Stephen Harris
Group Chief Executive
Bodycote
Source: LinkedIn
Bodycote has announced its acquisition of Lake City Heat Treating, based in Warsaw, Indiana, which was successfully completed on January 19, 2024. The midwestern heat treater is a leading medical market provider of hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and vacuum heat treatment services, primarily supplying the orthopedic implant market as well as civil aerospace.
Stephen Harris, group chief executive of Bodycote plc, commented: "This acquisition is an excellent fit, and it allows us to better address the growth opportunities in the medical and aerospace markets." With this acquisition, the heat treater will increase their range of specialist thermal processing and heat treatment solutions available to these industries.
Lake City Heat Treating is forecast to have achieved 2023 full year revenues of around $14m (£11m). The business revenue grew 30% in 2023 and looking ahead is expected to continue to deliver good progress.
Their constant growth reflects the high-quality business that has successfully gained share among distinguished medical and aerospace OEMs. The acquisition fits with Bodycote’s strategy to grow its Specialist Technologies businesses.
This Bodycote press release can be found in its original form here.
Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com
Have you decided to purchase batch or continuous furnace system equipment? Today's episode is part 2 of the Heat Treat Radio lunch & learn episode begun with Michael Mouilleseaux of Erie Steel. Preceding this episode were Part 1 (episode #102) and a Technical Tuesdaypiece, so listen to the history of these systems, equipment and processing differences, and maintenance concerns before jumping into this episode about capability and throughput.
Doug Glenn,Heat Treat Todaypublisher and Heat Treat Radio host; Karen Gantzer, associate publisher/editor-in-chief; and Bethany Leone, managing editor, join this Heat Treat Today lunch & learn.
Below, you can watch the video, listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or read an edited transcript.
The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.
An Example: Carburizing (00:52)
Michael Mouilleseaux: What we want to do here is just compare the same part, the same heat treating process, processed in a batch furnace and processed in a pusher.
Figure 1: Carburizing Load Example (Source: Erie Steel)
Here we’re just going to make an example:
Pusher Load Description (00:58)
Contact us with
your Reader Feedback!
I’m going to take a fictious gear: it’s 2 ¾ inch in diameter, it’s got an inside diameter of an inch and a quarter, it’s an inch and a half tall, and it weighs 1.25 pounds. For our purposes here, we’re going to put these in a cast basket. For the furnace that we’re going to put them in, the basket size is 36 inches square — so, it’s 36 x 36. The height in this pusher furnace is going to be 24 inches; the inside dimensions of a 36-inch basket (actually it’s a 35-inch basket that sits on a 36-inch tray) is 32 ½ inches.
Michael Mouilleseaux General Manager at Erie Steel, Ltd. Sourced from the author
We’re going to say that this basket is 18 inches tall, so we’re going to get 7 layers of parts so that there’s approximately 1 inch between each layer of parts. This loading scheme gets us 700 pieces in a basket; it gets us 875 pounds net.
So the 36-inch basket that’s 18 inches tall and we’ve got 10 rows of 10 pieces, and we’ve got 7 layers of these things, so we have some room in between them. The reason for that is circulation of atmosphere and quenchant. This is what’s going to constitute the pusher load.
Batch Load Description (03:09)
Now, when we go to the batch load, we’re going to take four of these, because the batch furnace that we’re going to compare this to is going to be 36 inches wide and it’s going to be 72 inches long. We have two baskets on the bottom, 36, and then two of them is 72, and two on top. They’re 18 inches high, so 18 and 18 is 36 — a standard 36 x 72. It’s got 40 inches of height on it. I can take that 36 inches, put it on a 2 ½-inch tray and I can get it in and out of the furnace.
What is this four baskets? 2800 pieces in a load and 3500 pounds. That’s the difference. I’m comparing one basket, 700 pieces and 875 pounds and we’re going to compare that to what we would do if we ran a batch load, which is significantly more. It’s 2800 pieces and 3500 pounds.
What do we want to do with this?
Let’s say that we’re going to carburize this, and we want 50 thousandths case (total case depth of 0/050”). Now, I will show you very soon why we’ve chosen 50 thousandths case. Because at 1700°F (which is what we’re going to carburize at), the diffusion rate is 25 thousandths of an inch times the square root of time.
Now, I can do that math in my head. 25 thousandths times 2 is 50 thousandths. That means we need four hours. So, the part would have to be in the furnace for four hours, at temperature, carburizing, in order to achieve 50 thousandths case.
Figure 2: Batch IQ Carburizing Load (Source: Erie Steel)
Batch Furnace Time (04:59)
Let’s look at the next section. As we said, the furnace is 36 x 72 x 36 and we have 2800 pieces in the load. So, that is 1700°F. We’re going to say that there is 3500 pounds and there is probably another 800 or 900 pounds in fixturing so that’s about 4500 pounds. It’s very conservative; in a 36 x 72 furnace, you could probably get away with running 6,000 pounds. This is just a load that is well within the capability of that.
Furnace recovery is going to take two hours.
Doug Glenn: Meaning, it’s going to take you two hours to get up to temperature.
Mike Mouilleseaux: Until the entirety of the load is at 1700°F, that’s right. Inside, outside, top to bottom.
We’re going to carburize this at four hours, as we described previously; we calculated that and we need four hours to get our 50 thousandths case. Then we’re going to reduce the temperature in the furnace to 1550°F so that we can quench it.
So, we have two hours of furnace recovery, four hours at carburizing, two hours to reduce the temperature and attain a uniform 1550°F. That’s eight hours, and that’s what you would term an 8-hour furnace cycle.
We know that we have 2800 pieces in the load. In eight hours (2800 divided by 8) you’ve got 350 pieces/hour. That’s what the hourly productivity would be in this load.
We won’t talk about “what could we do.” There’s a lot of things that we could do. This is simply an example.
