1688-1706 oF (920-930oC) is also not without importance, as it blocks the possibility of accelerating carburization and increasing production efficiency (due to the use of metal alloys in the construction, the service life of which drops dramatically at higher temperatures) and the formation of unfavorable intergranular oxidation (IGO), which is a characteristic feature of the atmospheric carburizing method.
Quenching in oil is effective, but it does not have precise controllable, repeatable, and ecological features that heat treaters may need. Due to the multiphase nature of oil quenching (steam, bubble, and convection phase) and the associated extremely different cooling rates, it is characterized by large and unpredictable deformations within a single part and the entire load. Furthermore, there is no practical method to influence and control the quench process.
Modern Vacuum Technology with LPC and HPGQ
Vacuum carburizing appeared as early as the 1970s, but it could not break through for a long time due to the inability to control and predict the results of the process, and heavy contamination of the furnaces with reaction products.
The breakthrough came in the 1990s, when acetylene began to be used as a carbon-bearing gas and computers were employed to control and simulate the process. Since the beginning of the 21st century, there has been a rapid development of the low pressure carburizing (LPC) technology and an increase in its industrial demand, which continues today with an upturn.
Vacuum carburizing occurs with the aid of hydrocarbons (usually acetylene), which catalytically decompose at the surface, providing carbon that diffuses into the material. The process is carried out under negative pressure (hundreds of times less than atmospheric pressure) and is very precise, efficient, and uniform due to the very high velocity and penetration capacity of the gas molecules, allowing the carburizing of large and densely packed loads and hard-to-reach surfaces such as holes.
In addition, the use of non-oxygen-containing hydrocarbon atoms eliminates the qualitative problem of intergranular oxidation (IGO). The process is completely safe, there is no flammable or poisonous atmosphere in the furnace and no open flame, and the furnace can work unattended and is fully available and flexible, i.e., it can be turned on and off on demand, which does not require any preparation. Similarly, changing the carburizing parameters takes place efficiently.
Due to the design of the vacuum furnace and the use of materials with high resistance to temperature, i.e., graphite — the only limitation for the temperature of the carburizing process is the steel from which the parts are made — it is possible to carburize at higher temperatures than traditional methods allow. The result is a significantly shorter carburizing time and increased furnace efficiency versus what can be achieved in an atmosphere furnace.
Neutral gas cooling was included with the vacuum furnaces. Initially, engineers used a cooling gas (nitrogen or argon) at near ambient pressure and natural convection. Subsequent solutions introduced fan-forced gas flow in a closed circuit. The cooling efficiency under such conditions was hundreds of times lower compared to that of oil, allowing only high-alloy steels and parts with very limited cross-sections to be hardened. Over the following decades, the development of HPGQ was focused on improving cooling efficiency by increasing pressure and velocity and using different types of gas and their mixtures. Current systems have cooling efficiencies on a par with oil-based systems and enable the same types of steel and parts to be hardened, with the advantage that deformation can be greatly reduced and reproducible, and the process is completely controllable (through pressure and gas velocity) allowing any cooling curve to be executed.
Vacuum technologies have an ecological edge. Because of their design and processes, vacuum furnaces do not interfere with the immediate surroundings and are environmentally friendly, so they can be installed in clean halls, directly in the production chain (in-line). They emit negligible amounts of heat and post-process gases which are not poisonous and contain no CO 2 at all. Gas quenching eliminates harmful quenching oil and the associated risk of fire and contamination of the immediate environment, as well as the need for equipment and chemicals for its removal and neutralization. Nitrogen used for cooling is obtained from the air and returned to it in a clean state, creating an ideal environmentally friendly solution.
The presented advantages of vacuum technologies influence its dynamic development and increase the demand of modern industry, and the gradual replacement of atmospheric technologies.
Vacuum furnaces are available in virtually any configuration: horizontal, vertical, single, double, or multi-chambered, tailored to the process and production requirements. In light of recent global changes, requirements, and industrial trends, special attention should be paid to disposable, flexible, and rapidly variable production and process systems, as well as independent and autonomous systems, which include a three-chamber vacuum furnace for semi- continuous heat treatment, equipped with LPC and HPGQ.
