FEATURED NEWS

Four 40 Under 40 Alumni: Where Are They Now?

OCHeat Treat Today’s 40 Under 40 was created to bring recognition to young professionals in the industry, giving names, faces, and words to the rising generation of industry professionals. In this article, released in the final nomination period for Heat Treat Today’s 40 Under 40 Class of 2021, we caught up with exemplary classmates from 2020 to see what they have been up to since being recognized in September 2020.


Alberto Cantú
VP Combustion, Control and Services
Nutec Bickley

Alberto Cantú

"I’ve been working from home for the past year, which in my case means that I am saving 2 hours of commute time every day! That’s not only good for the environment but also for my pocket ?.

"With this 'extra time,' I decided I wanted to read more, so I subscribed to the Harvard Business Review magazine, which has been very helpful for work. But perhaps the most interesting thing I’ve read over the past year is a book by Dale Carnegie How to win friends and influence people. I know it’s a classic but I was very reluctant to read it because it felt like a cheesy self-help book (which I am not a fan of), but I have to say it has timeless advice."

Ellen Conway Merrill
Vice President
DELTA H TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Ellen Conway Merrill

"The pandemic certainly presented its share of challenges, but it’s also been incredible to witness the strides being made across the industry in such a short matter of time.

"They say necessity is the mother of invention and many businesses across the globe, including DELTA H, have embraced the opportunity to think differently and creatively to give both our employees and clients some semblance of normality and connectiveness.

"DELTA H is grateful to have come out of 2020 with a record year in revenue which could not have been done if it weren’t for the dedication of our team to push forward through uncharted waters and embrace change."

Jeff Opitz
President and Owner
CeraMaterials

.

Jeff Opitz

"Since my induction into the Heat Treat Today’s 2020 “40 under 40” class, CeraMaterials has been fortunate to enjoy a surge in new business and product development, which has been especially rewarding considering the challenging business environment we’ve been navigating since the onset of Covid.

"A few noteworthy achievements include:

  • Developing a new resin treatment for our line of carbon-carbon modular fixturing which reduces open porosity and enhances performance in oil quench and fuel vane applications.
  • Collaborating with several large aerospace entities to switch out graphite and alloy fixtures for carbon-carbon fixtures, resulting in increased throughput and tooling longevity.
  • Conducting a national rollout of carbon composite and graphite insulation products with McMaster-Carr, achieving a 100% fulfillment rating.

"Additionally, we have a new production line up and running for our signature “tight weave” carbon cordage, available in 24K and 36K weave patters, outgassed to 2200C. We’re working with key players in the “hypersonic” space, and are in the process of obtaining full ITAR certification to help our business reach new heights! We’ve also invested in our team by hiring a new digital marketing manager and have added a new member to our shipping and receiving department to ensure our customers are receiving undamaged material in a timely manner.

"I’m beyond grateful to our loyal customers and suppliers, as well as our new business partners who allow us to continue growing and serving the global heat treat market."

Esau Zamorano
Manufacturing and Heat Treating Project Engineer
Eaton Hydraulics

Esau Zamorano

1. Just a few weeks ago, the certification for EATON Hydraulics was obtained as a plant under the ISO 9001: 2015 system.

2. Preparing for a conversion from EATON Hydraulics to the Danfoss culture and business system.

3. Developing new projects to minimize the risk of operation in batch-type furnaces with the add of safety devices in the furnaces.

Four 40 Under 40 Alumni: Where Are They Now? Read More »

thyssenkrupp Steel Europe to Receive Radiant Tube Burner Technology

HTD Size-PR Logothyssenkupp Steel Europe will receive more than 250 new recuperative burners. These are designated for single ended radiant tubes (I-tubes) and W-Type radiant tubes. Final installation will be at FBA 7 of thyssenkrupp Steel Europe, Bochum (Germany), and delivery of the new combustion system will take place at the end of 2021. Commissioning is scheduled for the first quarter of 2022.

Tenova LOI Thermprocess placed the order and is part of a wider modernization project of a continuous galvanizing line at thyssenkrupp Steel Europe. The new combustion system, provided by German based burner manufacturer IBS Industrial Burner Systems, meets the highest requirements by targeting NOx-emissions lower than 140 mg/Nm³ @3%O2 – reference at target strip temperatures above 1652°F (900°C).

Thomas Wolf and Bernd Machovsky
Managing Partners
IBS Industrial Burner Systems GmbH

“This order is the latest of numerous appreciations of our efforts to provide state-of-the-art combustion systems for our customers,” states Bernd Machovsky, managing partner of IBS. His co-partner, Thomas Wolf, emphasizes, “Our ambition [. . .] is to provide environmentally sound and energy efficient solutions for all kinds of continuous strip lines, no matter if W-, double-P or I-Radiant Tube fired.”

With their LOOPFIRE®-technology, the burner manufacturer is able to achieve very low NOx-emissions simultaneously with highest thermal efficiencies of W-Type radiant tube burners, even when burning gases such as Coke Oven Gas (COG) and Coke-Oven / Blast-Furnace (COG/BFG) Mixed Gas.

thyssenkrupp Steel Europe to Receive Radiant Tube Burner Technology Read More »

Aerospace Castings Manufacturer Orders Large Capacity Casting Furnace

Michael Lister
Director of Sales - North America
Consarc Corporation

HTD Size-PR LogoThe Doncasters Group recently ordered a vacuum furnace for their Doncasters Southern Tool facility in Oxford, Alabama. The order includes startup and installation with delivery scheduled before the end of 2021.

The new 300-pound Consarc vacuum precision investment casting (VPIC) furnace is equipped with high vacuum capabilities, controls, and increased automation with Teach Pour and other features that will give this furnace exceptionally high productivity for Doncasters Group.

The company is an international manufacturer of high-precision engineering components, designed to operate in the most demanding conditions. They serve the world’s leading OEMs in the aerospace, industrial gas turbine, and specialist automotive markets.

This order represents the 16th VPIC ordered from Consarc for delivery in North America in the last 24 months. Globally, the supplier has received 30 orders for this type of equipment in the same time frame.

"The recent strength in obtaining new orders for this product line is a testament to a customer centric philosophy we have at Consarc," said Michael Lister, director of Sales – North America at Consarc Corporation. "Our clients are sophisticated process owners who are well versed in the equipment and have demanding specifications placed on them by their own customers. Our collaborative approach in design, both before and after the order, is why customers trust [us] with these high value projects. We are able to understand their current problems and engineer long term solutions to mitigate those issues."

Aerospace Castings Manufacturer Orders Large Capacity Casting Furnace Read More »

Fatigue Improvement for Gear Steels in Helicopter Powertrains, Phase 2

OC"A compressive surface stress can benefit bend fatigue performance by reducing the mean stress experienced during service, effectively offsetting the tensile stress generated by the cyclic loading conditions." In this Technical Tuesday by Justin Sims of DANTE Solutions, learn how a simulation program, funded by the U.S. Army, modeled the method of Intensive Quenching®.

This article covers Phase 2 of the project, a follow up to an article that was previously featured on Heat Treat Today. Check out more original content articles in this digital edition or other editions here.