Pusher Furnace Time (07:05)
Now, in the pusher load, as previously described, it’s 36 x 36 and it’s 24 inches high. Now, we know that we have a basket that’s 18 inches high. Again, it’s going to sit on a 2-inch tray, so we’ve got 21 inches of the top of the basket that is going to fit in the furnace; there are going to be no issues with that whatsoever.
The controlling factor is that we want four hours at temperature. In the boost and diffuse, we have four positions. The furnace cycles once per hour.
We get one load size (700 pieces, 875 pounds) every hour. So, in this example (an 8-position, 36-square pusher) this process would yield 700 pieces an hour, and a batch furnace loaded as we described (same exact loading and number of pieces/basket) would yield 350 pieces/hour. In this scenario, the pusher furnace is going to produce twice the number of parts/hour that the batch would.
So, you would say, “Well, let’s just do that.” What you have to understand is that every hour, you are going to produce 700 pieces. If we went back and we looked at that description of what that pusher system looked like, you would see there are 23 positions in that. When I load a load, it’s going to be 23 hours before the first load comes out.
What we’re talking about is whether or not there were 700 pieces and 800 pounds, 23 of those[ET10][BL11] load.
The point would be, you either have to have enough of the same product or enough of similar product that can be processed to the same process to justify using something like this. Because if we want to change the cycle in the furnace. So, can we do that? The answer is absolutely, yes.
The preheat there, that stays at relatively the same temperature. The first zone in the furnace where we’re preheating the load, that temperature can be changed, as can the temperature in the boost diffuse and/or cycle time.
Figure 3: Pusher Furnace System (Source: Erie Steel)
So, in our example, we used an hour. What if you wanted 40 thousandths case and you’re going to be closer to 45 minutes or 50 minutes of time, how would you accomplish that? That can be done.
Typically, commercial heat treaters would come up with a strategy on how to cycle parts in and hold the furnace, or how many empties you would put in the furnace before you would change the furnace cycle.
Obviously, in the last two positions, where you’re reducing temperature, you could change the temperature in either the first two positions, where you’re preheating the load, or you could change the carburizing temperature, because when we’re dropping the temperature, it doesn’t have a material effect upon that.
Typically, in an in-house operation, you would not do that kind of thing, for a couple of reasons, not the least of which would be considering the type of people that you have operating these furnaces. They come in and out from other departments, and this is the kind of thing that you would want someone experientially understanding the instructions that you’ve given them. The furnace operator is not necessarily going to be the one to do it; this may be a pre-established methodology. You want them to execute that. But if you have somebody that is running a grinder and then they’re running a plating line and then they’re coming and working in the heat treat, that would not be the recipe for trying to make these kinds of changes.
As I described to you before, I worked in another life where we had 15 pushers. They were multiple-row pushers. We made 10,000 transfer cases a day. The furnace cycle on every furnace was established on the 1st of January, and on the 31st of December it was still running the same furnace cycle. You never changed what you were doing. The same parts went into the same furnaces and that’s how they were able to achieve the uniform results they were looking for.
Pusher Furnaces and Flexibility (12:45)
So, the longer the pusher furnace is, the less flexible it is.
In this example, you have eight. You know, there are pusher furnaces that have four positions. If you think about it, in a 4-position furnace, you could empty it out pretty quickly and change the cycle.
There are a lot of 6-position pusher furnaces in the commercial heat treating industry; that seems to be a good balance. The number of multiple-row pushers in the commercial industry, they’re fewer and far between. I’m not going to say they’re nonexistent, but enough of the same kind of product to justify that is difficult.
I think the bottom line here is, for companies that are having high variability, low quantity, low volume loads, generally speaking, your batch is going to be good because it’s very flexible, you can change quickly.
However, with a company like the one you were describing where there is low variability and very high volume, pushers are obviously going to make sense. But there is a whole spectrum in between there where you’re going to have to figure out which one makes more sense — whether you’re going to go with a batch or a continuous.
Mike Mouilleseaux: Possibly underappreciated is the aspect of distortion.
In that carburizing example, you’d say, “We have an alloy steel, we’re aiming for 50 thousandths case — what’s the variation within a load?” And I’m going to say that it is going to be less than 5 thousandths, less than 10%. From the top to the bottom, the inside to the outside, it’s going to be less than 5 thousandths. That same process, in the pusher furnace is going to be less than 3 thousandths.
That’s one aspect of the metallurgy. The other aspect is quenching.
Doug Glenn: 5 thousandths versus 3 thousandths — 3 thousandths is much more uniform, right?
Mike Mouilleseaux: Correct.
Doug Glenn: And that’s good because that way the entire load is more consistent (in the continuous unit, let’s say).
Mike Mouilleseaux: That is correct.
Then there is the consistency in quenching. In the batch furnace, you’re quenching 36 inches of the parts. If we had seven layers in the pusher, we have 14 layers of parts in the batch. What are the dynamics involved in that?
We have experience that the ID of a gear (it’s a splined gear) in a batch furnace, we were able to maintain less than 50 microns of distortion. There is a lot involved in that, that’s not for free; there’s a fair amount involved in that and it’s a sophisticated cycle, if you will. That same cycle in a pusher furnace, same case depth, similar quenching strategy, will give you less than half that amount of distortion.
To the heat treater, where we’re talking about the metallurgy of this, you’re going to think 5 thousandths or 3 thousandths is not a big deal.
To the end-user, that reduction in distortion all of a sudden starts paying a number of benefits. The amount of hard finishing that has to be done or honing or hard broaching or something of that nature suddenly becomes far more important.
Doug Glenn: Yes. That adds a lot of money to the total process, if you’ve got to do any of those post heat treat processes.
Mike Mouilleseaux: To a large extent, that is due to the fact that you have a smaller load. If you have a smaller load, you have less opportunity for variation — it’s not that it’s all of a sudden magic.
Doug Glenn: And for the people that don’t understand exactly what that means, think about a single basket that goes into a quench tank and four baskets, arranged two on top and two on bottom. The parts in the middle of that are going to be quenched more slowly because the quench is not hitting it as much.
