THERMOCOUPLES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Reader Feedback: Measuring Junction Construction in AMS2750 Rev. G

Readers are checking out recent AMS2750 Rev. G changes and want some more information from Heat Treat Today about a specific clarification. Read the correspondence about the implications of AMS2750 Rev. G paragraph 3.1.1.5 about how to measure junction construction.

Douglas Shuler, lead auditor at Pyro Consulting, has written numerous articles with Heat Treat Today about AMS2750 standards. Check them out by searching "Doug Shuler" at www.heattreattoday.com.

Submit your question, comments, thoughts, or queries here or email Bethany Leone at editor@heattreattoday.com.


READER QUESTION: After combing the new AMS2750 Rev. G, I found that paragraph 3.1.1.5 no longer allows thermocouples to be tack welded directly to parts, OR to representative dummy parts. This has been standard practice for decades. So I dug into it further with the folks from PRI and it turns out to be true. They’re now expecting load thermocouples to be either placed inside of a part (ends twisted and inserted), or inside the hole of a dummy block.

I’d done some searching online and there isn’t a single source talking about this major change. This could lead to a lot of failed upcoming Nadcap audits.

Doug Shuler
Lead Auditor
Pyro Consulting

Douglas (Doug) Shuler (Pyro Consulting) for Heat Treat Today: Historically (i.e. prior to Rev. F), AMS2750 was silent on measuring junction construction. In Rev. F, the construction of the measuring junction was as follows:

Measuring junctions shall be made by any combination of twisting and/or welding the thermal elements provided there is no addition of filler metal.

This raised concerns about both the use of quick tips and spot welding to make the measuring junction. The AMEC AMS2750 revision team engaged with Cleveland Electric Laboratories to perform testing on these measuring junctions as compared to the twisting/welding combinations.

The conclusion of the tests were that both quick tips and spot welding to a part/heat sink became unstable at temperatures above 2000°F. The quick tip crimping point and the spot welds showed rapid oxidation and increased errors in a short period of time. Based on the results of these tests the AMEC AMS2750 revision team put forth the following update in Rev. G:

Measuring junctions shall be made by either of the following methods:

        • Any combination of twisting and/or welding the thermoelements provided there is no addition of filler metal (including ungrounded and grounded MIMS).
        • Spot welding the thermoelements directly to a part, simulated part, or heat sink is permitted for temperatures ≤2000°F or 1100°C.

This allows spot welding measuring junctions for process temperatures at or lower than 2000°F. The team and AMEC members decided that quick tips were to unstable to permit their use going forward.

READER FOLLOW-UP: Our current method that we’re using is to twist the thermocouple using a set of Twister Pliers, then tack-weld that twist onto the part (first photo below). We’ve been doing this for parts up through brazing temperatures (~2150°F) without issue. We recently ran a furnace run around 2100°F with parts tack-welded as I’ve described AND had T/Cs that were just twisted with no tack weld. We noticed there was no significant difference in the temperature the TCs were reading. This was also our technique that we used at my previous company.

The way I read AMS2750 Rev. G was: You may twist and weld thermocouples to a part, but only for temperatures less than or equal to 2000°F.

To comply with Rev. G, we have gone ahead and made heatsink blocks to make sure we’re in compliance. Our new method of temperature measurement is twisting the wires and sticking the twisted end down inside of a block of solid metal (like the one I’ve shown below).

Source: Heat Treat Today Reader


We welcome your inquiries to and feedback on Heat Treat Today articles. Submit your questions/comments to editor@heattreattoday.com.

Reader Feedback: Measuring Junction Construction in AMS2750 Rev. G Read More »

Start Your Week with 4 Heat Treat Articles in Spanish

OC

At Heat Treat Today, we want to make sure everyone in the North American heat treat industry is well informed so they can be happier and make better decisions. With that in mind, we have been growing our library of Spanish heat treating content.

Below, click the blue headings to learn from Víctor Zacarías about pyrometry standards in the aerospace and automotive industries, from Carlos Carrasco about selecting heat treating equipment, from Bill Munn about leadership and motivation, and from Erika Zarazúa about CQI-9's probe method A. If you'd like to view this content in English, click the America flag icon. 


Pirometría: la normativa para un Procesamiento Térmico confiable en la Industria Automotriz y Aeroespacial

Víctor Zacarías
General Director
Global Thermal Solutions Mexico

"Las operaciones de tratamiento térmico son percibidas generalmente como cajas negras cuyos resultados son poco predecibles. Si bien, entendemos los mecanismos físicos involucrados para modificar las propiedades de un material, los hornos de tratamiento térmico son sistemas termodinámicamente imperfectos, y por ende los resultados finales en ocasiones también lo son."

Contact us with your Reader Feedback!

"Heat treatment operations are generally perceived as black boxes whose results are not very predictable. Although we understand the physical mechanisms involved in modifying the properties of a certain material, heat treatment furnaces are thermodynamically imperfect, and sometimes the final results are too."

This article first appeared Heat Treat Today's March 2022 Vacuum Furnace print edition.

Guía para la Selección de Equipos para Tratamiento Térmico

Carlos Carrasco
Founder
Carrasco Hornos Industriales

"Este artículo ayuda a los ingenieros a comprar equipos de tratamiento térmico. Hay muchas razones para seleccionar cuidadosamente los hornos industriales. Uno, es el costo del horno en sí y otro, es que el producto que se está tratando térmicamente afectará los resultados de su empresa."

"There are many reasons to select industrial furnaces carefully. One is the cost of the furnace. Another is realizing heat treating will affect the product and the bottom line. There is more specialized engineering in heat treating equipment than is apparent from the outside."

This article first appeared in Heat Treat Today's November 2021 Vacuum Furnace print edition.

Guía para el líder que quiere motivar

Bill Munn
Leadership Coach
Bill Munn
Source: Bill Munn Coaching

Por definición, de aquí se desprende que no se desempeña solo; es más, está posicionado no solo para trabajar en conjunto con otros seres humanos sino también para liderarlos; si su potencial se ha de realizar, puede que ya haya entendido bien que en esas personas reposa la verdadera clave del éxito que a futuro pudiera conseguir ¿Cómo, pues, lograr su compromiso?

By definition, this means that you are not functioning alone. Moreover, you are positioned not only to work with fellow human beings, but to lead them. And if your potential is to be realized, you may already know well that those people are the true key to your future success. So how will you engage them?

This article first appeared in Heat Treat Today's September 2022 print edition.

Guía para conducir pruebas System Accuracy Tests conforme a CQI-9 4ta. Edición

Erika Zarazúa
Regional Purchasing Manager 
Global Thermal Solutions México
Source: Global Thermal Solutions México

"Las pruebas SAT deben realizarse a todos los sistemas de control, monitoreo y registro de los equipos de procesamiento térmico. Esto no aplica para los sistemas de ‘alto-límite” cuya única función es la de proteger al horno de un sobre calentamiento."

"System Accuracy Tests (SATs) must be performed on all control, monitoring, and recording systems of thermal processing equipment. This does not apply to “high limit” systems, whose sole function is to protect the furnace from overheating."

This article first appeared in Heat Treat Today's August 2022 Automotive print edition.


Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com


 

Start Your Week with 4 Heat Treat Articles in Spanish Read More »

Exploring Thermal Sensors in Hydrogen Atmosphere for Turbines and Other Applications, Part 2 of 2

OCSome thermal sensing systems are not able to measure the lower end of the spectrum, while other systems are not able to measure the higher end. In Part 1, we learned how Nanmac and Rhenium Alloys, Inc. worked together to discover a thermal sensing system in hydrogen atmospheres that answered these issues.

In Part 2, explore thermal sensors in hydrogen atmospheres for temperatures above 2642°F to discover if ceramics can reach 4000°F. Can these ultra-high temperature systems be built commercially?

Today's Technical Tuesday was written by Herbert Dwyer, chief technical officer of Nanmac and president of Herb Dwyer & Associates, LLC.; Todd Leonhardt, metallurgist and director of Research & Development at Rhenium Alloys, Inc.; and Joe Johnson, senior metallurgical technician at Rhenium Alloys, Inc. This article was originally published in Heat Treat Today’s March 2022 Aerospace Heat Treating print edition.


Joe Johnson
Senior Metallurgical
Technician
Rhenium Alloys, Inc.
Photo Credit: Rhenium Alloys

Herbert Dwyer
CTO, Nanmac
President, Herb Dwyer & Associates

Todd Leonhardt
Metallurgist and Director of Research & Development
Rhenium Alloys, Inc.

Introduction

Temperature sensors for use in stationary or aviation turbines and/or test stands must also work in high wind shear, thermal shock, mixed gas environments and vibration which add more challenges. Key sections of the turbine, that contribute to the increased efficiency of the turbine operation, require higher temperatures than the traditional 2642°F (1450°C) to be measured. No thermocouple exists that can make these measurements reliably today. Theoretically, the temperature has been calculated to be near 4262°F (2350°C).

While there is significant history of using optical pyrometers above 2642°F (1450°C), the optical pyrometer is not practical on the actual turbine or in the test stand. The PIWG (Propulsion Instrumentation Working Group) consortium developed a matrix that added a requirement for directly measuring the hot section of the turbine to 4262°F (2350°C).

Figure 1. W5Re/W26Re wire with an alumina insulator and molybdenum sheath
Photo Credit: Herb Dwyer and Rhenium Alloys

To get the most useful result, we combined the insulator (a form of ceramic), the sheath (molybdenum), and the Type C wire, tested them and then performed a full lab analysis after each test period. The various step temperatures are shown in Figure 1 and started at 3362°F (1850°C) and the exposure time varied from one to six hours and compared this thermocouple assembly to a calibrated pyrometer in the same hydrogen-based atmosphere furnace. Our previous testing showed that a better understanding of the interactions between these materials was critical to longer life and performance at these UHT ranges. Our lab analysis also looked at both the mechanical and the chemical properties of these interactions as well.

This turns out to be a significant challenge because of the interaction of the material systems that cause the resulting eutectic temperatures to be much lower than their individual temperature ratings. This includes: the ceramic insulators, refractory metal sheath, and W-Re wires. A key question now is, are we approaching the material systems maximum capabilities? Further testing up to 4172°F (2400°C) is planned in 2022 to determine that answer. In addition to the material requirements, the real questions include: how accurate are these direct reading thermocouples and can they be calibrated at these UHT (Ultra-High Temperatures); what is their overall life and what are the drift factors?

Generally, the ASTM E230 Table for the Type C wire shows an accuracy of +/- 1% up to the maximum of 4199°F (2315°C). Earlier tests by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) showed that the typical accuracy of the Type C assembly (in this case the wire and its insulators only, not the sheathed versions) above 3182°F (1750°C) starts to degrade from those shown in the E230 Table. The accuracy may be closer to +/- 1.5% which at these temperatures may become a critical determiner for the life and maintenance costs. While we used a Type C wire supplied by a highly recognized manufacturer for our test program, our emphasis was to address the insulator since it was the weaker link in the overall assembly.

Nanmac set a goal to achieve the ASTM E230 Table accuracy of +/- 1% or better up to the maximum of 4199°F (2315°C) with the insulator life being analyzed. In addition, they have set their sights on developing a direct comparison measuring system by using a NIST traceable optical pyrometer calibrated and a NIST traceable thermocouple for Ultra-High Temperature measurements. NIST has previously used this type of system.

Experimental Setup

The temperature measuring experiments used a 33 KVA Spectra-Mat furnace which has three tungsten rod elements for heating as shown in Figure 2. The outer bell and pedestal are water cooled to prevent overheating during operation. The heating elements are surrounded on the outside diameter by a multilayer of 0.009” thick molybdenum sheet as shown in Figure 3. The NIST traceable thermocouple is fed through the pedestal and attached via molybdenum clamp above the pedestal shown in Figure 4. The thermocouple is centered in the hot zone to provide uniform temperature. The calibrated NIST traceable optical pyrometer is set at a specific distance from the quartz window imbedded into a water-cooled bell. The optical pyrometer is aimed 1.0” below the tip of the thermocouple and the emissivity is set for molybdenum, since the thermocouple sheath is molybdenum as shown in Figure 2. The optical pyrometer output was adjusted for the reflection angle, spot location, spot size, and to ensure that it was perpendicular to the assembled thermocouple, because these were identified as the critical variables for this calibration process.

By running the optical pyrometer/thermocouple experiment several times, it was demonstrated that this combination of a thermocouple and pyrometer can give reliable and repeatable comparative data as shown in Figures 5 through 7.

The furnace is increased in power in timed set points (steps) which show up on the graph as temperature versus time. Experiments were run at 2912°F (1600°C) and 3632°F (2000°C). As shown in the graphs, the yellow line (thermocouple) tracks these step point changes as the power is increased. The blue line (optical pyrometer) starts at 1472°F (800°C) since the optical requires color to measure temperature. After 1472°F (800°C) both thermocouple and optical pyrometer track temperature well. At the 2912°F (1600°C) the optical pyrometer was reading slightly lower temperatures than the thermocouple in all experiments at the higher temperatures.