Justin Sims
Lead Engineer
DANTE Solutions

Helicopter powertrain gearing can be subjected to tremendous loads during service. The high tensile loads experienced in the root of the gear tooth, combined with the cyclic loading conditions inherent in gear operation, can lead to cyclic bend fatigue failures. To improve cyclic bend fatigue performance, low alloy steels are often carburized and quenched. The combination of a high carbon case and low carbon core leads to increased strength and hardness in the carburized case, while maintaining a tough core. In this manner, the case resists wear and can carry a high load without fracture, while the core is able to absorb the energy imparted to it during operation. Besides the increased strength and hardness, the addition of carbon creates a chemical gradient from the surface of the component towards the core. The carbon gradient creates delayed martensite transformations, relative to the low carbon in the core, and is responsible for imparting residual compressive surface stress. A compressive surface stress can benefit bend fatigue performance by reducing the mean stress experienced during service, effectively offsetting the tensile stress generated by the cyclic loading condition

Since the timing of the transformation to martensite is the main driver in the generation of compressive residual surface stresses, it is possible, to some extent, to control the magnitude of the surface stress by changing the quenching process. Historically, transmission gears have been carburized and quenched in oil. However, as more and more attention is paid to improving part performance through processing techniques, other forms of quenching have become available that show promise in increasing surface compressive stresses, and thereby improving bend fatigue performance. Of particular interest, is a quenching method which utilizes high pressure, high velocity water to quench parts.

Source: DANTE Solutions
Table 1. Pyrowear 53 nominal chemistry.

Known as Intensive Quenching®, the method was developed by Dr. Nikolai Kobasko as an alternative means of quenching components to achieve deep residual surface compression and improve bend fatigue performance.1–3

The technology works by inducing a large temperature gradient from the surface to the core of the component. In non-carburized components, the process has been shown to provide an extremely rapid and uniform transformation to martensite in the surface layers, while the core remains austenitic. This creates a hard shell, under extreme compression. As the part continues to cool, the surface is pulled into an even deeper state of compression. As the core transforms, some compression is lost due to the expanding core, but the compression that remains is generally greater than that achieved by oil quenching.4–7

Source: DANTE Solutions
Figure 1. Gear CAD model (left) and actual test gear (right).

To evaluate the possibility of improving bend fatigue of helicopter transmission gears, a program was conceived to compare the bend fatigue performance of carburized gears quenched in oil versus carburized gears quenched using the Intensive Quenching process. Funded by the US Army, the project was comprised of two phases. Phase 1, described in a previous Heat Treat Today article, was a proof-of-concept phase, designed to prove that intensively quenched components could outperform oil quenched components in high cycle bend fatigue testing. Phase 2 then moved to actual transmission gear testing. DANTE heat treatment simulation was used extensively throughout the project to guide processing decisions and understand the mechanisms responsible for improved bend fatigue performance though the creation of residual surface compression. This article will examine Phase 2 of the project.

DANTE Solutions
Table 2. Test gear specifications.

Pyrowear 53 was the material of choice for the project, as it is used extensively in helicopter power transmission gearing. Table 1 lists the nominal alloy chemistry for Pyrowear 53, which is a low-carbon, carburizing grade of steel. Figure 1 shows a CAD model of the test gear (left) and a picture of an actual test gear (right); the actual test gear is copper plated to selectively carburize only the gear teeth. The gears were carburized as one batch, and then hardened and tempered to a tooth surface hardness of 59 HRC and a core hardness of 42 HRC. An oil quenching process was used to harden half of the gears and an Intensive Quenching process was used to harden the other half of the gears. Table 2 lists the dimensional specifications of the gear.

One benefit of using the Intensive Quenching process over a conventional oil quenching process is the development of high residual surface compression. Compressive surface stresses benefit fatigue performance by offsetting any tensile stress generated during loading, effectively reducing, or eliminating, the tensile load experienced by the material. Figure 2 compares the residual stress predicted by DANTE for the test gear subjected to an oil quenching process (top) and an Intensive Quenching process (bottom). It is clear that the Intensive Quenching process induces a greater magnitude of compression in the area of the tooth root, which is the location of most gear bending fatigue failures. The residual stresses present in the tooth flank appear equivalent between the two quenching processes, but the oil quenched component has higher tensile stresses under the carbon case. This could lead to problems should any inclusions or material defects be present in that location.

Source: DANTE Solutions
Figure 2. Residual stress prediction for test gear, comparing oil quench and Intensive Quench.

Figures 3 – 5 compare the residual stress profiles of the two gears at three gear tooth locations: flank, root-fillet, and root, respectively. The residual stress profiles for the two processes at the tooth flank, shown in Figure 3, are equivalent, as inferred from the contour plots shown in Figure 2. Both quenching processes generate a surface compressive stress of 275 MPa on the tooth flank. However, the residual stress profiles in the root area of the gear vary greatly between the two processes. Figure 4 shows the residual stress profile at the root-fillet, which is the location of the highest tensile stress during gear service. At this location, the rapid surface cooling afforded by the Intensive Quenching processes creates a large temperature gradient from the surface to the core, allowing more thermal shrinkage to occur after the surface transforms to martensite. The additional thermal shrinkage, combined with the concave geometry of the gear root area, creates additional compressive stresses in this area.

Source: DANTE Solutions
Figure 3. Residual stress versus depth prediction for test gear at point A, comparing oil quench and Intensive Quench.

Figure 4 shows that the Intensive Quenching process generated a compressive stress of 700 MPa on the surface of the root-fillet, while the oil quenched gear produced a 500 MPa compressive surface stress in this location. The intensively quenched gear also has a deeper layer of high compression, not rising above 600 MPa compression until after 1 mm below the surface. Figure 5 shows a similar trend for the root, but with an even larger difference between the two quenching processes, since the geometry is even more concave at this location. Again, the gear subjected to the Intensive Quenching process has high compression up to 1 mm under the surface and a compressive surface stress magnitude 300 MPa higher than the oil quenched gear at the root location. The modeling results indicate that the intensively quenched gears should outperform the oil quenched gears in bend fatigue given the increased surface compressive stress present.

Figure 4. Residual stress versus depth prediction for test gear at point B, comparing oil quench and Intensive Quench.

Figure 5. Residual stress versus depth prediction for test gear at point C, comparing oil quench and Intensive Quench.

All of the hardened gears were tested at the Gear Research Institute, located at Pennsylvania State University in State College, PA, using a servo-hydraulic testing machine with a specially designed fixture to apply a cyclic bending load to two teeth. A schematic of the fixture is shown in Figure 6. A load ratio of 0.1 was used for all fatigue tests to ensure the gear did not slip during testing by having a constant tensile load applied. The fatigue test was considered successful, defined as a runout, if the gear completed 107 cycles given a certain maximum load. The maximum bending stress, calculated for a stress-free initial condition, was used to compare the two processes.

Figure 6. Schematic of fatigue testing apparatus.

As previously mentioned, the effect of residual compressive stresses during tensile bend fatigue is to offset the tensile stress generated by the load. Figure 7 shows a DANTE model of the test gear subjected to oil quenching showing the residual stress from heat treatment (top) and the stress redistribution during the application of a 900 lb. load (bottom). Figure 8 shows the same conditions for the test gear subjected to the Intensive Quenching process. As can be seen from the two figures, in which the legend ranges are the same, there is substantially more compressive stress remaining in the root-fillet area of the gear subjected to the Intensive Quenching process when the load is applied. This means the effective stress experienced by the intensively quenched gear is less than that of the oil quenched gear, given an identical load.

