Rockwell hardness

Meeting Heat Treat Standards: 10 Tips and Tricks

OCWant a free tip? Check out this read of some of the top 101 Heat Treat Tips that heat treating professionals submitted over the last THREE YEARS. These handy technical words of wisdom will keep your furnaces in optimum operation and keep you in compliance. If you want more, search for "101 heat treat tips" on the website! This selection features 10 tips to meet heat treat industry standards.

Also, in this year's show issue, Heat Treat Today will be sharing Heat Treat Resources you can use when you're at the plant or on the road. Look for the digital edition of the magazine on September 13, 2021 to check it out yourself!


Compliance Issues? Try On-Site Gas Generation

On-site gas generation may help resolve compliance issues. Growth and success in thermal processing may have resulted in you expanding your inventory of reducing atmosphere gases. If you are storing hydrogen or ammonia for Dissociated Ammonia (DA), both of which are classed by the EPA as Highly Hazardous Materials, expanding gas inventory can create compliance issues. It is now possible to create reducing gas atmospheres on a make-it-as-you-use-it basis, minimizing site inventory of hazardous materials and facilitating growth while ensuring HazMat compliance. Modern hydrogen generators can serve small and large flow rates, can load follow, and can make unlimited hydrogen volumes with virtually zero stored HazMat inventory. Hydrogen is the key reducing constituent in both blended hydrogen-nitrogen and DA atmospheres—hydrogen generation (and optionally, nitrogen generation) can be used to provide exactly the atmosphere required but with zero hazardous material storage and at a predictable, economical cost.

(Nel Hydrogen)


Inspection Mistakes That Cost

Rockwell hardness testing requires adherence to strict procedures for accurate results.  Try this exercise to prove the importance of proper test procedures.

  • A certified Rc 54.3 +/- 1 test block was tested three times and the average of the readings was Rc 54 utilizing a flat anvil.  Water was put on the anvil under the test block and the next three readings averaged Rc 52.1.
  • Why is it so important that samples are clean, dry, and properly prepared?
  • If your process test samples are actually one point above the high spec limit but you are reading two points lower, you will ship hard parts that your customer can reject.
  • If your process test samples are one point above the low spec limit but you are reading two points lower, you may reprocess parts that are actually within specification.
  • It is imperative that your personnel are trained in proper sample preparation and hardness testing procedures to maximize your quality results and minimize reprocessing.

(Young Metallurgical Consulting)


Where You Measure Matters

Eugene Gifford Grace (August 27, 1876 – July 7, 1960) was the president of Bethlehem Steel Corporation from 1916 to 1945. He also served as president of the American Iron and Steel Institute and sat on the board of trustees for Lehigh University, of which he was an alumnus. One of his famous quotes is as follows:

“Thousands of engineers can design bridges, calculate strains and stresses, and draw up specifications for machines, but the great engineer is the man who can tell whether the bridge or the machine should be built at all, where it should be built, and when.”

If you check out the additional accomplishments of Mr. Grace, you will see that he was a successful and smart person. Maybe all of us are not capable of reaching such breadth of vision as he articulated above, but as heat treaters, do we simply accept the specification given? Or do we stop to ask if the specification has been properly determined?

With modern computer added stress analysis (FEA), we have at our fingertips a way to move beyond both the “guess and test” and the “copy the historical spec” methods of determining the case depth. Within “guess and test,” of course there are scientific guesses and scientific wild guesses. If you are using a wild guess, chances are that the field is the test lab!

Figure 1. Metallurgical mount holding a cross-section of the steel gear.

Especially for carburized components, deeper case is more time in the furnace, and thus more expensive. I continue to wonder why, if even back in the 1950s, thousands of engineers were available who could calculate stresses and strains and thus set a quantitative foundation for a case depth, in 2019, so few people take advantage of modern technology to optimize the cost of their products.

If you are not ready to take this big step toward design optimization, maybe you would consider always using effective case depth, based on hardness and thus linked to tensile strength, instead of total case depth, which is not linked to any durability or strength criteria.

Figure 1 shows the metallographic cross-section that was used to measure the hardness. Each white pin point is a Knoop 500 gram hardness indentation. The cross-section of the gear was mounted in black epoxy resin. Figures 2 to 4 show the data collected to determine the effective case depths to the common Rockwell C 50 criteria.

Figure 2. Knoop 500 gram hardness data converted to Rockwell C at the tooth flank.

Figure 3. Same data but for Root position.

Figure 4. Same data as shown in Figure 3, near surface information easier to see.

The effective case depth is the depth where the hardness dips below HRC50. For Gear Tooth Flank A, that value was 0.85 mm. For another gear from the same lot, it was over 1.08 mm. But for the root areas, between the teeth—the high-stress area, the effective case depths were only 0.45 and 0.65 mm, respectively. Figure 3 shows the same data as Figure 2, but using a logarithmic scale, illustrating what’s going on near the surface layers more clearly.

In any case, there’s a big difference between the two test locations, and this shows the importance of making sure that all relevant features of the component are adequately characterized!

(Aliya Analytical, Inc.)