It is believed that this is caused by the thermocouple reading the combination of convective, conductive, and radiated thermal energy while the pyrometer is responding to the radiated energy as potentially attenuated by the hydrogen gas atmosphere.

While the Type C matched legs (W5Re/W26Re) wire, according to the ASTM E230 Table, covers a range from 32°F to 4199°F (0°C to 2315°C) the initial test furnace was limited to a range of 1472°F to 3632°F (800°C to 2000°C) due to the type of insulator being used in this experiment.

The next set of experiments will have an operational temperature of 3992°F (2200°C) with the same ramp rate holding the same variables. In the near future, Rhenium will use a front loading Centorr furnace which is rated up to 4532°F (2500°C), but for now, tests up to 3992°F (2200°C) are planned in 2022. The experiments helped to identify key elements of the assemblies and suggested additional long duration tests that will address each element in more depth. These experiments are ongoing as of this Part II article and further reports of the results will be published over the next year.

Our tests used different types of insulators rated at these temperatures and after the tests, we performed a cross sectioned lab analysis to determine the interaction of these insulators with the wire and sheath.

Comparison of the Assembled Thermocouple and the NIST Traceable Pyrometer Output Curves

As the curves indicate, it is possible to directly compare the output of the Type C based thermocouple to the NIST traceable pyrometer, and, after some experimentation, we were able to develop a repeatable process which showed that the pyrometer tracked the assembled thermocouple.

Using this approach, we more realistically determined the actual accuracy of the assembled thermocouple under UHT and hydrogen atmospheres. Our life testing has achieved 100+ hours and these tests continue.

Typical Applications of These Types of Assembled Thermocouples

  1. Ultra-high temperature sintering and alloying of unique material(s) is used in turbine blades; hypersonic vehicles; space craft; nuclear reactors.
  2. Ultra-high temperature furnaces where critical temperature measurements at these elevated temperatures are important (tantalum materials for capacitors etc.).
  3. Very high temperature section of the stationary or aviation turbine where true temperature measurements, at UHT up to 4262°F (2350°C) can help to plan maintenance, contribute to life cycle calculations, and enable the optimization of the turbine’s combustion efficiency.
  4. Replacement of the Type S (platinum-rhodium), Type R (also a platinum-rhodium), and a Type B (platinum-rhodium). These are short lived at temperatures above 3002°F (1650°C) (and, in the case of the Type B, has a limited lower temperature measuring range of 1112°F (600°C) due to its low millivolt output).
  5. The Type C output at 1112°F (600°C) is 10.609 MV or almost 6x greater than that of the Type B (1.792 MV) allowing more accurate temperature measurement. The Type C at 572°F (300°C) has an output of 4.865 MV or almost 3x that of the Type B at 1112°F (600°C) enabling a wider temperature measuring range at a much lower total cost and a more robust temperature measurement.

About the Authors:

Herbert Dwyer is the CTO of Nanmac, and president of Herb Dwyer & Associates, LLC. Herb specializes in international business development, electromechanical manufacturing, heat treating furnace optimization, and thermal measurements up to 4172 °F. Herb has over 50 years of experience in the field of thermal and pressure sensors for the aerospace industry.

Contact Herb at herbdwyer1@gmail.com

Todd Leonhardt, a metallurgist and director of R&D at Rhenium Alloys, Inc., possesses an in-depth knowledge of high temperature refractory metal and is an expert in rhenium. As a 38-year veteran of industrial and government research in the areas of material characterization and processing refractory metals, Todd has shared his knowledge in over 25 publications including NASA technical memorandum, peer review journal articles, and conference proceedings.

Contact Todd at Todd.Leonhardt@rhenium.com

Joe Johnson is the senior metallurgical technician at Rhenium Alloys, Inc. and has been working with refractory metals, specifically rhenium and its alloys, for over 15 years. While his background is in material processing, most of his tenure has involved process metallurgy. In addition to co-authoring several technical publications, Joe enjoys performing failure analysis and designing custom tools and equipment.

Contact Joe at Joe.Johnson@rhenium.com or 440.309.2098


Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com


 

Exploring Thermal Sensors in Hydrogen Atmosphere for Turbines and Other Applications, Part 2 of 2 Read More »

Exploring Thermal Sensors in Hydrogen Atmosphere for Turbines, Part 1 of 2

OC

Direct thermal measurement of temperatures within a turbine is limited due to many factors. Some thermal sensing systems are not able to measure the lower end of the spectrum, while other systems are not able to measure the higher end. In this article, learn how Nanmac and Rhenium Alloys, Inc. worked together to discover a thermal sensing system in hydrogen atmospheres that solved these issues and more.

Today's Technical Tuesday was written by Herbert Dwyer, chief technical officer of Nanmac and president of Herb Dwyer & Associates, LLC., and Todd Leonhardt, metallurgist and director of Research & Development at Rhenium Alloys, Inc. This article was originally published in Heat Treat Today’s December 2021 Medical & Energy print edition.


Introduction

Todd Leonhardt
Metallurgist and Director of Research & Development
Rhenium Alloys, Inc.
Herbert Dwyer
CTO, Nanmac
President, Herb Dwyer & Associates

Direct thermal measurement of temperatures within the turbine (both fixed and aviation) and on the test stand, has been limited to 2642°F (1450°C). This uses a precious metal thermocouple composed of platinum (Pt) and rhodium (Rh) which are very expensive and have limited life above 3182°F (1750°C).

The conditions within the turbine also limit the choice of direct measurement systems due to the combustion by-products, wind speeds, pressures, shear forces, vibration, and thermal shock.

The recent focus on “green energy” gases that are more friendly to the atmosphere and offer excellent energy density per volume of gas points to a gas that has been around for many years — hydrogen. However, the use of hydrogen as a combustion gas within the turbine can be challenging as well. Molecular hydrogen is generally smaller than molecular oxygen. The by-product of the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen forms water. Water vapor is more climate friendly than carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, or other forms of carbon found in turbines using standard jet fuels, natural gas, or combinations. Another challenge is the wide variety of temperatures to be measured at various points within the turbine, from inlet air to combustion to outlet air, the range can be from -22°F (-30°C) or lower to a predicted high of 4172°F (2300°C). No one type of thermal measuring system exists today that covers this total range. With this as a baseline, Nanmac and Rhenium Alloys, Inc. worked together to explore various combinations of material systems that could operate at the lower temperatures, plus reaching the upper temperatures of 4172°F (2300°C).

The system that could cover this range was the Type C thermocouple with a 5% tungsten and 26% rhenium wire composition. One key part of the system is the insulator which separates the two legs of the thermocouple, the second key part is the refractory sheath like tantalum or molybdenum. The range of temperature covered by this combination was from about 662°F (350°C) to 4172°F (2300°C). The actual testing temperature was performed from 1292°F (700°C) to 3992°F (2200°C).

Application and Testing Objectives:

  • Fixed and aviation turbines (includes direct mount and test stands)
  • Test temperatures above the 2642°F (1450°C) range
  • 100% hydrogen atmospheres
  • Thermal shock issues
  • Life issues at elevated temperatures and stress
  • High shear stress caused by air flow
  • Low and high frequency vibrations
  • Mounting options to accommodate space issues
  • Atmospheric corrosion caused by particulates in combustion gases
  • Cold junction transition location
  • Mounting depth

Objectives, Equipment, Assembly, and Test Times

Of concern, as atmospheres approach the ultra-high temperatures (UHT) region above 2642°F (1450°C), there are materials interactions between the components of the thermocouple (sheath, insulators, and thermocouple wires) and the furnace environment (representing the combustion section of the turbine) at elevated temperatures. Individually, the materials have high melting points, but combining these materials within the thermocouple system can cause low melting point eutectic to form a reaction between materials to occur. These material interactions can cause the thermocouple to fail prematurely in service at unexpectedly lower temperatures than predicted.

During Nanmac’s material compatibility testing, interactions between the sheath, insulators, and Type C thermocouple wire occurred. The weak link in the thermocouple system is the high temperature insulators of hafnia, alumina, and boron nitride. As the temperature approached the 3812°F (2100°C) test temperature, the insulators decomposed. Some of the observed failures appeared to be due to the hydrogen gas penetrating the end closure welds or even through the sheath walls; some of the insulators failed at these temperatures at much lower levels than expected. Some failure modes were caused by the insulator melting and attacking the thermocouple wires leading to fractures of the junction welds and the individual thermocouple wires.

Nanmac and Rhenium Alloys, Inc. used hydrogen cover gas because of access to a furnace which used that atmosphere. The use of hydrogen as a future combustion gas gave insight into how these material systems would operate in that harsh environment. The furnace also gave insight into the thermal shock issues from quenching the furnace with hydrogen gas for rapid cooling which allowed for a quick turnaround in testing. Additionally, the processes helped evaluate the possible impact of 100% hydrogen atmosphere on the insulator’s materials, wire junction welds, and sheath end closure weld. The furnace used for compatibility testing used a calibrated control system with a reference thermocouple and a calibrated optical pyrometer.

The test assemblies for compatibility testing were smaller lengths of typical thermocouple systems composed of the 0.050” walled molybdenum sheath. The insulators tested included: hafnia (HfO2); 99% alumina (Al2O3), and boron nitride (BN insulator and Type C 24 AWG [0.020]) thermocouple wire assembly, which was back filled with argon gas to prevent oxidation of the components. Test durations were one hour, two hours, and six hours, at elevated temperature and a complete post-mortem evaluation was performed on all test articles to evaluate compatibility of the thermocouple components at UHT.

Discussion:

The ASTM E20 Committee is exploring the possible increase in calibration temperatures from the existing 2642°F (1450°C) to 3182°F (1750°C) or higher. While it appears the individual materials can achieve these and even higher temperatures, tests indicate that this is not the case for all the combined thermocouple components.

Discussion of some of the material issues includes:

1. As atmospheres reach 3182°F (1750°C) and up to 4172°F (2300°C), materials are limited to refractory materials like:

  • Molybdenum, tantalum, platinum, and other alloys of these materials.
  • Ceramics like 99% alumina, zirconia, hafnia, boron nitride, silicon nitride (SiC), and others were tested.
  • Wire materials are limited to some alloys of tungsten (W) and rhenium (Re).

2. Combining these materials also lowers the system’s overall temperature. For example, the boron nitride, on its own, can reach temperatures up to 5252°F (2900°C), but when combined with the Type C wire and molybdenum sheath, it can only operate reliably to 3632°F (2000°C). Figures 1 and 2 are examples of failures of ceramic insulator exposed to high temperature service conditions.

NOTE: During lab analysis, at the various temperatures, it was observed that decomposition and significant degrading of the insulators had occurred. The exposure to the UHT not only attacked the ceramic insulators but also attacked the Type C wire and its sheath. Part two of this article will show some of the pictures of this attack and discuss some of the approaches to address this material issue at these UHTs, above the threshold of 3182°F (1750°C).

3. Cost now becomes a significant driver. Some of these materials, including alloys of platinum and rhodium can cost upwards of $2,000 or more per inch, are very hard to machine and form, and can contain hidden cracks and voids that under these extreme temperatures lead to reduced mechanical life.

4. The operating atmospheres have a significant impact on the alloys used, and high carbon loads from unburned fuel can also impact these refractory materials, for example:

  • Oxygen attacks molybdenum, tungsten, and even tantalum, although to a lesser extent than the attack on molybdenum.
  • Hydrogen’s small molecules can attack the insulator by penetrating the welds; the insulators exposed to this reducing gas oxidize, melt, and shrink causing potential grounding, secondary junction(s), and further mechanical failure.
  • Nitrogen becomes a significant factor when used above 1832°F (1000°C).

5. The operating environment is not friendly to the following:

  • The need to directly insert into the combustion gas flow chambers exposes the tip to very concentrated thermal and mechanical forces.
  • Space restrictions limit the wall thickness and lengths (to resist H2 penetration and handle the extreme heat, thicker walls and an OD of ¼ inch or higher are required).
  • A turbulent air flow at speeds up to 400 mph.
  • Air pressures to 500 psi or higher.

6. The shorter the thermocouple (TC) length, additional thermal transfer issues are exacerbated. For example, four inch or shorter lengths can adversely impact any brazed joints from the TC to extension wire [(the temperature in this area where the tip may be at 3632°F (2000°C)], can be 1832°F (1000°C) or higher. Braze joints fail at much lower temperatures.

  • The transition at this point may also have insulation issues since it may be difficult to control the addition of an acceptable insulator in the transition area. The potential of secondary junctions is quite high (any significant mechanical movement (expansion and contraction) can cause high stress and weak insulators.
  • A technique using swaging has been somewhat successful but requires materials that can be swaged, limiting options to very expensive alternatives today. Some mineral insulated (MI) cables may be acceptable but need more testing.
  • The cold reference junction may be unacceptably close to the high temperature (1832°F or 1000°C), thus requiring a relocation further away from this point, requiring possibly a unique analog to digital converter (A/D) like those used in cars. This has not yet been fully developed at this point.
  • Nanmac is working on a method to carry the TC wire further into the test stand or turbine. This will address the transition issue, enable the use of existing A/Ds, and offer potential integration into the turbine engine itself.
  • By using this method (see d, above) on the test stand, it is possible to economically investigate this method, maintain safe operations, and make it useable once the system issues are resolved at the test stand.