Source: DANTE Solutions
Figure 7. Stress predictions for the oil quenched gear, showing the residual stress from heat treatment (top) and the stress change when a 900 lb. load is applied (bottom).

Source: DANTE Solutions
Figure 8. Stress predictions for the Intensive Quenched gear, showing the residual stress from heat treatment (top) and the stress change when a 900 lb. load is applied (bottom).

Figure 9 shows the residual stress profile from the surface at the root-fillet for both processes, in the unloaded and loaded conditions. From the plot, a load of 900 lb. generates a tensile stress of approximately 200 MPa, which is offset by the compressive residual stresses. With a 900 lb. load, neither gear sees any tensile stresses during loading, and thus, should runout during fatigue testing.

Source: DANTE Solutions
Figure 9. Comparison of predicted stresses versus depth for the oil quench and Intensive Quench gears in the unloaded (Initial) and loaded (Final) state.

Figure 10 shows the results of the fatigue testing. As expected, the gears subjected to the Intensive Quenching process have an increase in fatigue performance. The endurance limit of the intensively quenched gears is approximately equal to the difference in surface compression, though additional tests should be conducted to confirm this. Regardless, increasing the magnitude of surface compression through a process change can significantly improve fatigue performance of power transmission gearing.

Figure 10. S-N curves for the oil quench and Intensive Quench gears tested.

In conclusion, achieving higher residual surface compressive stresses during hardening of a carburized power transmission gear by way of a process change was shown to improve bend fatigue performance. This was confirmed by the company's simulations, which showed a significant increase in compressive surface and near-surface stresses when the gear was quenched using the Intensive Quenching process, as opposed to an oil quench. The cause of the increased compression was determined from simulations to be due to the combination of martensite formation in the surface layers of the gear and the accompanying thermal shrinkage of the austenitic core, which draws concave geometric features, such as a gear tooth root, into a higher state of compression. The large temperature gradient induced during the Intensive Quenching process is necessary to produce these conditions. Physical fatigue testing confirmed the simulation results, showing a significant improvement in fatigue performance for the gears quenched using the Intensive Quenching process. Accurate process simulation pointed to a heat treatment process change that could be used to achieve increased power density through a transmission as opposed to more expensive and time-consuming design changes.

 

  1. N. I. Kobasko and V. S. Morganyuk, “Numerical Study of Phase Changes, Current and Residual Stresses in Quenching Parts of Complex Configuration,” Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Heat Treatment of Materials, Berlin, Germany, 1 (1985), 465-486.
  2. N. I. Kobasko, “Intensive Steel Quenching Methods. Theory and Technology of Quenching”, SpringerVerlag, New York, N.Y., 1992, 367-389.
  3.  N. I. Kobasko, “Method of Overcoming Self Deformation and Cracking During Quenching of Metal Parts,” Metallovedenie and Termicheskay Obrabotka Metallov (in Russian), 4 (1975), 12-16.
  4.  M. Hernandez et al., Residual Stress Measurements in Forced Convective Quenched Steel Bars by Means of Neutron Diffraction”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Quenching and the Control of Distortion, ASM, (1996), 203-214.
  5. M. A. Aronov, N. I. Kobasko, J. A. Powell, J. F. Wallace, and D. Schwam, “Practical Application of the Intensive Quenching Technology for Steel Parts,” Industrial Heating Magazine, April 1999, 59-63.
  6. A. M. Freborg, B. L. Ferguson, M. A. Aronov, N. I. Kobasko, and J. A. Powell, Intensive Quenching Theory and Application for Imparting High Residual Surface Compressive Stresses in Pressure Vessel Components,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 125 (2003), 188-194.
  7.  B. L. Ferguson, A. M. Freborg, and G. J. Petrus, “Comparison of Quenching Processes for Hardening a Coil Spring,” Advances in Surface Engineering, Metallurgy, Finishing and Wear, SAE (01) 1373, (2002).

About the Author: Justin Sims has been with DANTE Solutions for eight years and is an excellent analyst and expert modeler of steel heat treat processes using the company's software. His project work includes development, execution, and analysis of carburization, nitriding, and quench hardening simulations. For more information, contact Justin at justin.sims@dante-solutions.com.

All images were provided by DANTE Solutions.

Fatigue Improvement for Gear Steels in Helicopter Powertrains, Phase 2 Read More »

National Mint of Egypt Secures Vacuum Heat Treating Furnace

HTD Size-PR LogoThe Mint of Egypt which manufactures both circulation and numismatic coin will receive a vacuum heat treat furnace. The furnace will be used to heat treat circulation and numismatic coin, embossing dies, medals, and special orders. This furnace to the Mint of Egypt is the first furnace provided by the furnace manufacturer to the country of Egypt.

The Mint of Egypt was established in 1950. After 70 years of operation, the first Egyptian Museum of Circulating Coins was created at the mint. It displays a rare collection of special coins representing important historic figures and events, such as the construction of the Suez Canal and the Aswan High Dam. The Vector furnace will be used by the Mint of Egypt mostly for producing collection seals.

"We needed equipment that would significantly increase our production capacity," commented General / Hossam Khedr, head of Egyptian Mint Authority, "With heat treatment in the vacuum furnace, our embossing dies will provide the highest possible quality and the durability that is important for the customers. Mints are very special companies. The ban on carrying embossing dies outside the mint prevents us from using commercial hardening plants. That is why it was extremely important to us that the equipment for upgrading our mint represented the highest quality."

Vector Vacuum Furnace by SECO/WARWICK

The Vector® vacuum furnace with 15 bar high-pressure gas quenching -- a product sold by North American SECO/VACUUM Technologies, which is the sister company to vacuum furnace supplier SECO/WARWICK --  is equipment that fits the operating performance requirements of mints.  Furnaces with a graphite round heating chamber can be used for a majority of standard hardening, tempering, annealing, solution heat treating and brazing processes.

In the mint industry, these vacuum furnaces are popular as they ensure powerful, uniform gas cooling, which guarantees the high hardness and durability of mint tools. The perfect quality of mint punches and other products is ensured by the very high purity vacuum atmosphere. The parameters of the equipment purchased by the Egyptian Mint are very similar to the solutions delivered by SECO/WARWICK last year to the Mint of Poland — one of the most technologically advanced mints in the world. Some of the equipment installed by the Polish supplier has been operated by this customer for over 9 years.

Maciej Korecki
Vice President of the Vacuum Furnace Segment
SECO/WARWICK
(source: SECO/WARWICK)

"Mints are very demanding customers. They manufacture high quality products that requires perfect details and production repeatability. Collectors, who are the customers of mints, expect the highest care, durability and quality of the finished products," said Maciej Korecki, Vice-President, Vacuum Furnace Segment, SECO/WARWICK Group. "This makes us even more happy that our flagship product — the Vector vacuum furnace — will be installed in another national mint."