So, the cooling rates on a stacked load are going to be substantially different than for a single basket, and that’s where distortion can happen.
Mike Mouilleseaux: There are a tremendous number of components that are running batch furnaces successfully. The transportation industry, medical, aerospace, military — are all examples. I’m simply pointing out the fact that there is an opportunity to do something but what we have to keep in mind is — how many of those somethings are there available?
The one thing you would not want to do is try to run four loads in a pusher furnace that could hold 10 because the conditions are not going to be consistent. The front end (the first load) has nothing in front of it so it’s heating at a different rate than the loads in the center, and the last load is cooling at a different rate than the loads that were in the center. That which I just described to you about the potential improvement in distortion, that would be negated in that circumstance.
Doug Glenn: If you’re running a continuous system at full bore and you’re running a batch system at full capacity, especially when you get to the quench, there are a lot of other variables you need to consider in the batch.
This is simply because of the load configuration, and the rates of cooling from the outer parts — top, bottom, sides, as opposed to the ones in the middle. Whereas with a single basket, you still have to worry about the parts on the outside as they’re going to cool quicker than the parts on the inside, but it’s less so, by a significant degree.
Mike Mouilleseaux: Something that I have learned — which is totally counterintuitive to everything that I was educated with and everything that I was ever told— we’d always thought that it was the parts in the top of the load where the oil had gone through and had an opportunity to vaporize and you weren’t getting the same uniform quench—those were the parts that you had the highest distortion.
Counterintuitively, it’s the parts in the bottom of the load that have the greatest degree of distortion. It has very little to do with vaporizing the oil and it has everything to do with laminar flow versus turbulent flow.
Doug Glenn: In the quench tank, is the oil being circulated up through the load?
Mike Mouilleseaux: Yes.
Doug Glenn: So, supposedly, the coolest oil is hitting the bottom first.
Mike Mouilleseaux: Yes.
Thoughts on the Future of Furnace Improvement (22:20)
Doug Glenn: What about the future on these things?
Mike Mouilleseaux: Where do we think this thing is going? Obviously, you’re going to continue to see incremental improvement in furnace hardware: in burners, in controllers, in insulation, in alloys. These things will be more robust; they’re going to last longer. If we looked at a furnace today and we looked at a furnace that was made 50 years ago, and we stood back a hundred yards, almost no one could tell what the difference was, and yet, it would perform demonstrably different. They are far more precise and accurate than ever.
For the process control systems, we’re going to see real-time analysis of process parameters. We don’t have that now. I think that machine learning is going to come into play, to optimize and predict issues and prevent catastrophic things.
In terms of atmosphere usage, if you’re running the same load, and you run it a number of times, the heating rate should be the same, and the amount of gas that you use to carburize that load should be exactly the same. But if you have a problem with atmosphere integrity — you got a door leak, you got a fan leak, or you got a water leak on a bearing — those things are going to change. Now, by the time it gets your attention, you could’ve dealt with that much sooner and prevented other things from happening.
"For the process control systems, we’re going to see real-time analysis of process parameters. We don’t have that now. I think that machine learning is going to come into play, to optimize and predict issues and prevent catastrophic things."
So, did it cause a problem with the part? By the time it causes a problem with the part, it’s really serious. The point is that there is something between when it initiated and when it’s really serious. With the right kind of analysis, that could be prevented. I think that that kind of thing is coming.
Motor outputs, transfer times — I see all of those things being incorporated into a very comprehensive system whereby you’re going to understand what’s happening with the process in real-time. If you make adjustments, you’re going to know why. Then you’re going to know where you need to go and look to fix it.
The other thing I see happening in the future is all about energy and greenhouse gases. Our Department of Energy has an industrial decarbonization roadmap today, and it’s being implemented, and we don’t even know it. One of the targets in this industrial decarburization roadmap is reduction in greenhouse gases: 85% by 2035, net zero by 2050.
So, what does that mean? I’ve listened to the symposiums that they have put on. There are three things that they’re looking for and one is energy efficiency. I’m going to say that we’ve been down that road and we’ve beat that dog already. Are there going to be other opportunities? Sure. It’s these incremental things, like burner efficiency. But there is no low hanging fruit in energy efficiency.
The other thing is going to be innovative use of hydrogen instead of natural gas because the CO₂ footprint of hydrogen is much lower than that of natural gas. If you look at how the majority of hydrogen is generated today, it’s generated from natural gas. How do you strip hydrogen out of there? You heat it up with natural gas or you heat it up with electricity. Hydrogen is four times the cost of natural gas as a heating source.
The other thing that they’re talking about is electrifying. It’s electrify, electrify, electrify. The electricity has to be generated by clean energy. So, does that mean that we run our furnaces when the wind is blowing or the sun is out, or we’re using peaker plants that are run off hydrogen, and the hydrogen is generated when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing, and we’re stripping out the natural gas?
From what I, personally, have seen with these things, these are absolutely noble goals. You could not disagree with them whatsoever. The way that they want to go about accomplishing it, and the timeline that they wish to accomplish that in, is unrealistic.
If you look at how the majority of hydrogen is generated today, it’s generated from natural gas. How do you strip hydrogen out of there? You heat it up with natural gas or you heat it up with electricity. Hydrogen is four times the cost of natural gas as a heating source.
Doug Glenn: Well, Michael, don’t even get me going on this! There are a lot of different things that are going on here but it’s good to hear you say this stuff. I agree with you on a lot of this stuff. They are noble goals; there is absolutely nothing wrong with electrifying.
Now, I do know some people — and even I would probably fall into the camp of one of those guys — that questions the premise behind the whole decarbonization movement. I mean, is CO₂ really not our friend? There’s that whole question. But, even if you grant that, I agree with you that the timeframe in which they’re wanting to do some of these things is, I think, fairly unrealistic.
