FEATURED NEWS

Heat Treaters Acquire Multi-Chamber Systems for Low Pressure Carburizing

HTD Size-PR LogoAn automotive supplier and a hydraulic pump manufacturer will acquire multi-chamber vacuum furnace system for low pressure carburizing.

For the automotive supplier of innovative driveline solutions, the system is estimated to reduce CO2 emissions significantly for vacuum carburizing versus an existing atmosphere carburizing furnace. For the hydraulic pump manufacturer, the modular flexibility of this specific furnace was the most important advantage.

ECM Flex Multi-Chamber System
Source: ECM USA, Inc.

The supplier, ECM USA, Inc., notes that their Flex Multi-Chamber System is built as a standard system with the possibility to further expand its capacity and/or to upgrade to a high level of automation (robots, AGVs, vision systems, or other 4.0 elements). In addition to modularity, several processes can be handled in the Flex furnace, such as: low pressure carburizing (LPC), vacuum tempering and a combination of vacuum sintering followed by hardening.

This stems from advanced automation technology -- including robotics -- acting as driving forces behind increased use of more eco-friendly applications outside the LPC-HPGQ sector. This includes, but is not limited to, multiple tool steel processing systems, brazing applications, and rapid thermal processing (RTP) systems.

Heat Treaters Acquire Multi-Chamber Systems for Low Pressure Carburizing Read More »

Turbine Manufacturer Receives Heat Treat Vacuum Furnace

HTD Size-PR Logo

Heat treat equipment to modernize a turbine manufacturing facility has recently been delivered to the client. Included in the order were a single chamber high vacuum furnace with high pressure gas quenching and a separate vacuum tempering furnace with built-in nitriding capability and auxiliary equipment.

With a pressing production start date, all units were pre-accepted, including a hot test process run after five months. Heat treat parts supplier was ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH (ALD). “Many of us put our hearts and souls into making this happen,” wrote Joachim Boss, vice president of Heat Treatment at ALD. “Special thanks go to our mechanics team with Andy Adler and to the electrical engineering and commissioning pair, Rico Englert and Markus Kunkel.” The company also highlights Natalie Roemer and Joachim Boss, who accompanied the project from its very start back in 2013 to its 2021 conclusion.

From left to right: Natalie Roemer, Product Manager; Rico Englert; Andy Adler; Joachim Boss, Vice President Heat Treatment; and Markus Kunkel.
Source: ALD Thermal Vacuum Technologies GmbH

 

 

 

 

 

 

(source: Siemens Pressebild at wikipedia.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Turbine Manufacturer Receives Heat Treat Vacuum Furnace Read More »

Mesh Belt Heat Treatment System Advancements for Automotive Fastener Production

OC

Tim Donofrio
Vice President of Sales
CAN-ENG Furnaces International Limited
Source: Can-Eng Furnaces International

Manufacturers of high volume, high strength precision automotive fasteners have constantly faced increased product quality standards, delivery and price pressures over the last decade. These pressures force manufacturers to seek new developments and creative methods for improving their long-term competitive positions.

This Technical Tuesday article by Tim Donofrio, vice president of sales at CAN-ENG Furnaces International Limited, will discuss two developments of mesh belt heat treatment systems – innovative tempering and dephosphating systems – that have been successfully integrated and exploited by manufacturers to maintain their competitive position.

Heat Treat Today first published this Original Content article in the Air and Atmosphere 2021 print magazine. Access the digital version of the magazine here. Contact Karen Gantzer for more information on how to contribute to future editions.


Introduction

Methods for heat treating threaded fasteners have evolved significantly over the last 20 years. Earlier versions of low-capacity shaker hearth, rotary hearth, and plate belt systems have now become extinct in favor of modern, highly efficient, continuous soft handling mesh belt heat treatment systems.

Figure 1. Mesh belt fastener heat treatment system
Source: Can-Eng Furnaces International

Today’s mesh belt fastener heat treatment systems (Figure 1) integrate soft handling techniques that use bulk dunnage unloading and sophisticated metering systems. These metering systems uniformly distribute fasteners across the conveyor width, avoiding any inconsistent loading that could vary the heat-up and soak times which can impact the fasteners’ mechanical properties distribution. Fasteners are conveyed through various washing, austenitizing, quenching, tempering, and post-treatment soluble oil processes, while carefully controlling critical processing parameters that ensure compliance to DIN EN ISO-898 fastener manufacturing standard and, more recently, Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) CQI-9 heat treatment system assessments.

With the integration of soft handling conveyors and low inertia part transfers, modern mesh belt furnaces can significantly reduce the opportunity for part damage and the likelihood of part mixing. Further system efficiencies are realized through external furnace load preparation, allowing for precise presentation of fasteners to the conveyor belt, resulting in minimal empty belt gaps between lots for part traceability integrity.

Figure 2. Comparison of automotive fastener temper furnace thermal
profiles following integration of technology advancements
Source: Can-Eng Furnaces International

Temper Furnace Uniformity Improvements

With increased quality objectives placed upon fastener manufacturers, furnace systems must be more and more precise. One of the most critical steps in the fastener heat treatment process is tempering, which is performed after austenitizing and quenching. Tempering is performed to increase iron-based alloy toughness, resulting in the reduction of excess hardness that occurs after subjecting the fastener to temperatures below the critical temperature for a defined period of time required for transformation. As quality restriction limits are imposed, so is the need to reduce the product temperature variation to meet the desired metallurgical and mechanical properties distribution.

With advancements in tempering furnace design, modern high capacity (+6000 lbs/hr) mesh belt temper furnaces can achieve product temperature uniformities of ±10°F or better, which is half of the allowable temperature uniformity survey (TUS) limits set out in AIAG CQI-9 assessment at ±20°F for continuous tempering furnaces (Figure 2).

These improvements in performance are made possible through the use of modern computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling tools. CFD modeling gives engineers the ability to conduct higher level analysis and optimization of the furnace’s forced recirculation and heating systems, internal furnace geometry, and product-to-airflow relationship.

