Why is parts cleaning an important step in heat treat? While a nice surface finish reflects quality, the importance of cleaning goes far beyond the aesthetic aspect. Parts cleaning can ensure against quality issues, especially when it comes to nitriding or brazing where high surface cleanliness is a prerequisite. Learn what questions you should be asking to achieve optimal parts cleaning.
This Technical Tuesday feature written by Michael Onken, market development manager at SAFECHEM, will be published in Heat TreatToday's August 2021 Automotive print edition.
Michael Onken Market Development Manager SAFECHEM SAFECHEM
There are two types of cleaning in heat treat. One is cleaning prior to hardening where residual metal working fluids on parts must be removed. Then there is cleaning after quenching. Residue oils left on parts after quenching may cause challenges in the next process steps, such as tempering.
Inadequate cleaning not only affects subsequent processes, but also parts quality. Contaminations on parts can also get into furnaces and fixtures, and thereby impact their functionalities.
Quality cleaning is costly, but necessary, if the goal is to achieve quality components. The important questions are: What cleaning solution should I choose? Is water-based cleaning better, or rather solvent cleaning? The answer is that it depends. We have briefly outlined 4 key questions you should consider.
What are your cleaning quality requirements?
Different industrial applications require varying degrees of surface energy of the metal surface, which is influenced by filmy contaminations. With nitriding, for example, a higher surface energy is required than with standard coating or assembling. The ability of the cleaning agent to remove the contamination should therefore match the required surface energy.
SAFECHEM
What is the affinity of the cleaning agent to the soils?
Effective cleaning is based on the principle “Equal dissolves equal.” For water-based types of contaminations, such as coolant and lubricant emulsions, aqueous cleaning agents are typically the first choice.
When removing mineral oil-based, non-polar contaminations, such as machining oils, greases, and waxes, solvent will commonly be the preferred cleaning agent.
The above contaminations can be classified as filmy contaminations that can be dissolved in a suitable cleaning agent. Another important category of contaminations is particles like chips, dust, and residues of polishing pastes. These contaminations cannot be dissolved in a cleaning agent. To remove these, sufficient mechanics are required in the cleaning machine to flush off particle contaminations.
What metal types are being cleaned and how are they configured?
In water-based processes, cleaning agents, which can be acidic, neutral, or alkaline, are usually matched to specific metal types. Simultaneous cleaning of different metals can therefore be problematic, and this can result in compatibility issues and in the worst case—corrosion. Solvents, in comparison, have universal compatibility with metals.
If the component parts are tiny or have complex geometry or small crevices, solvent is often recommended due to its lower surface tension and viscosity, which makes it easy to seep into and evaporate out of tight spaces.
What is the environmental impact?
The energy consumption in a water-based process can be significant, due to the energy requirement to operate high-pressure pumps, heat the cleaning water, dry the metal parts, as well as treat and purify used water for reuse or disposal. Depending on the cleaning agents, dirt and soil are emulsified and the contaminations are diluted in the water. As a result, aqueous baths that are not treated must be replaced frequently.
Solvent in a closed vacuum vapor degreaser can be recycled again and again via the built-in distillation unit. This can significantly increase solvent lifespan and cut down on waste volume. While energy is required to keep the closed cleaning machine under vacuum, this also lowers the boiling points of solvents, hence accelerating their evaporation and enabling quick drying of metal parts within a shorter cycle time.
The questions listed above are by no means exhaustive and there are many more key aspects to consider. The optimal cleaning decision should balance technical, economic, and environmental needs. Given the potential of parts cleaning to make or break heat treat processes, when done properly, it can deliver much more value than the mere technical function it fulfills.
Read more about parts cleaning in heat treat here.
About the Author: Michael Onken is a market development manager at SAFECHEM Europe Gmbh. For more information, contact Michael at m.onken@safechem.com or Phone: +49 211 4389-300
Pulse plasma nitriding systems deliver uniform case-hardening and increased speed of processing when treating high wear parts.
Did you think purple was just a fashion statement? Explore the advantages, applications, and future of advanced pulse plasma nitriding in this Technical Tuesday.Heat TreatTodayhopes you enjoy this original content piece by technical writer Jeff Elliott in cooperation with PVA TePla.
Jeff Elliott Technical Writer Source: Jeff Elliott
When case-hardening the surface of steel, or steel alloy parts, commonly used in the transportation industry, such as gears, crank pins, dies, camshafts, the options have traditionally included one-of-three processes: carburizing, salt-bath nitrocarburizing and gas nitriding. Each process has advantages and disadvantages, but those seeking more precise control of the diffusion layer formation, depth of case hardening, and preservation of component dimensions are increasingly turning to plasma nitriding.
Although pulse plasma has been utilized for decades, advanced pulse plasma nitriding offers absolute control of the DC (direct current) pulsing signal. In addition, improved chamber design and construction allow for more precise temperature control and uniform distribution of the heat zone throughout the hot-wall chamber. The result is extremely consistent and uniform nitriding batch-to-batch and part-to-part, with less gas consumption.
“The benefits are more precise control of the diffusion layers, and its broader appeal to heat treat more diverse materials, beyond steel, that include titanium, stainless steel, and even aluminum,” says Thomas Palamides, senior product and sales manager at PVA TePla America.
In addition, commercial heat treat shops and high-volume part producers can now select from multiple system configurations that offer flexibility, efficiency, repeatability, and throughput optimization. As a result, global manufacturers in machined parts, tool design, die forming, die cutting, medical device manufacturing, additive manufacturing, electric vehicles, trains, electric generators, and land-based power systems are now leveraging these systems to run a cleaner, more efficient operation.
Pulse Plasma Nitriding Advantages
For steel and steel alloys, case-hardening can be achieved by carburizing, nitriding, cyaniding, or carbonitriding. Although carburizing is a traditional approach, the part has to be raised above the A3 temperature (727°C or 1341°F) on the Iron-Carbon diagram, usually in the temperature range of 900-930°C (1652-1706°F) or higher. Since the solubility of carbon is higher in the austenitic state, than the ferritic state, a fully austenitic state is required for carburizing.
Along with the high temperatures and time-at-temperature associated with carburizing, parts can be distorted. Depending on the part, and its geometric tolerances, limited machining may also be required.
An alternative to carburizing is nitriding, a lower-temperature, time-dependent, thermo-chemical process used to diffuse nitrogen into the surface of metal.
Superior controls for the DC pulsing signal and improved chamber design allow for more precise temperature control. Source: Jeff Elliott
One method is salt bath nitriding. In this process, liquid immersion is required, and is typically conducted at 550 to 570°C (1022 to 1058°F). The source of nitrogen is a nitrogen-containing salt, such as sodium cyanide, often greater than 50% in concentration. However, with salt bath nitriding, post-bath cleaning is required to remove the residual cyanide-based treatment. In addition, there are disposal costs for salt and washing , also known as sodium hydroxide, environmental handling costs, as well as safety and operational liabilities.
Gas nitriding (500oC or 932°F) and gas nitrocarburizing (540-580oC or 1004-1076°F) are universally accepted procedures, and typically require a high concentration of ammonia (NH3), and a high amount of carrier gas flow (normal pressure process) compared with pulse plasma nitriding. The elemental nitrogen gas constituent diffuses into iron and forms hard nitrides. Because of the reduced temperature compared to carburizing, no quenching is necessary, and therefore the chance for distortion and cracking are lower.
Several disadvantages of gas nitriding are that it requires the use of flammable gases like ammonia, and high gas consumption compared to pulse plasma. Gas nitriding is also not able to treat rust- and acid-resistant steels (i.e. stainless steels with greater than 12% Cr content) due to the impenetrable layer of the protective surface oxide layer. Where as the energized pulsed plasma signal, during heat up, allows for the dissolution, or breakdown, of this thin protective layer, in effect cleaning the surface, allowing atomic nitrogen to penetrate.
With recent advancements in pulse plasma nitriding, however, a new level of precision and control is possible which results in uniform and consistent case hardening. Together with the advantages of using environmentally friendly gases only – in contrast to the use of ammonia in gas nitriding – plasma-based nitriding has become a focal point for additional innovations and a requirement for those that seek a more environmentally and safe solution.
In pulse plasma nitriding, parts are loaded into a heated vacuum chamber. After evacuating the chamber to a working pressure of 50 to 400 Pa, on a supporting fixture, to be covered by a bell chamber. The chamber is evacuated to below 10 Pa (7.5 x 10-2 Torr) prior to heating and a pulsating DC voltage of several hundred volts is applied between the charge (cathode) and the chamber wall (anode). The process gas in the chamber is then ionized and becomes electrically conducting. For this type of process, nitrogen and hydrogen gas mixtures and gases with carbon additions, like methane are often utilized.
Depending on treatment time and temperature, nitrogen atoms diffuse into the outer zone of components and form a diffusion zone. This can be is atomic nitrogen, dissolved in the iron lattice, as well as in the form of included nitrate deposition.
With recent advancements in pulse plasma nitriding, a new level of precision and control is possible. Source: Jeff Elliott
Adding further precision, innovators in advanced pulse plasma have discovered methods to optimize the process through better control of the pulses. In the PulsPlasma® process developed by PVA TePla AG Industrial Vacuum Systems, for example, a precision regulated gas mixture of nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon-based methane is used. A pulsating DC voltage signal of several hundred volts is delivered in less than 10 microseconds per pulse to ionize the gas. This serves to maximize the time between pulses for superior temperature control throughout the chamber.
“If you have a temperature variance of plus-minus 10 degrees within a batch, you will get completely different treatment results,” says Dietmar Voigtländer, sales manager at PlaTeG – Product Group with PVA Industry Vacuum Systems (IVS), Wettenberg, Germany, the manufacturer of PulsPlasma nitriding systems. “However, by controlling the pulse current by means of an exact pulse on and off time management, the overall temperature can be precisely managed with a uniform distribution, from top to bottom, throughout the hot wall chamber.”
