AEROSPACE HEAT TREAT NEWS

Heat Treat Equipment Manufacturer Expands to Broaden Aerospace Supply

 

Source: Lancaster Eagle-Gazette

 

A heat treating equipment manufacturer based in Carroll, Ohio, recently announced plans to expand its facility and broaden its capability to produce furnaces for aerospace manufacturers equipping in-house heat treat operations.

Delta H Technologies LLC’s investments will cover the purchase of machinery and equipment for the design and production of furnaces for aerospace components. The expansion confirms the company’s nearly 30-year commitment to providing state-of-the-art heat treat equipment manufacturing to keep pace with the growth in aerospace technology and production.

“Richard Conway, director and chief technology officer, started the company in 1990 while attending Ohio State University to get his bachelors of science in industrial engineering. He did maintenance and tuning work for industrial furnaces and ovens.  . . . Richard’s wife, Mary Conway, is a retired teacher who taught honors chemistry and physics at Pickerington North High School. And she was the one who came up with the name Delta H as it is a math symbol for change of heat.”  ~ Lancaster Eagle-Gazette

 

Read more: “Delta H in Carroll To Double Workforce and Invest $300,000 in the County”

Heat Treat Equipment Manufacturer Expands to Broaden Aerospace Supply Read More »

Aero MRO Services Provider Wins Multi-Year PW150A Contract

An independent provider of engine and airframe maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services was recently selected by a Ghana-based airline to provide a tailored package of engine services for its fleet of Q400 regional turboprop aircraft.

Under the multi-year contract, StandardAero, based in Scottsdale, Arizona, will provide MRO services for PassionAir’s Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) PW150A turboprop engines from its Designated Overhaul Facility (DOF) in Seletar, Singapore.

The contract will also authorize StandardAero to provide PassionAir with a range of rental engine, engineering and engine condition trend monitoring (ECTM) support services.  StandardAero is uniquely placed to offer ECTM analysis expertise as both a P&WC designated overhaul facility (DOF) and a CAMP Systems Designated Analysis Center (DAC).

Peter Turner, President of Airlines & Fleets for StandardAero

“After evaluating prospective service providers on our shortlist, we are happy to engage StandardAero as the engine maintenance provider for our Q400 fleet,” said Charles Richardson, Director of Maintenance for PassionAir. “We found the engine care package offered to be comprehensive and competitive, and it is my belief and hope that we will experience complete satisfaction with the service and support that we anticipate to receive from them.”

“We are pleased to add PassionAir to the list of Ghanaian operators supported by StandardAero,” said Peter Turner, President of Airlines & Fleets for StandardAero. “PassionAir joins a growing list of customers who benefit from service excellence provided by our start-of-the-art facility in Singapore, backed up by our extensive engineering and ECTM capabilities.  We look forward to meeting and exceeding the airline’s expectations for on-time support over the coming years.”

Photo credit: Paul Chan – Canada

Aero MRO Services Provider Wins Multi-Year PW150A Contract Read More »

California Heat Treater Partners with NASA on Moon & Mars Missions

The aerospace team at a heat treating company based in Orange, California, is partnering with NASA to launch manned missions to deep space.

Senator Ted Cruz (R- TX), Chair, Senate Space Subcommittee with Thermal-Vac Administrative Director Heather Falcone after he spoke to suppliers about the commitment to fund deep space exploration in years to come through bipartisan legislation.

Thermal-Vac Technology, which provides brazing, heat treating, and finishing services at its southern California facility, is working with NASA’s exclusive exploration-class space systems: NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, Orion spacecraft and the Exploration Ground Systems that launch these vehicles. Thermal-Vac’s aerospace division joins with NASA and aerospace leaders “to return Americans to the Moon and send astronauts to Mars in the early 2030s.”

“Our team is honored to be part of the American efforts to continue being leaders in space exploration,” said Steve Driscol, CEO of Thermal-Vac. “It is a vital part our humanity that we invest in and support these projects to ensure their success now and for years into the future.”

With suppliers in all 50 states, NASA’s journey to deep space is a national effort. 2019 marks the final integration and testing of the rocket and spacecraft leading up to the first integrated launch to the Moon late next year. Aerospace companies across the country are helping to meet NASA’s visionary plan and contribute to America’s unmatched legacy in space.