Worldwide, there are 70 national mints and several dozen privately-owned mints, manufacturing almost 800 various coin denominations. The oldest mint in the world that has been continuously operated since 864 and the eighth oldest company in the world is Monnaie de Paris in France. The British Royal Mint is the tenth oldest company in the world, established in 886. National Mints provide the official currency for their home countries. They need to comply with rigorous standards that guarantees the weight, purity, and face value of the bullion they produce. This guarantee enables the bullion products manufactured by the state to enjoy a global reputation as the ideal source for investment in high-quality noble metals.

National Mint of Egypt Secures Vacuum Heat Treating Furnace Read More »

Heat Treatment System to Expand Specialty Automotive Fastener Manufacturer’s Capabilities

HTD Size-PR LogoOne of the world’s largest producers of high volume, specialty automotive fasteners based in Italy has awarded two contracts to Canadian heat treat supplier in order to expand their manufacturing capabilities with a mesh belt fastener heat treatment system.

The two systems being supplied represent CAN-ENG Furnaces International Ltd. (CAN-ENG) high-capacity line of mesh belt fastener heat treatment systems.

The client returned to the furnace manufacturer in order to receive a furnace with proven low energy consumption, reduced part mixing, reduced part damage potential, and high uptime productivity when compared to conventional cast link furnace designs.

The system will include: computerized vibratory loading system, rotary phosphate removal washer, mesh belt hardening furnace, oil quench system, post quench wash system, mesh belt temper furnace, soluble oil, and part containerization system.

CAN-ENG Furnaces International Ltd. (CAN-ENG) high-capacity mesh belt fastener heat treatment system

These fully integrated systems will feature CAN-ENG’s Process Enhancement Technology – PET™ System (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System) which provides the client with complete product traceability through the critical thermal process, process data collection, historical event archiving, process variable trend monitoring, scheduling optimization, and energy consumption features which are unique to CAN-ENG systems.

These new systems will be commissioned to the EU in early 2022.

Heat Treatment System to Expand Specialty Automotive Fastener Manufacturer’s Capabilities Read More »

Heat Treat Radio #57: Hot Isostatic Pressing – Join the Revolution

Heat Treat Today publisher Doug Glenn discusses hot isostatic pressing with Cliff Orcutt of American Isostatic Presses, Inc. Learn about the revolution that is occurring in the heat treat industry and how it is being used across various manufacturing industries

Below, you can either listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or you can read an edited transcript.

 



The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.

Doug Glenn (DG):  First off, Cliff, I want to just welcome you to Heat Treat Radio.  Welcome!

Cliff Orcutt (CO):  Thank you.

DG:  If you don't mind, let's give our listeners just a brief background about you.

CO:  It's been 43 quick years in the industry.  I, actually, did start as a child.  My father was one of the original people at Battelle where it was patented in the '50s, so, I grew up under that.  Right out of school, I went to work for his company, after he and another gentleman left Battelle, Mike Conaway, and they formed Conaway Pressure Systems.  By the time I was 20, I had already installed 10 HIP units around the world and helped design and build the Mini Hipper.

I was involved in 1978 in moving the world's largest HIP unit from Battelle to Crucible Steel in Pittsburgh, which is now ATI.  Also, in 1979/80, we installed the very large system for Babcock and Wilcox at the Naval Nuclear Fuel Division in Lynchburg, VA.  Both of those units, 40 years later, are still running.

I'm also past president of the Advanced Materials Powder Association, part of MPIF, and I was also a director of their Isostatic Pressing Association.  I am currently the chairman of the International HIP Committee.  We put on the triennial HIP conference every 3 years.

DG:  Is that part of APMI?

CO:  It's actually its own group.  It was formed by all of the people in HIP around the world, in Europe and Japan and the United States back in, maybe, 1983 or so.

DG:  What's the name of the organization?

CO:  It's called the International HIP Committee.  It's kind of a loose organization which the only thing that we do is put on this conference and we bring in speakers from around the world and promote HIP technology, basically.  Our last one was in Sydney, Australia in 2017.  We were supposed to have one in October 2020 and now it's pushed until September of 2021.

DG:  Where will that be?

CO:  It's going to be in Columbus, Ohio because that was the original founding city.  Every other conference, we move to the United States, Europe or Japan.  So, it's coming back to the US.  I'm in charge of it.  We have some other good people on the board, including Mike Conaway, who was one of the original Battelle people.  Victor Samarov is on the board helping us with the meeting, programming and so forth.  People can visit www.hip2020.org to see information on that.

DG:  I got you a little distracted on that.  Keep going with your background.

CO:  Personally, in these 43 years, I've installed over 200 units, hands on.  I've flown about 5 million miles, I've been to 38 countries; you name it, I've been there, good ones and bad ones.  In my early years, when my father started this company, they pulled about 6 people out of Battelle and they were, basically, my teachers.  So, instead of going to educational school, I went to HIP school.  We had some of the top people:  Roger Pinney, Hugh Hanes, Don Woesner, Gary Felton and another gentleman, Bob Tavnner, all came out of there.

In 1979, my father passed away, and his company then sold to ASEA who then became ABB who then became ABB Flow and then they became Quintus now.  That's how they have a location in Columbus, as well.

A couple of people, including Bob Tavnner, left and formed International Pressure Service.  That was in 1983.  They hired me as operations manager, and we grew to be a force to be reckoned with and the Japanese then bought us.  At that time, Rajendra Persaud, or Reggie we call him, left and formed AIP (American Isostatic Presses) and I said, “Hey, Reggie, let's have a two person company again rather than two one-person companies.”  That was 1992 and so, 28 years later, now we're a force to be reckoned with again.

DG:  Tell us a little about AIP.

CO:  American Isostatic Presses, when the Japanese bought us, we had a lot of technology and a lot of good people.  Then they hired a new CEO and he decided he didn't want to continue building HIP units, he wanted to do something else.  So, Reggie formed AIP and I joined him and we pulled 5 other people back from ITS.  We sold our first big job in 1994 to Horus in Singapore, a multimillion dollar job, and took off from there and haven't looked back.  We started on a shoestring, no venture capitalists, no dollars, and now we have 4 buildings and locations around the globe.

"We're just a high tech blacksmith, that's all it is.  Instead of hitting something with a hammer, we're using gas pressure to squeeze on it."

DG:  How many units do you think you guys have installed since 1994?

CO:  As AIP, around 150.  It's snowballing.  In the last 5 years, we've sold 5 big units.  Up until that time we were mainly mid and small.  We had orders for some big ones but, unfortunately, we couldn't get export licenses for them.  The technology that grew out of Battelle was based on nuclear fuel rods for the submarines.  Admiral Rickover wanted to extend the life of the sub, so it was protected for quite some time.  And then they also had missile nose cone technologies it was used for and that's still what they're protecting it for is missile nose cones.

We had some orders in the late '90s early 2000 through China for large equipment and we were denied.  Then we were denied in India, so we kind of just got stuck with the smaller to mid-size units.  Here recently, it's starting to expand.  Things are loosening up a little bit.

DG:  AIP today is selling not only in North America, obviously, but you're pretty much selling around the world, anywhere where it is legal to sell, you'll do it.