It’s always good to know the reality of the world, whether you agree with it or not. It’s there, it’s happening, so you’ve got to go in with eyes wide open.
Safety Concerns (29:41)
Mike Mouilleseaux: The safety concerns on these are all very similar. You know, the MTI (Metal Treating Institute) has some pretty good safety courses on these things, and I think there are a lot of people who have taken advantage of that. The fact that it’s been formalized is much better.
When I grew up in this, it was something that you learned empirically, and making a mistake in learning it, although the learning situation is embedded in you, sometimes the cost of that is just too great, so that the probability of being hurt or burnt or causing damage to a facility, is just too great.
There are definitely things that need to be addressed with that, and there are some very basic things that need to be done.
Doug Glenn: Michael, thanks a lot. I appreciate your expertise in all these areas, you are a wealth of knowledge.
Michael Mouilleseaux is general manager atErie Steel LTD. Mike has been at Erie Steel in Toledo, OH since 2006 with previous metallurgical experience at New Process Gear in Syracuse, NY and as the Director of Technology in Marketing at FPM Heat Treating LLC in Elk Grove, IL. Having graduated from the University of Michigan with a degree in Metallurgical Engineering, Mike has proved his expertise in the field of heat treat, co-presenting at the 2019 Heat Treat show and currently serving on the Board of Trustees at the Metal Treating Institute.
Navigate the heat treat events upcoming in the months ahead with Heat Treat Today’s Industry Calendar. This hidden gem is located in the “Events” tab on www.heattreattoday.com, and it is always updating with the latest industry events. As you make your vacation plans, be sure you aren’t missing any key events; in mid-February, three industry events are happening on the same day! Check out a couple of upcoming event descriptions in today’s original content piece below!
If you have an event to add — or want to give us a heads up on an event that you and others are going to attend — feel free to reach out to the editors at editor@heattreattoday.com.
Jump over to the “Events” tab on www.heattreattoday.com, and you’ll find the Industry Calendar located third down. This calendar allows you to search by month or day in list or calendar view format so that you can visualize upcoming heat treat events with ease.
A Couple Tips To Navigate The Calendar:
Select view options from “list,” “month,” or “day” (see image 1).
In the “month” view, if you want to learn more about an item in the calendar, hover over the name of the event to see the image (see Image 2).
Search for events in the industry using the search bar at the top of the page.
Image 1Image 2
A Quick Look at Upcoming Winter Events
The end of January and February are busy months in the heat treat world. Stay informed and be sure not to miss any important dates!
“Looking to stay ahead of the curve? We attract the top minds in the industry to keep you current on everything HVACR. In addition to the latest products and technology, we’ll explore trending topics in all sectors of the industry including AI & controls, decarbonization, plumbing & hydronics, heat pumps, refrigerants, workforce development, business & professional growth, and much more.”
MDSM is the world’s leading conference & expo focused on the latest technical advancements in motor, drive systems, motion control, magnetic applications, technology, and rare earth materials.
“This is a once-a-year opportunity for professionals to hear world-class content in design, efficiency, and application advancements in automation, robotics, manufacturing, utilities, automotive, medical, consumer, aerospace & defense industries.”
“Held this year in Brisbane, Australia, SIM-PAC brings together in one location the four of the key components that will deliver a sustainable future for industrial manufacturing: technology, machinery, environmental design, and process engineering.
‘Not only will it be a window into the future, but it will also have a critical focus on what is ready for deployment today,’ says Geoff Matthews, SIM-PAC Event Director and Partner.”
“Each of IHEA’s Sustainability Webinars covers a different topic. This time, the topic will be carbon capture.
With the popularity and success of this summer’s Sustainability & Decarbonization Webinar Series, the Industrial Heating Equipment Association (IHEA) announces an expansion of the series with eleven new sustainability webinars in 2023 through 2024. ‘With interest very high regarding sustainability and reducing carbon emissions and greenhouse gases,’ notes IHEA Executive Vice President Anne Goyer, ‘the IHEA Board of Directors feels there is a strong need to continue providing valuable information that will assist our industry in navigating sustainability issues.’ The series will continue to be offered on the third Thursday of every month with an occasional exception for holidays.”
This is only the beginning of what the Industry Calendar can do for you! Explore more here.
Renowned for its dynamic trade show environment, FNA 2024 brings together the foremost experts, suppliers, decision makers, and buyers from around the globe. This year’s event is set to continue the tradition of offering an engaging technical conference alongside the bustling trade show floor.
The excitement takes off on the first day of the trade show with a unique gaming opportunity. During the Day 1 Trade Show Floor Reception, one lucky attendee will be selected to participate in a thrilling game at the heart of the expo, standing a chance to win $500, $1,000, or a staggering $100,000!
With exhibit booths in high demand and an anticipated sellout, prospective exhibitors are urged not to hesitate in securing their spots. Registration for attendees will open on May 1, 2024.
Mark your calendars and prepare to be a part of the industry’s most awaited event. Stay tuned for more details and visit www.FurnacesNorthAmerica.com for the latest updates.
Furnaces North America 2024 is excited to unveil its lineup of Title Sponsors for the upcoming trade show and technical conference, scheduled for October 14-16, 2024. Produced by the Metal Treating Institute in collaboration with Heat Treat Today, the event will be hosted in Columbus, OH — a hub of manufacturing innovation.
The search for sustainable solutions in the heat treat industry is at the forefront of research for industry experts. Michael Stowe, PR, senior energy engineer at Advanced Energy, one such expert, offers some fuel for thought on the subject of how heat treaters can reduce their carbon emissions.
This Sustainability Insights article was first published in Heat Treat Today’sDecember 2023 Heat Treat Medical and Energy print magazine.