The Type C was chosen for this temperature requirement (4172°F or 2300°C)

  1. Other than the Type D or A (both of which are in very limited supply and are basically of the same alloy construction), the Type C is well known and characterized, can operate up to 4172°F (2300°C), and has some significant history of use in this temperature realm [the tungsten (W)/Rhenium (Re) alloys are used regularly in high temperature metallurgical furnaces and even within the turbines].
  2. Type C is recognized by ASTM and NIST, its accuracy is 1%, and by comparison calibration Type C has been shown to be capable to about 0.5%, not the 0.25% of the Type S or R, but at a cost of 75% or less and its life, at elevated temperatures, is good and predictable.
  3. Type C has existing MI cable matching extension wire.
  4. Type C has existing A/D systems; thus, it is easier to integrate.
  5. Type C has existing connectors, color coded wire, and terminal connections.

Can other ceramics reach 4000°F (2204° C)? Can these ultra-high temperature systems be built commercially? To find out the answers to these questions, don’t miss the second part of this article in March’s (2022) Aerospace Heat Treating magazine and learn about the results, conclusions, and next steps.

About the Authors:

Herbert Dwyer is the CTO of Nanmac, and president of Herb Dwyer & Associates, LLC. Herb specializes in international business development, electromechanical manufacturing, heat treating furnace optimization, and thermal measurements up to 4172 °F. Herb has over 50 years of experience in the field of thermal and pressure sensors for the aerospace industry.

Contact Herb at herbdwyer1@gmail.com

Todd Leonhardt, a metallurgist and director of R&D at Rhenium Alloys, Inc., possesses an in-depth knowledge of high temperature refractory metal and is an expert in rhenium. As a 38-year veteran of industrial and government research in the areas of material characterization and processing refractory metals, Todd has shared his knowledge in over 25 publications including NASA technical memorandum, peer review journal articles, and conference proceedings.

Contact Todd at Todd.Leonhardt@rhenium.com

Exploring Thermal Sensors in Hydrogen Atmosphere for Turbines, Part 1 of 2 Read More »

Don’t Be Unique! 10 Temperature Uniformity Tips

OCWe’ve assembled some of the top 101 Heat Treat Tips that heat treating professionals submitted over the last three years into todays original content. If you want more, search for “101 heat treat tips” on the website! Today’s tips are all things temperature: thermocouples, how to keep temperatures in check, TUS, and more.

By the way, Heat Treat Today introduced Heat Treat Resources this year; this is a feature you can use when you’re at the plant or on the road. Check out the digital edition of the September Tradeshow magazine to check it out yourself!


Temperature Monitoring When the Pressure is On!

Increasing in popularity in the carburizing market is the use of batch or semi-continuous batch low pressure carburizing furnaces. Following the diffusion, the product is transferred to a high-pressure gas quench chamber where the product is rapidly gas cooled using typically N2 or Helium at up to 20 bar pressure.

In such processes, the technical challenge for thru-process temperature monitoring is twofold. The thermal barrier must be capable of protecting against not only heat during the carburizing, but also very rapid pressure and temperature changes inflicted by the gas quench. From a data collection perspective, to efficiently perform temperature uniformity surveys at different temperature levels in the furnace it is important that temperature readings can be reviewed live from the process but without need for trailing thermocouples.

During the gas quench, the barrier needs to be protected from Nitrogen N2(g) or Helium He(g) gas pressures up to 20 bar. Such pressures on the flat top of the barrier would create excessive stress to the metal work and internal insulation / logger. To protect the barrier therefore a separate gas quench deflector is used. The tapered top plate deflects the gas away from the barrier. The unique Phoenix design means the plate is supported on either four or six support legs. As it is not in contact with the barrier no force is applied directly to the barrier and the force is shared between the support legs. The quench shield in addition to protecting against pressure, also acts as an additional reflective IR shield reducing the rate if IR absorption by the barrier in the vacuum heating chamber.

(PhoenixTM)


3 Tips to Meet Temperature Uniformity Surveys

  1. Adjust the burners with some excess air to improve convection.
  2. Make sure that the low fire adjustment is as small as possible. Since low fire will provide very little energy, it will make the furnace pulse more frequently and this will improve heat transfer by convection and radiation.
  3. Increase internal pressure. This will “push” heat to dead zones allowing you to increase your coldest thermocouples (typically near the floor and in the corners of the furnace).

(Nutec Bickley)


Ways to Increase Temperature Uniformity in Heat Treat Furnaces

  1. A (sometimes) simple way to increase uniformity in a furnace is to add a circulation fan. Circulation fans can be a quick way to add an additional 5°F tighter uniformity on a batch furnace application.
  2. Be sure that the furnace is tuned optimally to reduce/eliminate any overshoot and oscillation around setpoint.
  3. Eliminate any thermal lag by making sure that the control thermocouple and TUS thermocouples have similar sensitivity. If not, the control thermocouples can fall behind and cause the TUS thermocouples to overshoot and fail.

(L & L Special Furnace Co., Inc.)


Pack Your Thermocouples

When a thermocouple is used with an open-ended protection tube, pack rope or fiber between the thermocouple and the protection tube to prevent cold air infiltration from influencing the reading.

(Super Systems, Inc.)


A Good Fit

If a thermocouple fits loosely in a protection tube, avoid errors by ensuring that the tip maintains good contact with the tube.

(Super Systems, Inc.)


Introducing Your Common Thermocouple Types

What are the common thermocouple types?

Thermocouple material is available in types K, J, E, N, T, R, S, and B. These thermocouple types can be separated into two categories: Base and Noble Metals.

Types K, J, E, N, and T are Base Metals. They are made from common materials such as Nickel, Copper, Iron, Chromium, and Aluminum. Each base metal thermocouple has preferred usage conditions.

Types S, R, and B thermocouples are Noble Metals because they are made of one or more of the noble metals, such as Ruthenium, Rhodium, Palladium, Silver, Osmium, Iridium, Platinum, and Gold. Noble metals resist oxidation and corrosion in moist air. Noble metals are not easily attacked by acids. Some Noble metal thermocouples can be used as high as 3100°F.

(Pelican Wire)


Culprits of a Stable Thermocouple

Factors affecting the stability of a thermocouple:

The EMF output of any thermocouple will change slightly with time in service and at elevated temperatures. The rate and change are influenced by metallurgical and environmental factors. The four factors that can induce EMF drift are: Evaporation, Diffusion, Oxidation, and Contamination.

(Pelican Wire)


Does Length Matter?

Does the length of a thermocouple wire matter?

In a word, “Yes.” There are several factors when considering the maximum length of a thermocouple assembly. Total loop resistance and electrical noise. Total loop resistance should be kept under 100 ohms for any given thermocouple assembly. Remember, the total loop resistance would include any extension wire used to complete the circuit. Motors and power wires can create noise that could affect the EMF output.

(Pelican Wire)


Type N Thermocouple (Nicrosil/Nisil)

Type N Thermocouple (Nicrosil/Nisil): The Type N shares the same accuracy and temperature limits as the Type K. Type N is slightly more expensive and has better repeatability between 572°F to 932°F (300°C to 500°C) compared to type K.

(Pelican Wire)


Know Your Thermocouple Wire Insulations

Know your thermocouple wire insulations. When is Teflon® not Teflon®? Teflon® is a brand name for PTFE or Polytetrafluoroethylene owned by Chemours, a spin-off from Dupont. FEP is Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene. PFA is Perfluoroalkoxy Polymer. All three are part of the Fluoropolymer family but have different properties. Of the three compounds, PTFE has the highest heat resistance, PFA second highest and FEP third. The higher the heat resistance the more expensive the insulation. Keep that in mind when specifying the insulation and only pay for what you need.

(Pelican Wire)


Check out these magazines to see where these tips were first featured:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don’t Be Unique! 10 Temperature Uniformity Tips Read More »

Heat Treat Radio #64: Thermocouple 101 with John Niggle, Pelican Wire (Part 3 of 3)

Heat Treat Today publisher Doug Glenn wraps up this three-part series with Pelican Wire experts by talking with John Niggle from Pelican Wire about thermocouple insulation types and considerations.

The first two episodes cover the history, types, vocabulary, standards, and other basics of understanding how thermocouples work. Listen to the previous episodes of the series here.

Below, you can either listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or you can read an edited transcript.



The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.

Doug Glenn (DG):  Welcome to Heat Treat Radio!

John Niggle (JN):  Yes, it's good to see you again, Doug.  I know we've run into each other a couple of times out there in the field.  I'm looking forward to having the opportunity to do all of this stuff in person again.

DG:  It will be nice.  Before we hit the record button, we were talking about shows this fall and hoping that they happen because you, like I, are ready to get out and go.

You are the business development manager for Pelican Wire.  If you don't mind, give us just a little bit of background about you and about your experience in the whole thermocouple world.

Pelican Wire headquarters

JN:  Sure, absolutely.  As you said, I am the business development manager at Pelican Wire.  I've been at Pelican since 2013 so we're working out my eighth year here.  I'm a career industrial sales representative.  I do have previous experience also, actually, in the process instrumentation industry.  Way back when, before I even knew how to spell thermocouples, I was selling that stuff when I first got out of college.  My career has, sort of, gone full circle, let's say.

DG:  Very nice.  Well, you've got plenty of years of experience, which is great.  We've had two previous episodes with your colleague, Ed Valykeo, and we covered a good bit of stuff.  We covered a lot of basics in the first episode.  We covered standardization, and things of that sort, in the second episode.  I want to encourage any listeners who haven't listened to those episodes, feel free to go back, Google “Heat Treat Radio and search for “Pelican Wire” and listen to episodes 1 and 2.

John, you and I want to move forward.  I'm always kind of curious about this question:  From your perspective, with your experience, why do we use thermocouples?  Let's talk about what they are and why we use them.

JN:  First of all, we have to assume that somebody is trying to measure the temperature of some sort of a process- a process or an event of some kind.  That's basically what they're trying to do.  Compared to other devices like RTDs, bimetal thermometers, liquid expansion state change devices and so forth, thermocouples are robust, they're inexpensive; they're repeatability, they're ease of use and size  -- all of those factors lead them to be more widely used than another sort of thermal measurement device of any kind.  It is the preferred method.

On top of that, I mentioned the expense part.  Because they're relatively inexpensive, there are certain industries, the heat treat industry and smelting industry, for example, consider these as, actually, consumable or disposable.  So, the cost factors in significantly in the industry that we're talking about here.

DG:  I live in western Pennsylvania and the town where my wife grew up, there was an old Leeds and Northrup manufacturing plant.  I believe they made the consumable thermocouples for melt shops.  You would, basically, throw the thermocouple in and it would melt quickly but it would give you a response during that time.

CLICK to Listen!

JN:  Right.  And, as I mentioned earlier, the response factor is important, or that's one of the factors considered, when people are looking at thermocouple wire.  And, you're correct, Ed Valykeo, as you mentioned, has 40 years of experience in the industry and has seen exactly the same sort of thing that you're talking about where people will just tack weld it onto something that gets thrown into a furnace or it gets thrown into a melting pot or something like that, and they're looking for that instantaneous temperature.

If you don't mind, I'll tell you that we've done some work, actually, in the aerospace industry and we had a customer that we sold significant, literally miles, of thermocouple wire to (when I say aerospace, it was specifically for space exploration) and this was because of whatever we had done with the insulation.  I can't tell you, because it was before my time, but this is what was relayed to me- they were able to get another 3 - 4 seconds of temperature measurement out of that wire.  That critical, extra data for them made all the difference in the world.

DG:  We're going to get to the insulation part which should be interesting.  You won't have to tell us any trade secrets, but we are headed in that direction anyhow.

So, different types of thermocouples.  Again, just a review question for us.  Why use them?  Why the different types and why are we using different types?

JN:  Forgive me, Doug, and the rest of the audience, for that matter, if I end of repeating some of the things that came out in the previous episode.  Basically, when you're talking about thermocouples, there are the two chemistries; for lack of a better term, you have “base” and “noble” metals.  The base metals are really the metals that we focus on at Pelican.  The noble metals are the more expensive ones- rare earth metals, tungsten, titanium, platinum and all those sorts of things that people spend exorbitant amounts of money on.  There are purposes for those, but, typically, what you're going to see in the heat treat industry, in particular, you're going to see a lot of the base metals.

I like to say that, truly, the 20 gauge K, in particular, is the 800 pound gorilla in the room.  It's almost considered, and I think it would be by people in the industry, a commodity.  There are untold miles of that wire that are used in the heat treating and smelting industry.  K is used, really, because of the temperature range.  It fits in well with what people do in the heat treating industry.  It is good for temperatures from zero up to around 1260 C.  It's inexpensive, it covers the ranges that those people are looking for, and, again, it's the 800 pound gorilla in the room when it comes to temperature measurement in the heat treating industry.