Today, users of modern temper furnaces enjoy design improvements that increase the overall process reliability, while also exceeding the quality expectations of their customers.

Integration of Dephosphate Removal Systems

For a long time, washers integrated into continuous heat treatment systems have been considered to have companion equipment status, with not much attention paid to their product quality and total cost of ownership. The importance of washer design is currently changing, mainly due to a desire to protect furnace internal components, increase uptime, and improve the quality of the final product.

Washer design configurations include rotary drum, belt, and batch bin systems. For the purpose of this discussion, we will focus on the continuous rotary drum and belt washers for integration with high-capacity mesh belt fastener heat treatment systems (Figure 3). Both systems, if properly designed, can provide suitable performance, with each system providing enhanced features depending upon the fastener size and performance expectations. Careful consideration should be taken during the application review process to identify the configuration that best suits the range of products that will be processed.

Most modern manufactured fasteners are mechanically formed from carbon and alloy steel coils and are normally coated with a phosphate lubricant which is applied to reduce cold forming friction and increase tooling life and part quality. It is widely understood that DIN EN ISO 898 Part 1, Class 12.9 requirements for fasteners specifies that phosphate lubricants be removed prior to heat treatment as phosphate elements can diffuse into the austenite during the heat treatment process and form delta ferrite, which can lead to fastener brittleness and crack propagation failures.

Figure 3. High-capacity in-line rotary dephosphating system
Source: Can-Eng Furnaces International

A recent trend in the industry is the increase in demand for integrated inline pre-heat treatment dephosphating systems. Although not a new requirement to the North American fastener market, more demand has recently been recognized largely due to increased demand for 12.9 strength class fasteners and increased localization of European automotive fasteners (Volkswagen/Audi), who specify strength class 10.9 and greater be dephosphated before heat treatment.

To satisfy these demands, modern heat treatment manufacturers are often integrating inline continuous dephosphating capability as part of their pretreatment strategies. The aqueous chemical removal of phosphate can be by acid or alkaline, however due to the risk of hydrogen-induced brittle fracture, the alkaline processes are preferred. Pretreatment wash systems implement a multi-stage process that includes:

  1. Oil removal & rinse
  2. Dephosphate
  3. Rinse 1
  4. Rinse 2
  5. Drying

Careful consideration must be taken to guarantee wash solutions are completely removed and fasteners are properly rinsed prior to entry into the high temperature furnace to ensure protection of the furnace internals and product quality concerns.

The fasteners are conveyed either by independent conveyors or continuous rotary drums that transport fasteners through each stage of the washing and dephosphating process. Careful consideration and control of wash solution concentration, solution circulation, product dwell time, solution temperatures, and avoidance of contamination is integrated into the equipment design as it is paramount to successful dephosphating integration and final product quality.

The effectiveness of the removal of phosphate is determined by colorimetric analysis, also known as the “blue test.” In this test, a defined quantity of product with a known surface area is immersed into a chemical solution, which will react with any residual phosphate present to form a blue color. The intensity of the color is proportional to the amount of phosphate present.

The effective removal of the phosphate layer prior to the heat treatment is critical to the final fastener quality. Modern dephosphating systems, when properly integrated with the pretreatment and heat treating system, can provide the manufacturer with improved processing flexibility and product quality performance at the lowest cost per pound to process.

 

About the Author: Tim Donofrio, vice president of sales at CAN-ENG Furnaces International Limited, has more than 30 years of thermal processing equipment experience. Throughout his career, he has held various positions within the custom engineered forging, commercial heat-treating services, and custom engineered heat treating equipment industries.

 

Mesh Belt Heat Treatment System Advancements for Automotive Fastener Production Read More »

Heat Treating Partnership Develops Modern Metal Treatment Solutions

HTD Size-PR LogoBetween science and business, the evolution of heat treatment is taking large strides. A global heat treat solutions manufacturer and a Polish laboratory hardening plant are developing modern solutions to metal treatment needs.

For the past decade, SECO/WARWICK, the global manufacturer and parent of North America SECO/VACUUM Technologies of metal heat treatment equipment and technologies, and HART-TECH, a hardening plant with scholarly shareholders — professors, doctors of science, process engineers — have been working together to engage in the evolving science of modern metal heat treatment solutions.

Together with professor Piotr Kula’s team from the faculty of Mechanical Engineering at the Łódź University of Technology, the company implemented projects and research, and collaborated on the technical capabilities of the equipment in terms of the latest research and innovations in the discipline. As this work progressed, the cooperation started to involve product development through equipment testing in practical business applications.

Robert Pietrasik, Sc.D. Eng
Management Board CEO and a Technological Department Head Director
HART-TECH Sp. z o. o.

In 2009, the initiative of three researchers from the Institute of Materials Science and Engineering of the Łódź University of Technology — professor Piotr Kula, professor Antoni Rzepkowski, and Robert Pietrasik, Sc.D. Eng. — brought to life the HART-TECH hardening plant, which currently holds 11 specialized devices for vacuum metal treatment, equipment provided by the global heat treat manufacturer.

The hardening plant specializes in: hardening, carburizing, nitriding, sulfonitriding, steel tempering processes, and more. They apply the latest technologies to modify, change, and improve products. In turn, SECO/WARWICK modifies their equipment designs to meet the exact needs of the customer.

“Our experience and process facilities enable us to perform very demanding and difficult processes,” explained Robert Pietrasik, Sc.D. Eng, president of the board of HART-TECH. “We are renowned to be experts in the impossible since we have vast scientific knowledge and expertise as well as reliable technological back-up from SECO/WARWICK. This cooperation enables us to specialize in highly demanding and difficult jobs requiring the best quality.”

The companies seek new implementations with technologies and processes/modifications that will make the heat treatment process more efficient, allow optimizations, or even defining new technologies. SECO/WARWICK equipment is for trials, experiments and tests. The devices allow for the control and monitoring of a given process, and their design provides for additional safety margins that make it impossible to exceed temperature, power and speed limits. The furnaces are enable many processes with the use of one device. Commercial hardening plants especially value the versatility when serving many different customers from various industries and sectors.