Three-Chamber Vacuum Furnace — CaseMaster Evolution Type CMe-T6810-25
This is a compact, versatile, and flexible system designed for vacuum heat treatment processes for in-house and commercial plants, dedicated to fast-changing and demanding conditions in large-scale and individual production (Fig. 1). It enables the implementation of case hardening by LPC and HPGQ processes and quenching of typical types of oil and gas hardened steels and allows for annealing and brazing. It is characterized by the following data:
working space 610x750x1000 mm (WxHxL)
load capacity 1000 kg gross
temperature 2282oF (1250oC)
vacuum range 10-2 mbar
cooling pressure 25 bar abs
LPC acetylene gas
Installation area 8x7m
Fig. 1a. Furnace CMe-T6810-25.
Fig. 1b. Fig. 1. Furnace CMe-T6810-25. On the right – view from the loading side (pre-heating chamber), on the left – view from the unloading side (quenching chamber).
The furnace is built with three thermally and pressure-separated chambers (Fig. 2.), and operates in a pass-through mode, loaded on one side and unloaded on the other, simultaneously processing three loads, hence its high efficiency. The load is put into the pre-heating chamber, where it is pre-heated to the temperature of 1382oF (750oC), depending on the requirements: in air (pre-oxidation), nitrogen or vacuum atmosphere. It is then transferred to the main heating chamber, where it reaches process temperature and where the process is carried out (e.g., LPC).
In the next step, the charge is transported to the quenching chamber, where it is quenched in nitrogen under high pressure. All operations are automatic and synchronized without the need for operator intervention or supervision.
Fig. 2. Construction and schematic furnace cross-section CMe-T6810-25. Source: SECO/WARWICK
Particularly noteworthy is the gas cooling chamber, which in nitrogen (rather than helium) achieves cooling efficiencies comparable to oil (heat transfer coefficient >> 1000 W/m2K), thanks to the use of 25 bar abs pressure and hurricane gas velocities in a highly efficient closed loop system. The cooling system is based on two side-mounted fans with a capacity of 220 kW each, forcing with nozzles an intensive cooling nitrogen flow from above onto the load, then through the heat exchanger (gas-water), where the nitrogen is cooled and further sucked in by the fan (Fig. 3). The cooling process is controllable, repeatable, and programmable by gas pressure, fan speed and time. An intense and even cooling is achieved. The result is the achievement of appropriate mechanical properties of parts with minimal hardening deformations, without the use of environmentally unfriendly oil or very expensive helium.
Fig. 3. Cross-section of the furnace CMe-T6810-25 cooling chamber. Source: SECO/WARWICK
An integral part of the furnace system is the SimVaC carburizing process simulator, which enables the design of furnace recipes without conducting proof tests.
Distinctive Features of the CMe-T6810-25 Furnace
The advantages of this type of furnace — versus more traditional or past forms — can be demonstrated in a number of usability and functional aspects, the most important of which are the following:
Safety:
Safe, no flammable and poisonous atmosphere
No open fire
Production and installation:
Intended for high volume production (two to three times higher output when compared to single- and double-chamber furnaces)
Effective and efficient LPC (even five times faster than traditional carburizing)
Total process automation & integration
Clean room installation
Operator-free
Compact footprint
Quality:
High precision and repeatability of results
Uniform carburizing of densely pack loads and difficult shapes (holes)
No decarburization or oxidation
Elimination of IGO
Ideal protection and cleanliness of part surfaces
Accurate and precise LPC process simulator (SimVaC)
Quenching:
Powerful nitrogen quenching (neither oil nor helium is needed)
Reduction of distortion
Elimination of quenching oil and contamination
Elimination of washing and cleaning chemicals
Operational:
Flexible, on-demand operation
No conditioning time
No human involvement and impact
High lifespan of hot zone components — i.e., graphite
No moving components in the process chamber
Ecology:
Safe and environmentally friendly processes and equipment
No emission of harmful gases (CO, NOx, SOx)
No emission of climate-warming gas CO2
Based on the CMe-T6810-25 furnace performance, it is rational and reasonable to build heat treatment systems for high-efficiency and developmental production in a distributed system by multiplying and integrating further autonomous and independent units. The reasons for doing so are because the furnace design affords:
No risk of production total breakdown
Unlimited operational flexibility
Less initial investment cost
Unlimited multiplication
No downtime while expansion
Independent quenching chamber
Independent transportation
Independent control system
The characteristics, capabilities and functionalities of the CMe-T6810-25 furnace fit very well with the current and developmental expectations of modern industry and ecological requirements, which is confirmed by specific implementation cases.
Case Study
The three-chamber CaseMaster Evolution CMe-T6810-25 vacuum furnace was installed and implemented for production at the commercial heat treatment plant at the Polish branch of the renowned Aalberts surface technologies Group in 2020.