A unique feature with this approach is that the system can be switched on to a stable glow discharge at room temperature. Most systems cannot do this because the generators do not supply stable plasma. To compensate, those systems must first be heated to 300-350°C (572-662°F) before plasma can be applied, adding time to the process.
[blocktext align="left"]“The benefits are more precise control of the diffusion layers, and its broader appeal to heat treat more diverse materials, beyond steel, that include titanium, stainless steel, and even aluminum." -Thomas Palamides, PVA TePla America.[/blocktext]Even the materials of construction used to manufacture the nitriding systems furnace itself have been optimized. In all systems, PlaTeG uses insulative materials developed in the aerospace industry to create a furnace wall as thin as 40 millimeters, compared to the industry standard of 150 millimeters. With less wall mass, the furnace requires less energy and time to heat, while still protecting workers that may accidentally touch the outside of the chamber.
With better overall control, advanced pulse nitriding furnaces offer multiple heating and cooling zones with each controlled by its own thermocouple. “This will create a very uniform temperature distribution within plus or minus 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit) from the bottom to the top of the furnace,” said Voigtländer.
Uniformity of temperature within a chamber pays a dividend beyond the consistency of nitriding results. With an even temperature throughout the chamber, the entire space is available for loading components which effectively increases the chamber’s capacity.
Stainless Steel – a Softer Steel
One of the key advantages of pulse plasma nitriding is that it is more suited to heat treating of high alloy materials such as stainless steel. When working with steels that have a higher chromium content, liquid nitriding can react with chromium and other elements, resulting in a loss of corrosion resistance.
Stainless steel has a natural passivation layer of chromium oxide, which inhibits corrosion. To bring nitrogen into the material, the chromium oxide layer must first be removed. With gas nitriding, removal of the passivation layer requires the application of a special gas chemistry, stainless steels can also be nitrided in salt baths, but only with a sacrifice of some level of corrosion resistance.
In the case of PulsPlasma nitriding, the treatment is applied directly through controlled ionic bombardment of the surface. By choosing a nitriding temperature below 450°C (or 842°F), and with exact control of the gas mixture, the material surface can be treated without reducing the corrosion resistance of the material.
Dies, Stamping & Injection Molds – a Harder Steel
Today, various molds and dies are used to shape everything from plastic bottles, to automobile quarter panels, to extruded wire, to metal injection molded (MIM) parts. Depending on the intricacy of the mold and die, it can cost a customer hundreds of thousands of dollars to fabricate. Customers require die longevity, while maintaining part tolerance, throughout the life of the die to ensure return-on-investment (ROI).
Despite being made of hardened steel, however, injecting melted resins at high temperatures and pressure into cavities over thousands of cycles begins to wear away and erode die edges, cavities, and moving components. Even the thermoplastic material can be abrasive, acting like sandpaper or leaving residue that wears down the surface. With the ever-increasing utilization of even more abrasive material, in the form of long glass and composite fibers, the amount of abrasion and friction within molds is increasing.
According to Voigtländer, pulse plasma nitriding is an ideal solution both to protect molds against damage and corrosion, but also because the diffusion of nitrogen increases the lubricity of the surface, facilitating quick removal of parts. “The diffusion of the nitrogen into the mold surface," he explains, "increases the fatigue strength of the material. In doing so, you can protect the surface against scratches… and increase the lifetime of the mold or die."
Sintered Parts
Pulse plasma nitriding also represents a strong option for sintered, or sinter hot isostatic pressing (HIP) components manufactured though additive manufacturing.
Salt baths have historically been used to nitride sintered components. However, the process of immersing components in molten salt makes it very difficult to remove the salt from open surface porosity. When gas nitriding is used, the nitriding atmosphere permeates all open pores resulting in the entire component, the surface, and the core, being completely nitrided.
“With pulse plasma nitriding, the atmosphere goes through the pores and only the surface area is affected, leaving the core or base material soft,” said PVA’s Voigtländer. “Most designers prefer having a wear-resistant surface with a soft, elastic core.”
Increased Production Throughput
Nitriding is a batch process. Innovation in furnace design, through an optimized mechanical operation, can increase efficiency and increase production capacity. While the actual time for nitriding does not change, efficient loading and unloading scenarios plays an important part. The PlaTeG plant design can use any one of a Mono, Shuttle or Tandem footprint, to manage throughput, resources, and operations costs.
As a batch process, nitriding typically requires waiting for the prior batch to be treated, cooled, and unloaded before a new batch can be started. Shuttle and tandem extensions are now available to streamline the batch process.
Multiple system configurations can offer flexibility, efficiency, repeatability, and throughput optimization. Source: Jeff Elliott
With a shuttle extension, an additional vacuum chamber bottom may be added to a furnace. During a running nitriding process, the unloading of an earlier batch and the loading/preparing of a subsequent batch on the second vacuum chamber is possible. The cycle time therefore for two consecutive batches is reduced because of the overlapping of the time for unloading/loading of a vacuum chamber with the treatment time of the running process.
With a tandem extension there are two complete vacuum chambers which are operated alternately by the vacuum pumps, the process gas supply, the plasma generator and the control unit of the system. In situations such as unmanned weekend operations, an automatic process can be started and controlled for both batches in succession. With this type of operational structure, “it is possible to increase overall nitriding capacity by 30-60% annually,” according to Voigtländer.
Because plasma nitriding uses environmentally friendly nitrogen and hydrogen, the furnaces can be collocated with the machining of components without requiring a separate room. Moreover, the pulse plasma nitriding systems produce no polluting gases. This makes nitriding more efficient as part of an overall manufacturing process as an operator can locate the furnaces beside their drilling machines.
Pulse plasma offers significantly more precision in nitriding through the control of the mixture of gases, the controllability of glow discharge intervals, the design of the Pulsed signal, and the use of a highly insulated hot wall nitride furnace. Together with innovations in the design of the furnaces to streamline batch management in nitriding operations, manufacturers who depend on nitriding components can benefit from greater uniformity of results, better-protected materials, and increased throughput.
About the Author: Jeff Elliott is a Torrance, California-based technical writer. He has researched and written about industrial technologies and issues for the past 20 years. He wrote this article in cooperation with PVA TePla.
What do gas nitriding, hot isostatic pressing (HIPing), black oxide coating, and high pressure gas quenching have in common? They all are key processes in heat treating firearm components.
Written by Rob Simons, manager of metallurgical engineering at Paulo, this in-depth Original Content article covers Paulo’s perspective on the thermal processing of firearms components and best practices for handling and lot traceability.
Check out more of Heat Treat Today’sTechnical Tuesday articles by searching “technical tuesday” in the search bar.
Rob Simons Manager of Metallurgical Engineering Paulo
While many industries are continuing to reel from the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, the firearms industry in the United States is booming. Over the past decade, the sector’s strong growth has only accelerated in 2020, fueled by consumers’ response to the pandemic and ongoing civil unrest. According to the NSSF’s 2020 Firearm and Ammunition Industry Economic Impact report, the firearms industry is responsible for well over 300,000 American jobs—a figure that has doubled since 2008.
Consumer demand for firearms also drives the need for heat treatment services for this highly regulated industry. Proper thermal processing is critical for safety and also plays a key role in delivering the quality finish that manufacturers want and consumers expect. In this article, we’ll share our firearms heat treatment expertise, delving into the common processes, specifications, and considerations of servicing this thriving industry.
Key Heat Treatment Processes for Firearms Components
Gas Nitriding
Nitrided 17-4.
Gas nitriding is used to case harden parts that must retain softer, more ductile cores. Because it is carried out at a lower temperature, gas nitriding helps prevent the part distortion that can sometimes occur as a result of conventional heat treatment. In addition to hardness characteristics, parts are often nitride coated for cosmetic purposes and to enhance corrosion resistance. Nitriding results in a beautiful, highly durable black coating that is often used in place of black oxide coatings or other blackening processes. Nitride coating is much harder than the alternatives, so the black finish will stand up to heavy use significantly longer.
Components and Materials Commonly Treated With Nitride Coating
Nitride coating is typically performed on outwardly visible components (and those you’d see while cleaning the gun) such as handgun slides and barrels, as well as muzzle devices such as flash hiders, muzzle breaks, and compensators.
These components are usually manufactured using the following materials, which can be nitrided to achieve the desired black finish and case hardness:
4140 steel. AISI 4140 is a chromium-, molybdenum-, and manganese-containing low alloy steel (usually referred to as chrome-moly steel). It has high fatigue strength, abrasion and impact resistance, toughness, and torsional strength.[1]
Grade 416 stainless steel. Grade 416 steel is a free-machining, martensitic stainless steel with a machinability of 85%. [2]
Grade 410 stainless steel. Grade 410 stainless steels are general-purpose martensitic stainless steels containing 11.5% chromium. Grade 410 steels have good corrosion resistance properties which can be further enhanced by hardening, tempering, and polishing.[3]
Grade 420 stainless steel. Grade 420 stainless steel is higher incarbon than 410 with a minimum chromium content of 12%.
4340 steel. AISI 4340 alloy steel is a low alloy steel containing chromium, nickel, and molybdenum. When heat-treated, it exhibits high toughness and strength. This material is considered extreme duty and is typically used for higher-end firearms.[4]
17-4 stainless steel. 17-4 stainless steel is an age-hardening martensitic alloy combining high strength with the corrosion resistance of stainless steel. It is relatively cost-effective and more weldable than other martensitic alloys.[5]
Nitriding Specifications
The most common measurement that firearms manufacturers specify in desirable nitriding results is intermetallic depth. Typical specifications fall between four and 25 microns of white layer depth. The amount of allowable porosity within the case depth is also commonly specified, and while there are varying ranges, less than 50% porosity is a typical target.