Sławomir Woźniak, SECO/WARWICK Branded
Sławomir Woźniak
CEO
SECO/WARWICK
Source: secowarwick.com

“On the one hand,” said Sławomir Woźniak, CEO of SECO/WARWICK Group, “HART-TECH is a particular partner with whom we have very close cooperation in terms of the technologies and processes. On the other hand, this customer is something of an extreme. They quickly switch from what the device was intended for to what more can be done with it.”

“Our [partner’s] curiosity of the world motivates us to develop new innovations,” added Maciej Koreckivice president of the Vacuum Business Segment at SECO/WARWICK Group. “We attentively listen to the feedback from our customers. This enables us to create tailor made solutions that always respond to the needs 100%. With HART-TECH, we share the passion and a huge, constant drive for excellence.”

After the hardening plant’s growth in their heat treating capacities over several years, they found themselves, like others confronting hardening deformations. Therefore, HART-TECH was in need of a device enabling gas quenching to minimize the problem. The company selected a single-chamber Vector® furnace for high-pressure gas quenching (10 bar) with nitrogen cooling.

The dynamic expansion of HART-TECH motivated them to place an order for another Vector® furnace for high-pressure gas quenching (15 bar).

The last device ordered summarizes the 10-year cooperation between the two companies: another CaseMaster Evolution® (CMe) unit — a two-chamber, third-generation furnace for batch processing with oil cooling. It offers a significant advantage in shortening the production process and improving the quality targets.

“Certainly, the expansion of our hardening plant has not been a conventional one,” says Pietrasik. “We need to remember that the developing market needs were a significant factor affecting the purchase of new devices by HART-TECH[…] We started with one customer and furnaces rented from Łódź University of Technology on an hourly basis. Now, all our vacuum furnaces come from SECO/WARWICK[..] More than 1300 customers and a technology partner are probably the best recommendation for us and for this partnership.”

“We are not interested in the intended purpose of the device,” Sylwester Pawęta, Sc.D., Eng, operations director and shareholder of HART-TECH, “but in what it can really do, what are its technological limits.”

“Continuous feedback from trials of equipment operated under the maximum load, used in an intensive way, shows us what we need to reinforce and improve to maintain the highest treatment parameters for the entire lifetime of the device, and also how we can upgrade them to work even better. Sometimes, this is a real trial by fire, or a test bench,” summarised M. Korecki.

 

Images sourced from SECOWARWICK.com.

Heat Treating Partnership Develops Modern Metal Treatment Solutions Read More »

13 Quick Heat Treat News Chatter Items to Keep You Current

Heat Treat Today offers News Chatter, a feature highlighting representative moves, transactions, and kudos from around the industry.

Equipment Chatter

  1. A new feature on Ipsen’s PdMetrics dashboard monitors incoming three-phase utilities, voltage and frequency on vacuum furnaces. This addition offers further diagnostics for the diffusion pump heater assembly.
  2. AMETEK STC’s JOFRA ASC-400 Advanced Signal Calibrator now includes a built-in help function that offers a graphical solution to connect with the ASC-400s current set-up. The end result is time saved and reduced errors.


Personnel/Company Chatter

  1. Andrew Clark from Advanced Heat Treat Corp. has been promoted to induction equipment operator.
  2. AVS is pleased to announce the successful transfer of ownership from Steven Levesque to Jacob (Jake) Krashan.
  3. Solar Atmospheres Greenville, SC facility announced it had been awarded GE Aviation approval.
  4. Solar Atmospheres of California (SCA) has installed and recently commissioned the state’s largest commercial Solar + Energy Storage System. By combining onsite generation, an advanced energy storage system, and an artificial intelligence powered analytics platform, SCA will optimize energy use by automatically switching between onsite generation, battery power, and grid power.
  5. Bodycote announced the opening of a new Syracuse, NY heat treatment facility.
  6. SECO/VACUUM, SECO/WARWICK’s North American’s vacuum furnace company, received orders in 2020 from the aerospace and defense sectors, with the tool and die market also placing orders.
  7. Paulo announced plans to double the size of its Monterrey, Mexico facility to meet the demand from the automotive industry for the heat treatment of brake components in passenger cars and trucks.
  8. Ambrell’s first system retired after nearly 35 years of service.

 


Kudos Chatter

  1. AMETEK STC launched a new webshop for pressure measurement industries.
  2. Schneider Electric is ranked the world’s most sustainable corporation by Corporate Knights.
  3. Hubbard-Hall announced its certification as a Woman Owned Small Business by the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC). Molly Kellogg leads the specialty chemical producer and distributor headquartered in Waterbury, CT as the chairman, CEO, president, and 6th-generation owner.

 


Heat Treat Today is pleased to join in the announcements of growth and achievement throughout the industry by highlighting them here on our News Chatter page. Please send any information you feel may be of interest to manufacturers with in-house heat treat departments especially in the aerospace, automotive, medical, and energy sectors to editor@heattreattoday.com.

 

13 Quick Heat Treat News Chatter Items to Keep You Current Read More »

Heat Treat Radio #48: The World of Ferritic Nitrocarburizing with Thomas Wingens

Heat Treat Radio host, Doug Glenn, talks with Thomas Wingenspresident of WINGENS LLC – International Industry Consultancy, about the growing popularity of ferritic nitrocarburizing (FNC) and whom this process would benefit most. Listen and learn all about FNC and how it might be a help to your production process.

To find the previous episodes in this series, go to www.heattreattoday.com/radio.

Below, you can listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button or read the edited transcript.

 

 



The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.

Doug Glenn (DG):  We want to welcome Mr. Thomas Wingens who is from WINGENS LLC – International Industry Consultancy.  Thomas is no stranger to Heat Treat Radio.  Thomas, you’ve been here before and, in fact, you’ve got one of the more popular  Heat Treat Radio (as far as downloads).  It’s one of the ones we did several years ago, actually, on megatrends in the heat treat industry.  But, anyhow, Thomas, welcome back to Heat Treat Radio.