Michael Stowe PE, Senior Energy Engineer Advanced Energy
The question in the article title is becoming increasingly popular with industrial organizations. Understanding the carbon content of products is becoming more of a “have to” item, especially for organizations that are in the supply chain for industrial assembly plants such as in the automotive industry. Many heat treaters are key steps in the supply chain process, and their carbon footprints will be of more interest to upstream users of heat treated parts in the future. I know I am overstating the obvious here, but I am going to do it anyway for emphasis:
Click to share your Reader Feedback
Heat treating requires HEAT.
HEAT requires ENERGY consumption.
ENERGY consumption creates a carbon footprint: a. Fossil fuels heating — direct carbon emissions (Scope 1) b. Electric heating — indirect carbon emissions (Scope 2)
Therefore, by definition and by process, if you are heat treating, then you are producing carbon emissions. Again, the question is, “How can we work to get the carbon out of heating?” Let us explore this.
Once more, heat treating requires energy input. The energy sources for heat treating most frequently include the combustion of carbon-based fossil fuels such as natural gas (methane), propane, fuel oil, diesel, or coal. Also, most combustion processes have a component of electricity to operate combustion air supply blowers, exhaust blowers, circulation fans, conveyors, and other items.
Figure 1 shows the chemical process for the combustion of methane (i.e., natural gas). Figure 1 demonstrates that during combustion, methane (CH4) combines with oxygen (O₂) to form carbon dioxide (CO₂) and water (H₂O). This same process is true for any carbon-based fuel. If you try to imagine all the combustion in progress across the globe at any given time, and knowing that all this combustion is releasing CO₂, then it is easy to see the problem and the need for CO₂ emission reductions.
In the most basic terms, if you have a combustion-based heat treating process on your site, then you are emitting CO₂. The electricity consumed to support the combustion processes also has a carbon component, and the consumption of this electricity contributes to a site’s carbon footprint.
Figure 2. The 4 Rs of carbon footprint (Source: Advanced Energy)
So, combustion and electricity consumption on your site contributes to your carbon footprint. Knowing this, organizations may want to consider the level of their carbon footprint and explore ways to reduce it. There are many methods and resources available to help organizations understand and work to improve their carbon footprint. For this article, we will focus on the 4 Rs of carbon footprint reduction (see Figure 2).
We will discuss each of these approaches individually in priority order in the next installment of the Sustainability Insights.
For more information: Connect with IHEA Sustainability & Decarbonization Initiatives www.ihea.org/page/Sustainability Article provided by IHEA Sustainability
Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com
ECOACERO, an ESTRELLA Group company, has placed an order for a new rebar mill with a heat treater with North American locations. It will be located nearby Santo Domingo, in Dominican Republic, for serving the growing local and regional construction industry.
The upcoming ECOACERO facility with a rebar mill from SMS group will introduce a versatile range of rebar to the market, tailored to meet the demands of different construction industry segments, manufactured with state-of-the-art technology from SMS, and adhering to rigorous international quality standards.
The complete project, conceptualized with a sustainability philosophy, consists of two phases, with the forthcoming integration of a steel production, involving a melt shop with a continuous casting machine, from the scrap processing.
The scope of delivery of the SMS includes a reheating furnace for billets, feeding a continuous single-strand rolling mill. Products are finished on a MEERdrive® finishing block, a machine that reduces CO₂ emissions and boots plant efficiency. Water boxes in the production process enable steel with improved mechanical properties through quenching and self-tempering of the bars, minimizing the use of expensive alloying elements in the melt shop.
From left to right: Pedro Estrella, Director of ECOACERO; Giuseppe Maniscalco, CEO of industrial division Grupo Estrella; Filippo Verlezza, SMS group and Nicola Redolfi, SMS group (Source: SMS group)
The second phase involves a modern electric arc furnace (EAF), high electrical efficient and designed with burner and oxygen injector technology to reduce CO₂ emissions and operating costs.
The scrap charging-based electric arc furnace will be equipped with the latest SMS technologies for safe and automatic operation aimed at reducing the carbon footprint. The entire melting-refining-casting process line is monitored by X-Pact® Level 2 system.
The plant commissioning is scheduled for the beginning of 2025, pointing to ECOACERO as the one of the largest and modern steel companies in the Caribbean and Central America.
This SMS group press release can be found in its original form here.
Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com
The four heat treat industry-specific economic indicators gathered by Heat Treat Today each month since June 2023 each reflect expectations for economic growth in the month of January, with suppliers to the industry predicting a particularly significant swing in expectations for one of the indicators as compared to December 2023.
The numbers, which were compiled the second week of January, show that responding parties anticipate that the number of inquiries will grow significantly, an increase from extreme contraction that was expected in December. So also, the value of January bookings shows an increase in expectations for growth from expected contraction in December. The backlogs indicator continue to reflect anticipated growth, slightly down from December. The overall health of the manufacturing economy indicator is up, especially when compared to December, with growth expected. This is the 8th month of data collection, so keep following this study as this bank of information builds.
The results from this month’s survey (January) are as follows; numbers above 50 indicate growth, numbers below 50 indicate contraction, and the number 50 indicates no change:
Anticipated change in the Number of Inquiries from December to January: 58.3
Anticipated change in Value of Bookings from December to January:58.9
Anticipated change in Backlog Size from December to January: 54.3
Anticipated change in the Health of the Manufacturing Economy from December to January: 53.7
Data for January 2024
The four index numbers are reported monthly by Heat Treat Today and made available on the website.
Heat TreatToday’sEconomic Indicatorsmeasure and report on four, heat treat industry indices. Each month, approximately 800 individuals who classify themselves as suppliers to the North American heat treat industry receive the survey. Above are the results. Data started being collected in June 2023. If you would like to participate in the monthly survey, please click here to subscribe.
Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com
An Ultra Low NOx HPH®-flameless bell-type annealing plant at thyssenkrupp Hohenlimburg has achieved CO2-neutral heat treatment of precision strip.