While porosity is often regarded as an undesirable characteristic, there are advantages to some porosity in the finished material. These microscopic voids can hold oils and enhance corrosion resistance. The resulting porosity in nitrided materials allows the coating to last dramatically longer than phosphate- or black-oxide-coated steels.
Some manufacturers utilize blanket aerospace specifications such as AMS 2757 or AMS 2959/12 because they encompass the desired porosity and case hardness depth for nitrided firearms components.
Vickers hardness testing is our preferred method for evaluating intermetallic depth in nitrided components. While 850 HV is typically the top achievable hardness for stainless steel, our team has consistently achieved 2000 HV with our nitriding processes. Higher-end hardness is beneficial for firearms components because it enhances wear resistance in components that slide against each other.
Casting of unknown material showing consolidation of macro pores through HIP.
Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP)
With hot isostatic pressing, parts are heated to very high temperatures in a sealed chamber capable of generating very high pressures in the presence of inert gas. During processing, heat and pressure combine to close the voids that formed during part manufacturing, eliminating weakness in the parts. Most firearms components respond well to standard coach cycles for HIP, which commonly run at 2050–2200°F and 15,000 psi.
Firearms Components and Materials Commonly Processed With HIP
HIP is especially well suited for removing porosity from metal injection molded (MIM), additively manufactured (AM), and investment cast parts.
MIM is a fast, cost effective way to produce fire control components such as hammers, triggers, and safety selectors, especially for AR-15’s. Traditionally, MIM components have had a reputation in the industry for being inferior to those manufactured with conventional machining because they have been known to fail early in the field.
Common MIM grades used in the manufacturing of firearms include 4140 steel, 17-4 stainless steel, and…
FL-4605. FL-4605 is a low alloy steel with prealloyed manganese, molybdenum and nickel content for enhanced hardenability.[6]
420 stainless steel. 420 stainless steel is relatively high in carbon with a minimum chromium content of 12%, which gives it the highest hardenability of stainless steel grades.[7]
Additive manufacturing has not yet been widely adopted in the firearms industry, but we have seen it increasingly used in the manufacture of suppressors. These components—commonly known as silencers—trap the expanding gas as the weapon is fired to reduce noise, and are used for military sniper rifles. AM is an ideal method of manufacture for these components due to their complex geometry that is difficult or even impossible to achieve with traditional machining.
Investment casting is another process we see used in the production of handgun frames, specifically in the M1911 pistol.
MIM, AM, and investment castings all have one thing in common: these manufacturing methods leave voids behind in the internal structure of parts. HIP eliminates unwanted porosity in these parts, increasing their toughness, gross strength, and fatigue life which allows firearms components to withstand being repeatedly subjected to high impact.
MIM 316L before (top) and after (bottom) HIP. Porosity has been consolidated, but there are solid inclusions in the material.
HIP Specifications
For additive manufactured firearms components, we encounter two primary specifications:
ASTM F3301, a specification that outlines standards for thermal post-processing for metal parts made with powder bed fusion. ASTM F3301 identifies hot isostatic pressing as an acceptable means to stress relieve additive manufactured components.
ASTM F3055, the standard specification for additive manufacturing nickel alloy with powder bed fusion. In this specification, HIP is required for Class B, C and D components and is considered optional for Class G.
In both specifications, components must be processed under inert atmosphere at no less than 100 MPa within the range of 2048 to 2165°F (1120 to 1185°C). Parts must be held at the selected temperature within ∓27°F (15°C) for 240 min ∓60 min, and cooled under inert atmosphere to below 797°F (425°C), or to parameters as agreed upon between the component supplier and purchaser.
Black Oxide Coating
Black oxide gives firearms a sharp black appearance, enhances corrosion resistance, and minimizes light reflection. Unlike paint, black oxide doesn’t add any additional thickness to gun components. The desired result in the black oxide process is creating magnetite (Fe3O4), an alloy of iron and oxygen, on the surface of the metal. The black oxide process enhances corrosion resistance by adding rust preventive oils to the metal part.
While it doesn’t last as long as gas nitride coating, black oxide is still a popular, cost-effective option to give visible gun parts the perfect black look. Finding a partner that can provide heat treatment and black oxide under one roof can reduce your transportation costs, speed up turnaround time, and simplify your overall process since one supplier owns the final results.
Firearms Components and Materials That Use Black Oxide Coating
Like nitriding, black oxide coating is used on outwardly visible components like slides, barrels, and muzzle devices including flash hiders, muzzle breaks, and compensators. It can be applied to any carbon steel component, but it will not adhere to stainless steel.
Specifications for Black Oxide Coating
Unlike nitriding and HIP, we rarely encounter standard specifications when it comes to black oxide results. However, as a best practice we work with customers to establish boundary samples for each part number treated with black oxide so we can compare our results to what both sides agreed upon as a desirable appearance.
High Pressure Gas Quenching
High pressure gas quenching can be performed in a vacuum furnace as an alternative to oil quenching for any firearms components that are near net shape or completely finished—or where distortion is a chief concern. In high pressure gas quenching, parts are austenitized under vacuum. Then, the chamber is backfilled with inert gas, which is heavily agitated by powerful motors.
High pressure gas quenching results in cleaner parts than oil quenching, but it has other benefits that can prove highly valuable for firearms components. This process can take a conventional 4140 alloy and make it achieve the same properties as a vacuum arc remelted (VAR) 4340, a much higher quality nickel-based material. This can allow firearms manufacturers to see similar hardness and strength results in everyday components as those they would expect from an extreme duty material like 4340.
Handling and Traceability for Firearms Components
No heat treater should make a habit of losing any type of parts, but the implications for serialized firearms components are more severe than any other mass-produced components. Serialized components are what the U.S. government considers the firearm—it refers to the part that features the serial number, usually the lower frame assembly and sometimes the barrel or slide.
Firearms components to be treated with gas nitriding that have AMS 2757 or AMS 2759/12 identified as the standard are also subject to the recordkeeping guidelines outlined in the specification. AMS 2757 requires that documentation includes the equipment and approved personnel’s identification, date of processing, number of parts, alloy, lot identification, and actual thermal processing times and temperatures at a minimum.
Proper handling of firearms components by heat treaters is essential to keep the supply chain running smoothly. Improperly heat treated parts will either wind up in the scrap bin or require reprocessing, and lost parts can result in an ATF audit or investigation. At our company, we’ve engineered our process to prevent issues from occurring in the first place. Here are a few examples of how we do it:
Electronic tracking. Each lot of parts is assigned a barcode that links to electronic records of all relevant information about the job—process parameters, specifications, shop orders, etc. The process parameters on the parts’ barcode are integrated with equipment, so when parts are scanned for processing, the furnace will be automatically set to the proper parameters according to the parts’ recipe. This helps us prevent parts from being improperly heated or subject to the wrong process altogether.
Secure storage. In Paulo plants that process firearms, we use locked cages and secure vaults to protect serialized components. All access to these areas is monitored and recorded to maintain accountability and, if applicable, adhere to AMS specifications.
Specialized handling. To give our firearms customers more peace of mind and to safeguard against errors in our process, we’ve also engineered secure fixturing for many components that allows them to remain locked throughout the entire heat treatment and finishing process.
In addition to a Federal Firearms License (FFL), heat treaters should also have a documented quality management system in place. Choosing an ISO 9001-certified supplier can help give manufacturers confidence in a heat treating partner’s ability to maintain quality operations. Maintaining other certifications such as IATF 16946 and CQI-9 is also a good sign that your partner is well equipped to handle firearms work.
Conclusion
The firearms industry relies on its thermal processing partners to sustain its growth. Proper heat treatment and metal finishing results in better performing, longer lasting firearms for our military and law enforcement, which helps keep our country safe. In uncertain times, the firearms industry represents a bright spot in the U.S. economy that we are proud to support.
About the Author: Rob Simons is manager of metallurgical engineering at Paulo where he leads the commercial heat treating industry’s largest in-house metallurgy team. Rob continuously spearheads research and innovation at Paulo that lead to advanced capabilities and better results for the company’s customers. Rob holds a bachelor’s degree in Metallurgical Engineering from the Missouri University of Science & Technology.
About Paulo: Founded in 1943, Paulo is one of the largest providers of thermal processing and metal finishing solutions in North America. Headquartered in St. Louis, Paulo operates six divisions servicing the United States and northern Mexico.
Edward Rolinski Senior Scientist Advanced Heat Treat Corp.
Mike Woods President Advanced Heat Treat Corp.
Why do forging dies fail? How can heat treating prevent failure? And what specific role does gas- or plasma-assisted nitriding treatment play in enhancing metal structure?
Heat Treat Todaybrings you this Best of the Web feature article this Technical Tuesday to answer these questions. Written by Dr. Edward Rolinski and Mike Woods of Advanced Heat Treat Corp., this article explains the impact of forging process, material and press type; heat treatment for forging dies; and nitriding forging and stamping dies.
An excerpt: "Surface properties critical for die performance can be further elevated by a surface-treatment process employing a multi-gradient design strategy, a novel plasma, multi-step treatment with formation of the nanostructured layer/coating developed by Advanced Heat Treat Corp."
Extensive wear or fatigue from friction and contact stress cause many engineering components made of ferrous or titanium alloys to fail. In this Best of the Web
Edward Rolinski,”Dr Glow”, Advanced Heat Treat
Technical Tuesday feature, Edward Rolinski, aka Dr. Glow, from Advanced Heat Treat Corp., compares “wear resistance between engineering components that were carburized vs nitrided,” originally published in his article, “Tribological Performance-Enhancing Surface Treatments for Improving Durability of Engineering Components” at AHT’s website.
An excerpt:
“The results of the tribological studies strongly suggest that for many engineering components, the application of nitriding may be more beneficial than carburizing since the nitrided layer had better wear properties than the carburized layer despite the fact that the layer was about four times as thick.”