Thomas Wingens (TW):  Thankful to be back, Doug.

DG:  If you don’t mind, Thomas, let’s start off very briefly and give the listeners a brief idea of your history and your current activities in the heat treat industry.

TW:  My name is Thomas Wingens.  I am an independent consultant to the heat treat industry for 10 years now.  I have been in the heat treat industry for over 30 years.  As a matter of fact, my parents actually had a heat treat shop and I was born and raised above the shop.  We had various heat treat processes in our shop.  Vacuum heat treating we started in the early ’70s, but also atmosphere heat treating and nitriding.

Nitriding – I am also familiar with this, now for over 30 years.  I work with different companies and manufacturers on the one hand, but also other commercial heat treat shops (like Bodycote and Ipsen).  I am a metallurgist by trade.  I studied material science.

Today, I live in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with my family (not far away from you, Doug), and we really enjoy it here.

DG:  It’s very obvious you’ve got heat treat in your blood.  You were born and raised in Germany, but you’ve been here in the States for quite a few years now.  You’re well acquainted, and I think this is important, with not only the European technology that we’re going to talk about today – which is ferritic nitrocarburizing – but you’re also familiar with the U.S. market.  It gives you a good “in” in both of those markets and so a good perspective to share with our listeners.

This episode is basically going to just cover FNC, ferritic nitrocarburizing.  We want to start at the basic level and work down through a few questions for anyone interested in what it is, how to do it, and that type of thing.  If you don’t mind, FNC 101.

What is ferritic nitrocarburizing?

TW:  It is aligned with carburizing and nitriding into fusion treatment.  It is thermal process diffusion, not a coating.  As it is ferritic, it means it is not austenitic.  So, we’re not heating parts as high as we would do with carburizing or carbonitriding, which is more the range of 950 Celsius; nitriding in general is operated in a temperature range of 500 Celsius range and ferritic nitrocarburizing is in the 560 – 590 Celsius range.  We are not austenitic, and that makes a huge difference, especially when it comes to distortion.  We are treating with FNC parts which are ready to build in.  It is the final step, very often.  That is a huge difference.  We can do this because we do not experience any distortion.

FNC Image
Source: Paulo

DG:  So, you’re doing it at a lower temperature range, we don’t have to worry about distortion and things of that sort, and it is, more or less, the final step.

TW:  It is.  Like nitriding, the nitriding is taking place in the 500 – 540 Celsius, and usually the nitriding takes longer; it is up to 90 hours very often, so deep case nitriding is very popular for some applications.  The rise and the popularity of FNC is that we can achieve results very fast.  First of all, we are at elevated temperature versus nitriding as we are operating at 580 – 590 degrees Celsius.

But there is also the carbon content.  The additional carbon, in conjunction with the nitrogen, also accelerates the diffusion.  We are achieving faster diffusion layers with FNC than with nitriding.  So, shorter cycle times means lower costs and faster turnaround.  Instead of having 24 or 90 hours cycle times, we often have 4-6 hours.

DG:  Let’s do the comparisons again of the processes.  You’ve got nitriding which is probably the lowest temperature process, but it’s a much longer cycle.  If we’re moving up in temperature, probably ferritic nitrocarburizing would be next.  It’s going to be a much shorter cycle because you’ve got the addition of carbon as well, which is helping diffusion into the metals.  Then you’ve got nitrocarburizing or carburizing, both at much higher temperatures.  In fact, when you get to carburizing, you need to worry about distortion, I would assume, correct?

TW:  Exactly.  That makes a big difference because it is not the final step after carburizing or carbonitriding which is taking place at 950 degrees Celsius, or, if you go into a vacuum furnace with LPC, you can go even higher (up to 1000 Celsius).  Nevertheless, you’re in the austenitic field.  When your part is cooler when being quenched, you transform from austenitic to martensitic, and then you get distortion associated with quenching and the ensuing transformation.  That means you need to grind the parts to have finished parts.  That’s not the case with nitriding or nitrocarburizing or FNC.

DG:  As an example, can you list off some parts that typically go under FNC?  What are people typically ferritic nitrocarburizing? What types of parts?

TW:  Due to the fact that we have a couple of micron layer only, (that means you don’t have huge parts, for the most part), you are doing .3mm up to 3 or 6mm for deep case for windmill gears.  With the size of the part, usually the surface treatment layer is growing as well, so it really depends on the wear.

Nitriding certainly can be applied on large parts and it is done on very large parts, meaning 7 meter long extrusion screws and such; but it is because of the wear.  The work technique you have on a very unique surface layer with nitriding and nitrocarburizing is formed from friction.  When you have chemical wear, when you have fatigue wear, you get a couple of things.  One of them is you have compressive stresses that are holding up to some degree of fatigue, and then you have, of course, a high surface hardness of 1200 vickers.  You have a very high surface hardness and then if you have galling or pitting where metal on metal is wearing.  The nitriding layer is very supportive here.  But also, the chemical resistance is a very big factor.

A big part of the success of FNC is the combination with post oxidation.  That is a big part because the combination of ferritic nitrocarburizing with post oxidation leads not only to a mechanical strong surface with compressive stresses, it also has a very high corrosion resistance.  That combination is a wonder combination for several automotive parts.  A lot of components have been hard chrome plated in the past.  So you have several ball pivots, ball joints, in the car.  When you have an older car with chrome plated ball pivots, you maybe have heard an itchy noise, when the car makes a noise when you go over a curb or when you go up and down.  That is very often due to the fact that these ball joint pivots are corroded and were chrome plated.  That is a huge application.  That became the standard in the automotive industry.  Every ball joint is now FNC and post oxidized.

The other application that you see a lot is if you have a pneumatic trunk lift piston.  The piston, you remember, has been hard chrome plated so that you have the chrome finish.  You will see in a newer car, in the front hood, you have a gas piston that is FNC treated and post oxidized.  Everything that is exposed to corrosion, which are so many parts on the automobile, even the light building of the body.  This is something to mention.