Click to read the Heat Treat Today Original Content article on thermocouples.

The other types such as J comes up periodically, particularly if you're looking at lower temperature ranges.  You won't see it quite as often in the heat treating industry.  You will see it somewhat, but not to the degree that you would K.  The J thermocouple wire has an iron leg so it does oxidize and you need to be careful about that sort of thing.  Type T thermocouple wire has a narrower range.  It has very good response times in cryogenic and cold temperature applications.  The higher, upper end of type T thermocouple wire, typically, wouldn't be of terrible interest to the audience that we're involved with here, for the most part, because the upper ends around 370 to 400 C degrees, in lab environments; that's where it's going to be the most popular.

There is also type E.  It's a higher temperature, as well.  Response time.  Broader range is a little bit better than K at lower temperature ranges.  An interesting one is type N that you will see fairly often in the heat treating industry.  For those people not familiar with type N, it is different alloys than type K.  It covers virtually the same temperature range that type K does and will, actually, have less drift than type K.  It is more expensive because of the alloys that it is made of, but, again, if you're interested in less drift, then type N is worth looking at.  It hasn't quite caught on in the US the way it has in, say, Europe, in particular, and that really has to do with the infrastructure of the instrumentation.  People have instrumentation that is either calibrated for K or J or something like that.  Now, there is instrumentation out there, now, that would use K and N both, so we may see more, particularly, in the aerospace industry I would think it would become more and more popular.

DG:  That's helpful.  It's always good to hear those things over again.

How about the parameters and/or the factors that need to be considered when you're constructing the wire to start with?  What do we need to be worried about in that area?

JN:  I don't know if I like the word “worried” exactly, Doug.  It's more, what do we need to think about?  What do we need to be concerned about?  Besides the metallurgy that we just talked about, we need to think in terms of what the sensor is actually going to look like.  Is it just the wire?  Thermocouple wire, by itself, can be a thermocouple; that's it, without any protection or anything like that.

As I mentioned earlier, you can tack weld it to an ingot, or something like that, and there you go.  You don't have any probe, there is no thermal well to protect it or anything like that.  But, what we do need to think about, then, is the process that it's going to be involved in.  Where is it going to be used?  Is it going to see an environment where there is a flow.  Is it going to see an environment where somehow the thermocouple wire can become damaged?  In that case, then, we're headed in the direction of talking about what our customers are interested in.  And for a customer for Pelican Wire, we're mainly talking about people who actually assemble thermocouples – they make the connections, they have the molds and all that sort of thing.

To be clear, Pelican Wire just makes wire.  And, again, the thermocouple wire can be used as a thermocouple, but a tremendous amount of wire is actually connected to some sort of a sensor or a probe, as I said, and is protected in a thermal well or something along those lines.

"But, what we do need to think about, then, is the process that it's going to be involved in.  Where is it going to be used?  Is it going to see an environment where there is a flow.  Is it going to see an environment where somehow the thermocouple wire can become damaged?  In that case, then, we're headed in the direction of talking about what our customers are interested in."

John Niggle

DG:  Do we also have to be concerned with oxidizing, carburizing atmospheres, corrosive atmospheres?  Is that, also, something that we need to be aware of?

JN:  Absolutely.  And that is one of the reasons you will see a probe thermocouple is because the wire is protected from that atmosphere.  Nearly all of the wires that we talked about would be affected, particularly, in say, like a sulfurous environment; it would be subject to corrosion, oxidation and something along those lines.

Other factors, of course, are the accuracy and how much space we have.  Believe it or not, if it's going to go into a small orifice, then we need to think about what the age size is going to look like.  And then the environment:  Is it going to be abrasive?  Is there movement?  Is there some sort of braiding motion that could wear a hole in the wire in the insulation and so forth?  There are a lot of things to think about.

DG:  And, it would probably be a good idea, especially if our heat treat people are running anything outside of the norm, regardless of what it is, whether it be atmosphere, configuration, fixturing, if there is anything outside the norm, they would probably be wise to mention it to the thermocouple wire and/or thermocouple probe manufacturer and make sure that they know so that you guys can get help get the right thing on there in their furnace.

JN:  Yes, absolutely.  At the end of the day, we work with this every day.  We have design engineers on staff who can assist with technical questions and so forth and, of course, our customers, and the actual thermal wire assembly people, this is what they do every day of the week.

“I'll tell you that we've done some work, actually, in the aerospace industry and we had a customer that we sold significant, literally miles, of thermocouple wire to (when I say aerospace, it was specifically for space exploration) and this was because of whatever we had done with the insulation.”

DG:  Let's talk about something a little bit new, I guess, to our conversation here in this 3-part series, and that is the insulation that's going to go around these wires.  Can you tell us what are the different types of insulations and what are the advantages and/or disadvantages of each, and why would we be using them?

JN:  I'll break it down into, what I would call, the four basic categories.  That would be an extruded insulation, insulations that are tapes, fiberglass insulations that are routinely worked with and then, of course, high temp textiles.  High temp textiles, in particular, would be of interest to the audience here in the heat treat metallurgy world.

Extruded insulations can be a variety of thermoplastics.  A term that, I think, Ed has probably mentioned before and we've talked about before is extension grade wire.  That typically has a PVC insulation on it and the reason PVC works for that is that it's cheap and extension grade wire, typically, does not see the sorts of high temp environments that you're going to see in processes.  It's really a signal wire that takes the signal from the probe or from the sensor to the process control device.

DG:  So what kind of temperature tolerances can the extruded wire handle?  Are we talking 300, 400 degrees?  I guess you talk C, I talk F.

Teflon frying pan

JN:  We talk whatever language our customer likes to talk, but we do talk C quite a bit.  So, PVC is quite low, it's in the 200s F.  But, when you're looking at fluoropolymer insulations (and Pelican is really a high temp house, so we focus on the higher temp insulations) you have FEP and PFA, those are in the 200s.  PFA actually goes up to 260.  So, you can see, it's probably not suitable for heat treating applications, smelting and that sort of thing.  The advantages to those compounds would be that you're going to have abrasion resistance.  Think about your Teflon frying pan: it's slick, it's smooth.  So, if you're in an environment where there is some movement, it will be good for that.  And, of course, it will have excellent moisture resistance and chemical resistance.  Those would be the advantages to the extruded wire.  The other advantage would be, because you'll have a thinner wall than you will with the other insulations, you'll have some more flexibility.  So, if you have a type N radius, you can go around a corner easily.

The next step up, in terms of temperature resistance, would be the tapes.  Basically, in that area, you're looking at PTFE tape, mica take and capped-on tape or polyamide tape.  Those will give you slightly higher heat resistances.  The mica, in particular, would give you more.  (Mica, as a matter of fact, is used as a supplement to the PTFE to give it even higher heat resistance.)  Mica will go up to 500 C, PTFE and the polyamides match, in terms of heat resistance, the extruder products around 260.  What they do give you, again if you use the tapes, is the heat resistance you're looking for, some abrasion resistance and the moisture resistance.  You'll have less flexibility because those products are stiffer, but they're also going to be a little bit lighter weight unless you incorporate the mica into it.  Then, when you do that, you're going to end up with an even stiffer wire and it will be a little bit heavier, and all those will be larger in diameter than an extruded wire.  If you look at an environment where you need to poke the wire through a hole and that hole is an eighth of an inch, you need to think really hard if what you're doing is going to work.

DG:  So you've got extruded and you've got tapes.

JN:  The next step after that would be fiberglass.  In the case of fiberglass, you have E glass and S glass.  Of the two, E glass would  have the lower temperature resistance and you're looking at 482 C on the high end.  For S glass, you're up to 704 C.  Now you're starting to talk about insulations that you will see in the heat treat environment; it's quite common, especially on the S glass side where you're looking at the 704, you'll see a lot of people that need 500 C for whatever reason.  The advantage, obviously, to the glass, as I mentioned, is the higher heat resistance.

There are disadvantages.  Think about fiberglass for a minute.  We actually have to saturate the wire to keep it from fraying without it ever really experiencing any abuse.  If we don't saturate it, then the wire can fray, and you can get fiberglass in your fingers even, which is unpleasant.  So, fiberglass has some disadvantages like that.  If you put it in an environment where there is some movement, abrasion, vibration or something like that, it can be problematic.  Also, it's going to be stiffer because it's saturated, typically.  Sometimes you'll even see those saturants even cause problems in a heat treat environment where, if it gets too hot, the saturant can leave an ash behind.  You're going to lose flexibility, as I said.  You're not going to have the abrasion resistance, the chemical resistance or the moisture resistance that you're going to get from an extruded product.

The other one that we see, again, literally miles and miles and miles of, in the heat treat world would be what's called Refrosil and Nextel, (those are both, actually, trade names).  We're talking about vitreous silica and ceramic.  Again, those are, what we call, high temp textiles.  Now, you're looking at products that are in the 1200 C range.  Ceramic goes up to 1204, vitreous silica is in the 870's.  Again, there are some of the same disadvantages with those that you're going to have with glass.  It's going to be somewhat fragile.  We don't saturate those because the saturants are not going to hold up in the environments that they're going to be placed into, so you would have that ash residue left.

Again, it will be stiff, it will be even larger in diameter than the fiberglass, which is larger than tape which is larger than the extruder products.  Of course, you're not going to have the abrasion resistance, the moisture resistance or the chemical resistance.  But it does protect the wire in those elevated temperature environments that are critical for the heat treating industry.

DG:  Let's back up a bit.  I want to understand something you said.  You said, in the fiberglass, it is saturated and in the textiles it's not.  I want to know what you mean by saturated.

JN:  It's either a solvent-based or a water-based saturant that is applied to the wire to protect it.  Think in terms of a varnish.  It would be like a protective coating.  Again, it just keeps the exterior of the wire, the bare wire, from being exposed.  It's a coating, but we call it a saturant.

DG:  High temperature textiles tend to be the stuff we're using, in the heat treat industry, probably most.

JN:  Yes.  Again, when I mentioned the 800 pound gorilla in the room, the 20-gauge K with the vitreous silica or the Refrosil would be an extremely popular product in the heat treating industry, absolutely.

DG:  Let me ask you a very, very fundamental question.  I'm curious of your answer to this.  Why do we insulate wires at all?  Is it done to protect from temperature or is it done simply to protect them from crossing with each other and grounding or shorting out?  Why do we insulate?

"I'll go back to something that I know Ed talked about: the Seebeck effect. You have this loop; if you don't have that loop, then you don't have anything. You don't have the EMF, the electromotive force, that you're looking for."

John Niggle

JN:  It is the second part.  When you look at any wire construction, the two singles have to be insulated from each other.  I'll go back to something that I know Ed talked about: the Seebeck effect.  You have this loop; if you don't have that loop, then you don't have anything.  You don't have the EMF, the electromotive force, that you're looking for.  We do make a wire that is not duplex, but, typically, what you're going to see is a wire that has two singles and then it's duplexed with an insulation over the top.  We do make a wire that the two singles are jacketed in parallel and then no jacket is placed over the top but that is for an application that wouldn't be suitable for the heat treat industry.

DG:  I asked that question, because for those who are unbaptized in this conversation, it's kind of interesting.  So, we're talking about insulation and we're doing a lot of conversation about temperature ranges and, for someone who wouldn't think so, they would say, "Well, that means you're insulating because of temperature."  But, really, the reason you're insulating wire is for electrical.  It's to keep them apart.  It's just how high of temperatures those insulations can handle, not that you're insulating the wire to keep them cool.  Right?

JN:  Absolutely not.

DG:  That may sound very basic, but there may be people that think that, so I want to get that on the table.

JN:  Most of the people in the audience are probably familiar with this already.  Typically, what happens is the wire is stripped so we have exposed ends.  And then those ends, as we mentioned earlier, can be tack welded onto something or they can just be out there.  The thermocouple world, by the way, is an incestuous world where we have customers, we kind of compete with those customers, some of our customers compete with others of our customers but then they buy supplies from each other.  You probably already know that from talking with other people in this industry.  At any rate, the wire is stripped and then it's either tack welded or it's connected to some sort of sensor or probe of some kind.

DG:  It's a tangled web, the whole thermocouple world.  You've got customers, yet you sell to certain suppliers who also sell to those customers.  It can be complicated!  But that's OK, we'll let you guys worry about that; we just want to make sure the thermocouples are good and we'll be in good shape.

Another question for you:  We talked about the process and a lot of different environments about what type of thermocouple you should use, but does the process being monitored influence the type of insulation that should be used?  Obviously, temperature is going to have an impact, but is there anything else?

JN:  Yes.  Let's circle back to what we talked about earlier just a little bit.  When you look at the process, you need to think of what is going to happen to that wire?  Is it going to see, first of all as you mentioned, the temperatures?  That is certainly important so that comes into play with the insulation.  But, we need to think about, Is there movement?  Is there going to be some abrasion?  Is there some sort of activity that could damage the wire somehow?  Then, we need to look at the chemicals, like we talked about.  Do we need some chemical resistance?  Do we need water resistance?  Is it going to be submersed in something?  Those things all need to be considered.