Tenova LOI Thermprocess, a company which is part of Tenova, continues to prove that CO2-neutral heat treatment can go together with low nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions in a cooperation project with thyssenkrupp Hohenlimburg GmbH. Tenova LOI Thermprocess is part of Tenova and is one of the leading companies supplying industrial furnace systems for the heat treatment of metals. Tenova, a Techint Group company, is as a worldwide partner for sustainable, innovative, and reliable solutions in the metals and the mining industries.
In bell-type annealing plants, which have so far been mainly operated with natural gas, precipitation and spheroidizing annealing of steel coils is carried out to specifically adjust the mechanical properties for subsequent rolling processes or the required product properties at the end customer.
At thyssenkrupp’s Hagen-Hohenlimburg site, Tenova LOI Thermprocess’s heating hoods with LOI’s patented Ultra low NOx HPH®-flameless concept has been used for around 12 years. By increasing air preheating temperatures to 1112°F (600°C), this technology has led to energy and therefore CO2 savings of up to 12%.
Dr. Gökhan Gula Project Manager and Process Engineer Tenova LOI Thermprocess.
In a campaign involving several annealing cycles, a further step has been taken towards decarbonizing steel production as part of the joint project. In production trials, the fuel gas supply for the heat treatment of hot-rolled narrow strip was gradually converted from natural gas to up to 100% hydrogen. Tenova indicates that, for the first time in the world, 70 t of steel strip were heat treated in a bell-type annealing plant in a locally CO2‑neutral process. The flameless concept demonstrates its advantages here because despite the higher combustion temperature compared to natural gas and thus a tendency towards higher nitrogen oxide emissions, it results in remarkably low NOx emissions.
Using the bell-type annealing plant, up to 2600 kg of CO2 can be saved per annealing cycle by using regenerative produced hydrogen, while maintaining productivity and product properties.
“The combustion of hydrogen is technically more complex than the direct use of electricity or the combustion of natural gas. This project has provided us with further insights into the decarbonization of the bell-type annealing process and is helping us on our joint path towards the transformation to climate-neutral steel production,” says Dr. Gökhan Gula, project manager and process engineer at Tenova LOI Thermprocess.
The appeal of additive manufacturing (AM) for producing orthopedic implants lies in the “ability to design and manufacture complex and customized structures for surgical patients in a short amount of time.” To complement speed of production, learn how an innovative hot isostatic pressing (HIP) application is confronting the challenges of post-processing heat treatments when creating high quality AM medical parts.
Today’s Technical Tuesday article, written by Andrew Cassese, applications engineer; Anders Magnusson, manager of Business Development; and Chad Beamer, senior applications engineer, all from Quintus Technologies, was originally published in Heat Treat Today’sDecember 2023’s Medical and Energy Heat Treat magazine.
AM is playing a significant role in the medical industry. It gives manufacturers the ability to create customized and complex structures for surgical implants and medical devices. Additionally, medical device manufacturers have different material factors to consider – such as biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, strength, and fatigue – when selecting a material for a given application. Each of these factors plays a significant role. It’s no wonder that the most common metallic biomaterials in today’s industry are stainless steels, cobalt-chrome alloys, and titanium alloys (Trevisan et al., 2018).
In this article, learn about the application of Ti6Al4V in the medical industry, as well as ways to address some of the challenges when producing AM medical components.
The Future Demands Orthopedic Implants
Figure 1. Example of AM trabecular structure on a Ti6Al4V
acetabular cup (Source: Quintus Technologies)
The medical market for orthopedic implants is predicted to grow annually by approximately 4% where joint replacement, spine, and trauma sectors are reported to account for more than two-thirds of the market. The largest portion is joint replacement with over a third of global turnover, reaching in excess of 20 million U.S. dollars in 2022 (ORTHOWORLD® Inc., 2023). This confirms an earlier study by Allied Market Research where spine, knee, and hip implants made up over 66% of the entire market, with knee implants leading the way at 26% (Allied Market Research Study, 2022). This fact, combined with the expectation that the global population aged 60+ is predicted to double between 2020 and 2050, adds to the increasing demand on manufacturers to produce better quality and longer lasting orthopedic implants (Koju et al., 2022).
These factors have increased the predicted medical implant market for Ti6Al4V and other common orthopedic materials. Using AM processes such as electron beam melting (EBM) and laser powder beam fusion (L-PBF), manufacturers can produce thin-walled trabecular structures that are fabricated to promote bone ingrowth in a growing market that is in competition with traditional production methods.
Titanium-based alloys have been increasingly used in orthopedic applications due to their high corrosion resistance and a Young’s modulus similar to that of human cortical bone (Kelly et al., 2021). The high strength-to-weight ratio and bioinert-ness of Ti6Al4V has proven it to be an ideal candidate for orthopedic and dental implants. It is a titanium alloy with 6% aluminum and 4% vanadium that has low density, high weldability, and is heat treatable. Ti6Al4V demonstrates good osteointegration properties, which is defined as the structural and functional connection between living bone and the surface of a load carrying medical implant.
Many manufacturers are using L-PBF to create thin-walled complex structures on the surface of the implant. This makes use of the osteointegration properties as the implant integrates itself into the body over time without the need for bone cement (Kelly et al., 2021). Introducing a large metallic foreign body leads to challenges such as promotion of chronic inflammation, infection, and biofilm formation. Instead, porous AM Ti6Al4V implants have a biomimetic design attempt towards natural bone morphology (Koju et al., 2022).
AM Yields Production Solutions for Medical Alloys
The medical industry has been increasing the use of AM over traditional processing methods. AM facilitates weight reduction, material savings, and shortened lead-time due to reduced machining, but these are only a few of the benefits. Improved functionality and patient satisfaction are also key aspects through tailoring of designs to take advantage of AM over traditional forging and casting techniques. Additionally, the costs of machining a strong alloy like Ti6Al4V can be expensive, and any wasted material and time in turn lead to higher cost.