CO:  Yes, if we can get an export license, we will put it in.  Some of the rules have relaxed a little bit, and, with some countries, we're more friendly with them now.

DG: I think a lot of our listeners are probably not going to be as familiar with HIPing, hot isostatic pressing, as other more common “heat treat operations” like carburizing, hardening, annealing and that type of thing.  Take us back, class 101:  What is HIPing?

CO:  We're just a high tech blacksmith, that's all it is.  Instead of hitting something with a hammer, we're using gas pressure to squeeze on it.  We heat it up hot, we put pressure on it, and we're basically densifying it, making it more dense, and getting rid of imperfections in the metal.

A lot of what's done is castings.  When you have a casting, the metal is hot, so it's expanded.  When it cools, it cools from the outside in, so it freezes on the outside first and then the center starts to shrink.  It creates internal porosity.  Most of that porosity is thermal shrinking which is a void.  So, you put it back in our heat treatment, apply pressure to it and you get rid of the voids that are left.  You make the casting dense and better grain structure and more homogenous.  It increases fatigue in property strength.  That's the number one use of it right now.

Second is probably powder metallurgy where you take powder metals and you can blend powders and you can start with different grain sizes and different materials.  You put them in a container because the gas would go through the container if you didn't have something around it.  So, you squeeze on the container and it densifies whatever is inside of it and you make a solid part.  For example, a lot of powder metallurgy billets which are then used for extruding into other products or rolls and different things.  We do a lot of pump bodies and valves for deep sea work, extruder barrels, you can bond things; there are a whole lot of applications.

DG:  The two things I understand with HIPing are high temperature and high pressure.  Give us a sense of high temperature.  What does that mean?  Is it hotter than a typical heat treat operation?  And. how about the pressures?  Give us a sense of what the pressures are looking like.

CO:  A lot of people are familiar with sintering.  That's where you just take the metal up, you sinter it and the grains merge together by melding and attractive forces.  What we're doing is: we're not taking it up to those high temperatures to where the part actually is molten or melting, we're taking them up below that and applying pressure.  Because of the pressure, we're basically pressurize sintering; we're adding force to make it sinter faster or better or at lower temperatures.

Usually, it's about 150 C degree less than sintering temperature.  Again, it depends on the process of what we're trying to do with it.  Typically, most parts are done around 15,000, some parts 30,000.  Here, at AIP, we actually have test units up to 60,000 PSI and we've actually built 100,000 PSI HIP units.  You're above the yield strength of some of the metals you're using.  Most of the majority, again, in like castings, titaniums around 970, steels around 1225, but we go up to 2200 C for some things, even higher for like half-in carbide with people pushing it to 2300.  It's pretty hot, a lot of pressure.  Unfortunately, high temperature and high pressure costs money.  You want to use the lowest pressure and the lowest temperature you can get by with, but sometimes you can't.

DG:  It's harder, I would imagine.  The way I've always heard it said is that the hotter it is, the more difficult it is to keep, let's say, that cylinder container that you're talking about.  If it becomes hotter, it's harder to keep it together.  I would guess you're right, when you've got higher temperatures, things tend to blow apart easier?

CO:  Not so much.  The temperature is contained in the middle of the pressure vessel, so you've got plenty of insulation around it and you keep your container cool.  The goal there, in a HIP unit, because it's the expensive piece of item, you want maximize your work zone, that's where you have to have good engineering to make sure you do keep the container cool.

DG:  Are most of those units water cooled jackets, or are they cold wall?

CO:  They're almost all hot wall, but some of them are cooled internally and some of them are cooled externally.  You still have loss to the metal, whether it's internal or external cooled, but internal gives you faster cooling than the external.

The big advantage of HIPing is, like with some materials like titanium, you can eliminate a lot of machining.  Making chip that you can't really reuse real easy makes a lot of economic sense.  Titanium is a very high melting temperature, so you can't take those chips and melt them cheaply.  Aluminum, you can.  A lot of aluminum, people can't afford to HIP it because you can just recast it.

HIP is an expense process.  The equipment is expense.  It uses argon gas.  Swinging a hammer is cheap, but using gas pressure, it's so compressible, that you have to put a lot in.  You can reclaim some, but the cost is still high.  You're talking medical, aerospace and military, basically.  Forty years ago, I thought every car would have HIP pistons.  It's just not going to happen.  They can't afford it.  I do see Edelbrock and Trickflow both have HIPed aluminum race heads, though.  If you get into where you have the economy of doing something like that, you can apply it.  You're definitely going to get a better product, it's just price versus performance.

Watch an "oldie but goodie" on what HIP is.

DG:  As far as why people want to do the HIPing, I guess, primarily, it's an elimination of, let's say, defects or inclusions or whatever, either cast parts or powder metal parts, you're increasing fatigue strength, and things of that sort.

Are there any other major reasons why people want to HIP?

CO:  Well, there are some things you can't make other ways.  In other words, it's like water and oil, you can't mix them very well and some metals you can't melt them and just make a molten bucket and pour it.  In HIP, since you're starting with powders that are solid, you can blend things like graphite powder and steel.  You couldn't blend them very well in a molten state, but in here, you can.  And, you can squeeze it to solid, you can get interlocking and bonding and diffusion bonding materials that you couldn't otherwise.  So, you can make things you couldn't make any other way.

Also, you can eliminate machining.  For instance, you're making a titanium fitting that has a lot of holes on the inside, it might even be curved and really hard to drill, but you can lay it up and do powder metallurgy around it and make shapes that you couldn't make otherwise.  A lot of parts are pressed and sintered for years, for instance, for transmissions.  Something like that is real easy because it's a small disc and it's not very long.  But, if you're trying to make a real long part that is a strange shape, you can't just press and sinter it.  You can do it from HIPing.  You can do big shapes that you couldn't get enough force on or you can't fit into a press dye.  You can do big shapes that you couldn't get enough force on or you can't fit into a press dye.  It opens up a lot of options.  A missile nose cone, for instance.  There is just almost no way to press and sinter a cone, but with HIPing you can make that shape and you can make it very uniform.  There's really no other way to do it.

DG:  I think that is one of the benefits of HIPing, from what I understand, it is absolutely equal pressure on all parts when you increase the pressure.  It's not like you're only pushing on one part, like with a forge press, or something like that – equal pressure all round.

CO:  Yes.  And it gives you uniform density throughout the part, which is very difficult.

DG:  HIPing is primarily used on castings, powder metal and things of that sort, helps us get a very clean part, if you will, to eliminate inclusions, and minimize the porosity.

You may have mentioned this before, but the actual history of HIPing.  It started at Battelle?

CO:  It started at Battelle [Memorial Institute], I think in '55 or '56.  Again, for the nuclear fuel rods for cladding of the fuel rod.  Four people were involved in the patent, two of them, Ed Hodge and Stan Paprocki, "the two others on the patent were Henry Saller and Russell Dayton" I worked for both of them over my years.  It grew out of Battelle and then in 1975 is when my father and Mike Conaway left and formed Conaway Pressure Systems.  That was kind of like the beginning of the commercialization of it.  There were some other companies, like Autoclave Engineers, that were building high pressure equipment, but they weren't really offering packaged HIP units.  Conaway Pressure, CPSI we called it, was really the origination of commercial HIPs as we know it.

