Jim Roberts

Cost of Fuel Drives Change

/ BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, OP-ED

Jim Roberts of U.S. Ignition engages readers in a Combustion Corner editorial about how rising fuel costs have driven dramatic improvements in furnace efficiency and combustion technology over the past 60 years, transforming heat treat processes from 20% to 70% fuel efficiency.

This editorial was first released in Heat Treat Today’s January 2026 Annual Technologies to Watch print edition.

A furnace guy walks into the shop and sees the cost of gasoline. “This keeps going up, what gives?”

My first car got about 10 MPG — we will not even go near to discussing when that was. Gasoline costs have since driven cars to become more efficient with 30+ MPG vehicles.

Last month’s article highlighted how there are five qualities in our heat treat processes: Quality and Accuracy, the necessary attributes; Efficiency and Performance, the variables; and Profit, which comes whenever we improve the two variables. We have discussed government regulation on emissions and technological breakthroughs that improved combustion technology in earlier articles, but now we turn to the connection of combustion and cost: how gasoline costs drove improvement of the two variable qualities of heat treat processing for combustion, Efficiency and Performance.

Gasoline Costs: A Timeline

Up until about 1960, the world of heat processing was pretty much a level playing field with Efficiency and Performance. We had tons of fuel at our disposal. Pollution was known but not yet a criterion to manage processes. So, burner efficiency and design were very low end. Nobody cared. Fuel was almost free. In doing research for this story, I found records of natural gas being less than $0.50 per million BTUs. Electricity was on par with delivered BTU costs. But then the cost of fuel started to fluctuate. The furnace guys started to notice; if nothing else changed, our friend Profit would weaken.

From 1930 to 1980, electricity pricing went up 500%. Natural gas started to bounce around in price. It was less than a $1.00/thm in the ’60s and ’70s, peaking during times of fuel shortage at $16.00/thm. Ten years later, in 2016, it hit $2.30/thm again. Some pretty wild fluctuations. In fact, it should be noted that the industry overseas had already begun to shift technologies — several years ahead of the U.S. — because they had been suffering with high fuel costs in Great Britain, Germany, Western Europe, and in Asian markets.

Furnace guy and the suppliers had to improve the efficiency and performance.

Troubleshooting and Combustion Design Changes

At first, you look at easy fixes to improve Efficiency and Performance. An example would be that insulation and refractory science really improved. If you can keep the heat in the furnace, you need less fuel to hold it at these high temperatures, right? So, improve the insulation.

Next, let’s get the burners from just being the opening in the furnace that you pour gas into, and make the burner more like a carburetor on an engine. Let’s get control of the air and gas ratios.

Next, let’s recover some of the flue gases and pre-heat the air coming into the burner. When you do that, the flame temp goes up, sometimes by as much as 400-500°F. That means higher heat transfer rates to the parts inside a now well-insulated furnace. Huge efficiency gains started happening.

Efficiency and Performance got a huge boost when the burners started to have high velocity discharge rates. In other words, we now had flames that were hotter and going into the furnace at several hundred miles an hour more than before. With that comes circulation improvement inside the furnace. And much like pudding in a blender, the faster the beaters, the smoother the mix. To give you an idea of the scope of these improvements, form 1960 to 1990, a matter of only 30 years, furnace and burner technology improvements went from 20% fuel utilization to estimated 60-70% fuel efficiencies, even higher in some instances. And there it was, super efficiency driven to occur by fuel cost and flucturation of supply.

To really hit home what that meant, let’s look at a 1,000-lb load of steel. Our process temp is 1750°F. Our furnace and combustion efficiency used to be 20%. That would require 1,370,000 BTU to heat up in an hour. Now, with 75% furnace and burner efficiency, that’s 352,000 BTU. You just saved approximately 1,000 ft3 of gas per hour! If we use the average industrial gas price today at $3.80/1,000 ft3, the difference of all this is $24,000/year, and that’s just a 1,000-lb load. Real world, the numbers are significantly higher, as all you furnace guys know. Imagine the dollar savings when fuel was at $16.00/thm?