Photo credit / caption: Thermal-Vac Technology / Eight astronauts from multiple missions to the moon and ISS pose with Congresswoman Kendra Horn (D-OK), Chair, House Space Subcommittee during a reception for SLS-Orion suppliers.

 

California Heat Treater Partners with NASA on Moon & Mars Missions Read More »

Comparative Study of Carburizing vs. Induction Hardening of Gears

Modern rotary-wing aircraft propulsion systems rely on different types of gears to transmit power from the turbine engines to the rotors. The basic requirements of these gears are that they are high strength, sustain long life, meet weight considerations, and have a high working temperature and low noise and cost, among others.

Most importantly, these gears require a hard, wear-resistant surface with a ductile core.

Gas carburizing is the current heat treat method used to produce these aircraft quality gears, but this method of heat treatment is costly due to the large number of process steps, huge footprints, energy consumption, and environmental issues. Moreover, the final grinding of gear teeth to correct distortion produced during quenching reduces effective surface compressive stresses.

An investigation into low-cost alternatives for surface hardening aerospace spur gears was conducted where specimens of the selected gears were induction hardened using a patented process. Dimensional and microstructural analyses were conducted, and residual stress studies were performed. This article is a summary of the steps and observations of the case study that resulted from this investigation, which can be summarized this way:

The proposed induction process is a low-cost alternative to conventional gas carburization. In some applications, a 25% savings is estimated.

The first step to gear manufacturing demands a total understanding of aerospace gear requirements. As the gear transmits torque, the teeth are subjected to a combination of cyclic bending, contact stresses, and different degrees of sliding or contact behavior. It is, therefore, critical for a gear to have the proper case and core structure to withstand these loading conditions.

With every revolution, a cyclic bending load is applied, resulting in tensile stress at the root region of the gear. The core of the gear has to be soft to absorb impact load and prevent brittle failure. Due to high-speed contact between adjacent gear teeth, peak shear stresses generated at the surface act in the normal direction to the surface. Pitting, spalling, or case crushing types of failures can occur due to low residual stress or inadequate case depth.

For aircraft quality gears, typical surface hardness is around 58Rc to 60Rc. The case depth is in reference to 50Rc and is controlled by diametral pitch.

Carburization

Carburization hardening is the most widely used technique for surface hardening of aerospace quality gears. A brief introduction to carburization is necessary to understand the potential benefits of this process and how other surface transformation can improve on some of the drawbacks of this commonly used process.

After raw material is received, it is forged to achieve proper grain structure and core hardness. The alloy most commonly used is ASM 6260 (AISI 9310). This low carbon alloy steel exhibits high core toughness and ductility.

Parts are loaded in a furnace and heated to 1650ºF – 1750ºF in a carbon rich atmosphere, where approximately 1% carbon potential is maintained. The depth and level of carbon absorption depend on carbon potential, temperature, time inside the furnace, and the alloy content of the material. After the desired carbon gradient is achieved, the gears are cooled slowly. Then the parts are heated to austenitizing temperature and quenched.

The process depends on the size, geometry, dimension tolerances, and other gear requirements.

The heat treat cycles shown above are two commonly used carburization processes. The difference in post carburization steps depends on the alloy used and final product requirement.

The characteristic of carburization is the inherent distortion associated due to the difference in cooling rates between the thin web and thicker rim. Distortion can occur as a size growth, a change in involute profile, or the loss of crown in spur gears.

Case Hardening by Selective Heat Treatment

The number of process steps required to case carburize a gear can be significantly reduced only if the gear tooth surface areas are heat treated.

Processes for locally heating only the tooth surface include induction, flame, laser, and electron beam.

In order to use induction, steel with a minimum of 0.5% carbon must be used. Several different alloy steels were experimented with, such as AMS 6431, AlSl 6150, and AlSl 4350/4360/4370. These steels were selected due to their combination of toughness, temper resistance, hardenability, and strength. The hardened case is obtained by heating a specific volume of the tooth surface above the transformation temperature for that material. Rapid contour heating produced a case of martensitic structure around the profile-hardened area, resulting in high compressive residual stress at the surface at the root fillet. This compressive stress increases the tooth bending fatigue life, where tensile stress exists due to tooth bending.