Rolinski defines the uses, advantages, and tribological behavior of nitrided and carburized steel and provides illustrations of samples subjected to both treatments.
Main image photo credit/caption: Advanced Heat Treat Corp / Advanced Heat Treat’s Cullman, Alabama, location ion nitroding vessel, which the company says is one of the largest in the United States—”big enough for two small cars to fit inside.”
Conventional wisdom says that batch processing is for smaller volumes. Anytime large volumes of 1 million or more parts per year are envisioned, for instance with ferritic nitrocarburizing, the go-to technology is a roller hearth or other continuous systems like rotary retort or mesh belt furnace. In this article, which originally appeared in Heat Treat Today’sJune 2019 Automotive print edition, Mark Hemsath urges end-users and engineers who use, or specify, continuous systems to not undervalue automated batch processing for large volume production.
There are a number of trends in the automotive arena:
More parts are being light-weighted. This means they need more precise and repeatable heat treating.
Parts need to be cheaper and lighter. The trend we see are increased and more sophisticated stampings.
The trend is away from carbonitriding and toward ferritic nitrocarburizing due to less distortion on lighter parts.
Gears and such are smaller and require exact carburizing, minimized quench distortions, and less hard machining.
A deep discussion of all of these is beyond this article, but we will touch on each as we focus on nitrocarburizing for large-volume production.
Batch v. Continuous
What is the difference between a classic “batch” furnace and a classic “continuous” furnace? The answer is material handling. By definition, heat treating is a “batch” operation. In virtually all instances, the product must be brought to temperature and held—or “soaked”—for a specific time. Ferritic nitrocarburizing is no different. This ramp heat, hold, and cool is a “batch”. Thus, virtually all heat treating is batch and only material handling is the difference. The basic difference is that in batch we move the product in its cold state and heat it in one place (batch). In continuous furnaces, we move it while it is heating.
Advances in Material Handling
Figure 1: Roller hearth conveyor furnace with heating section, cooling tunnel and after cooling. Note the right angle turn via automatic conveyors to meet space requirements.
Advanced, fully automated, and reliable material handling has made great advances over the last two decades from more recent industries like Amazon, where millions of packages need to be moved through the shipping process, to older industries like heat treating which moves steel parts through furnaces and other equipment. Automation, such as conveyors with self-driven rollers and photo sensors or proximity switches, or robots and automated self-guided vehicles—all coordinated by a PLC—have made material handling more reliable. Manufacturers have a lot of options.
A continuous furnace like a roller convey-or—or “roller hearth”—furnace conveys the product while it is heating (Figures 1, 5 & 8). A mesh belt furnace conveys parts while heating, and a rotary retort furnace (Figure 4) moves parts via a heated rotating barrel to the next process step which is typically cooling or quenching. Moving parts while hot is a challenge, but reliable high volume heat treating is why these furnaces have seen such success over the years. Roller furnaces and rotary retort furnaces are still built and used in a wide variety of industries, and they make sense for a number of reasons. Lower energy use is one main factor.
With robots placing the load, both batch and continuous processes can be fully automated. With such options, batch processing has increased in use.
Automated Batch
Figure 2: The doors have actuators for automatic opening.
A leading manufacturer of heat treating furnaces has implemented the high volume automation approach many times using batch technologies. In 2013, a fully automated batch FNC installation for gears was installed for processing 1 million gears annually.[1] As a result of this success, the customer added more batch furnaces to the line.
The furnaces in Figures 2 and 3 are retort-based nitriding and ferritic nitrocarburizing furnaces. With automatically opening doors, complete PLC control, and automated batch load movement, no humans are needed. A load car operates in both directions for a heavy load of two metric tons or more, allowing furnaces to be placed facing each other.
Automated, High-Volume System Design
Figure 3: This line consisted of pre-oxidizing ovens on one side to save time in the more expensive FNC furnaces. Cooling stations after heating are also added to reduce time in the batch furnace and make the parts safe for handling.
As mentioned, the company supplied nitrocarburizing technology using its ZeroFlow™ method (Figures 2 and 3) for an automated thermal treatment line for the production of a variety of gears. The line consisted of six large, front-loaded retort-style batch furnaces, a four-chamber vacuum washer, two ovens for pre-activation in air, additional post-cooling of the furnace charges, and an automatic robotic loader/unloader, which ensured charge transport within the system (seen in Figure 3). The automated line also included safety monitoring. System workload dimensions were 32″ wide x 32″ high x 60″ long with a gross workload capacity of 4,400 pounds. Production totaled 2,000 pounds of gears per hour. Good equipment design, retort technology, and use of ZeroFlow control technology resulted in a very successful project.
Cooling the Load and Vacuum Purging
Figure 4: Whirl-Away Quench on a Rotary Retort line for small part efficient quenching/cooling.
There are advantages to continuous furnaces like a conventional roller hearth furnace; however, special options like fast cooling and vacuum purging present challenges to these conventional furnace designs. In batch, this is usually not a problem. Vacuum (and even cooling) is more difficult to attempt in continuous variations due to sealing challenges in the chamber designs. An example of a good solution is the rotary retort furnace shown in Figure 4, which offers single piece quenching where each piece falls into a water or oil quench and is “whirled-away,” a continuous furnace design which works well for small parts with a relatively small footprint. In batch, the whole load needs to be quenched together; this can present challenges that understanding the part needs and configurations can lead the process engineer to different solutions.
In a roller furnace, slow cooling means the furnace gets longer (Figure 1).
Variations in Continuous Batch – Semi-Continuous Processing
Figure 5: Hardening roller conveyor furnace with integral pre-heat and oil quench system
In Figure 6, an automated batch hardening line is shown. In Figure 7, the same process is shown, but with an added pre-heat chamber to allow faster processing via the pre-heat and use the single quench in a more productive manner. An oil quench is an expensive piece of equipment. The cycles are also always much shorter for quenching than heating, so we want to maximize the use of the quench. In a pure batch system, you need one quench per furnace. In the semi-continuous approach, the quench is used more frequently and there is higher productivity per capital dollar invested. In a roller hearth or rotary retort installation, the quench can be properly sized to handle all of the heating production. In an installation using pure batch systems, there might be 3 to 6 quench tanks. In a fully continuous roller furnace, there would be one quench (see Figure 5).
Figure 6: This automated batch line is for low pressure carburizing and vacuum hardening, with oil quench, automated washer, and batch temper furnace. The smart loader makes the cell fully automated.
Case History and Take-Aways
The automated batch system referred to in Figures 2 and 3 went online in 2014 and is currently operating at full capacity, while meeting the stringent requirements of the automotive industry. It achieved the planned production goal of 1 million gears per year with 99% process reliability and 98% equipment availability. The customer previously had a continuous conventional pusher furnace. The new line achieved an 80% reduction in the consumption of ammonia from that consumed using in the pusher furnace to nitrocarburize. Endothermic gas was also eliminated by the supply of a new methanol CO generator as the carbon source in the process.[1]
Figure 7: Triple chamber vacuum hardening line with oil quench and pre-heat chamber. Tray flow is right to left.
The take-away from this successful project is that in order to increase production even more, automated batch systems need to exhibit two factors to compete with a continuous system like a roller hearth furnace. First, the loads need to be optimized and very densely packed. Second, the batch loads need to be larger than the continuous loads. A standard size of 40″ x 40″ x 60″ has since been created which has 50% more volume than the unit in the example above. Making the furnace a bit larger is not that difficult. Additionally, in a recent application, CFC tooling has been utilized to assure more dense loading geometry with much lighter parts, giving reliable rack geometry for a load of 1,000 pieces.
Gas Usage – Benefit Batch
Figure 8: Cooling tunnel and exit of continuous roller hearth furnace for instrument transformer electrical steels annealing.
The biggest advantage of batch furnaces is the lower process gas usage. In continuous furnaces, in order to keep the process safe and clean, pressure must be maintained by flowing a significant volume of gases. With the constant opening of doors during the process and the need to keep operating pressures high enough to prevent air infiltration, atmosphere gas usage is always high. To keep the costs down, gases are typically generated with the use of an endothermic generator (40% Nitrogen, 40% Hydrogen, and 20% CO) or a lean exothermic generator with a low dewpoint. In all instances, the generator is another piece of thermal equipment to maintain and purchase.
Energy Costs – Benefit Continuous
In most instances, batch processing uses more energy—or more expensive energy—such as electricity. Electricity costs can vary tremendously from location to location whereas natural gas prices are more consistent and lower. Batch nitriding furnaces are available in gas-fired heating options at an added capital cost. However, the batch process still uses more energy per pound. If electricity is available at a reasonable rate, then the difference is not as great on a per pound basis. In a recent analysis, it was estimated that an electrically heated batch system came to cost the equivalent of about $0.06 per pound of FNC operating costs, versus $0.03 per pound of FNC operating costs in a continuous gas-fired variation (energy and consumables only).
Summary
Batch or continuous in large volume scenarios is no longer a clear-cut answer. Your heat treating professional and your furnace suppliers should understand this. There are literally dozens of variables that need to be assessed, and only after a careful analysis tailored for each customer can an optimized solution be designed with either batch or continuous furnace solutions.
Notes
1. Hemsath et al, “Nitrocarburizing Gears using the ZeroFlow Method in Large-Volume Production”, Thermal Processing, 10/2015
About the Author: Mark Hemsath is Director of Nitriding and Special Vacuum Furnaces at SECO/VACUUM Technologies, LLC and acting Thermal General Manager at SECO/WARWICK Corp. in Meadville, Pennsylvania. With 30 years of experience in the industrial furnace and heat treat equipment market, he is in charge of all North American atmosphere furnace sales, gas nitriding, and gas carburizing. This article originally appeared in Heat TreatToday’sJune 2019 Automotive print edition and is published here with the author’s permission.