One of the main reasons for the interest in AM is the ability to design and manufacture complex and customized structures for surgical patients in a short amount of time. For example, if a patient needs an implant for surgery, an MRI scan can help reverse engineer a customized implant. Engineers prepare a design of a patient-specific implant according to the patient’s anatomy that is then printed, HIPed, and finished for surgery with a reduced lead time. This is especially important for trauma victims, where the speed of repair can mean the difference between losing a limb or returning to a fully functional life. Cancer victims and those requiring aesthetic surgery to the skull, nose, jaw, etc., can also benefit from this (Benady et al., 2023).
Some of the current challenges with AM titanium in the medical industry are related to the post-processing heat treatments that are required. These treatments can leave an oxide layer on thin-walled structures that is hard to remove by machining or chemical milling. Quintus Purus®, a unique clean-HIP solution, has proven to overcome this challenge and provide clients with a robust solution that both densifies and maintains a clean surface.
When HIP Meets AM
Figure 2. AM Ti6Al4V components HIPed without getter using conventional HIP (left) and Quintus Purus® (right) (Source: Zeda)
HIP is important in the AM world as a post-process that closes porosity and increases fatigue life. For medical implants, high and low cycle fatigue life properties are key as they affect the longevity of the repair. The mechanical strength and integrity are improved significantly by HIPing the implants, reducing the need for further surgery on the same patient. Modern HIP cycles have been developed to further increase this performance. When combined with Quintus Purus®, modern HIP cycles can minimize the thin, oxygen-affected layer that can result from thermal processing on surfaces of high oxygen-affinitive materials, such as titanium.
For Ti6Al4V, this layer is often referred to as alpha-case. The brittle nature of the alpha-case negatively impacts material properties resulting in medical manufacturers requesting their AM parts in the “alpha-case free” state. Alpha-case can be formed during heat treatment. As surfaces of the payload and process equipment are exposed to oxygen at elevated temperatures, they may be oxidized or reduced, depending on the oxide to oxygen partial pressure equilibrium. During heat treatment, evaporating compounds become part of the process atmosphere, and solids are deposited or formed on other surfaces, either as particles or as surface oxides.
For titanium alloys, surface oxides are formed at logarithmic or linear rates, depending on temperature and oxygen partial pressure. At the same time, oxygen can diffuse into the surface to form the brittle alpha-case, which is detrimental to the part’s fatigue performance. Changes of the surface color can often be seen as an indication that surface reactions have occurred during processing when using traditional thermal processes (Magnusson et al., 2023).
The HIP furnace atmosphere contaminants that cause this oxidation can originate from various sources including the process gas, equipment, furnace interior, and, most importantly, the parts to be processed. The payload itself often absorbs moisture from the surrounding atmosphere before being loaded into the furnace, which is subsequently released into the HIP atmosphere during processing. Industrial practice today attempts to solve the issue by wrapping parts in a material such as stainless steel foil or a “getter” that has a high affinity to oxygen protecting the Ti6Al4V component from exposure to large volumes of process gas, thus helping minimize the pickup of the contaminates.
This method adds material, time, and labor to wrap and unwrap parts before and after each HIP cycle. Also, wrapping in getter cannot guarantee cleanliness and may result in some uneven oxidation. This is where the tools of Quintus Purus® are of assistance; these tools allow the user to define a maximum water vapor content that can be accepted in the HIP system before the process starts. The tool utilizes the Quintus HIP hardware together with a newly developed software routine, ensuring that the target water vapor level is met in the shortest time possible. The result is a cleaner payload, without the need to directly wrap components with getter (Magnusson et al., 2023).
Table 2. Results from case study productivity analysis
(Source: Quintus Technologies)Table 1. Input to case study (Source: Quintus Technologies)
Alpha-Case Avoided: Comparing Conventional HIP and Optimized HIP Technologies
Quintus Technologies performed a study with Zeda, Inc. to evaluate Quintus Purus® on L-PBF Ti6Al4V medical implant parts. The study was performed in the Application Center in Västerås, Sweden in a QIH 21 HIP. A conventional HIP cycle was performed as well as an optimized Quintus Purus® HIP cycle, both without the use of getter. No presence of alpha-case was found on the part processed with the Quintus Purus® cycle as shown in Figure 2 below (Magnusson et al., 2023).
Quintus Purus® can be further enhanced with the use of a Quintus custom-made getter cassette supplied as part of the installation, which consumes or competes for the remainder of contaminant gaseous compounds still present in the system after all other measures such as best practice handling, adjustment of gas quality, etc., have been implemented.
Titanium is considered the getter of choice for Quintus Purus® and is included as an optional compact getter cassette placed at the optimum position in the hot zone of the HIP furnace. Although the custom-made getter cassette occupies a small space, its use can significantly increase loading efficiency. The traditional way of individually wrapping components with stainless steel or titanium foil will consume more furnace volume, through reduced packing efficiency, leading to less components per cycle when compared to the Quintus Purus® titanium getter cassette strategy. Using an average spinal implant size of 2 in3 (32 cm3), one can calculate the packing density in a standard HIP vessel assuming two shifts per day and a 90% machine uptime. For example, a Quintus Technologies QIH 60 URC with a hot zone diameter of 16 in (410 mm) and a height of 40 in (1,000 mm) can pack up to 1,280 implants per cycle, with clearances for proper spacing and load plates.
Figure 3. Quintus Technologies QIH 60 URC outfitted with
Quintus Purus® technology (Source: Quintus Technologies)
The typical Ti6Al4V HIP parameters include a soak time of two hours at 1688°F with 14.5 ksi argon pressure (920°C with 100 MPa). Accounting for heat up and cool down time, this HIP cycle can take less than eight hours, allowing two cycles per day on a two-shift work schedule. A typical case of wrapping each component in getter material adds time, cost, resources, and uses up to an estimated 50% of the load capacity. With the increased efficiency enabled by Quintus Purus®, clients have the opportunity to HIP 552,960 spinal implants per year (Tables 2 and Figure 3).