DG:  You hit on this a little bit, but I want to make sure that we're clear on it.  You mentioned the industries that are using it, but let's just review that real quickly, and maybe if you can give any example of parts.  You said, they've got to be higher value parts because the process is expensive, so we're looking at aerospace, medical and that type of thing.  What primarily, at least in those two industries, and other industries if you want to list, are the parts being run?

We’re seeing a lot of application now in ceramics. We see pump plungers and ceramic bearings. Here, at AIP, we do a lot of military work for armor, boron carbides, spinell (21:03), things that are really hard, ceramics. . . You want them perfect because if they have a defect in it, that’s a starting point for a crack. A lot of brakes for jets and fighter jets.

CO:  A lot of extruder barrels.  What happens is you can use a solid steel chunk of metal for the barrel portion but then you can HIP or diffusion-bond powders on the inside of that barrel that might be very expensive.  If you're doing something like a crane or something where the teeth are outside, you can weld on.  A lot of times they'll weld on hard brittle materials that help you dig things with a digger.  But on an extruder barrel, it's on the inside, it's internal; it's very hard to coat down on the inside.  So, we can actually bond those powders to the inside of extruder barrels.

Another big application is sputtering targets.  I don't know if you're familiar with sputtering targets, but they're basically sacrificial material that you plate onto other materials.  The target is just something that is being hit with an electron beam inside a vacuum furnace.  It creates a vapor and by charging the different particles you can attract  them and plate things out.  All of your mirrored windows, all of your hard drives, all of your CDs and DVDs, when you see that mirrored finish on there, that is a sputtered coating and those coatings come from these things we call targets.  What happens is, if say, you're doing a chromium target, at the end,  if you try to molten cast it, if you had a bath or a melt of chromium, it would get oxides in it and be terrible.  But, you can make very pure powders.  That's one of the good things about HIPing is they can make very pure powders by blowing argon through a stream and it makes nice pure powder.  Then, we can put it in and squeeze it into a solid billet and make a target which then can be evaporated in the vacuum chamber for coating.

We're seeing a lot of application now in ceramics.  We see pump plungers and ceramic bearings.  Here, at AIP, we do a lot of military work for armor, boron carbides, spinell (21:03), things that are really hard, ceramics. . . You want them perfect because if they have a defect in it, that's a starting point for a crack. A lot of brakes for jets and fighter jets.

We have a process inside the HIP that we call carbon-carbon impregnation.  We take pressure and we push the carbon into the 3D woven graphite fibers and make brakes and nose cones.  Other materials like beryllium, it's very hard to make beryllium and machine it because it's kind of dangerous, and so forth.  Again, they take powders and the HIP the beryllium to make things like space mirrors and other jet parts.

Now, we've got into more things like teeth and braces are being done with ceramics- new transparent braces made out of aluminum and different materials, zirconia caps for your teeth.  Again, if you don't HIP them and they've got a defect in it, it will be like a plate when you drop it.  But, if you get rid of that defect, now you've got something harder than steel.  On the other end we're doing jewelry such as gold and platinum rings.  The benefit there is you don't have porosity.  If you have porosity, it's like trying to sand a sponge and you can never find a nice perfect surface.  But if you've got rid of that and the sponge is now hard, then you can polish it and you're not taking off any material.

It hasn't really happened too much, but we're seeing rumblings on phone cases.  A lot of those have been metal in the past, but now they want to do the magnetic charging and it doesn't work real well.

DG:  It's got to be glass of some sort, right?

CO:  Yes. We're competing with Gorilla Glass.  Some companies are looking at transferring that to zirconia.  The iPhone watch, or iWatch, they were making it in zirconia, and that's one of the applications and things like that.  Ceramic rings, ceramic knives, ceramic scissors – they're all being HIPed.

On the diffusion front, like the vacuum plates for the fusion reactor, like ITER, they can bond copper to tungsten and different things.  You couldn't really weld them, because if you try to weld tungsten, it gets real brittle and cracks, but you can diffusion bond materials and you can do things you couldn't do otherwise.

DG:  Those are great examples, and I think that gives folks enough.  Are there any other examples that jump to your mind that you think people ought to know about, or is that it?

CO:  The big one right now is 3-D printing.  There is a lot of interest in 3-D body parts, titanium, stents, spines, implants for teeth and screws.  Just about anything you can put in 3-D, they're trying to print.  The problem with 3-D is, it's not perfect yet.  Maybe in 10 years it will be perfect, but they're making imperfect parts when they print them.  If you put them in the HIP and squeeze on it, not you've got a pretty much perfect dense part that's bonded better, stronger, improved properties.

It also allows you to print faster, so maybe you'll want to print an imperfect part, but you can just print twice as fast, so you increase the range between the particle and speed up your process.  Again, price versus performance.  You look at what the benefits of the two ways are.

DG:  I've got a question.  In heat treating, a lot of times after heating, you have to worry about dimensional change of the part, right?  So, I'm thinking to myself, you've got a cast part with some innate porosity and you put it in a HIPing unit.  Do you have to compensate, or do you have to be careful about dimensional change, most notably, I would think, with pressure shrinkage of the part?

CO:  Very little because it's isostatic and we're talking about micro macro small porosity.  If you had a 1 inch hole in the center and you were squeezing that out, you might give it up, but microscopic particle size is really not that much.  Now, in the powder metallurgy, we say it's isostatic but then you do have some of the stresses in the container that you put around it.  You might see some distortion at the corners where you welded a container, and so forth.  But, there's good software out there, there's good programming and things and a lot of empirical data.  People can pretty much design to shape within a couple millimeters.

DG:  You mentioned this earlier, but the gas that's used is predominantly argon, because it's a heavy gas?

CO:  The reason we use argon is the furnaces we use can't run in air or oxygen.  We have a choice of nitrogen or argon, the two commercial grade gases.  Nitrogen also embrittles materials like molybdenum.  It tears up our furnaces, so argon is the preferred choice.  Also, it has poor thermal conductivity which is good for the insulating portion of the HIP unit and when you get it dense enough then it does conduct good enough that it works for the part.  It's the all around cleanest, best gas but it's an inexpensive gas.  We do use nitrogen on some things.  A lot of ceramics like silicon nitride we'll use nitrogen, for different reasons.

One of the biggest issues right now is we see a lot of interest in oxide ceramics.  I've got many customers that want us to build a real high temperature oxygen furnace and we're real close to issuing that.  What it will allow is to actually sinter in the HIP unit at high temperatures under partial oxygen which hasn't been done yet.

DG:  Let's change gears just a little bit.  You actually have two sister companies.  I want to ask you two questions and you can incorporate information about those sister companies with this:  One, why would a company want to outsource a HIPing process?  And, two, on the flip side of that, why would a company want to purchase their own HIPing equipment and do it in-house?  Maybe you can address both of those, because you've got experience on both sides, based on your sister companies.