[blockquote author=”Thomas Wingens, WINGENS LLC – International Industry Consultancy” style=”1″]A big part of the success of FNC is the combination with post oxidation. That is a big part because the combination of ferritic nitrocarburizing with post oxidation leads not only to a mechanical strong surface with compressive stresses, it also has a very high corrosion resistance. [/blockquote]

All of these components I’m mentioning here are body parts predominantly and have nothing to do with electrification or with internal combustion drive trains.  They are not impacted by that, so we will not see any change here in the future.  A lot of under body components, where there is stone chipping and all the corrosion, people are tending to use FNC and black oxide because they can make it on thinner sheet metal part with compressive stresses so they have higher strength built in and they have the corrosion protection on top of it.  It’s a good combination.  And, of course, it’s virtually distortion free.  You may see that on some parts, due to very high compressive stresses, there is a buildup on the corners, but other than that, it is virtually distortion free and that’s a big, big plus of FNC.

DG:  That explains why it is growing in popularity.  I think that’s one thing you and I talked about earlier; there seems to be within the last, I don’t know, five years for sure, it seems like you’re hearing a lot more about FNC than you used to hear about.  Nitriding is still popular and carburizing is still popular, but you’re hearing a lot more about FNC, primarily because of the things you said.  Are there any other reasons, or is that primarily it?  Cost savings and good qualities.

TW:  If you look back, Doug, in the early days, in the beginning of the early nineties, I was running our nitriding department in our heat treat shop, and I had this little shaker bottle where it can determine the disassociation of ammonia and that determined the nitrogen potential.  The outcome was mediocre, to tell you the truth.  We did not clean the parts, we just put ammonia on it, and we had no way of controlling it other than the time and the temperature, so the outcome was a big variation. That’s why it was limited.  You could not find anything in the aerospace industry.  Nitriding was not accepted in aerospace at all.  Even in the automotive industry in the nineties, you did not find anything nitrided.  It was only used on tooling applications, and such.

But with the controls you have today, with the probes and sensors, you can determine everything, and you can see exactly what’s going on.  That has been a big factor.  There is the reproducibility of the layer you achieve and that is only possible with the good controls that you have and a better understanding of the process.

And, it is very important to mention, the cleaning of the surface.  There is no other heat treat process which benefits from good cleaning than nitriding and nitrocarburizing or FNC.  That makes a huge difference because you’re operating at a lower temperature and you don’t necessarily get rid of all the impurities and the ammonia gas, which, speaking of the process, really relies on the surface cracking of the material to dissociate in.  We have seen a huge impact if parts are not cleaned well on the different surface layers of FNC where we have missed the wide layer in total and such, so that is a big difference.

DG:  And the cleaning, I assume, besides just particles, I assume we’re talking about removal of grease and chemicals and things of that sort so that there can be good diffusion.

TW:  Exactly.  The surface has to be active.  The chips and the dirt to remove, that’s the easy part, but you have, sometimes, salts and residue from cutting and forming, especially the forming agents, sulfur phosphate, which are very hard to remove, especially for parts that are often FNC treated, like deep drawn parts or cheap metal components that are cut and there we see a big difference if they’re not cleaned well.

DG:  Run our listeners through a typical FNC process.  How does it happen?

TW:  I think it’s important to mention, as we haven’t done it yet, that we have three different processes.  We have salt bath nitriding or nitrocarburizing, gas, and plasma.  Each process has pros and cons.

FNC Image
Source: Bluewater Thermal Solutions website

The salt, there is a [cleaning] process or…QPQ, there are a lot of names out there for salt bath nitrocarburizing.  It is wonderful in that you just dunk it in, it’s quick.  The problem is the cyanide salts.  You have to carry it over, you have to clean it, you have to appropriately handle it, store it, and not everyone likes to do that.  Other than that, you have wonderful mechanical results with salt bath nitrocarburizing.

And then there is the plasma process.  The plasma is excellent for certain geometries, not so much for bulk.  You can place the parts in the furnace; it’s wonderfully clean and environmentally friendly.  Everything is good.  The problem is twofold: it is hard with bulk loads, it’s not as flexible on various parts and the other is with the post-oxidation, you cannot do it with plasma because it technically doesn’t work, so you need the… of gas nitriding in the plasma furnace to have the oxidizing part of the process, if you wish to go that route.

Having that said, the most widely accepted process is gas nitriding and gas nitrocarburizing.  Everyone knows that in pit furnaces this is one of the arrangements.  You put the parts in the furnace either vertically pit or modern now love horizontal arrangements, so if there is a loader you just have a batch.  Then you either purge with nitrogen gas or with a newer equipment that have a vacuum pump, so they have a vacuum purge system and instead of flushing with a lot of gas that draw a vacuum, they heat up the load and the convection to 580–590 degrees Celsius.  That can be done with so called “pre-oxidation process.”

Some people, especially if you have higher alloy chrome 4140 – “chrome alloyed” steels – they’re better to nitride if they are pre-oxidized on the way up.  Other than that, you would nitrocarburize ammonia gas, when you do gas nitriding, in conjunction with either endogas or CO2 gas.  Both, in combination, over a cycle time of 1 hour to 4 hours, soaking time and process time, and then you cool down with gas.  Not with the ammonia.  A lot of people make that mistake.  They heat up with ammonia or maybe even cool down with ammonia, but that is not correct.  Depending on, of course, what you’re trying to achieve, the best way is to flush it out because you have different disassociation processes going onto the surface and you have whatsoever surface combination nitrides if you don’t do it properly.

DG:  Are we gas cooling with nitrogen then?

TW:  You’re better off cooling with nitrogen.  Or you go interrupted cooling and then you oxidize on your way down, then you have this so called post oxidation.  You cool down to 300 – 350 C, and you have an FEO to layer which is dense, which is important.  You don’t want to have a flaky one or rough one, you want to have a dense oxidized layer as a surface and then you continue to cool.  That is basically the recipe of FNC.