AMS2750 Is Golden

This standard is gold and unfortunately has a bad rap today because companies feel it’s just added cost into the process. Today’s technology means you can afford AMS2750E compliant controllers and digital recorders for only a few hundred dollars above a standard offer. This investment will be paid back many times over due to the longer lifetime expected with a quality instrument as well as the quality benefits from better drift performance between calibration intervals, redundant recording (in case of record loss), and overall accurate temperature control, leading to less rejects and reduced rework.

(Eurotherm)


Snagged T/C Wire – Avoid It

Try not to use insulated thermocouple wire if you snag the insulation off the outerjacket along the length of the wire. This may cause the inner insulation to fail andcause low temperature readings.

(WS Thermal)


Order SAT Probes All at Once

Place a yearly blanket order for your SAT probes and ask that they are made from the same coil. This will give you the same correction factors and temperature tolerances.

(GeoCorp)


Out of Control Carburizing? Try This 11-Step Test

When your carburizing atmosphere cannot be controlled, perform this test:

  1. Empty the furnace of all work.
  2. Heat to 1700°F (926°C).
  3. Allow endo gas to continue.
  4. Disable the CP setpoint control loop.
  5. Set generator DP to +35°F (1.7°C).
  6. Run a shim test.
  7. The CP should settle out near 0.4% CP.
  8. If CP settles out substantially lower and the CO2 and DP higher, there’s an oxidation leak, either air, water or CO2 from a leaking radiant tube.
  9. If the leak is small the CP loop will compensate, resulting in more enriching gas usage than normal.
  10. Sometimes but not always a leaking radiant tube can be found by isolating each tube.
  11. To try and find a leaking radiant tube, not only the gas must be shut off but combustion air as well.

(AFC-Holcroft)


3 Tips to Meet Temperature Uniformity Surveys

  1. Adjust the burners with some excess air to improve convection.
  2. Make sure that the low fire adjustment is as small as possible. Since low fire will provide very little energy, it will make the furnace pulse more frequently and this will improve heat transfer by convection and radiation.
  3. Increase internal pressure. This will “push” heat to dead zones allowing you to increase your coldest thermocouples (typically near the floor and in the corners of the furnace).

(Nutec Bickley)


CQI-9 Best Practices

Whether you need to meet rigid CQI-9 standards or not, what are the top 3, nay 4 best practices that nearly every in-house heat treat department ought to follow to make sure their pyrometer stuff is together?

Daily furnace atmosphere checks. Use an alternative method to verify your controls and sensors are operating properly and that there are no issue with your furnace or furnace gases.

Daily endothermic generator checks. Using an alternate method to verify your control parameter (dew point typically) or the gas composition is accurate will alleviate furnace control issues caused by bad endothermic gas.

Verify/validate your heat treat process every 2 hours OR make sure process deviations are automatically alarmed. this is a solid practice to ensure your controls and processes are running properly. This practice can help ensure that parts are being heat treated to the proper specification intended.

Conduct periodic system accuracy tests (SATs) per pre-defined timelines in CQI-9. Good pyrometry practices are an essential part of heat treatment. Because of the importance of temperature in heat treatment, ensure timeliness of all pyrometry practices addressing thermocouple usages, system accuracy tests, calibrations, and temperature uniformity surveys.

(Super Systems, Inc.)


Inspection Mistakes That Cost

Rockwell hardness testing requires adherence to strict procedures for accurate results.  Try this exercise to prove the importance of proper test procedures.

  • A certified Rc 54.3 +/- 1 test block was tested three times and the average of the readings was Rc 54 utilizing a flat anvil.  Water was put on the anvil under the test block and the next three readings averaged Rc 52.1.
  • Why is it so important that samples are clean, dry, and properly prepared?
  • If your process test samples are actually one point above the high spec limit but you are reading two points lower, you will ship hard parts that your customer can reject.
  • If your process test samples are one point above the low spec limit but you are reading two points lower, you may reprocess parts that are actually within specification.
  • It is imperative that your personnel are trained in proper sample preparation and hardness testing procedures to maximize your quality results and minimize reprocessing.

(Young Metallurgical Consulting)


Check out these magazines to see where these tips were first featured:

 

 

Meeting Heat Treat Standards: 10 Tips and Tricks Read More »

Understanding Heat Treatment Specifications

Metallurgists need accurate specifications in order to correctly perform the necessary heat treatment of parts. This helpful guide, written by William Rassieur, Sales Leader at Paulo Heat Treating, is a useful tool to identify what details ought to be communicated to the heat treating expert. Read below to understand the terms to pass along.


William Rassieur, Sales Leader, Paulo Heat Treating

Too often, metallurgists receive inadequate heat treatment specifications. Some specs contain too little information. Some are unclear. Some are just plain wrong.

In any case, inadequate specs mean heat treaters don’t have the information they need to deliver finished parts that can stand up to the applications intended by their manufacturers. Avoiding the confusion and delays that follow comes down to understanding what heat treaters need to see in heat treatment specifications so that the right treatment is applied.