Transformation hardening allows a significant reduction in process steps and associated fabrication costs, due to two different factors:

  1. Since sufficient carbon is already present in the base material, copper masking, plating, stripping and carburization steps are eliminated.
  2. In selective hardening, the area of the heated zone is limited to only the hardened sections, and distortion is minimal and predictable.

Surface hardening applications are generally controlled by three process parameters, namely frequency, power level, and time. In this respect, several different hardening processes have been used for gear hardening. The proposed method discussed in this presentation is known as Dual Pulse Induction Hardening (DPIH).

DPIH Process

The DPIH is a patented process (U.S. patent #4,639,279). The process uses single frequency for both the preheat and final heat cycles. Two different power levels are used. This allows the entire process to be performed in one setup, using a single solid-state power supply.

The DPIH process consists of the steps described below:

 

 

The heat treatment process steps for both the carburized and DPIH processes for the aircraft gear are compared below:

 

 

An 85% reduction in heat treat process steps occurs when the gear hardening method is changed from conventional gas carburization to DPIH.

 

Conclusion:

Comparison of the above data and the conventional carburization process to DPIH process.

Carburizing grade material has to be changed from low carbon to medium carbon steel for induction hardening. In both the processes, surface hardness achieved is comparable, but the characteristic of induction hardening is that the gear section maintains a constant hardness value from the surface up to the transition zone, where it rapidly drops to core hardness levels, unlike a more gradual decrease in hardness in case of carburized gears. Low distortion of induction hardening gear is also a major cost reducing factor.

 

Acknowledgment:

This work was performed at AGT, Division of General Motors.


Madhu Chatterjee is founder and president of AAT Metallurgical Services LLC in Michigan with extensive experience in advanced engineering, research and development, and process and product improvement. He is also one of the original dozen consultants that inaugurated Heat Treat Today’s Heat Treat Consultants resource page. You can learn more about Madhu Chatterjee here.

 

 

 

 

Look for more on aerospace heat treating in the upcoming special aerospace manufacturing edition of Heat Treat Today.

Comparative Study of Carburizing vs. Induction Hardening of Gears Read More »

High-Performance Metals Developed for DMLS Processing

 

Source: ETMM Online

 

A nickel-based heat resistant alloy that is very strong, corrosion resistant, and can be used at temperatures between -422°F and 1300°F has recently been released by a German specialist in custom prototypes and low-volume production parts.

Inconel 718 and Maraging Steel 1.2709 will expand Protolabs’ list of Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) materials that make up a wide range of metals available for rapid prototyping and the manufacture of functional end-use parts with complex geometries.

The high-temperature strength of Inconel 718 is derived from its ability to create a thick, stable passivating oxide layer at high temperatures, protecting the material from further attack. Inconel, which has good tensile, fatigue, creep and rupture strength, is thus ideal for the aerospace and heavy industries–particularly, in the production of jet engines, rocket engine components, gas turbine parts, instrumentation parts, power and process parts and related equipment that are exposed to extreme environments.

 

Photo credit/caption: Protolabs/Inconel 718 is a superalloy used in the development of turbojet engines for aircraft, among a variety of other applications.

High-Performance Metals Developed for DMLS Processing Read More »

Brazing Demands on the Rise for Aerospace Applications

 

Source: MRO-Network.com

 

The demand in aerospace manufacturing for brazing technology is likely to increase as the alloys developed and manufactured through the process are used for more applications — from turbine blades to rocket nozzles to hydraulic assemblies.

“Brazing is used just about everywhere—it’s difficult to classify.” ~ Ed Arata, brazing engineer, Morgan Advanced Materials

Brazing may be difficult to classify, but the process can be explained, and its subsequent value to aerospace design and manufacturing groups is explored in this Best of the Web article from MRO-Network.com

 

Read more: “Applications of Brazing in Aerospace Likely To Increase”

And keep an eye out for more on aerospace heat treating in the upcoming special aerospace manufacturing edition of Heat Treat Today.

