griebcw1

In addressing the challenges of modern automated production flow, thru-process temperature monitoring and process validation strategies provide viable options in the automotive heat treat industry. Could they help your operations?

This Technical Tuesday article was composed by Steve Offley, “Dr. O,” product marketing manager, PhoenixTM. It appears in Heat Treat Today’s August 2023 Automotive Heat Treating print edition.

---

The Heat Treat Monitoring Goal

Dr. Steve Offley, “Dr. O”
Product Marketing Manager
PhoenixTM
Source: LinkedIn

In any automotive heat treatment process, it is essential that the heat treat application is performed in a controlled and repeatable fashion to achieve the physical material properties of the product. This means the product material experiences the required temperature, time, and processing atmosphere to achieve the desired metallurgical transitions (internal microstructure) to give the product the material properties to perform it’s intended function.

 

When tackling the need to understand how the heat treat process is performing, it is useful to split the task up into two parts: focusing on the furnace technology first, and then introducing the product into the mix.

If we consider the furnace performance, we need to validate that the heat treat technology is capable of providing the desired accurate uniformity of heating over the working volume of the furnace for the desired soak time where the products are placed. This is best achieved by performing a temperature uniformity survey (TUS). The TUS is a key pyrometry requirement of the CQI-9 Heat Treat System Assessment (AIAG) standard applied by many automotive OEMs and suppliers.

Traditionally temperature uniformity surveys are performed using a field test instrument (chart recorder or static data logger) external to the furnace with thermocouples trailing into the furnace heating chamber. Although possible, this technique has many limitations, especially when applying to the increasingly automated semi or continuous operations discussed later in this article.

Thru-process Temperature Profiling — Discover the Heat Treat DNA

When it comes to heat treatment, the TUS operation gives a level of confidence that the furnace technology is in specification. However, it is important to understand the need to focus on what is happening at the real core of the product from a temperature and time perspective. Product temperature profiling, as its name suggests, is the perfect technique. Thermocouples attached to the part, or even embedded within the part, give an accurate record of the product temperature at all points in the process, referred to as a product temperature profile. Such information is helpful to determine process variations from critical factors such as part size, thermal mass, location within the product basket, furnace loading, transfer rate, and changes to heat treat recipe. Product temperature profiling by trailing thermocouples with an external data logger (Figure 1) is possible for a simple batch furnace, but it is not a realistic option for some modern heat treat operations.

Figure 1. Typical TUS survey set-up for a static batch furnace. PhoenixTM PTM4220 External data logger connected directly to a 9 point TUS frame used to measure the temperature uniformity over the volumetric working volume of the furnace.
Source: PhoenixTM

With the industry driving toward fully automated manufacturing, furnace manufacturers are now offering the complete package with full robotic product loading — shuttle transfer systems and modular heat treat phases to either process complete product baskets or one-piece operations.

The thru-process monitoring principle overcomes the problems of trailing thermocouples as the multi-channel data logger (field test instrument) travels into and through the heat treat process protected by a thermal barrier (Figure 2).

Figure 2. PhoenixTM thru-process monitoring system. (1) The thermal barrier protects internal multi-channel data logger, (2) the field test instrument, (3) the product thermal profile view, (4) the temperature uniformity survey (TUS), and (5) short nonexpendable mineral insulated thermocouples.
Source: PhoenixTM

The short thermocouples are fixed to either the product or TUS frame. Temperature data is then transmitted either live to a monitoring PC running profile or the TUS analysis software via a two-way RF (radio frequency) telemetry link or downloaded post run.

Although thru-process temperature monitoring in principle can be applied to most heat treat furnace operations, obviously no one solution will suit all processes, as we know from the phrase, “One size doesn’t fit all.”

For this very reason, unique thermal barrier designs are required to be tailored to the specific demands of the application whether temperature, pressure, atmosphere, or geometry as described in the following section.

Product Profiling and TUS in Continuous Heat Treat Furnaces

Thru-process product temperature profiling and/or surveying of continuous furnace operations, unlike trailing thermocouples, can be performed accurately and safely as part of the conventional production flow allowing true heat treat conditions to be assessed. As shown in Figure 3, surveying of the furnace working zone can be achieved using the plane method. A frame attached to the thermal barrier positions the TUS thermocouples at designated positions relative to the two dimensional working zone (furnace height and width) as defined in the pyrometry standard (CQI-9) during safe passage through the furnace (soak time).

Figures 3. Temperature uniformity survey of a continuous furnace using the plane method applying the PhoenixTM thru-process monitoring system. The data logger travels protected in a thermal barrier mounted on the TUS frame performing a safe TUS at four points across the width, which is impossible with trailing thermocouples.
Source: : Raba Axle, Györ, Hungary

Sealed Gas Carburizing and Oil Quench Monitoring

For traditional sealed gas carburizing where product cooling is performed in an integral oil quench, the historic limitation of thru-process temperature profiling has been the need to bypass the oil quench and wash stations.

In such carburizing processes, the oil quench rate is critical to both the metallurgical composition of the metal and to the elimination of product distortion and quench cracks, and so the need for a monitoring solution has been significant. Regular monitoring of the quench is important as aging of the oil results in decomposition, oxidation, and contamination of the oil, all of which degrade the heat transfer characteristics and quench efficiency.

To address the process challenges, a unique barrier design has been developed that both protects the data logger in the furnace (typically 3 hours at 1700°F/925°C) and during transfer through the oil quench (typically 15 minutes) and final wash station.