DG:  I didn’t ask you before, and I should ask you: metals with which you can nitride or FNC, are they basically all steels?  Are there some steels you can’t do it with?  How about aluminum?  Titanium?  What can you do FNC with and what can’t you do it with?

TW:  I would say that nitriding is applied to a much broader spectrum of steels and even other alloys, let’s say.  People even do titanium and nickel alloys and try to put in nitrogen surface, calling it nitriding.  That is much broader.  FNC with nitrocarburizing is typically done with low carbon steels or carbon steels rather than high alloy steels.  That is why we have sheet metal parts very often.  So, low carbon or plain carbon steels.

DG:  And that’s maybe another reason, Thomas, why it’s become a more favorable process, right?  You can get some of the mechanical properties out with less expensive materials.  Is that safe to say?

TW:  Yes, that can be part of it.  But you should have a pre-hardened material, that’s important.  You need some carbon content in to have some hardness which sustains the high hardness of the surface.  It’s all prehard metals, for the most part.  Not necessary, but it certainly helps if you have some strength in the sub-strength which is supporting the hard layer.  It truly depends on your application.  But, you’re right: you can save on the materials to some degree and still get the mechanical properties that you’re looking for, especially in combination with the carbon.

DG:  Two final questions that maybe will help some of our listeners who are thinking about moving into the FNC direction.  The first question is, Who are the companies, and I know we can’t be exhaustive here, but who are some of the companies that actually manufacture this type of equipment that they could speak to?  And secondly, What are some of the things that companies ought to be asking themselves before they decide to go down the FNC rabbit trail, if you will?

So, first a list of companies if you have them.  We’ll try to be more exhaustive in our transcript of this.  If we miss any here, we’ll list them in the transcript.  But if you could rattle off a few that you’re comfortable with.

TW: There are the plasma people, that is RÜBIG GmbH & Co KG and Eltropuls and PlaTeG.  On the salt side, you have HEF Group, Degussa, and Kolene.  On the gas nitriding, you have Lindberg/MPH and Surface Combustion.  On the horizontal, very recently over the last 20 years, a very popular design is a horizontal vacuum perch retort nitriding and nitrocarburizing furnaces.  There you seen Ipsen, a German company called KGO, but also you have SECO/WARWICK with some proprietary designs (zero flow is also a good concept), and lately Gasbarre came into this business and Solar as well; they have the vacuum purge nitriding firms.

DG:  I want to back up a little.  On the salt bath companies you mentioned several, I also know Ajax Electric, also Upton Industries.  I don’t know if they do FNC units, but I’m assuming that they do.  There are a lot of other companies.

TW:  Salt bath is unique to salt.  There are only two, or three maybe, companies left in the world who supply these salts.  It’s more popular in Japan, by the way.  Anyway, it’s not as big as the gas process.

DG:  So, I’m a company thinking about maybe converting from some other surface hardening process over to FNC.  What kind of questions should I be asking myself?

TW:  It all starts, of course, with the product and the application.  Then you need to understand the wear and the corrosion methods.  That has to be well understood.   If that leads to FNC being the most suitable solution for this application, you need to understand the details of how you want to build up the surface layer, the thickness of your diffusion layer, the compound layer, the wide layer on the top and if you want to do post oxidation, so you will also need to do the oxide layer, which by the way, very often needs to be polished at the end, as well, to increase corrosion resistance.  These kinetics need to be well understood and the wear and what you want to achieve with this.

Then, of course, you have to see the design.  If you have sheet metal components which are cut, the cutting corner usually receives a higher layer and then the corners themselves that built up due to stresses, so there are a couple of minor things that need to have attention.  Then, of course, you need to have an expert who really refines the process, and that has to be done in conjunction with good controls.  There are two or three companies in the market.  UPC is one of them.  Oh, I forgot to mention Nitrex, a big brand.

DG:  UPC is part of Nitrex, but they also do the process.

TW:  Right.  Very important.  Somebody who really understands the nitriding and the control part of it.  UPC Marathon, they have very good controls.  SSI also has the probes.  There is STANGE in Germany as well.  You have two or three companies which have good knowledge in the controls and the probes and how to control this nitriding process.  Then you can build up your desired layer system.  In the layers, you have a diffusion, then you have a compound, a white layer, and then maybe you have an oxide layer on top and that needs to be well understood.  And, of course, as mentioned before, it is essential to have  parts cleaned thoroughly and if you maybe need a polishing afterwards.  Then, of course, how you put them in the furnace (placement) so that the gas can uniformly penetrate the parts.  These are the essential things.

DG:  There you have it, folks.  That’s FNC 101.  Those are the basics in ferritic nitrocarburizing from Thomas Wingens.  Thank you, Thomas.  I appreciate it very much.  I know that if people have questions, you, specifically, would be more than happy to help them out.  The company again is WINGENS LLC – International Industry Consultancy.  Thomas, www.wingens.com.

TW: That’s it!

 

 

 

 

Doug Glenn, Publisher, Heat Treat Today

Doug Glenn, Heat Treat Today publisher and Heat Treat Radio host.


To find other Heat Treat Radio episodes, go to www.heattreattoday.com/radio.

Heat Treat Radio #48: The World of Ferritic Nitrocarburizing with Thomas Wingens Read More »

Heat Treat Support Expands in Midwest

HTD Size-PR Logo

Ben Gasbarre
President, Industrial Furnace Systems
Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems

A 7,700 sq. ft. technical center for heat treat has opened in Livonia, Michigan. This technical center will expand heat treaters’ range of support in the Midwest, housing sales, engineering, and service personnel to their clients.

With locations in Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Michigan, the addition of the technical center completes another step in the process that Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems announced a little over a year ago to position themselves to better support their clients and advance their product offering.

The company is currently in the process of installing both atmosphere and vacuum processing equipment in the technical center to support product development, client trials, and demonstrations.

“The opening of the technical center,” commented Ben Gasbarre, president of Industrial Furnace Systems at Gasbarre, “not only maintains our presence in the Midwest, but also allows us to have a convenient location for customers and vendors to meet with our experienced team.  The furnace equipment being installed will give us the flexibility to process material in both atmosphere and vacuum environments.  The technical center is a key addition for us to continue to position ourselves as a leader in the thermal processing market and provide solutions to our growing customer base.”