 

Photo credit: MRO-Network.com

Brazing Demands on the Rise for Aerospace Applications Read More »

USAF Pilot Trainers To Be Equipped with Ejection Seat, Landing Gear Systems from New Merged Aero Company

When the U.S. Air Force flies its new advanced pilot trainer from Boeing and Saab, it will be equipped with an ACES 5® ejection seat along with a fully integrated landing gear system.

John “Barney” Fyfe, Air Force programs director for Collins Aerospace

Both will be supplied by Collins Aerospace, the entity that resulted from the recent merging of UTC Aerospace Systems and Rockwell Collins. Collins is a unit of United Technologies Corp, headquartered in Farmington, Connecticut, and provides heat treating capabilities among its high-technology systems and services to the building and aerospace industries.

ACES 5 offers passive head and neck protection, arm and leg flail prevention, and a load-compensating catapult rocket that varies its thrust based on the occupant’s weight. In addition to ACES 5, Collins will supply the aircraft’s fully integrated landing gear system, including structure, actuation, dressings, hydraulics, and wheels and brakes. The system boasts several technological innovations designed to help reduce maintenance costs while improving operational performance.

“Collins Aerospace is honored to be a supplier for Boeing in support of the U.S. Air Force’s next-generation trainer program and proud to provide a host of integral content, including our ACES 5 ejection seat and fully integrated landing gear system,” said John “Barney” Fyfe, Air Force programs director for Collins Aerospace. “Our innovative technologies will play a critical role in helping to keep aircrews safe, reducing maintenance costs, and improving operational performance. Our support for Boeing military aircraft dates back to 1932 with the P-26, and we look forward to continuing to work with the Boeing and Saab team on the T-X program in the years to come.”

USAF Pilot Trainers To Be Equipped with Ejection Seat, Landing Gear Systems from New Merged Aero Company Read More »

Jason Schulze on AMS2750E: Initial and Periodic Temperature Uniformity Surveys

This is the seventh in a series of articles by AMS2750 expert, Jason Schulze (Conrad Kacsik).  Click here to see a listing of all of Jason’s articles on Heat Treat Today. In this article, Jason advances the discussion of initial and periodic TUS requirements. Please submit your AMS2750 questions for Jason to editor@heattreattoday.com.


Introduction

Any technician who has performed a Temperature Uniformity Survey (TUS) understands that the assembly, use, and placement of thermocouples is imperative to the success of the TUS.

As we move through the requirements of Temperature Uniformity Surveys, we will examine the requirements that apply to TUS thermocouples.

Initial Temperature Uniformity Surveys

Before we get started, let’s take a look at how AMS2750E describes :

An initial TUS shall be performed to measure the temperature uniformity and establish the acceptable work zone and qualified operating temperature range(s). Periodic TUS shall be performed thereafter in accordance with the interval shown in Table 8 or 9. ~ AMS2750E page 23, paragraph 3.5.1

Most companies, whether purchasing a new furnace or used one, know what they would like the acceptable work zone size and qualified operating range to be. I emphasize “would like” because what we would like our furnaces to be capable of is not always what they are able to do. We would like to use every square meter of our furnace control zone in an effort to maximize capacity and, of course, maximize profit on each cycle we process. We would like our furnaces to operate at the very limits of what the furnace manufacturer states it can do.  Unfortunately, these items don’t always exist once the furnace is subjected to an initial Temperature Uniformity Survey per AMS270E.

An initial TUS is used to tell us what our furnaces can do based on pre-determined parameters. Normally, these parameters should be flowed down to our furnace manufacturers, and prior to shipping, these parameters are compared to what the furnace can actually attain making the furnace conformative and ready for shipment. I strongly recommend this whenever purchasing a new or used furnace.

Initial temperature uniformity testing requirements are as follows;

  1. Initial survey temperatures shall be the minimum and maximum temperatures of the qualified operating temperature range(s).
  2. Additional temperatures shall be added as required to ensure that no two adjacent survey temperatures are greater than 600 °F (335 °C) apart.

These requirements are simple and straight forward. One could argue that I may be oversimplifying the requirements of an initial TUS, but let’s not forget, these are merely the requirements, not the conditions, under which an initial TUS must be performed. Let’s look at an example that would conform to the stated requirements.