Again, as I mentioned earlier, the actual placement of the wire.  Does it need to be inserted in a hole?  At Pelican, we produce wire down to 40 and actually 44 gauge which, I think, will probably be stunning to most of the people in your audience because, again, 20-gauge K is what these people think about.  In the heat treating industry, what you see is they need a robust wire, something that's going to be able to handle those temperatures and a large conductor like that.

Another thing to think about, actually, is a bend radius.  Are you going to put the wire somewhere where it needs to go around a corner, around a bend?  Then, are you better off using a stranded wire?  A stranded wire is going to have more flexibility.  You can buy a 20-gauge stranded wire, you can buy 24-gauge, 28-gauge, 36-gauge.

DG:  Now, what do you mean by stranded?

JN:  Stranded wire would be instead of just one solid 20-gauge conductor, you have multiple strands that make up that 20-gauge.  But, if you think about it, multiple strands of wire will actually be more flexible.  You'll still get the same results, but it will be more flexible if you need to go around a corner or if you need to insert it into something.

DG:  It's almost like a braided wire as opposed to a solid.

JN:  Yes.  Now braiding is a little bit of a different process.  When we're talking about stranded wire, it's, basically, just spiral.  Braided is more crossed into each other, which, coincidentally, is the way that the fiberglass and the high temp textile insulations are made – those are actually braided.  And, by the way, I'll just toss this out, it's made on equipment that really hasn't changed since the ‘20s.  I'm not talking about the 2020s, I'm talking about the 1920s!  Rumor has it, some of that braiding equipment was, actually, designed by Thomas Edison.  I'm not sure if that's really true.  But that is the process used to apply the fiberglass and high temp textiles.

DG:  So, anything else as far as any other considerations we need to take into consideration when we're talking about choosing insulation?  If not, that's fine.

JN:  I think I covered them, Doug.

DG:  At Pelican Wire, your company, I know you guys deal with a broad number of markets, I'm sure, one of them being heat treat.  What do you see as any special demands or special concerns that are, maybe, unique or, at least, inherent in the heat treat market?

". . . what you see is insulations that are higher in temperature resistance, as well. In some cases, as I mentioned earlier, in ovens where there is a saturant involved, we could see ash. Some people ask that saturant not be applied to the fiberglass and that's certainly something that can be done."

John Niggle

JN:  For the heat treat market, again, I'll go back to what I said earlier, we see a lot of 20-gauge K used.  It's because of the higher heat requirements, the higher heat that is involved with the processes of heat treating.  Secondly, what you see is insulations that are higher in temperature resistance, as well.  In some cases, as I mentioned earlier, in ovens where there is a saturant involved, we could see ash.  Some people ask that saturant not be applied to the fiberglass and that's certainly something that can be done.

Sometimes we're even asked to not put tracers.  We go back to what we talked about earlier with the metallurgy- you have two legs, a positive and a negative leg.  Well, how do those end users tell those legs apart if they look similar, if they're an alloy of some kind?  So, we put a tracer wire in there so you have a red leg and a yellow leg, in the case of type K, or sometimes you just have a red leg depending on what they ask for.  Those tracers can, actually, cause problems, too, if the ovens are hot enough and they are in there for long enough times.  We even have customers who ask us not to put tracers in their wire, for that matter.

Accuracy, of course, is extremely important.  I know that Ed, in a previous episode, talked about standard limits, special limits and all that sort of thing.  Typically, you're going to see special limits used in the heat treat industry and, in some cases, we're asked even for special calibration points.  In previous podcasts, I've heard you talk with other people about AMS2750 and how that comes into play.  It is extremely critical for the folks in the heat treating industry and something that clearly a thermocouple wire producer has to understand.

Episode 1 of 3 of AMS2750 series

DG:  Let's say you've got a customer that calls you and wants to talk about their thermocouple needs, let's say there is some sort of special need.  What would you suggest they have, in hand, when they call you?  What do you need to know from them to help you do a better job with their thermocouple needs?

JN:  Honestly, the first question we do ask is:  What temperature are you going to be running this at?  How hot are we going to be?  We, absolutely, need to know that.  That helps us narrow down the alloy that we might be looking at, whether it's type K, type J, type E, or whatever.  And then, of course, it's a natural thing to dial in the insulation after that.  Quite honestly, one of the things that frustrates me is when people say, "I need Teflon."  Well, OK.  Do you need FEP or do you need PFA?  Those are both fluoropolymers like Teflon is.  We need to talk about temperature resistance, so don't tell me you just need Teflon.  We do need some specifics when it comes to that sort of thing.  Again, we talked earlier about stranding and stranded wire.  Do you need some flexibility?  What gauge size do you think you need?  How robust does this wire need to be?  Those are some of the key factors we need to know about.

DG:  Let's say, for example, somebody does want to get a hold of you or Ed, your colleague who was on the first two episodes, how is best to do that?  How can we get a hold of Pelican Wire?

JN:  Our web address is www.pelicanwire.com, about a simple as it possibly gets.  Our email addresses are, actually, quite simple, as well.  If anybody wants to email me, it's jniggle@pelicanwire.com.  You can contact me directly, if you want to, or we have a sales inbox and that is simply sales@pelicanwire.com.  We do have a phone number, but it seems a lot of people don't care about phone numbers as much these days.  But the number is 239-597-8555.

DG:  I have one, unrelated, question for you that I know the world is wanting to know:  How is it having a company in Naples, Florida, that's what I want to know?

JN:  I'll tell you what, Doug, the answer today will be different than the answer in October or December.  It's actually quite nice.  We moved down here 8 years ago in 2013.  I moved from the Midwest and didn't really feature myself owning palm trees, but I own palm trees, which is pretty darn cool.  We are, as the crow flies, about 3 miles from the water, where I live anyhow, 20 minutes by car.  Our office and manufacturing facility are, actually, on the very edge of the everglades.  You can see the picture in the background behind me.  That's our building.  That's actually facing east.  That is a sunrise over the everglades.  We're on the very edge of the everglades.  There is a lake right next to our building and then, after that, it's everglades all the way over to Miami.  And, real quick, our weather pattern comes from the east.  It doesn't come from the Gulf.  This time of year, in the summer at about 3:00 in the afternoon, about the time that we're doing this call right now, a thunderstorm blows up and it comes from the east over the everglades and it moves to the west.  The trees blow that direction, you can see it coming.  It's interesting.  During the wintertime, I have to tell everyone, you'd probably be jealous, but it is truly paradise.

DG:  Yes!  I've been to Naples, ate at a nice restaurant down there, years ago, but it was very nice.

You guys are also employee-owned, right?

JN:  That's correct, yes.  The company is over 50 years old.  The founder of the company passed away in 2008 and, before he passed away, he converted the company to an employee-owned operation.  So, we've been employee-owned since 2008.  We've purchased a couple other companies since then that folded into, what we call, the Wire Experts Group.  Pelican Wire is part of that.  We have a sister company out in Colorado.  We bought another facility in Chicago and folded that into our company in Colorado.  So, yes, we're employee-owned and it works out really well for the employee owners, I'll tell you that much.

DG:  That's great.  John, it's been a pleasure talking with you.  Thanks for taking the time.  I appreciate your expertise.  Hopefully, we will see you out on the pavement somewhere in the real world.

JN:  I'll, actually, be seeing you at the heat treat show in about 3 weeks.

DG:  That's about right, yes.

JN:  Hopefully, some of the people that are listening we will see, as well.

Doug Glenn <br> Publisher <br> Heat Treat Today

Doug Glenn
Publisher
Heat Treat Today


To find other Heat Treat Radio episodes, go to www.heattreattoday.com/radio and look in the list of Heat Treat Radio episodes listed.

Heat Treat Radio #64: Thermocouple 101 with John Niggle, Pelican Wire (Part 3 of 3) Read More »

Heat Treat Radio #62: Thermocouples 101 with Ed Valykeo, Pelican Wire (Part 2 of 3)

Heat Treat Today publisher Doug Glenn has a second conversation with long-time thermocouple industry expert Ed Valykeo from Pelican Wire about T/C accuracy and classifications. Listen to learn more.

This is the second episode in a series of three on Thermocouples 101. Check out the first episode of the series here.

Below, you can either listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or you can read an edited transcript.

 



The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.

Doug Glenn (DG):  Ed, welcome back.  I'm glad you were brave enough to come back.  Last time, Ed, we talked about a lot of good basic thermocouple stuff.  We talked about, basically, Thermocouples101 which I mentioned last time, was one of the best and most well read articles on our website, which is great.  We covered a lot of different things last time.  I was just reviewing it, and it's interesting, we were talking about several different men as you gave a good history of thermocouples starting back in the early 1800's and talking about guys like Alessandro Volta, where we get the word volt, and Thomas [Johann] Seebeck and the Seebeck effect or the Seebeck coefficient, and things of that sort.  We talked about all the different noble thermocouples, J, K, E, N, and T, and we talked about the N leg and the P leg on all of those which was all good.  It was very interesting.  If you didn't listen to the first episode, you ought to go back and listen to it.  It's really a pretty good summary of thermocouples, a basic primer on thermocouples.  We also did some things like vocabulary for ourselves; we learned what an EMF was, electromotive force and things of that sort.  It was very good.

This time, I think we want to move on to, what we could commonly classify or in a big picture classify as, standardization and accuracy discussion.  But, before we do, I've got a quick follow-up question from the last episode.  We had mentioned that an EMF is produced when two dissimilar metals are joined together or placed together.  There is a very, very, small electric current that's created.  My question is:  Can you do that with any metal?  Is it possible?  Or do you have to have only certain types?

Ed Valykeo (EV):  Theoretically, yes, you could probably join any two different metals and produce some sort of voltage.  However, the accuracy of that, and if doesn't mean anything, probably not.  The thermocouple base metal thermocouples that we talked about last time, are industry known, used worldwide and, quite honestly, have been perfected over many, many years.  So, yes, you could generate a volt probably from any two metals, but, really, to produce an accurate thermocouple, something you can measure temperature with, you're going to want to stick to the thermocouple types that we talked about.

And again, today, we're talking about the base metal thermocouples which are known as Type K, Type J, Type T, Type E and Type N.  Those are the base metal thermocouples.

DG:  Let's talk a little bit about standardization of these things, and accuracy.  My understanding, Ed, is that there are one or more organizations out there in the world that deal with certifying, qualifying, or giving us standards for these thermocouples.  Can you tell us a little bit about those organizations?  Then, we'll jump in and talk more specifically about the classifications and accuracy.

EV:  Sure. One of the bodies that we use is ASTM.  In ASTM-E230, are all the thermocouple tables for the different types of thermocouples, not just the base metal, but also noble metal.  It's a fairly lengthy book.  All the thermocouples are based on the ITS-90 scale and that is the EMF output of each one of these thermocouples at prescribed temperatures.  We could go into more detail with that if you'd like, but there are a number of ways that they have extremely accurate temperature medium to measure the thermocouple output.  But, that's what the tables in ASTM-E230 are based on, the ITS-90 scale.

When we talk about ASTM, there are also a couple of other standards that we use, and we'll probably get into a little bit later in the conversation when we talk about calibrating the thermocouples themselves.  So ASTM-E220 and ASTM-E207 are the two that are used in calibration of the thermocouples.

DG:  But, basically, the organization that does that, I don't know if we want to call them a lab or not, but the organization that does is it ASTM.

EV:  ASTM is one of the bodies that publishes the books that I call the standards for thermocouples.  I think I won't be mistaken, but ITS-90 is really more an IST list.  They control the ITS-90.

DG:  Let's move into the accuracy standards, then.  I think you mentioned the ASTM-E230.  Is there anything else we need to talk about as far as the accuracy standards, or did we already hit it?

EV:  Certainly, in the ASTM-E230, they spell out the different types of thermocouples, as I mentioned, the base metal thermocouples, but the accuracy of each one of those is listed in the ASTM-E230.

DG:  What about classification?  Let's talk about the guidelines for classifying these different thermocouples.

EV:  Again, ASTM-E230, and there are other publications, but, again, we use ASTM here.  The classification of the thermocouples are also spelled out in ASTM-E230 and basically, we talk about special limits of error, standard limits of error and extension grade thermocouple.  Again, those can be found in E230.

DG:  So, when we classify those, are we classifying them based on temperature deviations or the temperature tolerances?  Is that, basically, what it is?

EV:  Yes.  It's based on temperature tolerance.  I'd like to share a quick rule of thumb for classification of those thermocouples.  So, special limits of error, basically from zero degrees Fahrenheit to 500 degrees Fahrenheit, it's + or - 2 degrees, and above 500 degrees it is + or - .4%.  For example, at 1000 degrees, you're looking at + or - 4 degrees; if you have 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, the tolerance at 2000 would be + or - 8 degrees for special limits of error.