 

All images provided by Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems.

Heat Treat Support Expands in Midwest Read More »

Washing and Heat Treat: What Did You Miss?

OCIn January 2021, Hubbard-Hall hosted a free webinar with Thomas Wingens of Wingens International and Michael Onken of SAFECHEM. These two experts described the influencing factors for technical cleanliness and some solutions for washing. This Technical Tuesday, we are sharing an Original Content overview of what happened at the virtual event.

To learn more, watch the recorded webinar here. Additionally, listen to Thomas Wingens on "Parts Washing" on Heat Treat Radio.


This year, we are seeing a lot of online-adapted education for the heat treat industry. One of these webinars was "Solving The 4 Most Common Metal Cleaning Challenges In Heat Treatment" hosted for free by Hubbard-Hall. Jeff Davis, SVP of business development and distribution at the chemical supplier, introduced experts Thomas Wingens, longtime metallurgist with a lifetime of exposure in the heat treating industry, and Michael Onken, market development manager at SAFECHEM. Here is a brief rundown of what they talked about.

The concluding slide from Hubbard-Hall's webinar, Tuesday February 2, 2021.
Source: Screen shot from Hubbard-Hall Webinar February 9, 2021

How Do You Clean | Why Do You Clean | Who Cleans

The audience indicated that if they cleaned, they overwhelming used water-based cleaners on their products.

The experts then gave four clear reasons why heat treaters should clean:

  • Optics -- get rid of stains
  • Achieve Uniformity -- resolve soft spots and stop-off paint issues
  • Brazing Voids -- prevent the appearance of bubbles on your part
  • Contamination of the Furnace -- all furnaces, even vacuum furnaces, are susceptible to contamination
  • Smoking Parts -- if not cleaned well, left-over oil on a part can smoke up

With all of these reasons and with the specificity of the part, all heat treaters should pay attention to how they clean their products, but especially commercial heat treaters. The reason? Commercial heat treaters are in the most challenging situation with cooling fluid contamination, corrosion protection, chips, dirt, and dust as they treat a variety of different parts at their facility. As a note, the experts noted that commercial heat treaters could remove these contaminants with sandblasting, pickling, and sputtering.

4 Challenges - 4 Solutions

One by one, Wingens shared a cleaning challenge that Onken immediately responded to.

1 - Residual Contamination Results in Insufficient Hardening (T.W.)

Residual contamination may be because the cleaning method you are using is insufficient or non-existent. Still, Wingens noted there is clear evidence that insufficient cleaning for nitriding and ferritic nitro caburizing (FNC) leads to white spots. This, among other things, is a cause for concern and may compromise the part quality.

1 - Consider Cleaning Factors, Regulations, and Requirements (M.O.)

If you are running into this cleaning challenge, you have to first consider specific factors, regulations, and requirements for implementing optimal cleaning, says Onken.

  1. Time. You want cleaning to be as short as possible because "time is money."
  2. Temperature.
  3. Mechanics of the cleaning machine.
  4. Chemistry of the Cleaning Agents. Alkaline, neutral, or and organic solvents? You must know what type of contaminations you have on the surface -- if it's polar or non-polar -- in order to use the correct solvent in cleaning the part.
    • Are the contaminants fat, resins, oil, petroleum or salts, emulsions, emulsions?

Additionally, there are several factors of the part itself, pricing, and Environmental Health & Safety standards that do come into play, as Onken lists in the slide below.

Michael Onken sharing factors influencing technical cleanliness.
Source: Screen shot from Hubbard-Hall Webinar February 9, 2021

2 - Surface Stains on Finished Product (T.W.)

This is a pretty straight forward challenge: you don't want the surface stain, so what do you do?

2 - Type of Contamination: Polarity (M.O.)

First, you want to clean "like-with-like." That is, if you have a water insoluble/non-polar contaminant like petroleum or wax, you want to clean with an insoluble/non-polar cleaner like halogenated solvents. Likewise, if the contaminants are water soluble/polar like salts or emulsion residues, then you clean with water-based cleaners. Check out the chart below that Onken shared at the webinar to see how specific cleaners are non-polar, polar, or even hybrid.

Polarity of cleaners and contaminants presented by Michael Onken at SAFECHEM.
Source: Screen shot from Hubbard-Hall Webinar February 9, 2021

Additionally, the way your load is situated can influence what cleaner you use. For a basket load, you'll want to use a cleaner with low surface tension like solvents since those can penetrate and move through the complex geometry of the load.

3 - Inconsistent Cleaning (T.W.)

The impact of a cleaner decreases in strength over time, particularly with solvents, leading to an oily surface. (See the example below.) What to do?

Oily parts before hat treating and after quenching.
Source: Screen shot from Hubbard-Hall Webinar February 9, 2021

3 - Process Stability (M.O.)

There are preventative measures, Onken highlights, that emphasizes process stability that can handle high through-put that will clean all of the parts you have uniformly:

  • Solvents: These are 100% composed of solvent with a stabilizer. Monitor build up of acids only, not the concentration of cleaner itself.
  • Water cleaner: These are 90-99% water mixed with other chemical(s). Therefore, they are much more complex. Check out alkalinity.

Bottom line: keep an eye on how your cleaners are doing so that you always know their quality before you use them.

4 - The Cost. (T.W.)

Wingens pointed out that it is costly to invest in a cleaner, and so how is a heat treater to mitigate this practical challenge?

4 - Efficient Product Use (M.O.)

First, look at efficiency of aqueous cleaning. Solvent cleaning is now in closed machines, not open machines. It is simply not that efficient to use an open machine because a lot of the cleaner disperses into the atmosphere when it is in use. That is why it is more common to see closed cleaning process. Vacuum Tight Machines close the processes even more.

Do what can to conserve material and keep the process efficient and effective.