Fig. 4. Gearwheel used in the case hardening process. Source: SECO/WARWICK
The CMe furnace, together with the washer and tempering furnace, forms the core of the department's production, which is why the furnace is operated continuously. Last year, the furnace performed over 2000 processes and showed very high quality (100%) and reliability (> 99%) indicators. The very high efficiency of the furnace was also confirmed, which, with relatively low production costs, contributes to a very good economic result.
The case hardening process on gearwheels used in industrial gearboxes was taken as an example. The wheel had an outer diameter of about 80 mm and a mass of 0.52 kg (Fig. 4), and the load consisted of 1344 pieces densely packed in the working space (Fig. 5) with a total net weight of 700 kg (920 kg gross) and 25 m2 surface to be carburized. The aim of the process was to obtain an effective layer thickness from 0.4 – 0.6 mm with the criterion of 550 HV, surface hardness from 58 – 62 HRC (Rockwell Hardness C), core hardness at the gear tooth base above 300 HV10 and the correct structure with retained austenite below 15%.
Fig. 5. A photograph of the arrangement of gearwheels in the load. Source: SECO/WARWICK
The LPC process was designed using the SimVaC® simulator at a temperature of 1724oF (940oC) and a time of 45 min, with 3 stages of introducing carburizing gas (acetylene), obtaining the appropriate profile of carbon concentration in the carburized layer, with a content of 0.76% C on the surface (Fig. 6).
The process was carried out in the CMe-T6810-25 furnace and had the following course from the perspective of a single load (Fig. 7):
Loading into a pre-heating chamber, heating and temperature equalization in 1382oF (750oC) (100 min in total).
Reloading to the main heating chamber, heating and temperature equalization in 1724oF (940oC), LPC, lowering and equalizing the temperature before quenching in 1580oF (860oC), reloading to the cooling chamber (total 180 min).
Gradual quenching at a pressure of 24, then 12 and 5 bar, discharge of the load from a quenching chamber (total of 25 min).
Fig. 6. Carbon profile simulated by SimVaC®. Source: SECO/WARWICK
Fig. 7. Process flow in CMe® furnace parameter trends. Source: SECO/WARWICK
The load stayed the longest in the main heating chamber – for 180 minutes. This means that with the continuous operation of the furnace in this process, the cycle will be just 180 minutes, i.e., once every three hours the raw load will be loaded, and the processed load will be removed from the furnace.
In the next step, the parts underwent tempering at a temperature of 160oC.
The result of the process was tested on ten parts taken from the reference corners and from the inside of the load. The correct layer structure (Fig. 8) and hardness profile (Fig. 9) were achieved, and all the requirements of the technical specification were met (Tab. 1).
Fig. 9. Hardness profile band obtained from tested gearwheels. Source: SECO/WARWICK
Tab. 1. Comparison of the parameters required and obtained in the process. Source: SECO/WARWICK
During the process, the consumption of the costliest energy factors was monitored and calculated, and the results per one load are as follows:
Electricity – 550 kWh
Liquid nitrogen – 160 kg
Acetylene – 1.5 kg
CO2 emissions – 0 kg
Cooling water and compressed air consumption have not been included as they have a negligible impact on process costs.
Summary: Efficiency and Economy
As a result of the process, all technological requirements have been met, obtaining the following indicators of efficiency and consumption of energy factors calculated for the entire load and per unit net weight of the load (700 kg):
On this basis, it is possible to estimate the total cost of energy factors in the amount of approximately EUR 100 per load or approximately EUR 0.14/kg of net load (assuming European unit costs of 2021). It is important that these costs are not burdened by CO2 emission penalties, as can happen with more traditional furnaces.
To sum up the economic aspect, based on an example process, a CMe furnace capacity of 1,500 net tons of parts per year was achieved for 6500 hours of annual furnace operation, at a cost of energy factors of about 100 EUR per load, or 0.14 EUR per kg of parts. The economic calculation is very attractive, and the return on investment (ROI) is estimated at just a few years.
Conclusion
While the advantages of this type of vacuum application are clear from this case study, the example discussed here does not represent the full capabilities of the CMe-T6810-25 furnace, even this process can be optimized and shortened, thereby increasing the furnace's efficiency, and reducing costs. It is possible to carry out carburizing processes (LPC) or hardening alone in a 1.5 h cycle, which would double the capacity of the furnace and similarly reduce the cost of energy factors and shorten the ROI time.