On the other side of that, you've got standard limits of error, and, basically, you could just double that.  From zero to 500 degrees Fahrenheit, you're talking + or - 4 degrees; at 1000 degrees would be + or - 8 degrees and at 2000 degrees, + or -16 degrees.

Where there is some confusion, and maybe some people don't understand thermocouples, is when we talk about extension grade.  There are actually two types of extension grade.  There are standard limits of error and special limits of error extension grade.  Extension grade is just exactly as it sounds.  It carries that signal from your sensor all the way back to instrumentation rather than run maybe a little more expensive wire all the back to your instrumentation, you're going to put extension grade to continue that circuit back to the instrumentation.  Extension grade is the same metals as the thermocouples.  If you're using Type K sensor, then you're going to want to use Type K extension grade, and so on, for the rest of the base metal thermocouples.  The difference is that the extension grade material is only guaranteed to meet the tolerances up to 400 degrees Fahrenheit.  If you look at ASTM-E230, the tolerances only go, on extension grade, to 400 degree Fahrenheit.  And, actually, Type T is a little bit different; Type T only goes to 200.

DG:  In the heat treat industry, that's not really going to do us much good, right?  I mean, most of our processes are well above 400.

EV:  It is.  That's why you would never use an extension grade as the actual sensor.  This is some of the confusion out in the industry: “Well, I can just take my extension grade, create a junction and use it to measure temperature.”  You probably could up to 400 degrees, but it's not guaranteed above that temperature, and you could get yourself in trouble.

DG:  So, you run extension grade outside of the furnace because, obviously, you're not above 400, so you can use extension grade to run it.  I think last time we talked about no more than 100 feet rule of thumb.

Extension grade is basically this: Here's your extension cord that you can run from your regular wire, either your standard limit of error or special limit of error, from that to the box.

EV:  Exactly.  And so, the key to understanding extension grade is the tolerances on that extension grade are the same – say if you have special limits extension grade – it's the same as your special limits thermocouple wire, + or - 2 degrees, in this case, up to 400.  It's guaranteed to meet special limits of error and then the same thing on the standard limit side.  You just double those tolerances.  Again, it's really the temperature that it is guaranteed to.

DG:  Very good.  So those are the different classifications.  We've got special limits of error, which is a tighter temperature tolerance, and then we've got standard limits of error, which is a little less tight, and they we've got our extension grade which is only classified up to 400 degrees anyhow.

I know some heat treat processes require very, very tight temperature tolerances, especially in things like aluminum brazing and things of that sort.  Is it possible to get anything better than special limits of error?

EV:  It is.  The first thing I want to say is that they're not really recognized within ASTM, these tighter tolerances.  But, in the industry, certainly in heat treating and in the pharmaceutical side where they typically use Type T, we've had many requests for tighter tolerance material.  Some people call it quarter limit material or half limit material, there's a bunch of different names that it goes by.  So, we go to our manufacturer's of the wire and request that and, most of the times, it's a no quote. It really comes down to more of a selection process.

For us here at Pelican Wire, we have a pretty good sized stocking program of bare conductor and sometimes what we can do is mix and match to try and meet the tighter tolerance material. There are a number of ways that some of the manufacturers, in fact, the heat treaters, will request special limits materials, that must meet + or - 2 degrees up to 1000 degrees and then .2% after that.  It can be done and we do it on occasion.

DG:  Let's follow up on that a little bit.  How do you determine the accuracy of a lot of wire, or a spool of wire?  How do you go about doing that?

EV:  Let me back up just a little bit and start with the actual wire producer themselves: There are not any left in the States, so, basically, all the thermocouple wires are melted overseas, whether it be Germany, France, Sweden.  When they melt, they try to meet special limits of error.  Now you're talking each leg has to be melted separately; they don't melt them all at one time, right?  So, each “melt” or “heat”, they are shooting to make special limits of error.

This is where some of the testing specifications come into play.  ASTME-207 is a test method for single thermal element thermocouple wire.  I don't want to confuse our listeners, but, again, if you think about a melter that just melted or heated a melt of wire and they process it down to wire, they only have one conductor.  They want to know if that one conductor is going to potentially meet special limits of error.  There is a testing specification that ASTM has (ASTME-207) that you can test a single leg thermocouple wire to see if it's going to meet special limits of error.  What they do is they calibrate the single leg, they get their values (the EMF output), and they have the second other leg and they do the same thing.  They, then, mathematically add the EMF of those two and go back and look at the standards to see if it's going to fall within the special limits of error.

That's how the melters, the folks that are melting the individual thermocouple legs, are doing it.  We users, we are an insulator wire, we put the two legs together and now we have a thermocouple.  The way we test those thermocouples is by using an ASTME-220, which is a comparison method.  We're taking a known standard and we're calibrating the thermocouple wire against that standard and getting the temperature deviation from that.  That's how we verify that the wire is meeting the tolerance that is requested by our customers, whether it's special limits of error, standard limits of error or even extension grade.

DG:  When you say "a standard", what does that test actually look like?  Are you taking a thermocouple that you know is good, sticking it in a hot furnace and your test thermocouple or are you just doing it through current testing or something like that?

EV:  Good question.  We actually use SPRTs (resistance thermocouples) high accuracy, that we use as our standard.  They're calibrated at an outside firm, so we know what the output of that resistance thermometer is, and we calibrate our sample against that.  The three things you need to do a temperature calibration is the temperature medium, the reference thermometer and the equipment to capture that output or measure the voltage that's being produced.  Having those, we have our reference standard that we know the EMF or the temperature output of.  Now, we put our thermocouple in the furnace and we compare the two.  That's how you get your deviation.

DG:  There are labs, I understand, that do these certifications and things of that sort, that certify the accuracy of the thermocouple.  Now, Pelican Wire does that.  You do have a lab and you do certifications, right?

EV:  We do.  We calibrate the thermocouples and we produce a test report showing the deviation of the thermocouple for the customer.

DG:  Earlier, we were talking about standards and how there's the organization ASTM.  How about for these labs?  Do the labs have to meet some sort of outside third party certification?

EV:  There is nothing that they have to do.  I will say that there are a number of standards.  We're ISO9001, but we're also seeking accreditation for 17025 so that our lab is accredited to IECISO17025, which just proves that we are a quality lab.  We have our quality systems in place.  We have our uncertainty budgets for all the equipment we use.  A customer can feel confident that the calibration report that we provide is as accurate as possible.

DG:  I think covers most of the things we wanted to cover in this episode.  We talked about the standardization, the special limits of error, the standard limits of error, who are the bodies out there that do the certifications/classifications, if you will.  I think we covered a good bit.

I think we were going to do one more episode, Ed, and I think we're going to talk about insulating materials.  I understand that one of your colleagues is going to be there to talk about that with us, John Niggle.

EV:  Yes.  John Niggle will join the next podcast and talk a little bit about how now that we have the thermocouple wire, what kind of insulations do we put on that wire.  It depends on the medium that it's going to be used in, the heat treater or whoever.

Doug Glenn <br> Publisher <br> Heat Treat Today

Doug Glenn
Publisher
Heat Treat Today

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


To find other Heat Treat Radio episodes, go to www.heattreattoday.com/radio and look in the list of Heat Treat Radio episodes listed.

 

 

Heat Treat Radio #62: Thermocouples 101 with Ed Valykeo, Pelican Wire (Part 2 of 3) Read More »

Heat Treat Radio #61: Thermocouples 101 with Ed Valykeo, Pelican Wire (Part 1 of 3)

Heat Treat Today publisher Doug Glenn sits down with Ed Valykeo from Pelican Wire in the first of a three-part series on all-things thermocouples. This first episode covers the history, types, vocabulary, and other basics of understanding how thermocouples work.

Below, you can either listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or you can read an edited transcript.

 



The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.

Doug Glenn (DG):  Ed, why don't you take a minute, as we typically do on these interviews, to talk briefly about you and your background especially your qualifications for talking about thermocouples.

CLICK the image to access the article!

Ed Valykeo (EV):  I've actually been in the wire and cable industry for a little over 40 years now.  I actually first started in the industry as, well maybe not a grunt, but certainly I was called a “melter's helper.”  I worked at a company called Hoskins Manufacturing in Ann Arbor, Michigan where we actually melted the raw materials to make thermocouple wire, resistance wire, and a whole host of other things.  I was actually the guy that, after we got done pouring that molten metal into the molds to make the ingots, was cleaning up all the mess that happens after you pour and you're pulling those ingots.

That's really where my career started, with Hoskins.  As a matter of fact, it kind of ran in the family.  My dad retired at Hoskins with 42 years of service with Hoskins, so it was kind of a natural progression that, eventually after I got out of the service, I ended up joining Hoskins.  I was there about 18 years at Hoskins Manufacturing, again, starting out right at the bottom.  I worked my way up to becoming an associate engineer working in the R&D department.  That's where my career really started focusing a little more on thermocouples.  I enjoyed working with thermocouples.  We were developing some new products using thermocouple wire and things like that.

Ever since then, I've kind of stayed in thermocouple arena at some of the other places I've worked.  After I left Hoskins, I started working for companies that insulated wire.  So, we were taking the wire, like we made at Hoskins, and we were putting a whole host of insulations on it from ceramic braid to extruded products and things like that.  And, again, both the companies, and even the one I'm currently employed with at Pelican, but before that I was working for a company out in New Hampshire called PMC, are real similar, it's just we insulated wire.  So, we purchased the raw materials (raw wire from Hoskins or whoever) and then insulated it.

DG:  For the unbaptized in this topic, what are thermocouples, how do they work, how do they come about, and then are the modern-day thermocouples any different than the thermocouples of old?

EV:  I always start out with a little bit of history about thermocouples, whenever I'm talking about them, just to give people background.  Thermocouples were introduced in the early 1800's with the most significant developments taking place in Europe.

One of the very first gentleman that worked on it was Alessandro Volta.  You can probably recognize the name because Volta actually is the volt, today, which everybody recognizes, not just with thermocouples but, obviously, in the electrical industry too.  He basically built a couple thermopiles using metals, silver and zinc and some cloth in between them, soaking them in salt water, and discovered that it would produce a voltage.  That's kind of how it got started.  The significance of that discovery was that there is a source of steady and reliable current flow from using dissimilar metals and saltwater and things like that.

Thomas Johann Seebeck, Baltic German physicist, who, in 1822, found the relationship between heat and magnetism.

Over the years, many others have experimented with the phenomenon.  Probably the most famous, anybody that's in the thermocouple industry will hear it a lot, in 1821, Thomas [Johann] Seebeck announced that he had discovered that when two dissimilar metals were placed in a closed loop and one of those junctions was exposed to a change in temperature, electrical current was produced.  This production of the electromotive force and electromatic force is the electric current is known as "the Seebeck effect" or "Seebeck coefficient."  It was, obviously, much later, before everything was understood and correct mathematics, but Seebeck's name will always and forever be associated with the discovery of thermoelectricity and thermocouples.  Again, even to this day, even ASTM books reference Seebeck coefficient.

Some other gentlemen that we involved, again you'll recognize some of these, were Michael Faraday, Georg Ohm, Claude Pouillet, and Antoine [César] Becquerel.  It was Becquerel, actually, that suggested using Seebeck's discovery for measuring high temperatures.  He proposed the strength of the current generated was proportional to the change in temperature in exactly the principle behind the thermocouple.  We're measuring temperature, whether it's 200 degrees or 2300 degrees.  That's how the modern day thermocouple got started way back in the early 1800's.

DG:  And the modern-day thermocouples are, essentially, the same as that?  Have there been any major changes?

EV:  In reality, Type J was the first thermocouple to really be experimented with.  After Type J, then some additional thermocouple types came on board.  People experimented with other metallurgical compositions to develop different millable outputs.

DG:  Let me understand:  Type J, what that basically the first type of thermocouple that was developed?

EV:  Let me back up a little bit.  Actually, the early metal thermocouples were based on what we can call noble metals.  Noble metals are rare earth elements such as platinum, rhodium, tungsten and uranium.  The problem with the noble metals is that noble metals are much more expensive than our base metal thermocouples, or what we call base metal thermocouples, today.  Base metal thermocouples, today, typically the compositions are just a handful of elements.  You have iron, nickel, chromium, copper and things like that, which is considerably cheaper than the noble metals, the platinum and rhodium and things like that.

DG:  I want to learn this history a little bit, because it's just kind of fascinating to me.  So, the very first ones were made of noble metals, primarily. So, they would put those together and then, basically, we said, "This is great but it's way too expensive.  Can we get the same effect, if you will, (the difference in voltage, or whatever, between dissimilar metals), if we use a little less expensive metals?"

EV:  Right.

DG:  You’ve said there is a difference voltage when there's a difference in temperature.

EV:  The EMF (electromotive force) generated by the thermocouple is linear.  So, at 200 degrees, it produces this amount of voltage, at 300 degrees, it produces this much.  All the thermocouples are, basically, the same principle.  It's very linear.  That's one thing that is good about a thermocouple- the EMF output is linear.  You aren't producing a millivoltage at 200 degrees and then at 300 it goes down and then at 500 it goes back up; it's linear proportional to the temperature.