Welcome to another episode of Heat Treat Radio, a periodic podcast where Heat Treat Radio host, Doug Glenn, discusses cutting-edge topics with industry-leading personalities. Below, you can either listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or you can read an edited version of the transcript. To see a complete list of other Heat Treat Radio episodes, click here.
Audio: Mark Hemsath on Nitriding & FNC
In this conversation, Heat Treat Radio host, Doug Glenn, an interview that Doug Glenn, publisher ofHeat Treat Today and host of Heat Treat Radio, conducted with Mark Hemsath, director of nitriding and special vacuum furnaces with SECO/Vacuum Technologies, which is a SECO/WARWICK group company, located in Meadville, Pennsylvania, where he oversees nitriding, including ferritic nitrocarburizing (FNC), and also other surface engineering such as carburizing. Doug talks with Mark about nitriding and FNC.
Mark recently completed his paper for the ASM Heat Treat Show 2019, titled “Nitriding, Its Growth and the Technologies That Have Cemented Its Broad Use in Surface Engineering”, to be presented at the ASM Heat Treat Show in October 2019. In this podcast, Doug and Mark discuss why nitriding has become popular, what is nitriding and what processes does it entail, the new technologies affecting the industry, and major players in processing and supply.
Click the play button below to listen.
Transcript: Mark Hemsath on Nitriding & FNC
The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.
Mark Hemsath, director of nitriding and special vacuum furnaces, SECO/Vacuum Technologies
Are you a hard case or a case hardener? If you’re a case hardener, you might be interested in today’s episode. If you’re a hard case, well, there are other self-help podcasts you might want to consider. On today’s episode, we’re going to talk about nitride, and we’re going to talk with one of the most qualified individuals in the North American heat treat marketplace. This guy has nitriding and heat treating running in his blood.
Mark Hemsath (MH): My father was involved with a furnace manufacturer in Toledo, Ohio, and he actually brought ionitriding to the United States from Kluckner in Germany. I think, at last count, we think he had 65 patents under his name.
Doug Glenn (DG): Hi, and thank you for joining us. I’m your Heat TreatRadio host and Heat TreatToday publisher, Doug Glenn. Today on Heat TreatRadio, we’re talking nitriding with Mark Hemsath.
MH: Hi, I am Mark Hemsath with SECO/Vacuum Technologies, which is a SECO/WARWICK group company, and I am the director of nitriding and special vacuum furnaces. I am involved with everything to do with nitriding, including ferritic nitrocarburizing, and also other surface engineering such as carburized.
DG: If you have an interest in surface hardening, such as nitriding, ferritic nitrocarburizing or carburizing, you might want to take a quick cybertrip to www.heattreattoday.com where we have a substantial and growing list of resources that might be helpful to you. Heat TreatToday is one of the industry’s leading information sources for all things heat treat-related. Every Tuesday, we post a new technical article. We call it Technical Tuesday. And Heat TreatToday is the only North American-based heat treating publication offering a comprehensive list of heat treat consultants. So, if you’re a manufacturer with in-house heat treating, especially in aerospace, automotive, medical, or energy, or even general manufacturing, and you’ve lost a good bit of your organizational heat treating brains, take a look under resources on Heat TreatToday’s website, or simply Google “heat treating consultants”, and you’ll find a comprehensive list of heat treat industry consultants that can help you solve your pressing heat treating problems. Look us up on the web at www.heattreattoday.com.
Let’s get back to Mark Hemsath and our discussion on nitriding.
DG: Mark, we’ve been trying to connect for quite a while. I’m really glad we were finally able to connect.
MH: This is a perfectly opportune time to do this because I just finished my paper for the ASM Heat Treat Show, so it is all fresh in my mind.
DG: Interesting! What is the paper?
MH: My paper is “Nitriding, Its Growth and the Technologies That Have Cemented Its Broad Use in Surface Engineering”. It will be presented at the ASM Heat Treat Show in October.
DG: Hey, heat treat readers, the show Mark is referring to is being held on October 15 – 17 in Detroit. You can find out more about that show by Googling “2019 Heat Treat Show Detroit”, or by going to www.asminternational.org and searching for it there. Now, back to Mark.
Why Nitriding?
Let’s jump into the nitriding market. What are you seeing? I’ve been hearing more and more about nitriding. How about you?
MH: I think the main thing is that nitriding is growing, and it is still growing rapidly. It has grown in the past number of years, and that is one of the reasons I just wrote a paper, which is very opportune to discussing why it’s growing and why it has gone up in use in the market.
There are a number of points that I probably should point out as to why nitriding is growing: I think more and more people are discovering the positive effects of nitriding. This would include the very high surface hardness that you can get. The higher temperature hardness—in other words, it resists tempering—a carburized-type surface or an induction-hardened surface if it’s used at temperatures above the tempering temperature, it would start to reduce its hardness, whereas nitriding is done at a higher temperature (it’s done above 900° or 1000° or so F), so you would resist the decrease in hardness up to those temperatures, which is pretty nice. Also, it gives you the ability to have a high fatigue strength. The nitrided layer actually will change the fatigue properties of the metal part. Another thing that everybody usually talks about is the improved corrosion resistance. This is something unique to nitriding. It is used a lot, especially ferritic nitrocarburizing, for corrosion resistance. And the final thing I wanted to talk about is the minimal process distortion. If you compare this to carburizing where you are quenching the part, because you’re coming from the austenitic region going into the quench bath and it’s cooling very rapidly, there is a chance for your part to distort, which means you may have to follow on process it to get it back into dimension. Nitriding has a lot of benefits to it.
DG: Interesting, Mark. These seem like some pretty compelling reasons to nitride, but one of the objections I hear is that nitriding is a more expensive process. Your thoughts?
MH: It is not really as expensive as you think, because you have to take into account certain things. Let’s take carburizing, for example, or just thru hardening, for instance. You’ve got to quench it, you’ve got to wash it, and you’ve got to temper it. If anything goes wrong in that process, you’ve got to do some sort of follow on processing. You probably won’t need to do any of that after nitriding. Now, you will need to change probably some of the material and the alloying properties, but we can get into that later.
DG: Yes, fine, but perhaps a little clarification is in order. We’re talking about nitriding, but we often hear the phrase “ferritic nitrocarburizing.” Can you help us understand the difference?
MH: Yes. It is a nitriding process, but it is typically done with lower carbon materials and that is why they put carbon in there, too, so that is where they get the nitrocarburizing into the process. It is typically done at a little bit higher temperature because you’re not as much worried about the thru hardness property or the tempering properties. What you’re trying to do is to take a less expensive material, whether it’s a cast iron or inexpensive steel, and you’re trying to get a nice white layer around there, or a combination of white layer, commonly known as a compound zone. It’s a combination of epsilon and gamma prime. You can create different layers, and the carbon is going to help you with that by creating it faster and creating it a little bit harder. What that’s going to do for you on that part is give you lubricity; because of the nature of the white layer, the compound zone has a lubricious nature to it. It will give you corrosion resistance and give you that wear resistance that everybody wants in those parts.
Where Is Nitriding Being Done?
DG: So where are nitriding and FNC being used today?
MH: Today nitriding thankfully is being used everywhere. It is actually being used where chrome used to be used, such as rods for hydraulic systems. This is a post-oxidized FNC that comes out black, and it is a very nice replacement for chrome. In the automotive industry, FNC is very popular because they use cheaper materials, and it prevents not only wear and denting, but it also offers corrosion resistance for a lot of the parts, which is nice on cars. This is actually how FNC got involved with the brake rotors. On brake rotors for cars, they used to paint them. The problem was, as soon as the car got moved from the truck onto the lot and the brakes were stepped on, it would wear the paint off and start rusting. People would complain there was rust on the brakes and they hadn’t even bought the car yet. What they discovered was that if they ferritic nitrocarburized the cars, they would not get that kind of rust on their brake rotors. So that was helpful. It also provides incredible wear resistance against your brake pads.
Nitriding is also used in gears. I mention that because you have minimal or no post grinding. In aerospace, it’s used all over. They like the wear properties and corrosion. A lot of parts stay in planes for years and years and years, so they don’t want the corrosion.
Something I learned recently in the last few years in regards to the oil and gas industry, is that oil and gas are pumping a lot of stuff. They are fracking, they are pumping water and brine, and they have a lot of slurries that cause a lot of wear in pumps and pipes. It is very caustic. Nitriding works very well to extend the life of those parts.
In a lot of large parts, they plasma nitride a lot of stamping dyes—again, because it gives you dent resistance, and it’s going to give you more life on that dye because you’re stamping metals or your hot stamping forgings, etc. There are a lot of reasons to use nitriding.
DG: Are you hearing of companies converting some of their carburizing processes to nitriding or FNC?
MH: There is a lot of effort in that area. A lot of engineers don’t know about it, but they’re starting to become more aware of it. Of course, a lot of materials and components out there are already pre-engineered, and they’re already done, and now we’ve got to thru harden it, and we’ve got to carburize it. It takes a good engineering group to understand the differences and that is part of the education process. That’s why I’m happy to do this with you today. It’s an effort to try to get more people up to speed and for the engineers and component people to say, “Yes, I can do this with nitriding,” and can understand what can be done.
You can do this with gears, for instance. We’ve done it many times, and people are starting to specify it. You can do FNC of gears, and you can do nitriding of gears, too.
DG: So, it can be done. Understood. But are you hearing of any examples of where it is actually being done?
MH: It is being done more and more in motor transmissions; [that’s] where I got word of the fact that one automaker with a ten-speed transmission was going to have three or four of the gear sets be ferritic nitrocarburized versus carburized. An offshoot of carburizing is carbonitriding. Carbonitriding is basically the same thing as carburizing except that it is usually a shallower case and they use a little ammonia in there to get a little bit harder surface. However, you’re going to get distortion on that. There are a number of parts that you can change the chemistry of the steel. Although you’re paying more for the steel, you can ferritic nitrocarburize it and get the similar properties that you’re looking for for that wear component.