Make certain your parts get the appropriate treatment by including the following information:

Clearly identified materials

The chemical makeup of a part is one of the most critical determinants of how it is heat treated. It’s not enough to state on the spec that a piece is steel alloy. Consult materials standards and use the correct material designation on the spec.

For example, if you want to treat a carbon steel or an engineering alloy, using those terms (or known trade names for a specific material) isn’t adequate. Good heat treatment specifications include the material as expressed in the standards—AISI 1040 for a carbon steel, for example, or SAE 4140 for an engineering alloy.

Specific process required

It’s not enough to tell a heat treater you’d like a harder part because there are many ways to do that. Does it need to be through hardened? Case hardened? Does it require stress relief via annealing?

Specs that dictate which process is to be used help heat treaters shape the rest of the heat treatment steps that follow.

Hardness tolerance

For through hardened parts, a prescribed hardness should be included on the spec and expressed as a range. Tolerances are always more useful than uniform hardness levels because parts can have different hardness values in different regions due to material thickness or closeness to an edge.

Engineers should note that the materials and dimensions of a part affect how well it hardens out. As these variables change, so does the acceptable hardness tolerance that should appear on a spec.

Case depth tolerance

For case hardened materials (i.e., those that are carburized or carbonitrided), specs should indicate whether the desired hardness is expressed as effective case depth or total case depth.

Case Hardening (photo source: Paulo.com)

Total case depth refers to the distance carbon has diffused into the part. This is usually specified for parts that have thinner case depths after treatment. Effective case depth applies to parts with generally thicker cases. This is measured as the distance from the surface through the case to a specific hardness level. Usually, that hardness is effective based from 50 or 52 HRC. This should always be stated on specs.

Heat treatment specifications should also identify the case tolerance, or the range of depths the prescribed hardness should reach. For example, a good spec for the heat treatment of a theoretical gear might state the effective case depth should be between 0.007 and 0.012 inches at the prescribed hardness.

As with through hardening, it’s more useful and realistic to specify minimum and maximum case depths rather than to write specs with a single case depth. Specs that include only minimum or maximum case depths still leave too much to interpretation and should be avoided.

Avoid too much information

Sometimes, though, too much specificity can lead to trouble. Specs that include too much process information can paint metallurgists into a corner, forcing them to abide by strict requirements that can end up thwarting their efforts to deliver improved parts.

For example, if a tempering spec includes both a specified temperature and a specified hardness, the hardness may not be possible to achieve due to differences in equipment. In such a scenario, metallurgists advise that specs be amended to call for a minimum temper as long as the part’s configuration and material hardenability are capable of achieving it.

Correct hardness scales

The scale on which a part’s hardness is determined depends on the heat treatment applied to the part. In the U.S., we typically use the following four hardness scales: Rockwell Hardness, Brinell Hardness, Microhardness, and Leeb Hardness. Become familiar with each scale and which parts and processes should be tested with each.

Also note that conversions between hardness scales should be avoided unless it’s absolutely necessary. That’s because hardness values are approximate; converting from one approximation to another compounds variation and could lead heat treaters and owners to incorrectly assume the prescribed hardness has been achieved.

Inspection points

Heat treatments are carefully designed to achieve specific results on specific areas of parts, so owners need to clearly identify those areas on which hardness tests are to be conducted.

For example, the critical part of the theoretical gear mentioned above is its teeth; case hardening is designed to strengthen that part of the gear while leaving other areas relatively soft and ductile. Applying a hardness test anywhere else but the teeth won’t inform heat treaters of whether the treatment was successful.

Be prescriptive with heat treatment specifications

Problems with heat treatment specifications are one of the biggest —and perhaps the most avoidable— pain points in the relationship between a manufacturer and heat treater. Manufacturers need finished parts that perform as promised. Armed with accurate and descriptive heat treatment specifications, heat treaters can deliver that performance.

For more information, contact the quoting team at Paulo or download Paulo's guide for in-house versus out-source handling of heat treatment needs.

 

(photo source: original article)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Understanding Heat Treatment Specifications Read More »

Global Materials Engineering Group Tests Hardfacing Alloy Applications

A global materials engineering group explored alternative methods of applying a hard surfacing alloy at the ITSC conference in Japan.

Engineers from Wall Colmonoy Corp. discussed in a conference presentation how the properties of a hard surfacing alloy change when applied by different methods. Alloy Ni-15Cr-15W-3B-4Si-3.5Fe-0.6C is a hard surfacing alloy designed to extend the life of OEM parts that are subjected to various wear mechanisms in service. The alloy can also be used to repair/rebuild those worn parts and extend service life.

This hard-surfacing alloy can be applied by various methods, including thermal spray processes, laser cladding, PTA welding, GTAW, OFW, and GMAW. This study compared the properties of the alloy applied by different methods using various test procedures, and also included the cost/benefit ratio of each.

Test procedures included abrasion testing by ASTM G-65; erosion testing by ASTM G-76; Vickers hardness by ASTM E-92; and Rockwell hardness by ASTM E18. In addition, metallographic examples of the test specimens were prepared.

Photo Credit: ASM International

Global Materials Engineering Group Tests Hardfacing Alloy Applications Read More »