Final Comments

The experts left the live webinar with a few final comments, noting that there is a move away from water-based cleaning because of the constraints of being able to do batch part cleaning (see solution #2). Additionally, they reiterated that investment costs are higher for closed system with a vacuum; but due to their efficiency, that investment can be paid-off fairly quickly.

If you are interested in catching the next webinar, "Do You Know Your Real Cost of Cleaning?" is happening next week, February 23, 2021 at 2:00pm ET. Again, the recorded webinar can be accessed here.

 

All images were captured during the live webinar on February 2, 2021.

Washing and Heat Treat: What Did You Miss? Read More »

Standardization vs. Innovation

This brief original content column by Heat Treat Today’s publisher, Doug Glenn, is from the most recent print magazine, Air and Atmosphere 2021. Are standardization and innovation in competition with one another, or do they assist each other? Which one is better to have? Read this article weighing the economics, business, and cultural realities of both.


Doug Glenn
Publisher and Founder
Heat Treat Today

In the heat treat industry, I wonder what effect standardization has had on innovation. This is a somewhat loaded question given the number of companies in the North American heat treat industry that are invested in industry standards such as AMS2750, CQI-9, and a large alphabet soup bowl of other standards. I’d like to hear your specific stories about how standardization has been helpful or harmful. Maybe Heat Treat Today can do a future article on the topic if we get enough responses. But in lieu of those real-life anecdotes, let’s think for a moment about the relationship between innovation and standardization.

First, I think that nearly everyone would agree that innovation is a good thing and should be encouraged. Many of today’s conveniences are the result of yesterday’s innovations. Certainly, not EVERY innovation is good, but encouraging a company, economy, or culture of innovation is far and away preferred to the absence of innovation.

Second, we should also acknowledge the benefits of standardization. Repeatability is the hallmark of high production societies. Knowing that you’re always going to get the same burger at any McDonald’s across the country is a huge selling point for that fast food giant. And when it comes to mission-critical or life-critical goods or services, who would not want the assurance that “past performance is a good indicator of future results.” I prefer my heart surgeon to do the same thing every time!

Third, let’s be clear that standardization and innovation are, by nature, mortal enemies in the sense that each tends to destroy the other. An atmosphere of standardization, where everything is always done the same – over and over again – is antithetical to shaking things up and trying new and sometimes odd things. Likewise, an atmosphere of innovation, cuts directly across the same sameness of standardization. If you do it differently one time, standardization is destroyed.2021 print mag 02

There is wonderfully simple and brilliant book written by the towering mind of Ludwig von Mises called Bureaucracy which contrasts bureaucratic organizations with profit-driven organizations. I recommend it highly (search Bureaucracy, von Mises) and it has something to say about the differences between bureaucratic organizations, which are highly standardized by nature, as well as being profit-driven organizations that tend to be less standardized and more innovative. One of his points is that there is a place for both in the world. The military, for example, is not a good place for question-asking and innovation, especially in the midst of a battle. In a military setting, do what you’re told without question and don’t deviate/innovate. In a profit- driven business, however, this same mindset is not so healthy – take for example the postal system or another bureaucratic organization where responsiveness to customer needs is not highly valued.

Some may say that there is a standardized process for being innovative. Could be.

Where’s the balance and how do we know if/when we’ve gone too far in either direction?

I’d be interested to hear your heat treat stories of when and why standardization or innovation is good, and especially how these two live comfortably together.

 

 

Standardization vs. Innovation Read More »

What a Heat Treater Loves Most…sort of

OCHeat Treat Today is grateful for your support and we love to make available information on the topics that you are most interested in. For this Valentine’s Day weekend, we are sharing a few thoughts on what professionals in the industry “love” or find intriguing and interesting in heat treat. Happy Valentine’s Day!

These messages are taken from two upcoming Heat Treat Radio episodes featuring the 40 Under 40 Class of 2020.


Alberto Cantú
VP Combustion, Control and Services
Nutec Bickley

Alberto Cantú, VP Combustion, Control and Services, Nutec Bickley

[blockquote author=”Alberto Cantú” style=”2″]One of the things I find most intriguing about the heat treating industry is that even though it is based on hard science…the industry still relies on many ‘rules of thumb’ for operations.[/blockquote]

This winner has also contributed to this publication. Read his article here.

Scott Cumming, Sales Manager, CAN-ENG

[blockquote author=”Scott Cumming” style=”1″]I cherish the relationships that I’ve made with the people who I have met; the heat treat community is full of amazing and knowledgeable people.[/blockquote]

Nathan Durham, Engineered Components Group Manager, Ipsen

[blockquote author=”Nathan Durham” style=”2″]I’m truly motivated by the diversity and resilience of our industry.[/blockquote]

Andy Muto, Operations Manager, Paulo

[blockquote author=”Andy Muto” style=”1″]What really intrigues me in the heat treat industry is how different applications require some form of heat treating in order for the parts to perform to the necessary level that they need to in the field.[/blockquote]

Kelly Peters
Vice President of Operations
ALD Heat Treat

Kelly Peters, Vice President of Operations, ALD Heat Treat

[blockquote author=”Kelly Peters” style=”2″]We resemble a family – both within ALD and within the industry… You can really see that at any trade conference, industry exhibit, or technical committee meeting.” [/blockquote]

[blockquote author=”Kelly Peters” style=”2″]Watching the technology evolve is fascinating.[/blockquote]

Bryan Stern, Advanced Development Engineer, Solar Atmospheres

[blockquote author=”Bryan Stern” style=”1″]My favorite thing about the heat treating industry is the equipment itself, especially when it comes to vacuum heat treating furnaces[/blockquote]

Luke Wright
Senior Engineer
JTEKT North America Corporation

Luke Wright, Senior Engineer, JTEKT North America Corporation

[blockquote author=”Luke Wright” style=”2″]The thing I find most interesting or intriguing… I didn’t really know much about it, and coming into it on the job, I was really pleasantly surprised that it was this interesting mix of chemistry and mechanical properties.[/blockquote]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(photo source: Joanna Kosinska at unsplash.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What a Heat Treater Loves Most…sort of Read More »