Example

A furnace (in this case, it is irrelevant what type of furnace or what it is used for) processes production hardware from 900°F to 2200°F. Based on the requirements of AMS2750E, the initial TUS would start by testing at 900°F and the last temperature tested would be 2200°F. The supplier would need to select temperatures between 900°F and 2200°F to ensure that there is no more than a 600°F gap between each adjacent temperature. Figure 1 is an example of temperatures that could be selected.

 

Figure 1

 

We’ve covered the requirements of an initial TUS; we will now address the conditions when an initial TUS is required. Initial TUSs are required when a) the furnace is installed (new or used) and b) when any modifications are made that can alter the temperature uniformity characteristics. You could dispute this by stating if a TUS fails (and the furnace is then repaired to be put back in service), if the qualified work zone is expanded, if a thicker control thermocouple is installed, etc. a new initial TUS is required. I would agree, but these would all fall under “B”.

Periodic Temperature Uniformity Surveys

Periodic TUSs are performed for single operating ranges greater than 600°F. In this case, the temperatures are selected must be 300°F from the minimum- and 300°F from the maximum-qualified operating range. If there is a gap of greater than 600°F, additional temperatures must be selected so there is no gap greater than 600°F. Using the example above, we could select temperatures as stated in Figure 2 below.

 

Figure 2

 

It is required that at least once each calendar year the minimum and maximum temperatures of the qualified operating range (in our example, it would be 900°F and 2200°F) are tested. Some suppliers may choose to perform an initial TUS once per year to ensure they capture the minimum and maximum.

Initial and Periodic Test Frequency

Tables 8 and 9 within AMS2750E describe the TUS frequency which is based both on furnace Class and Instrumentation Type. As an example, if our furnace referenced previously was identified as a Class 3 (±15°F), Type A instrumentation, the initial survey frequency would be quarterly. After two successful consecutive surveys, the frequency of testing could then be extended to being done annually.

It is important to recognize the difference between initial and periodic TUS temperatures and initial and periodic TUS frequency. Let’s use our example to expand on this. The supplier would perform a TUS using initial temperatures shown in Figure 1. If the TUS passes, the supplier would then, three months later, perform a TUS using the temperatures shown in Figure 2. This would then count as two successful consecutive TUSs. The next TUS could then be performed annually using the temperatures stated in Figure 2.

Conclusion

Understanding initial and periodic TUS requirements is imperative to ensure conformance to AMS2750E and Nadcap. In the next installment, we will discuss TUS data collection, relocation of hot and cold thermocouples, as well as quality requirements.

Submit Your Questions

Please feel free to submit your questions, and I will answer appropriately in future articles. Send your questions to editor@heattreattoday.com.

 

 

 

Jason Schulze on AMS2750E: Initial and Periodic Temperature Uniformity Surveys Read More »

Quartz, Alumina Combine for Innovative Aerospace Castings

A global materials engineering company which designs and manufactures a wide range of high specification products recently released an innovative new material for use in production of turbine engine blades that combines the best of two key materials to improve strength and processing time for the investment casting industry.

The new material, developed by Morgan Advanced Materials, is known as LEMA™. In this Technical Tuesday feature, Eric Larson, Director of Technology and Process Improvement at the Technical Ceramics Business of Morgan Advanced Materials, explains how LEMA™ combines the best aspects alumina and silica (quartz) to provide an effective solution for manufacturers. Content is compiled by Jennifer Kachala, Product Engineer at Morgan’s Technical Ceramic’s business.


Quartz and alumina – the best of both worlds for turbine engine blades

The commercial aerospace industry is on the cusp of significant technological change. High fuel prices, stricter regulations on emissions, and intense competition from low-cost carriers are all driving a quest for more efficient aero-engines and components, where even small advantages can drive major benefits.

Turbine blades are no exception, with a recent report by Market Research Future suggesting that the market for commercial aircraft turbine blades is set to grow at a CAGR of 6 percent by 2023.

Not only is the investment casting industry preparing to meet this demand, but it’s also looking to gain advantages in every aspect of manufacturing, including for the support rods used in the production of turbine engine blades. The two most commonly used materials to cast these are quartz (silica) and alumina.