DG: So you’re paying more for the base steel, but you’re paying less for the post-processing of it?
MH: Yes, potentially, because you don’t need to rework it because of distortion. A lot of parts are hard to quench and not get them to move, especially small parts or flat parts. At SECO/WARWICK, we also make rotary retort furnaces. You can do washers in there, but when that washer goes into the quench, it’s going to enter at different angles. But nobody wants to take washers and individually line them up so that the edge goes into a quench. It’s just too expensive to do that. So you’re going to put up with a certain amount of distortion on that material that you’re quenching, and then have to figure out how to deal with it afterward. With ferritic nitrocarburizing, you wouldn’t have to worry about that, because there is no quench and there is no distortion.
DG: Carburizing and carbonitriding both have quenches, whereas nitriding and FNC do not require quench.
MH: Correct. Nitriding and FNC are all done typically below 1100°F, and there is no quenching. It is always a slow cool.
DG: And, therefore, we are avoiding distortion.
MH: You’re not putting it into a liquid, whether it’s a hot oil or what have you, you’re not putting it into a liquid to cause that rapid cooling, correct.
DG: And it’s a slow cool for nitriding and FNC.
MH: Yes. Nitriding will give you some growth. We typically predict, let’s say a white layer which can be all the way up to 25 microns, usually running in 10 – 25 micron range. About 60% of that will result in growth, but it is very predictable. If the engineer is worried about the size, they can put that into their stack up in how they machine it initially. You’ll get a very small growth of the material from nitriding. I think it’s in the 10,000th range, absent the white layer.
Nitriding: Gas or Plasma
DG: When I think of nitriding, I think of several approaches such as gas or plasma nitriding. Would you explain the differences?
MH: There are four major different types of nitriding. There is gas nitriding, which is an area that I play in very heavily. There is plasma nitriding, also know as ion nitriding. There is liquid or salt bath nitriding, and there is even nitriding done with fluidized beds.
Let’s go through them quickly. I’m not going to talk much about liquid that is done in salts. It is a very old process, but not a bad process. The problem that I have always found is that people don’t want to own this equipment because of all the hazards with salts, the disposal, and everything else. It is not a bad process if you’re willing to own it and run it; you can do some great things with it.
Fluidized bed is an older technology. It’s a little different. You’ve basically got particles that are being fluidized which allow heat transfer. There is an art to running and using it, but it is certainly a process that can have very good results. A long time ago, I was involved with a company where we helped them create a new fluidized bed technology. It is still being used; it just never really has taken hold that well in this country. There are some old systems out there, however.
I actually started out my career in ion and plasma. When I was in college a long time ago, in the early 1980s, I translated German to English from the German technology which was created by Kluckner. This came to the US, and I was helping the engineers to translate what they were talking about. My paper, that I was just in the process of writing, talks about some of this, and I plan on doing a webinar in the near future and talking more about this. There are some really nice benefits to plasma. This is well-documented in the literature, but there are ones that I point out that are different than some of the other processes. You have what they call sputtering. The effect of the plasma can help clean up the surface of the material. If you have some oxides, this is very beneficial if you’re doing some type of stainless which can have some problems.
Another thing that plasma is very good at is masking. A lot of times, there are parts that have a lot of threaded holes or areas where they don’t want nitriding. They might weld on it. It is very easy to mask with plasma nitriding because you can mechanically mask it. What that means is that if you have threads, you can just put a little bolt in there and they won’t get nitrided. If you have a surface, let’s say a piece of pipe, you can take some shim stalk of metal, wrap it around there, and you won’t get any nitriding where that metal is. It will nitride the metal piece that you put on there, but it won’t nitride what’s below there. So it is excellent for masking.
The other thing with ion nitriding [is] why it was popular. It’s still popular, but gas nitriding has overcome some of the negatives that it had in the past. But ion nitriding is what’s known as a low potential process, so by nature, it has a low nitriding potential. What that means is, it is difficult to get thick compound zones or white layers because the potential is fairly low. So people that wanted to nitride parts would use ion nitriding if they didn’t want the white layer to come with it. At the same time, FNC is harder in the plasma and post oxidation is a little more difficult. The equipment is not really designed to do those processes. The other thing is that the parts need to be individually placed and very nicely placed within the furnace proper, so there is more set-up work involved. But, in general, it does a wonderful job. One thing I say in my paper is once you own the equipment and you have some loads that you’re doing, you can get very repeatable results if you do the same thing every time.
The last one is gas nitriding. We actually have a process called zero flow, but it is just ammonia. Like any other process, it is a control method. What is happening with the gas nitriding today is that the advance of controls has allowed you to do a lot more with nitriding to get you similar properties than what you can get in ion. Plasma has come a long way, too, because the controls took forever to catch up with the technology. There were a lot of issues, which I discussed in my paper. Gas nitriding has seen the same type of issues. When I was in college, the computer chip was called an 8080/8086. They weren’t very advanced and they were just getting microprocessor technology and it took decades before all of this stuff got into the industrial equipment where it needs to be.
Fast-forward to this decade, 2010 to 2019, there have been tremendous advancements in the microprocessor and in electronics. For gas nitriding, we need to measure hydrogen because it’s a way for us to estimate nitriding potential. Today, that is very reliable and you can do it in situ, which means you can do it right in the furnace and get very accurate readings and you know where your nitriding potential is. The trick to gas nitriding and to doing precision gas nitriding [is] being able to craft a layer that you want. The layers are a combination of epsilon, gamma prime, and alpha. In order to get the layer that you want, first of all, you have to look at the literature and know what you’re doing. But you have to have equipment that can get you there. Today’s control systems can get you there and craft the layer that you want.
Quite frankly, the nice thing about gas nitriding is the loading can be ugly. In other words, it doesn’t have to be prim and proper like it is with ion nitriding. You can put a bunch of things into a basket, then put another basket on top of that and another one on top of that, put a lot of weight in it, and you don’t have to worry about the parts necessarily touching each other or the wire mesh that they’re sitting on or the basket. It’s going to get very well nitrided. That is not the case with ion. It’s much easier to own the equipment once you have it. Obviously the negative is that you’re using a gas (ammonia), it costs money and you have to store it and use it.
New Tech in Nitriding
DG: I want to cover two other major areas. The first one is new technologies in this field, and the second is a brief conversation of the major players. What can you tell us about the new and/or interesting technologies in this field?
MH: With plasma nitriding, they’ve been able to do a few things there. Mainly, they’ve been able to get better power supplies, pulse plasma, and they also obviously have gone to hot wall heating. That means they don’t have to heat with the plasma anymore. On the power supplies, they always had problems with arcing and a chance to burn some holes in it or pit some surfaces if you didn’t have the right power. And again, the microprocessor control that I talked about before had gotten so good, that they now have DC pulse plasma that is very fast-acting and can sense any problems within the process, and you can control it very closely. I think most people in the plasma arena have found that technology and are using it.
Gas is a little bit different. There are a lot of things going on in gas. Many, many years ago there was a process of controlling nitriding potential only by diluting with nitrogen and that was done by one of our competitors. We have a process called “zero flow” where we don’t use nitrogen. Other people will dilute with disassociated ammonia. The problem with that is that you have to buy an ammonia disassociator in order to introduce the disassociated ammonia. The reason you introduce disassociated ammonia instead of nitrogen is you’re able to much better calculate and measure nitriding potential. With a nitrogen dilution, the calculations are different, they are much more complex, and you need a lot of experience to get similar or same results that you would get with either zero flow process or with disassociated ammonia dilution.
There is some other neat stuff going on out there that I’ve gotten involved in and that we’re trying to get moving at our company, and there is a lot of stuff out there in the literature; it’s called oxi-nitriding. I’ve heard it used both for post-oxidation and for a part of the nitriding process. Oxi-nitriding to me is not post-oxidation. Oxi-nitriding is the injection of some sort of oxygen source early in the nitriding process with ammonia so that you can do some things to the surface of the steels. Let’s say with a 300 series stainless, what you’re trying to do is break apart oxygen bonds. That is pretty well proven in the literature that you can do that. It’s probably a little cleaner way of doing it than what other people do for those stainlesses and which we also do is put some sort of a chloride in there to break the bond so that you can nitride some of those more difficult stainless steels.
The other thing that people are doing and they’re doing it differently is-post oxidation. This is giving that black color. You can do that with water or you can do it with nitrous oxide which is laughing gas. And there are different temperatures you can do it at and different depths of it. We talked before about having the effect of a white layer compound zone and that helps with corrosion resistance, but we’ve also found out that putting a post oxide on it not only gives it a nice color, being a darker, near-black color, but it also helps with the corrosion resistance. On top of that, you can develop a layer that has a certain amount of porosity, and you can impregnate that with oils and that will give it even more corrosion resistance. In industries where this is very common is hydrolic cylinders, a typical front-end loader, agriculture equipment, snow plows, etc. These are usually chromed. But a lot of manufacturers are finding that a black ferritic nitrocarburized surface with post oxidation—and then they’re using oils in the cylinders anyway—will give you better wear property from the chrome and will give you very nice corrosion resistant properties. And I think it is probably a little less expensive. A lot of people are moving to that. If you see cylinders with black instead of chrome, that’s what’s happening.
Players: Processors and Suppliers
DG: Let’s move on to major players in the industry. First, who are the major players that are actually doing the nitriding?