Figures 4. PhoenixTM thru-process temperature profiling system monitoring the core temperature of automotive parts in a traditional sealed gas carburizing furnace with integral oil quench. (left) System entering carburizing furnace in product basket. (right) Thermal barrier showing outer structural frame and sacrificial insulation blocks protecting inner sealed thermal barrier housing the data logger.
Source: PhoenixTM

The key to the barrier design is the encasement of a sealed inner barrier (Figure 4) with its own thermal protection with blocks of high-grade sacrificial insulation contained in a robust outer structural frame. The innovative barrier offers complete protection to the data logger allowing product core temperature monitoring for the complete heat treat process under production conditions.

Low Pressure Carburizing with High Pressure Gas Quench

In the current business environment, an attractive alternative to the traditional sealed gas carburizing application for both energy and environmental reasons is low pressure carburizing (LPC). Following the vacuum carburizing process, the product is transferred to a sealed high-pressure gas quench chamber where the product is rapidly gas cooled using typically N₂ or Helium at up to 20 bars.

Such technology lends itself to automation with product baskets being transferred by shuttle drives and robot loading mechanisms from chamber to chamber in a semi-continuous fashion. The sequential processing (with stages often being performed in self-contained sealed chambers) can only be monitored by the thru-process approach where the system (thermal barrier protected data logger) is self-contained within the product basket or TUS frame.

In such processes the technical challenge is twofold. The thermal barrier must be capable of protecting against not only heat during the carburizing phase, but also very rapid pressure and temperature changes inflicted by the gas quench. To protect the thermal barrier in the LPC process with gas quench, the barrier construction needs to be able to withstand constant temperature cycling and high gas pressures. The design and construction features include:

• Metal work: 310 stainless steel to reduce distortion at high temperature combined with internal structural reinforcement
• Insulation: ultra-high temperature microporous insulation to minimize shrinkage problems
• Rivets: close pitched copper rivets reduce carbon pick up and maintain strength
• Lid expansion plate: reduces distortion during rapid temperature changes
• Catches: heavy duty catches eliminating thread seizure issues
• Heat sink: internal heat sink to provide additional thermal protection to data logger

During the gas quench, the barrier needs to be protected from Nitrogen N₂ (g) or Helium He(g) gas pressures up to 20 bar. Such pressures on the flat top of the barrier would create excessive stress to the metal work and internal insulation or the data logger. Therefore, a separate gas quench deflector is used to protect the barrier. The tapered top plate deflects the gas away from the barrier. The unique design means the plate is supported on either four or six support legs. As it is not in contact with the barrier, no force is applied directly to the barrier and the force is shared between the support legs.

In LPC technology further monitoring challenges are faced by the development of one piece flow furnace designs.

Figures 5. (left) Thermal barrier being loaded into LPC batch furnace with TUS frame as part of temperature uniformity survey. (right) Thermal barrier shown with independent quench deflector providing protection during the high pressure gas quench.
Source: PhoenixTM

New designs incorporate single piece or single product layer tray loading into multiple vertical heat treat chambers followed by auto loading into mobile high pressure quench chamber. Miniturization of each separate heat treat chamber limits the space available to the monitoring system. The TS02-128-1 thermal barrier has been designed specifically for such processes utilizing the compact 6 channel “Sigma” data logger allowing reduction of the footprint of the system to fit the product tray and reduce thermal mass. With a height of only 128 mm/5 inch and customized independent low height quench deflector, the system is suitable for challenging low height furnace chambers and offers 1 hour protection at 1472°F/800°C in a vacuum.

Figure 6. (left) Low profile TUS system (TS02-128-1 thermal barrier six channel Sigma data logger) designed with TUS surveying individual one-piece flow heat treatment LPC furnace chambers (right) Thermal barrier shown with optional low profile gas quench deflector.
Source: PhoenixTM

Rotary Hearth Furnace Monitoring — Solution Reheat of Aluminum Engine Blocks

In modern rotary hearth furnaces (Figure 7), temperature profiling using trailing thermocouples is impossible as the cables would wind up in the furnace transfer mechanism. Due to the central robot loading and unloading and elimination of charging racks/baskets, the use of a conventional thru-process system would also be a challenge.

Figure 7. A modern rotary hearth furnace.
Source: PhoenixTM

To eliminate the loading restrictions, a unique thermal barrier small enough to fit inside the cavity of the engine block and allow automated loading of the complete combined monitoring system and product has been developed. To optimize the thermal performance of the thermal barrier with such tight size constraints, a phased evaporation technology is employed. Thermal protection of the high temperature data logger is provided by an insulated water tank barrier design keeping the operating temperature of the data logger at a safe 212°F/100°C or less. The system allowed BSN Thermoprozesstechnik GmbH in Germany to commission the furnace accurately and efficiently and thereby optimize settings to not only achieve product quality but also ensure energy efficient, cost effective production.

Summary

Thru-process product temperature profiling and surveying provide a versatile, accurate, and safe solution for monitoring increasingly automated, intelligent furnace lines and the means to understand, control, optimize, and certify your heat treat process.

About the author:

Dr. Steve Offley, “Dr. O,” has been the product marketing manager at PhoenixTM for the last five years after a career of over 25 years in temperature monitoring focusing on the heat treatment, paint, and general manufacturing industries. A key aspect of his role is the product management of the innovative PhoenixTM range of thru-process temperature and optical profiling and TUS monitoring system solutions.

For more information:

Contact Steve at Steve.Offley@phoenixtm.com.

---

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

---