CLICK the image to access the article!

DG:  I have heard in the past, and you mentioned it here, maybe we can discuss it a little bit:  noble metal versus base metal.  Obviously, we know noble metals, you mentioned what those are.  Those are expensive; they work to do the same thing.  Base metals, though, tend to be what?  Which metals?

EV:  As I already mentioned, the nickel, chromium, copper, and others.

DG:  And those are, in fact, just less expensive, right?  Essentially, they do the same thing but they're less expensive.

EV:  Exactly.  But, there are some other differences, too, between the noble metals and the base metal thermocouples.  When you're talking noble metals, the platinum and the rhodium, and things like that, they can handle much higher temperatures than even the base metal thermocouples.

DG:  I'm going to make an assumption, but probably the vast majority of the thermocouples used in the heat treat industry are probably base metal, although, I'm sure they've got some specialized ones for high temperature, which probably jump into noble metals.

EV:  Absolutely.  A lot of the base metal thermocouples are used in the load sensors where they're putting multiple sensors in and then the oven may be controlled by a noble metal.

DG:  The different types of thermocouples.  You mentioned, and I've forgotten the letter already, that there are different types.  Was it Type J you mentioned?

EV:  Yes, Type J.

DG:  OK.  We've done a study recently asking about what's the most popular one in the heat treat industry, but I know we listed down there J, E, K, N, and T.  Can you run us through those and tell us what are the differences, and whatnot?

EV:  J, E, K, N and T are the most common noble metal thermocouples.  Obviously, you've got two dissimilar metals or, what we refer to in thermocouples, two legs of the thermocouple – the positive leg and the negative leg.  So, for instance, on a Type J thermocouple, you're using iron as a positive leg, which is basically pure iron, (there are some coatings on the iron to help against oxidation and things like that), and the other leg is a copper nickel alloy.  That makes up the two legs of the Type J thermocouple.

If we look at Type K thermocouple, the negative leg is the KN which is, basically, just high nickel with a little bit of chromium; the KP leg, or the positive, of Type K is higher content nickel chromium.  There are also some other minor elements.

With Type T, the positive leg is pure copper.  The TN leg is, again, a copper nickel alloy.  So, when we talk about Type E, what is interesting is that with the Type E thermocouple, you're actually taking the Type KP leg and matching it with the TN leg.  So, again, it's just a mismatch or some hodgepodge of some legs.

DG:  So, you're using some lingo that I'm just picking up on and I want to make sure our listener's are, as well.  You talk about a P and an N leg.  Obviously, you didn't say it, but you're talking about a positive leg and a negative leg.

EV:  Yes, I'm sorry.  KP and KN.  So it's K positive and K negative leg.

DG:  Great.  So, with the Type E, you're taking a few and switching them around and matching them up and seeing what you can come up with.

EV:  Yes, that's the E, and I already mentioned the T.  N is a relatively newcomer to the thermocouple industry.  I say new, but it's still probably 40 or 50 years, I'm not sure when it was developed.  But, again, the Type N is similar to the Type K where the KP leg is a nickel and the KN leg is nickel and some silicon.  So, it's just a little bit different composition from the Type K thermocouple.  But, there are some differences.

Some of the differences, when you're looking at the different types of thermocouples, for example, Type E has the highest EMF output of any of the thermocouples.  Your question might be, "Well, why wouldn't we just use Type E because it has the highest output?"  What the higher EMF output means is that the sensitivity is a little bit greater in the Type E thermocouple.  Then why wouldn't we use that throughout all the industries?  Well, the short answer is, a couple things:  Type E has a limited temperature range, because, again, you're using that TN leg which is copper nickel alloy and the melting point of a copper nickel alloy is much lower than a nickel chromium alloy.  So, that's some of the differences, and with all the thermocouple types, also.

Each one has their own EMF output at certain temperatures but one of the biggest considerations is, really, the environment that you're using the thermocouples in.  Type K has good oxidation resistance; Type J, not so much, because you've got a pure iron leg which is going to oxidize much faster.  That's some of the differences between the individual thermocouple types.

DG:  I assume that if there's oxidation, or any type of corrosion or anything of that sort, it's going to change the EMF, it's going to change the reading and therefore that thermocouple, out the door she goes.

EV:  Absolutely.  And there have been even some recent changes in some of the specifications that some of the heat treaters are using nowadays where they finally realize that these thermocouples do deteriorate over time and so they start limiting the amount of uses that each thermocouple can be used in, in a bunch of different applications, but heat treating mainly.

DG:  Let's pause for just a second and do a little vocabulary.  You've mentioned EMF a couple of different times.  Could we have just a brief review of that just to make sure?  Also, I've heard about millivolts.  Are those two things related?  If so, how?

EV:  EMF stands for electromotive force.  It is, basically, when two dissimilar metals are put in contact with each other, a small voltage is generated.  When we're talking about millivolts, that's exactly what we're looking at: a millivolt is 1/1000 of a volt.  It's a very small amount.  If you look at some of the millivolt outputs for some of these thermocouples, at 200 degrees, for example, you're putting out .560 of a millivolt.  So, these are small.

DG:  And you're saying that it was the Type E that has the highest millivolt of all, so the current that is produced between those dissimilar metals is the highest, but you can't always use that one because in certain temperature ranges you're going to melt one of the legs.

EV:  Exactly.

DG:  The millivolts are measured by what?  I mean, it goes into an instrument that is able to read that?  What is that instrument?

EV:  Actually, some DVMs (digital volt meters) have the capacity to measure in the millivolt range.  So, it could be as simple as a digital voltmeter.  But, in the industry, we have temperature controllers, things like that, that you hook a thermocouple up to and it measures the EMF and then it converts it into a temperature.

DG:  It will measure that millivolt and then tell us what the temperature is?

EV:  Right.  With the instrumentation nowadays, it has the formulas in its memory, or whatever, and can convert that millivolt into an actual temperature that you actually read on a meter.

DG:  We've got an EMF which is measured in a millivolt.  It's going to travel across a long wire, I assume, to some place where it's going to be read.  Let's talk about that wire a little bit.  The impact of this, whatever EMF is being created, millivolt, what about that wire?  Tell me about it and what do we need to be careful of, etc?

EV:  We're actually saving that for another podcast, but I will touch on it a little bit.  So, there are limitations on the length of the thermocouple.  There are a lot of different mindsets, but probably the one I've heard the most is no longer than 100 feet.  So, you have your thermocouple sensor and that arrangement, the configuration, can be a number of ways.  At PMC Corp. we insulate the wire.  You could just take that insulation off at the end, weld the junction there, stick it and [. . .] then run it to a meter.

But in other industries, you may have it in a ceramic tube because of the temperature it's being used at.  You have a ceramic tube with a connector at the end, you may run what we consider an extension wire from that point all the way back to your instrumentation.  Again, the general rule of thumb, is 100 feet.

DG:  Let's talk about that wire with the different types of thermocouples.  What do we need to be sensitive to?  What do we need to be careful about?

EV:  Again, temperature range is probably the first consideration, but then also the environment that it's in.  Again, each thermocouple has its limitations on the environment.  Some are good in a vacuum, other thermocouples are not good in a vacuum.  Some thermocouples are good just in air, (like Type K), but Type J is not so good.  It still can be used in air but it will oxidize faster.

Like I said, in an environment of a vacuum, some thermocouple elements will actually leech out or evaporate out and that definitely would cause a problem with the EMF output and would have an erroneous reading.  Certain acids you can use some thermocouples in, others you can't.

DG:  With all of this pyrometry stuff going around, especially the AMS2750 revision, there are a lot of places where the tightness of the tolerance on the temperature really needs to be paid attention to.  Are some thermocouples inherently tighter tolerance, where they can go down to + or –2, or less than that?

[blockquote author="Ed Valykeo, Pelican Wire" style="2"]Special limits of error is the tightest tolerance, and that's according to ASTM.  But, there are some customers and some companies that want tighter tolerance material.  So, when we talk about that, that's really a special order.  Now you have to back all the way back up to the melters that melt these elements and make the thermocouple wire.  It's on them to produce something that is a tighter tolerance. [/blockquote]

EV:  Again, that was something we were going to touch on a little bit later, maybe on another podcast, because it can be a whole category on its own.

But, yes.  If you think about in general, overall, when we're thinking about the different thermocouple types, they basically all have the same tolerances according to ASTM.  The rule of thumb, that we kind of use, is from say 200 degrees to 500 degrees, the tolerance on all thermocouples are + or - 2 degrees if you want special limits of air material.

Now, there are other tolerances.  In the thermocouple industry, you’ll here – at least calibration-wise – you'll hear special limits of error, standard limits of error and extension grade.  Special limits of error is the tightest tolerance, and that's according to ASTM.  But, there are some customers and some companies that want tighter tolerance material.  So, when we talk about that, that's really a special order.  Now you have to back all the way back up to the melters that melt these elements and make the thermocouple wire.  It's on them to produce something that is a tighter tolerance.  Once that metal is poured in that mold and it's processed down the wire, it is what it is.  When they calibrate that wire, you can't really do a lot with it to change the EMF output, per se, other than there are some heat treat operations that can, what they call, stabilize, and there are processes to oxidize thermocouple wire, and things like that, but you're pretty much stuck with EMF right from the melt.

DG:  And it's dependent on the material composition or quality of the material.

EV:  Absolutely.  In some cases, they may melt 10 melts to get 2 special limit of air thermocouple types.  I don't think it's quite that bad, bur from my early melting days, we've had to downgrade many a melt because it didn't quite meet the tolerances.

DG:  Just reviewing, we talked about the basic history, how they got started.  We talked about the difference between noble versus base metal thermocouples.  We talked about the different types.  We defined EMF, electromotive force.  We talked about millivolt a little bit.  We talked about the wire, the differences in what we need to pay attention to as far as wire, and some other considerations like temperature range, calibration tolerance and environment.

EV:  Just so you know, the only base metal thermocouples there are, at least what ASTM recognizes, are the Type J, E, K, T and N.  We covered all the base metal thermocouples.

DG:  Just out of curiosity, a noble metal thermocouple, what are those?

EV:  There is a fairly large list of those.  You've probably heard of thermocouple Type R or Type S thermocouple.  Those are all made with noble metal thermocouples.  It's not really considered a base metal, but tungsten uranium thermocouples.  Those are in more the noble metal category Type C.  There is even development of some other additional noble metals:  gold is used.  Thermocouples are made out of gold.

DG:  Those could be expensive.  Of course, some of those other metals are more expensive than gold, so, who knows?

Well, that's very interesting.  So, J, E, K, N and T are all base metal thermocouples.

I want to make sure that we give appropriate credit to your company.  We talked about the fact that you're from Pelican Wire, part of the wire expert group.  I want to make sure that our listeners know that they can go check out your website which is pelicanwire.com.  You're not obligated to do so, but would you like to give out any other information where they can get a hold of you?

EV:  Yes.  Through the Pelican website, you can certainly get a hold of me.  Our number is on the website.  It's 239-597-8555 and it goes through a central board.  If anyone wants me, they can just ask for me through the operator.

Doug Glenn <br> Publisher <br> Heat Treat Today

Doug Glenn
Publisher
Heat Treat Today

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


To find other Heat Treat Radio episodes, go to www.heattreattoday.com/radio and look in the list of Heat Treat Radio episodes listed.

 

 

Heat Treat Radio #61: Thermocouples 101 with Ed Valykeo, Pelican Wire (Part 1 of 3) Read More »

Measuring Furnace Temperatures in Oxidizing Atmospheres

Source: AZO Materials

Measuring temperatures inside a furnace can present a number of challenges: temperature cycling, high temperatures and hostile atmospheres exceeding the limits of several measurement devices while others have significantly reduced lifetimes and poor accuracy. This article discusses some of the challenges associated with temperature measurement in furnaces where oxidizing and reducing atmospheres are employed in microelectronics fabrication.

An excerpt:

"The Type K is low-priced and can be used across a temperature range from -200 to 1250 °C (-328 to 2282 °F). However, metallurgical changes at temperatures more than 1000 °C (1832 °F) decrease accuracy, and cycling via this temperature induces hysteresis effects, further reducing accuracy. Type K thermocouples are also vulnerable to corrosion in an oxidizing atmosphere."

Read more at "Measuring Furnace Temperatures in Oxidizing Atmospheres"

best of the web

Measuring Furnace Temperatures in Oxidizing Atmospheres Read More »

AMS2750F – Changes and Implementation

OCAMS2750F? What are the new changes? How do you implement them? This informative article from Heat Treat Today's Aerospace 2021 issue will help you navigate through the uncertainty of these changes to ensure successful compliance.

This Technical Tuesday is an original content contribution from Jason Schulze, the director of technical services at Conrad Kacsik Instrument Systems, Inc. Check out other technical articles here.