MH: I probably can’t list them all, but as you mentioned I used to work for Advanced Heat Treat Corp. They are a very large commercial nitridor in the Midwest, and they get work from all over the country. Obviously, another big heat treater out there is Bodycote. By definition, they do quite a bit of nitriding. Nitrex Inc. makes competing furnaces against us, but they’re actually a very big nitriding house out there, and they’re probably much bigger in the nitriding than they are in the equipment business, so they’re very well versed in doing the nitriding. There is another company in Indiana that’s been growing greatly, and it’s called Advanced Nitriding Solutions. There is Ionic Technologies Inc. in South Carolina that do quite a bit of nitriding that would also be ion and gas. What we’re seeing a lot more of is that people that really are in nitriding are doing gas nitriding and they’re doing ion nitriding. They understand that nitriding is a great process and they’re trying to offer that to everybody.
The other thing is a lot of heat treat shops do just ferritic nitrocarburizing, which I call the “poor man’s nitriding.” It’s hard to screw up ferritic nitrocarburizing. If you get enough ammonia in there and you put some carbon in there, you’re going to get some sort of a layer.
DG: And how about the nitriding equipment suppliers?
MH: There are a number. There is Ion Heat. I know those guys pretty well and they are a nice little company and have some new technology. There is RUBIG, which is a big company. I’m sure there are other ones out there, but those are the main ones right now playing in the US market for plasma nitriding. RUBIG has gotten into gas nitriding, so they do offer some designs there. I think what they do is mostly pit nitriders. I break the gas nitriders into guys doing front-loading (which looks more like a regular batch furnace) versus pit. There is nothing wrong with doing pit furnaces. Both furnaces, front-loading or pit, work very much the same. They have a fan, they’ve got a retort typically, and they try to keep the parts uniform that they put the gases in. The thing with the pit is, you’ve got to have a pit. What’s nice with the pit is you can usually load it heavier. So for people who really want to have high production, like when I was at the commercial heat treater where I was, they liked the pit design because you could load them up a lot heavier. Guys doing more precision nitriding typically want the front load. It’s more like a vacuum furnace or a batch furnace within the building, etc. Companies out there for this, as I mentioned before, are Nitrex—long ago we actually used to build their equipment, so our equipment looks very similar to theirs because we designed it; SECO/WARWICK, as I mentioned makes zero flow; Lindberg/MPH makes a pit design. I think they have not gone too much into the advanced controls. They do a lot of single-stage nitriding. Other companies out there like ALD Thermal Treatment Inc. have come out with a front load. There is KGO which has a front load. And there are a lot of new entrants in the market. It’s getting kind of crowded out there. A lot of people with not a lot of experience, but I guess they have a hammer, a welding wire, and some duct tape and they’re making furnaces.
DG: Hey readers, you can hardly blame Mark for that answer. It really wasn’t a very fair question to ask him to list all of his competitors, but he did a pretty good job. But since a good solid list of suppliers might really be helpful to you, we’re going to do two things. First, I’m going to briefly round out the list here and now. I’m sure I won’t get everyone, but we do know for sure that companies like Surface Combustion, Gasbarre, and Tenova are also making nitriding furnaces.
And since I’m sure there are others, we’ll provide a more complete list of nitriding furnace manufacturers in the transcript of this episode. You can find that transcript by Googling “heat treat radio mark hemsath”, and we’ll keep an updated list of manufacturers listed there.
DG: Final question, Mark. If someone wants to learn more about nitriding, what resources would you recommend?
MH: There are a lot of good resources online. There are a few people in the industry that are extremely well versed. A good friend and associate, Daniel Herring, is called “The Heat Treat Doctor®,” and he knows all about heat treating. There is also my friend, Edward Rolinski, who is still at Advanced Heat Treat who’s very well published and you can look for his papers. A general flow developer and also fairly well published is Leszek Maldzinski.
Daniel Herring,“The Heat Treat Doctor®
There are a couple of guys that have been working in nitriding their whole lives and they are prolific writers, and that would be Marcel Somers and E.J. Mittenmeijer. There is actually a book that they put out in 2014 called Thermochemical Surface Engineering of Steels. That book contains articles by Maldzinski, Rolinski, and other people that I mentioned, but it talks about carburizing, ferritic nitrocarburizing, plasma, and gas. It’s a really great resource. It cost a few dollars, but you can also get it electronically. It is highly technical.
You can go to some of the magazines out there—Heat Treat Today, Industrial Heating continually does some small articles, and the gear guys out there publish some articles. There is a lot of stuff out there and you can find most of it on the internet.
Doug Glenn, Heat Treat Today publisher and Heat Treat Radiohost.
To find other Heat Treat Radio episodes, go to www.heattreattoday.com/radio and look in the list of Heat Treat Radio episodes listed.
Welcome to another episode of Heat Treat Radio, a periodic podcast where Heat Treat Radiohost, Doug Glenn, discusses cutting-edge topics with industry-leading personalities. Below, you can either listen to the podcast by clicking on the audio play button, or you can read an edited version of the transcript. To see a complete list of other Heat Treat Radio episodes, click here.
Audio: Heat Treat Radio: Ben Gasbarre on Nitriding
In this conversation, Heat Treat Radio host, Doug Glenn, interviews Ben Gasbarre, president of Gasbarre Products Industrial Furnace Systems Division, about nitriding. Gasbarre Products is located in Plymouth, Michigan, where Ben oversees one of the recent acquisitions of Gasbarre products, the former JL Becker Co. Nitriding is one of the more popular thermal processes, so you’ll want to tune in to this podcast conversation with Ben Gasbarre of Gasbarre Products, one supplier of equipment for that process. Ben talks with Doug about the growth of nitriding in the heat treating market, particularly for domestic suppliers of equipment and services. This is especially true in the automotive manufacturing industry, but also in the aerospace and energy sectors.
Click the play button below to listen.
Ben Gasbarre, president of Gasbarre Products Industrial Furnace Systems Division
Transcript: Heat Treat Radio: Ben Gasbarre on Nitriding
The following transcript has been edited for your reading enjoyment.
In this episode of Heat TreatRadio, we’re going to talk about one of the more popular and growing thermal processes and one supplier of equipment for that process. The process: nitriding. And maybe a little bit of FNC (ferritic nitrocarburizing). The equipment supplier: Gasbarre Products.
Before we begin hearing from Ben Gasbarre, let me remind you that googling “nitriding” or “nitriding heat treatment” will bring up Heat TreatToday as the very first heat treat industry publication. Check out our site if you’re looking for nitriding or just good heat treating content. Every day our editorial team posts one new piece of heat treat content. Tuesdays are especially exciting. We call them ‘Technical Tuesdays’ because we post a new technical article every Tuesday. Pay a visit to our website, and don’t forget to support the advertisers and content providers you see on the site. Go to www.heattreattoday.com.
And one last thing—Do you know anyone under the age of 40 who is making a significant contribution to the heat treat industry? I’m betting you do, and it would be smart on your part to nominate that young professional to be a member of Heat TreatToday’s 40 Under 40 Class of 2019. From all of the applications received, our team chooses 40 outstanding, young heat treat professionals to be in our 40 Under 40 Class of 2019. You can see last year’s winners and nominate someone for this year’s award by going to www.heattreattoday.com/40under40. If you’re a supplier to the industry, think about nominating a young person from one of your customer’s organizations.
Today, we’re going to talk to Ben Gasbarre, president of Gasbarre Products Industrial Furnace Systems Division. Ben is located in Plymouth, Michigan, where he oversees one of the recent acquisitions of Gasbarre products, the former JL Becker Co. Although Gasbarre is phasing out some of the previous company names like JL Becker and Sinterite, they have, over time, become one of the major players in the North American heat treat market. Today, we’re going to talk to Ben about nitriding.
Vacuum Purge Nitriding Furnace
DG: Let’s talk about the nitriding market. What are you hearing and seeing?
BG: There is no doubt that nitriding has been around for a long time. It is not necessarily a brand new process, but it has certainly become a buzz word in the industry over the last number of years, and there are companies out there that have built their entire business on strictly doing different nitriding processes. We hear a lot of discussion and activity of more people wanting to get involved in it and in what aspects they can do that and where. There are a lot of process advantages to it. You get the wear and corrosion resistance, you get low distortion on the product which can lead to a lot of lower secondary processing costs for the ultimate end user. Then, on the heat treater side, there are advantages with the equipment in general. There is no oil quenching, so you’ve got environmental and plant cleanliness advantages there. There is limited part movement within the equipment, with some of the styles of equipment, so there are a lot of maintenance advantages. There are also the lower temps. With plant employees being around the equipment, operating temperatures in that 1,000 degree up range, it can be quite a bit more comfortable in the heat treat departments where this equipment is running. And then on the nitriding side, cycles are much longer, you can get higher equipment utilization, lower labor costs, and that type of thing. There are a lot of advantages for both the end user of the product and the heat treaters as well.
DG: Out in the marketplace, does it seem like the demand for this type of equipment or this type of process is up?
Integral Quench Line
BG: Absolutely. We’ve done our own market analysis studies and have talked to people, and all of it shows strong growth and a lot of interest here in the US market. We’ve been successful over the years as well just with our current product line. It’s been a little more niche for us, but we’ve certainly had success with our product offering. What we’re looking for now, and what we believe is out there, is a broader need in the heat treating market. We feel the demand is there and really it is for a reliable domestic support for the equipment and the process. That’s where we see the need here domestically.
DG: So we’re getting a little more demand. Any sense of what’s driving that demand? Are we actually doing more nitriding, and if so, what markets might they be coming from, or what processes or materials?
BG: From our standpoint, being based right outside of Detroit, automotive is a big part of what we do and the people we talk to. There is a lot of activity on that side converting coatings and other processes from the coating over to the nitriding. We hear a lot of activity around that. It is heavy automotive, but we’ve also been taking interest and inquiries for aerospace and oil and gas applications as well. A big key to that though, again, for our end users is the flexibility—being able to run different styles, whether it be stainless steel parts or castings and things like that. The equipment has got to be able to handle both and keep it flexible for the user. You can also tie in atmosphere stress-relieving and tempering, not just nitriding, into these styles of equipment.