In conclusion, the growing Ti6Al4V market in the medical industry demands innovative developments to keep up with ever-increasing production volumes, whilst quality demands in lean production are becoming more significant. Solutions like the Quintus Purus® will allow manufacturers to have control over the quality of their titanium parts during a HIP cycle. It can be applied to produce alpha-case free components ensuring the optimal performance of orthopedic implants with increased service life.
References Ahlfors, Magnus, Chad Beamer. “Hot Isostatic Pressing for Orthopedic Implants.” (2020): https://quintustechnologies.com/knowledge-center/hiporthopedic-implants/. Allied Market Research Study performed for Quintus Technologies, 2022. Benady, Amit, Sam J. Meyer, Eran Golden, Solomon Dadia, Galit Katarivas Levy. “Patient-specific Ti-6Al-4V lattice implants for critical-sized load-bearing bone defects reconstruction.” Materials & Design 226 (Feb. 2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127523000205?via%3Dihub. Kelly, Cambre N., Tian Wang, James Crowley, Dan Wills, Matthew H. Pelletier, Edward R. Westrick, Samuel B. Adams, Ken Gall, William R. Walsh, “High-strength, porous additively manufactured implants with optimized mechanical osseointegration.” Biomaterials (Dec.2021): 279, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/.
About the Authors
Andrew Cassese is an applications engineer at Quintus Technologies. He has a bachelor’s degree in welding engineering from The Ohio State University.
Anders Magnusson is the business development manager at Quintus Technologies with an MSc in engineering materials from Chalmers University of Technology.
Chad Beamer
Applications Engineer
Quintus Technologies
Chad Beamer is a senior applications engineer at Quintus Technologies, and one of Heat Treat Today’s 40 Under 40 Class of 2023 award winners. He has an MS from The Ohio State University in Materials Science and has worked as a material application engineer with GE Aviation for years and as a technical services manager with Bodycote. As an applications engineer, he manages the HIP Application Center located in Columbus, Ohio, educates on the advancements of HIP technologies, and is involved in collaborative development efforts both within academia and industry.
Artificial intelligence remains a hot topic for every industry, not least heat treating. Understanding the how and why of AI’s potential impacts on the industry, however, is not so easily apparent.
Today’s article, written by Joe Coleman, cybersecurity officer at Bluestreak Consulting, breaks down the pros and cons of implementing AI, to help you decide if artificial intelligence might be a beneficial addition to your heat treat operations.
Joe Coleman, cyber security officer, Bluestreak Consulting
As all of you are aware, artificial intelligence (AI) is getting more and more attention, and companies are beginning to use AI to help with many aspects of running their businesses. I’m sure you’ve heard of ChatGPT and other intelligent user interfaces (IUI). You may be one of those businesses considering the idea or experimenting with it to access its potential benefits for your business.
Like any industry, there are quite a few pros and cons associated with using AI to improve the heat treating processes. This article will outline some of these advantages and disadvantages. Always make sure you do your own research before jumping into the AI world because it’s not always what it seems.
What Is Artificial Intelligence (AI)?
Artificial Intelligence is the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to think and learn like humans. It includes a wide range of techniques and approaches, including machine learning, allowing computers to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as understanding natural language, recognizing patterns, solving problems, and making decisions. AI systems are designed to learn from data, improving their performance over time without direct programming. These technologies find applications in many areas, from virtual assistants and language translation services to autonomous vehicles and industrial diagnostics, revolutionizing industries and helping to shape the future of technology
Pros of AI in Heat Treating
Quality Improvement:
AI systems can monitor and help control the heat treatment process in real time, ensuring you have consistent quality and to minimize defects.
Predictive analytics in AI can anticipate potential defects, allowing for corrective actions before they occur.
Increased Efficiency:
AI algorithms can optimize processing parameters and reduce bottlenecks, leading to faster and more efficient heat treating processes.
AI-driven automation can improve employee labor throughput and increase overall production speed.
Cost Reduction:
By optimizing utilities usage and resources, AI can help reduce the plethora of operational costs within heat treating facilities.
Predictive maintenance generated by AI can prevent costly equipment breakdowns and production downtime.
Customization and Personalization:
AI algorithms can analyze customer requirements and tailor heat treating processes to their specific needs.
Improved data analysis can lead to the development of new and specialized heat treatments for different metals and alloys.
Data Analysis and Information:
AI systems can process enormous amounts of data generated during heat treatment, collecting valuable information that can be used for process improvements and better-quality management.
Pattern recognition and statistical process control (SPC) analysis by AI can identify trends and correlations that could normally be overlooked.
Click image to download a list of cybersecurity acronyms and definitions.
Cons of AI in Heat Treating
Initial Investment:
Implementing an AI system requires a significant initial investment in the technology, training, and infrastructure, which may be a showstopper for smaller businesses.
Dependency on Technology:
Dependencies on AI systems can be a problem if there are technical glitches or breakdowns, disrupting the entire heat treating process.
Data Security and Privacy:
AI systems rely heavily on data. Ensuring the security and privacy of sensitive data is critical, especially when dealing with Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), your proprietary heat treating processes, and sensitive customer information.
Ethical Concerns:
AI decision-making processes raise ethical questions, especially if the technology is used in critical applications, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability in AI decision-making is essential.
Skilled Workers Replaced:
Automation using AI might reduce the need for certain manual tasks, potentially leading to skilled workers losing their jobs without the necessary skills to operate or maintain AI systems.
Here’s the bottom line: You should always do your own research to see if AI is a good fit for your business. AI is not always better. There are upsides of using it, and there are definitely downsides to using it. You can’t always trust AI to give you the best information, so always make sure you confirm the information it is giving you through V&V (verification and validation).
At the Metal Treating Institute’s (MTI) national fall meeting, held October 9–11 in Tucson, AZ, Jay Owen gave an excellent presentation entitled, “Artificial Intelligence: Be Afraid or Be Excited.” Contact MTI by visiting www.heattreat.net.