Both have advantages – and weaknesses. Quartz is the traditional material of choice and has the benefit of being chemically weak and fast to leach, which both accelerates and simplifies production. On the other hand, it is mechanically quite weak which can lead to processing issues and defects during investment casting of difficult metals like super-alloys.

In contrast, alumina rods have about four times the mechanical strength of quartz and are acknowledged for their strength and load-bearing capabilities. However, alumina is so chemically strong it can take several days to fully leach out the material, resulting in longer production times.

While both appear to offer almost opposite properties, they share one common advantage: neither create trace elements which can cause contamination in the process and compromise the quality and performance of parts.

So, neither quartz nor alumina is the perfect material. But what if there was a way of combining the best properties of each to create something new?

The Making of LEMA™

This was the challenge Morgan Advanced Materials set for itself in 2015, resulting in LEMA™, a range of proprietary alumina-based materials that provide double the mechanical strength of quartz while providing significantly improved leaching times, compared with typical high purity alumina.

Like most new inventions, the solution was reached after significant experimentation. The challenge lay in combining two materials and finding the right balance – a complex task, especially as the materials in question were so different.

In search of an answer, Morgan’s laboratories started with a method borrowed from glass science where two distinct phase-separate materials can be used to improve mechanical properties such as toughness or to provide a leaching path through the chemically-weaker glass. In the end an alumina-silicate ceramic was created with a leaching path of silica across the grain boundaries. Particle size distribution and processing parameters were adjusted until the desired mechanical strength was achieved.

Following a period of extensive live testing and refinement, LEMA™ was first introduced to the market in 2017.

Turbocharged Leaching Times, No Loss of Strength

Combining the mechanical properties of alumina with the chemical weakness of quartz, LEMA™ exhibits many unique and valuable properties. It’s almost twice as strong as quartz, and it has a slightly lower thermal expansion coefficient than alumina, which can help with metal leakages sometimes encountered with alumina rods during casting. In addition, LEMA™ is made of pure materials to ensure that the material satisfies the demand for trace element certification.

LEMA™ “crumbles out” when flushed, making it easier to remove during the leaching process. Moreover, like-for-like LEMA™ 250 parts will experience approximately a 20 percent mass reduction after 20 hours (at 300°F [149°C]) and 185 psi). Under the same conditions, a comparable alumina part does not demonstrate any mass loss.

In addition to its advantageous chemical and mechanical properties, LEMA™ also delivers significant commercial benefits. It can reduce investment casting times in turbine engine blades by accelerating leaching by up to 20 percent, solving many of the delays and production challenges which have long been frustrating the global investment industry.

Importantly, as there is less need for autoclave time during the leaching process, manufacturers are spared some of the costly investment in additional equipment. Recognizing the benefits, the industry has already begun to embrace LEMA™; major aerospace manufacturers have used LEMA™ to achieve the desired quality while also reducing costs.

LEMA™ offers a powerful solution for the investment casting of turbine blades, just as the industry is facing an increased demand for these critical components. By bringing together the best aspects of both quartz and alumina, it doesn’t just represent the best of both worlds: it represents a major breakthrough for the industry.

 

Photo credit and caption: iStock / Jet engine turbine (3D xray blue transparent)

Quartz, Alumina Combine for Innovative Aerospace Castings Read More »

Heat Treaters, First Article Inspection, and AS9102 Compliance

 

Source: Paulo

 

Aerospace, automotive, medical and all other industries require FAI — first article inspection, the systematic inspection of new parts to ensure they’ll perform as designed. This includes parts that are subject to heat treatment, which adheres to its own process-specific set of FAI requirements.  This week’s Technical Tuesday feature provides an examination of the exhaustive FAI documentation process for heat treatment of aerospace parts and why it’s so critical.

“Heat treatment almost always distorts parts—it’s the price that comes with enhancing mechanical properties. First article inspections help heat treaters and customers determine whether specified processes will result in acceptable amounts of distortion or if design, material, manufacturing and processing specs need to change.” ~ Paulo

 

 

Read more: “First Article Inspections and AS9102 Compliance: How Heat Treaters Fit In”

Heat Treaters, First Article Inspection, and AS9102 Compliance Read More »