DG: What are you hearing about the equipment currently being offered in that space?
Pit Furnace
BG: We actually did a presentation at the FNA show this last fall that really focused on all of the different styles of equipment that you could use in this process. You have what I’ll call the classic integral quench furnaces, pit furnaces, and that kind of thing. On the integral quenches, they can be very flexible; you can process multiple loads; they are very forgiving for part cleanliness. But inherently with integral quench furnaces and the atmospheres and temperatures of the nitriding FNC [ferritic nitrocarburizing] process, you’ve got some safety challenges, and there is also a lot of maintenance that comes in with integral quench furnaces. Pit furnaces, on the other hand, are more single chamber, so your volume might be a little bit less, but you get a good quality part, you’ve got strong process control, but you do have infrastructure challenges with pit furnaces and loading mechanisms and maintenance for pits, so there are some challenges there. Where a lot of the interest has been is in the horizontal retort, in a lot of cases, with vacuum purge units associated with that. Those styles of equipment have been very popular in Europe and in other parts of the world, but are gaining a lot of traction here in the US. Again, they give very good part quality, strong process control, and your maintenance and infrastructure costs can be less. It doesn’t require a pit. There are not a lot of moving parts, so your focus is more on really ensuring your door seal and those kinds of things are good. Then you just continue to run the product and keep utilization high which is what everybody’s looking for.
DG: Let’s dig in a little deeper about what your company brings to the nitriding market.
BG: We have a lot of equipment out there that does this process, but what we’ve been developing is the horizontal retort, not gas nitriding, system that uses a vacuum purge system to allow for more effective quick purging and turnaround times in the furnace. It is something that is offered out there, but where we are unique is that we’ve built an extremely knowledgeable team for this product. This goes back to our roots to what my grandfather started the business over 45 years ago, having that knowledgeable staff that understands the customer’s processes, needs, and challenges.
We’ve brought people in that have sold this process, that have run the equipment, that have designed recipes, and that have troubleshot the process in the equipment. That’s where we are hanging our hat right now. We’ve got that staff, we know the equipment, and we are domestic, so we can offer that support that is reliable right here in the US and that is our approach right now. We do have areas that we are looking at and are working on. There are certain parts of the nitriding process that can challenge the end user, and we’re looking at things that can make equipment improvements and process improvements to ultimately solidify ourselves in that market for the long term.
DG: Besides your presence in the nitriding market, your company has had a pretty extensive history in the heat treat market generally, correct?
BG: Yes. Gasbarre was started in 1973 by my grandfather, George Gasbarre. He started doing powder compaction presses for the power metallurgy industry. My
Tom Gasbarre, former CEO, Gasbarre Products
grandfather started out as a parts maker and saw an opportunity in that market to design a press specific for powder compaction and he built the foundation on having a knowledgeable staff, design flexibility, maintenance friendly, and affordable, and these are principles that we continue to live by as we’ve grown the business. My father, Tom Gasbarre, and his brother, Bill, grew the business into what it is today. We’ve acquired 8 different companies, all based around powder metal presses or powder compaction presses, furnaces, and then tool and die. Today we’re made of up of a powder compaction solutions group which manufactures compaction presses and tool and die components for the particulate materials industries. We’ve got the thermal processing systems group that
Alex Gasbarre, CEO, Gasbarre Products
manufactures a wide range of heat treating equipment. And we also have a manufacturing technologies group that just utilizes our broad resource of engineering and manufacturing capabilities to make equipment and components. We’ve been pretty successful in the glass industry, railroad industry, and mining industries. We’ve done some defense work as well. Just a couple months ago, we officially announced the transition to the third generation where my brother, Alex Gasbarre, is taking over as CEO. We’re proud of our past, and we are really excited about where we are today and the people and strategies we have in place to move us into the future.
DG: Let’s talk about the acquisitions you referenced just a moment ago. On the heat treating side of your business, tell us about the acquisitions.
BG: It’s kind of interesting with the re-branding we’re doing this year. We’re really pushing the Gasbarre name into the market, so that the Gasbarre name may be new, but we’ve been building equipment for 30 years. With the acquisition of Sinterite with their
Tip Up Furnace
continuous mesh belt furnace or powder metal sintering, that obviously complemented our compaction press line and got us into the thermal processing market. In 2003, we acquired C.I. Hayes, and that was really to meet our interests in getting to higher temperature applications with the pusher furnaces and vacuum furnaces, and they brought a long history and a large and solid base to us as well and got us into a bigger market outside of just powder metal. In 2011, we acquired J.L. Becker. That was really what built us out from a product line standpoint in the heat treating market. It complemented the other lines well in that we had a little bit of overlap, but with our focus out here, it’s more on the larger batch style equipment and some of the continuous processes associated with that. Therefore it really filled out our product line and gives us a broad variety of products to offer to the market.
Modular Vacuum Furnace
DG: Where do you see Gasbarre having the strongest product offering?
BG: With the broad product line, we’ve got a few. The mesh belt product for sintering and brazing—we lead the industry in that. You won’t find a piece of equipment more suited for those applications, and we have an extremely knowledgeable staff for those. We have a hypercooler design for sinter hardening that has shown results that eliminate the need for additional heat treat, which I know can be a touchy subject with the readers here, but it is a pretty dynamic piece of equipment.
DG: But if it saves money for the end user, that is the key.
BG: Exactly. Also, our vacuum line is very unique in that we specialize in the multi-chamber systems. We can adapt to a wide variety of processes and different production demands. Work flows in and out of cells with our multi-chamber designs, and we can adapt to all of that. With our variety on the batch side, we can offer equipment that processes 500-pound loads all the way up to loads that are over 100,000 pounds. We can be competitive and technically competent in all of those areas.
DG: And your vacuum line?
Single Chamber Vacuum Furnace
BG: We offer both batch and continuous vacuum equipment, single chamber, and multi-chamber. Most of our designs, and where we are strong, is in the multi-chamber systems. We’ve developed a modular design that allows expandability and versatility for the end user. You can start with a single chamber and adapt in oil quenches or gas quenches. You can convert it from a batch system to a continuous system. The modular design gives people a lot of flexibility in what they can do. It also helps with maintenance, with how the systems are designed, so I think that has a lot of advantages for the end user that you don’t necessarily see in the market.
DG: And how about active markets, either markets you currently serve or markets where you see growth potential?
BG: Obviously with vacuum equipment, you get into aerospace quite a bit. The one that we’re excited about is the 3D printing. We’ve been working closely with a number of partners there. Binder jet companies are looking on the vacuum sintering side, and we’ve got expertise there. We have also gotten involved with some vacuum annealing for people doing direct metal laser sintering applications, and we’ve seen quite a bit of activity on that front. Obviously, it’s front and center in a lot of different ways, so we are looking to be very active in that market.
DG: If you’d like more Heat TreatRadio, it’s simple. Log onto the Google, then type in “Heat Treat Radio”. We’re the first thing that pops up. You can subscribe to Heat TreatRadio on iTunes or SoundCloud or you can find Heat TreatRadio on Heat TreatToday’s website which is www.heattreattoday.com. If you’d like to get in touch with Ben or learn more about Gasbarre products, you’re welcome to email me, Doug Glenn, at doug@heattreattoday.com, or you can email Ben Gasbarre directly at ben.gasbarre@gasbarre.com.
Don’t forget to nominate young professionals in the heat treat industry to be part of Heat TreatToday’s40 Under 40 Class of 2019. Nominations are now open at www.heattreattoday.com/40under40.
Extra support for this episode of Heat TreatRadio was provided by the Industrial Heating Equipment Association (IHEA), where leaders in the heat treat industry meet to give back to the industry. Find out more about IHEA and especially about their fall educational seminars on September 24 and 25 in Cleveland, Ohio, by visiting www.ihea.org.
This episode of Heat TreatRadio is the sole property of Heat TreatToday and may not be reproduced without advanced written permission from Heat TreatToday.
This episode was produced and mixed by Jonathan Lloyd from Butler, Pennsylvania, who is still engaged and waiting to get married. I’m your host, Doug Glenn. Thanks for listening.
Doug Glenn, Heat Treat Today publisher and Heat Treat Radio host.
To find other Heat Treat Radio episodes, go to www.heattreattoday.com/radio and look in the list of Heat Treat Radio episodes listed.
The compound zone acts as a ceramic skin protecting the metal underneath from corrosion. (Photo credit: Advanced Heat Treat Corp)
Engineers considering the advantages and disadvantages of surface treatments typically have a usable lifespan, surface hardness, and fatigue strength in mind. As a process, both gas and ion (plasma) nitriding avoid the issues involved with coatings and achieve similar metallurgical properties, and the compound zone increases corrosion resistance. But what are other areas in which the two processes can be compared, and what are their differences? It’s good to know, particularly since the latter could significantly make a direct impact on the end product.
Jacob McCann, a process metallurgist with AHT Corp., provides a specific list of pros and cons of gas nitriding and ion (plasma) nitriding in our Technical Tuesday feature for today.
Nitriding and carburizing are the two most common heat treatment practices for surface hardening functional components. The main difference is that in nitriding, nitrogen atoms are made to diffuse into the surface of the parts being processed, whereas in carburizing, carbon is used. There are advantages and disadvantages to both processes.
This excellent blog post by Metlab in the Philadelphia area is a great primer for both processes.
Why is parts cleaning an important step in heat treat? While a nice surface finish reflects quality, the importance of cleaning goes far beyond the aesthetic aspect. Parts cleaning can ensure against quality issues, especially when it comes to nitriding or brazing where high surface cleanliness is a prerequisite. Learn what questions you should be asking to achieve optimal parts cleaning.