CO:  The outsourcing is really easy.  If you've only got one part to HIP, you're not going to buy a HIPing unit.  It's quantity versus can you support the operation of the HIP unit.  And, you've got to do it profitably.  You've got to do everything profitably or you're not going to do anything.  You've got to look at the capital equipment cost and the space.  Maybe you don't have space in your building or you don't want to build a new building, or, maybe you just don't have the people that have the knowledge in HIPing and you don't want to hire and train a maintenance crew, and so forth.  Even some big companies like Pratt &Whitney and Wyam-Gordon both owned massive HIP units at one time and they decided it was cheaper to sell the HIP unit to Bodycote and then outsource it.

Sometimes economics may play in there, but sometimes maybe you want to have in-house sourcing.  Maybe your part is so heavy, you can't afford to ship it.  Then, you look at that and say you might want to have your own HIP for that reason, or you've got so many parts, you just can't afford to box them all, ship them out and bring them back.  So, there are reasons why you'd want to own your own HIP unit.

DG:  You've got sister companies that do the service, right?  AIP, American Isostatic Presses, the company that you're with specifically, they build the units.  But you've got sister company that actually does the service.  Tell us about them a little bit.

CO:  When we started out, we were just going to build HIP units and we were selling to a lot of the toll companies and we still do.  But, around 2004, after the economic downturn of 2001, we decided we would get into building our own pressure vessels.  We hired an engineer, Dan Taylor from Hydropack, and started building pressure vessels because we thought we could do it better.  Then we were looking at toll.  A lot of people would come to use and say they were not happy with turnaround or other things and they asked if we could help them toll HIP?  We kind of got drug into it.  We didn't, again, want to step on our customer's toes, so we came out with a different name and sort of hid behind that a little bit and didn't really even market it for a long time.  But then again we kept getting dragged in, so we opened another plant and now, this last year, we opened another one.  I've never seen a toll HIP company go out of business yet or lose money.  Equipment building is up and down, you're riding the waves.  It helped us flatten the curve a little bit.  It flattened out the cash flow curve and it helped us a lot.  Our competitors weren't doing it.  They still aren't really doing it like we're doing it.  The original name was Isostatic Pressing Services (IPS), then when we did our plant in Oregon, we called it ITS, Isostatic Toll Services.  The family wanted to have different names and different people involved and there are different investors.  It's AIP, basically, but there are other family members in the Persaud family.  In Spain, the big one we opened last year, it kept the ITS name, but there are five players in that one, so we're one of the players.

DG:  So, the sister companies have Toll Services, I know one in Oregon.  And one in Ohio?

CO:  The other is in Mississippi and then one in Spain.  The Ohio one is under the AIP name.  Basically, what we do in Ohio is we do more research.  We, again, are expanding here in Columbus.  We are getting ready to build again and we'll start heading a little more into the production toll.  We've got a couple customers that are, again, pulling us that way.  But, right now, Columbus has 5 HIP units, up to abut 500 mm in diameter.  Most of it is high temperature.  In Columbus, we concentrate on 2000 C.  All of our other plants are doing production work which is medical implants and turbine type parts and those are all 1225 C roughly.

DG:  Let's talk about some of the more latest advances, some of the newer things that are coming onto the scene.  You mentioned one, I know, and that was the ceramic oxides.  Let's talk about that a little bit more, and also, are there any other advances in the HIPing world that we should know about.

CO:  I've been in it from almost day one, and it hasn't changed much.  If you look at HIP from 40 years ago and today, they'd look the same.  We still use the same valves and fittings.  The big thing that has changed is computer control.  AIP was one of the very first, I won't say the first because, again, back at Battelle in 1973, they had a Foxboro PDP that was in the whole room and had tape reels in it.  I remember seeing it run a HIP unit, you'd type in STOP and START.  It was like a movie.

Around '93 or '94, AIP branched into computer control pretty hard and we've kind of  led since then.  It allows us to do a lot of things, number one is that we can run it remotely.  So, in Mississippi, we actually run our plant from Columbus.  They load it and we take it over here.  Our guys here in Columbus, they run our units all night by staying at home and watching them.  Computers really help us there.  As for service, we were able to get on the computer and look at a piece of gear in Singapore and fix it.  That's the thing that really helped us.

"Where we're advancing things is in furnace technology for high temperatures, getting these furnaces to last longer, making them more reliable. . . We're trying to hit the everyday guy and make him profitable, get parts in and parts out."

Where we're advancing things is in furnace technology for high temperatures, getting these furnaces to last longer, making them more reliable.  That's kind of one of the keys because, again, with costs and the economics of HIP is you want not to have to be repairing it and replacing things all the time.  That's what we concentrate on.  We don't try to push the edge.  I think some of our competitors really try to push the edge and do things that may or may not be beneficial or even needed, but they're just trying to push the edge of things.  We're not.  We're trying to hit the everyday guy and make him profitable, get parts in and parts out.

As far as the oxygen, that's because ceramics has been coming for a long time and it's still coming.  It's just never really taken off yet, but sooner or later it has to because they're higher temperature, stronger materials in steels, it's just we are competing against forgings and we re competing against casting companies.  That's kind of the whole thing with all the HIP companies.  There are basically only four main players in the world.  We are all kind of small.  We all kind of try to work together as much as we can and we all make good equipment to try to advance HIPing technology.  More than beating up on each other, we try to beat up on the forging companies and the casting companies.  We want to take their business.

In the research here, a lot of what we're doing is trying to work on the higher temperatures and higher pressures.  If you can go to higher pressure, you can drop the temperature which then minimizes grain growth.  In many materials, that improves either clarity of the material, if it's a transparent ceramic, or it can improve the strength of a steel because you have better interlocking between small particles.  We're trying to do a lot more in high pressure, high temperature than some of the other companies.  A lot of the companies are just in the metals only; they really focus on that.  We're doing some really odd things here.  We do stuff that nobody else wants to fool with.

DG:  And you have fun while you do it!  I'm curious, just from my own purposes.  I envision these things as kind of like bell furnaces, a cylinder.  Is that true?  And, how big, on average, is a HIP unit?  What's the work zone dimensions, let's say?

CO:  They start with our smallest one which is about the size of a desk and it has a work zone of about 3 inches x 4 inches.  We can build a little bit smaller, but economy-wise, we just built that one small model and that is the smallest that anyone uses.  It's the size you need for a tensile bar.  Just about every university and lab has an AIP small unit.  Then, they can go up to massive units.  The large one in Japan that Quintus built is 82 inch hot zone.  That's a big diameter.  They're talking about a 100 inch or 110 inch hot zone.

DG:  That's diameter.  How tall was it?

CO:  3 meters.  Some people are looking at 4 meters or even longer.  I've been told that the Army said if you can put a whole tank in one, they'd do it.  One of the drivers there is turbine blades.  As the blades get bigger, like on jet engines, your turbo fan is the outer blades and so forth, those big shrouds as they get bigger, the gas economy gets better, so they would like to build massive engines and they would like some of those parts HIPed.  They want really big HIP units.   Another one is in nuclear reactors for small modular nuclear power.  They'd like to replace some forgings and if they could do it with powder metallurgy lids, and so forth, and those need a 3mm diameter HIP unit.  The majority of the work is in the 1 meter range.

For more information: isostaticpressingservices.com or aiphip.com/links

Doug Glenn <br> Publisher <br> Heat Treat Today

Doug Glenn
Publisher
Heat Treat Today

 

 

 

 

 


To find other Heat Treat Radio episodes, go to www.heattreattoday.com/radio and look in the list of Heat Treat Radio episodes listed.