Jason Schulze
Director of Technical
Services
Conrad Kacsik Instrument
Systems, Inc.

Introduction

AMS2750F has been released for approximately 7 months now. This specification applies to manufacturers and suppliers who heat treat aerospace material. AMS2750F is typically communicated via industry standards such as SAE/AMS specifications as well as customer purchase orders and part prints. This specification gets even more complex when you apply Nadcap heat treat accreditation to the equation as Nadcap has a checklist dedicated to AMS2750, which, as of January 2021, has yet to be released.

In this article we will examine some of the changes within AMS2750F as well as discuss the implementation process for suppliers.

AMS2750F Changes

General Changes

AMS2750F now has 25 tables, where there were previously 11. These tables are no longer at the end of the specification (like most SAE/AMS specifications); they are now placed throughout the specification adjacent to paragraphs to which the rewrite team thought they applied. The challenge with this is that all aspects of AMS2750 are interconnected. For example, one change in the qualified operating range of a furnace will directly affect other areas, such as instrument calibration and the temperature at which an SAT is performed.

Previously, temperature values were expressed in whole numbers. They are now expressed to the tenth of a degree (X.X°F). With this change, I would recommend suppliers follow suit in their own pyrometry procedures and associated documents: think of it as comparing apples to apples.

Scope and Definitions

The definitions section is important, especially to those who are new to AMS2750F who may be working to interpret some of the verbiage within the specification. The specification has increased the number of definitions from 79 to 87. A good example of these definition changes is the comparison of expendable thermocouples versus nonexpendable thermocouples.

  • EXPENDABLE SENSOR: Sensors where any portion of the thermal elements are exposed to the thermal process equipment environment.
  • NONEXPENDABLE SENSOR: Sensors having no portion of the thermal elements exposed to the thermal process equipment environment.

This example is especially important because it is such a major change from the previous revision of AMS2750. The definitions section within AMS2750F should be utilized often by suppliers to ensure comprehension and conformance.

Thermocouples

As simple as thermocouple technology is, there are many requirements within AMS2750F governing thermocouple usage, error, replacement, etc. Previously, AMS2750 did not address resistance temperature devices (RTDs). It now requires RTDs be nonexpendable, noble metal, and ASTM E1137 or IEC60751 (Grade A).

I do not see this next change as anything major, because what I’m witnessing in my consulting all around the US and Mexico are that suppliers already conform. Thermocouple hot junctions (the tips of the thermocouple measuring temperature) are made by either twisting, welding, or a combination of both.

In my experience, it is rare to see a thermocouple supplier/manufacturer issue a thermocouple certification that is nonconforming. Whenever there are issues with thermocouples, it is typically because the supplier did not communicate the correct information. With that, thermocouple error should be considered and communicated correctly.

Thermocouple permitted error has changed to the following:

  • Type R & S: ±1.0°F or ±0.1%
  • Type B: ±1.0°F or ±0.25%
  • Base metal: ±2.0°F or ±0.4%
    • AMS2750E permitted ±4.0°F or 0.75% for TUS, load and furnace thermocouples.

Exceptions:

  • Note 11: For temperatures <32°F or <0°C for Types E and T only, calibration accuracy shall meet the following:
    • Type E: -328 to 32°F, ±3.0°F or ±1.0 % for either, whichever is greater
    • Type T: -328 to 32°F, ±1.8°F or ±1.5 % for either, whichever is greater
  • Note 13: When correction factors are used, type B load sensors shall meet calibration accuracy of ±2.7°F or ±0.5% and types R and S load sensors shall meet calibration accuracy of ±2.7°F or ±0.25%

AMS2750 has always required that the results of an SAT and TUS must reflect corrected temperatures. This would mean when expressing the final ± readings of a TUS, those readings must be identified as corrected values. The challenge may come when you need a correction factor from a thermocouple certification where there is not a temperature value for the test. AMS2750F now addresses this situation:

  • PARA 3.1.4.8 - Interpolation of correction factors between two known calibration points is permitted using the linear method.
  • PARA 3.1.4.9 - Alternatively, the correction factor of the nearest calibration point shall be used.
  • PARA 3.1.4.10 - Whichever method is used shall be defined and applied consistently.

Each supplier must decide what method they will utilize and document this. Know your customer requirements; some customers may not permit certain methods.

Sensor usage has changed dramatically, especially for expendable test sensors. These thermocouples are now limited to a single use above 1200°F regardless of the type. Between 500°F and 1200°F, Type K may be used five times or three months, whichever occurs first and for Type N, 10 times or three months, whichever comes first. Below 500°F, Type K may be used for three months with no limit to the number of uses, and Type N may be used for six months, with no limit to the number of uses. I can understand how this may seem like a lot to understand and filter through, but I can assure you, we will get used to it as we did with AMS2750E.

Thermocouple certification requirements have also changed. I do not foresee any issue with this as what is listed is, for the most part, already on existing thermocouple certifications. I would advise suppliers to check the requirement in bullet point “E.” (Figure 1)

Figure 1

Instrumentation

There were several major changes within the instrumentation section. The first one is readability of furnace recording and field test instruments. Previously, readability for all furnace and field test instruments was 1.0°F; it is now 0.1°F, or to the tenth of a degree. Suppliers may find this challenging to meet as not all field test instruments on the market are capable of this. An easy way to test yours is to either source or read the value on your field test instrument at 999°F. Then, increase the temperature to 1000°F.

On some units, when a temperature is reading/sourced below 1000°F, it will show to the tenth of a degree, but when increased above a tenth of a degree, the value in the tenths place will be removed and only whole numbers will be shown. If this is the case, you will need to purchase a new field test instrument which displays values to the tenth of a degree regardless of whether values go above 1000°F.

The second major change is timers or digital clocks on recording devices. This change makes sense, as most thermal cycles used to achieve metallurgical transformation are time-dependent and have specific tolerances that apply. AMS2750F now requires that these timing devices must be accurate to within ±1 minute per hour. There is a caveat which states that as an alternative, suppliers may have a synchronized system linked to NIST via internet system which is verified monthly and will support the ±1 minute per hour requirement. With that, a new paragraph, regarding stopwatch calibration and accuracy requirements, has been inserted adjacent to the recording device timing calibration requirements.

The third change, simple and straight forward, is that the instrument number or furnace number must be stated on the calibration sticker.

Additionally, changes have been made to what is required on an instrument calibration report. (Figure 2)

Figure 2

System Accuracy Testing (SAT)

There are several changes within the SAT section that should get attention. One which may continue to be overlooked is whenever an SAT cannot be performed (not that one fails), but if no product was run and the furnace was locked out, the SAT could be performed with the first production run (AMS2750E, para 3.4.2.4). This is no longer an option. AMS2750F now states that, in this situation, the SAT must be performed prior to putting the furnace back into service (or prior to production).

Furnaces that have multiple qualified operating ranges (i.e., CL2 from 1000°F to 1600°F and CL5 from 1601°F to 2000°F) must have the SAT performed in each range, at least annually. This means that if you typically run production at 1550°F and SATs are run at the same time, at least annually, an SAT must be processed above 1600°F to catch the CL5 range.

The alternate SAT process was the source of much confusion when revision E was released. Previously, single use thermocouples (i.e., load thermocouples) did not require an SAT per AMS2750D, para 3.4.1.2. When AMS2750E introduced the alternate SAT, the wording was so poor it caused suppliers to misunderstand the requirement, and subsequent audits yielded quite a few related findings. I have written previous articles explaining the alternate SAT process in detail, so I will not be going into this topic too deeply. For information, please visit www.heattreattoday.com and search Jason Schulze.

The changes within the alternate SAT section primarily amount to clarification and incorporation of what was previously in Nadcap’s pyrometry reference guide. That being said, there really isn’t much to speak of in this section for existing Nadcap suppliers, but one item to point out is how the wording has changed. Previously, it applied to single use sensors or sensors which were replaced more frequently than the SAT frequency requirement. This has been changed to state that the alternate SAT applies to load sensors used only once. Nadcap heat treat auditor advisory HT-20-010 has clarified this further. If load sensors are used more than once, the alternate SAT does not apply, and the comparison SAT must be used.

There were some minor changes to what is required on the comparison SAT report. (Figure 3)

Figure 3

Documentation related to the alternate SAT as well as the SAT waiver have been introduced. These should be examined closely by those suppliers to whom it may apply.

Temperature Uniformity Surveys (TUS)

Among many of the changes in this section, there is one that is not stated outright but is based on verbiage changes within Tables 18 and 19 of revision F regarding frequency. In AMS2750E, Tables 8 and 9, the statement reads “Initial TUS Interval” and “Extended Periodic TUS Interval.” Due to the wording, it was assumed that if four passing consecutive TUSs were needed before going to a reduced frequency, the initial TUS would count as part of the four needed. The modified wording in Tables 18 and 19 of AMS2750F now reads “Normal Periodic Test Interval” and “Extended Periodic Test Interval.” With this change in verbiage, the initial TUS does not count toward the needed consecutive tests to reduce TUS frequencies.

If a supplier uses vacuum furnaces for thermal processes and both partial pressure and low vacuum is used, a TUS must be performed annually in the partial pressure range using the gas applied during production. This is a rather simple change, although it is important to recognize that partial pressure gases, depending on certain variables, can affect the uniformity in the area in which the gas enters the furnace.

Thermocouple location for work zone volumes less than three cubic feet has changed. AMS2750E/Nadcap previously required that the five TUS thermocouples be placed on a single plane. AMS2750F has revised this to require each test thermocouple be placed diagonally opposite of each other. Using Figure 4, this could mean suppliers may choose locations 1, 4, 5, 7, and 8 or 2, 3, 5, 6, and 9.

Suppliers familiar with GE’s P10TF3 specification will recognize this next change as it was a GE requirement long before SAE/AMS introduced it into AMS2750F. Previously, data collection during TUSs needed to start prior to the first furnace or test thermocouple reaches the lower end of the tolerance (AMS2750E, para 3.5.13.3.1). This has changed and now requires data collection to begin when the furnace and TUS thermocouples are no fewer than 100°F below the survey temperature.

The documentation or TUS certification requirements have also changed. Considering that there are so many changes within this section, I will merely point out the letter annotations that apply to changes within Para 3.5.16.1: B, D, F, G, H, J, L, O, R, S, and Y. Some of these items contain simple verbiage changes, although most of them are solid changes and should be incorporated into suppliers’ procedures and forms.

Figure 4

Rounding Requirements

Previously, AMS2750E permitted rounding in accordance with ASTM E29. To the delight of many users, I am sure, this has changed. AMS2750F now permits rounding in accordance with the following options:

  • All rounding must be applied in accordance with a documented procedure and used in a consistent manner.
  • Rounding to the number of significant digits imposed by the requirement is permitted in accordance with ASTM E29 using the absolute method or other equivalent international standards. (Previously, the only method permitted was the rounding method.)
  • The rounding method built into commercial spreadsheet programs is also acceptable.
  • All specified limits in this specification are absolute and out of tolerance test data cannot be rounded into tolerance.
  • Rounding must only be applied to the final calibration or test result.

Quality Provisions

The only change in this section is in regard to pyrometry service providers. The requirement now states, “Beginning 2 years after the release of this specification, third-party pyrometry service provider companies shall have a quality system accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 from an ILAC (International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation) recognized regional cooperation body. The scope of accreditation shall include the laboratory standards and/or field service as applicable.” It is important to keep in mind that, when verifying conformance to this, the supplier’s scope of accreditation should include reference to AMS2750 with regards to instrument calibration, SAT, or TUS or all three if that is what is performed at your facility by an outside service provider.

Implementation of AMS2750F

he implementation of AMS2750F with suppliers’ systems should be two-fold: not only what is implemented but when it is implemented. Right now, AC7102/8 Rev A, as it applies to AMS2750F, is in the review stage. Its projected release date is April 2021. Regardless, once the new revision of AC7102/8 is released, suppliers will have 90 days to implement AMS2750F.

Implementing AMS2750F must be done in its entirety, not partially. This means internal procedures, forms, purchase orders, etc. should be revised in the background in conjunction with training. Once your team is familiar with the new changes, then all the revised documents should be released at one time. This ensures the whole of AMS2750F is implemented at once and not in stages.

Nadcap heat treat auditor advisory HT-20-007 requires that all thermocouples issued on or after Jan. 1, 2021 must be certified in accordance with AMS2750F. By this time, suppliers should have already revised purchase orders to require this and may have thermocouple certifications reflecting AMS2750F.

About the Author: Jason Schulze is the director of technical services at Conrad Kacsik Instrument Systems, Inc. As a metallurgical engineer with over 20 years in aerospace, he assists potential and existing Nadcap suppliers in conformance as well as metallurgical consulting. He is contracted by eQualearn to teach multiple PRI courses, including pyrometry, RCCA, and Checklists Review for heat treat.

(source: Joshua Coleman at Unsplash.com)

 

 

 

 

 

All other images provided by Heat Treat Today

 

AMS2750F – Changes and Implementation Read More »