 

Heat Treat Radio #57: Hot Isostatic Pressing – Join the Revolution Read More »

Fives to Receive High Efficiency Burners for Silicon Steel Processing

HTD Size-PR LogoFives, an international industrial engineering group for silicon steel processing lines, will receive high efficiency burners with low emissions. This will help the company as they fulfill recent orders involving the supply of annealing and pickling lines as well as annealing and coating lines to Chinese steelmakers.

The burners were designed and supplied by WS Wärmeprozesstechnik, and with their FLOX® process, Fives will be able to manufacture using the strictest emission values without SCR (selective catalytic reduction) treatment for their furnaces for silicon steel. This was necessary as China’s steelmakers have been demanding combustion technology with lowest NOx emissions in order to meet climate-related goals.

Dr.-Ing. Joachim G. Wünning
President
WS Wärmeprozesstechnik GmbH

The silicon strip line with FLOX® burners from WS (pictured above) will assist Fives in their current orders as well as their continued design and supply of machines, process equipment, and production lines in various sectors. These sectors include steel, aerospace and special machining, aluminum, automotive and manufacturing industries, cement, energy, logistics and glass.

"It is our ambition at WS," states Dr.-Ing Joaching G. Wünning, president of WS Wärmeprozesstechnik GmbH, "to provide solutions for all continuously operated strip lines which can reliably attain NOx emissions well below 100 mg/Nm³, with simultaneously high combustion efficiency over 80% and which are, already today, suited for a future with green combustion gases."

Fives to Receive High Efficiency Burners for Silicon Steel Processing Read More »

10 Heat Treat Topics in the Words of the Experts

OCHeat Treat Radio is a podcast where Doug Glenn, publisher of Heat Treat Today discusses cutting-edge topics with industry-leading personalities. Among many cutting-edge interviews and conversations on the latest technologies and commercial happenings in the industry are topics like AMS2750F, ferritic nitrocarburizing, and supply chain options.

You can subscribe to Heat Treat Radio on iTunes or SoundCloud, and even listen to these episodes on PodBean, iHeart Radio, and ListenNotes. Check out some of the top heat treat topics from the list of episodes below.


1 - The World of Ferritic Nitrocarburizing with Thomas Wingens

"A big part of the success of FNC is the combination with post oxidation. That is a big part because the combination of ferritic nitrocarburizing with post oxidation leads not only to a mechanical strong surface with compressive stresses, it also has a very high corrosion resistance."

Thomas Wingens, WINGENS LLC - International Industry Consultancy

Click Here to Listen!


Episode 1 of 3 of AMS2750 series

2 - Andrew Bassett on AMS2750F (Part 1 of 3)

"One of the things I always had in my mind when I first got involved with the specification was that the specifications were written by the aerospace 'primes,' but that’s not the case; it involves people, such as myself, who are end-users of this specification. I’m an end-user, so I’m able give my input and say, 'Hey, this doesn’t make sense. What you want to add into the spec is not real world.' It’s nice that people such as us get involved with these specifications."

Andrew Bassett, Aerospace Testing and Pyrometry

Click Here to Listen!


3 - Rethinking Heat Treating for the 21st Century with Joe Powell (Part 1 of 4)

"I am a commercial heat treater who believes that part design should be integrated for heat treating by the part-maker. It’s a nuance, but what it really boils down to is that sometimes commercial heat treaters do it best, but sometimes the part-maker can do it better."

Joe Powell, Integrated Heat Treating Solutions

Click Here to Listen!


4 - Metal Hardening 101 with Mark Hemsath, Part 3 of 3

"[Nitriding], and really its cousin FNC (ferritic nitrocarburizing), are actually fairly inexpensive treatments and they can be performed on final dimension parts. There is no post machining and there is minimal distortion. That’s kind of my opinion of why it has done well.”

Mark Hemsath, Nitrex Heat Treating Services

Click Here to Listen!


5 - Peter Hushek on Reducing TUS Failures

"Who wouldn't want to have a smoother operation? Not have to schedule people, pay overtime, justify it. We're three years into the project and I think we have a very viable tool for heat treaters to see what they currently cannot see."

Peter Hushek, Virtual Visual Surveys

Click Here to Listen!


6 - James Jan & Andrew Martin on Development of Modeling Software

"We model what happens with FIRE CFD code, we model what is happening at the transition of the interface between the metal component and the water. Because when something that hot gets plunged into water, it is quite an interesting thing that happens—it is called the Leidenfrost Effect. Initially, what happens is the component is so hot, it forms a film around the outside of it, a vapor film, and perversely that vapor film then insulates the component from the water. That film slowly breaks down then you get into nucleate boiling and things like that, and that becomes a lot more aggressive and the cooling happens much faster until you eventually get a single phase. But actually modeling the boiling process is what the CFD code does. That is the secret sauce that we’re bringing to the party here."

James Jan, Ford, and Andrew Martin, AVL

Click Here to Listen!


7 - A Discussion with Carl Nicolia, PSNergy President

"Their recovery cycle was reduced by 25%. Now, a recovery cycle is from the time I close the door to the time I start my controlled cycle. 25% reduction. And in that total cycle, they dropped gas consumption 5% which eventually led to an increase in output of that furnace by 10%. What we love about this, and this is kind of the theme of the article really, is that the total cost to implement this was less than $10,000. This is a perfect example of high value solution. I hate to say ‘low cost’ because cost is relative, but this is high value. If I can deliver 25% improvement with less than $10,000, or if I can deliver 10% double-digit output increases for less than $10,000, that’s a high value solution."

Carl Nicolia, PSNergy

Click Here to Listen!


8 - A Discussion with Harb Nayar, Sintering Guru

"The other one I think that’s going to emerge is most probably making more and more parts by powder metallurgy from metal powder which are 100% free alloyed. In other words, all the elements are in each metal powdered particle. In other words, you’re starting with a micro ingot as opposed to a big ingot that you normally use to make bars, and then from bars you cut pieces, and then from those pieces you do hard forging or machining."

Harb Nayar, TAT Technologies LLC

Click Here to Listen!


9 - Justin Rydzewski on CQI-9 Rev.4 (Part 1 of 4) – Pyrometry

"Perhaps the most significant change within the temperature uniformity survey section is to the alternative temperature uniformity survey testing methods. In instances when I can’t perform a survey with sensors being trailed in, or I can’t send a data pack sort of unit or a PhoenixTM unit through that furnace system itself to collect the data, for systems like that, in the third edition, there were three or four paragraphs of information about what you could do."

Justin Rydzewski, Controls Service, Inc.

Click Here to Listen!


10 - Heat Treat Modeling With Justin Sims

"The interesting thing is that there is a phenomena precipitation hardening that goes on in aluminum and titanium. But it also goes on in these high alloy steels. It is a secondary hardening mechanism. We’ve been working on that and we feel that once we can handle secondary hardening in steel, then the jump to aluminum and titanium should be pretty straightforward."

Justin Sims, DANTE Solutions

Click Here to Listen!

10 Heat Treat Topics in the Words of the Experts Read More »