And so, there it is. The well-known realization that in most markets, the dollar cost of the energy triggers improvement of technology.

Until next time…

About The Author:

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition

Jim Roberts president at U.S. Ignition, began his 45-year career in the burner and heat recovery industry focused on heat treating specifically in 1979. He worked for and helped start up WB Combustion in Hales Corners, Wisconsin. In 1985 he joined Eclipse Engineering in Rockford, IL, specializing in heat treating-related combustion equipment/burners. Inducted into the American Gas Association’s Hall of Flame for service in training gas company field managers, Jim is a former president of MTI and has contributed to countless seminars on fuel reduction and combustion-related practices.

For more information: Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com.

Cost of Fuel Drives Change Read More »

Refine Your Process, Get Profits

/ BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, OP-ED

Jim Roberts of U.S. Ignition engages readers in a Combustion Corner editorial about how focusing on the right priorities in the right order naturally leads to profitability in heat treating.

This editorial was first released in Heat Treat Today’s December 2025 Annual Medical & Energy Heat Treat print edition.

It’s a crisp winter day, and a furnace guy walks into the heat treat plant and says, “Something has changed here, it feels…more modern.” The rest of the furnace guys shrug and continue with the tasks at hand. But the furnace guy is right — something has been changing all along and will continue to do so in the foreseeable future, I’ll wager.

We’ve talked about how certain trends and needs have driven the growth in the industry. My ramblings have included bed posts and pipelines and the flavors of different fuels, and what it all boils down to is change. These changes are attempts to get the following qualities into our processes in the heat treating world:

  1. Quality
  2. Accuracy
  3. Efficiency
  4. Performance
  5. Profit

“But Jim, you listed profit as the last measuring stick! What is wrong with you?” It would be pretty easy to invert this list; turn these guideposts upside down and the world you are in would still work. But if we add longevity in business as an additional goal, then it will not be too long before you begin to realize that the order is listed correctly here. For the most part, in my experience, the heat treating industry has kept the order intact. It is an honorable path, I think.

Quality and Accuracy are the new givens. We do not have to spend time on this. As long as we have been wielding control over metal, those properties are the constant. From hammering out the very first horseshoes, if they did not fit the horse or cracked and broke after a couple of steps, you were not in the horseshoe business very long. These days, standards clearly map out the goal: a client tells us what is demanded, maps it out for us in a specification, and we meet it.

Items 3 and 4 are where we focus today. If we can improve Efficiency and Performance after meeting the Quality and Accuracy targets, then good old item 5 happens — Profit. It just happens. What a concept! Now you may think this is a re-run of every BUS-101 class or seminar you have seen. Maybe you are right, but this is where I veer off as a furnace guy and get back to the business of combustion as it applies to our industry.

We talked earlier about how the natural gas industry expanded and built this fantastic infrastructure to provide fuel to all of us. Electric providers did and are still doing the same thing.

At the end of the transmission line, whether gas pipe or electrical cable, sit the furnaces and ovens that heat treating needs. The buck stops here. Speaking of bucks, in order to get to profit, what must we do? If we really only have Efficiency and Performance in our control (Quality and Accuracy are presumed to be met), then let’s look at how that changed, in furnace guy world…next year [in 2026].

All the best to everyone in the Holiday seasons. May you be blessed with good health and happiness.

About The Author:

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition

Jim Roberts president at U.S. Ignition, began his 45-year career in the burner and heat recovery industry focused on heat treating specifically in 1979. He worked for and helped start up WB Combustion in Hales Corners, Wisconsin. In 1985 he joined Eclipse Engineering in Rockford, IL, specializing in heat treating-related combustion equipment/burners. Inducted into the American Gas Association’s Hall of Flame for service in training gas company field managers, Jim is a former president of MTI and has contributed to countless seminars on fuel reduction and combustion-related practices.

For more information: Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com.

Refine Your Process, Get Profits Read More »

Flame and Fire: History of the Industrial Gas Industry

/ BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, OP-ED

Jim Roberts of U.S. Ignition entertains readers in a Combustion Corner editorial about how the industrial gas industry evolved from its humble beginnings in the early 1900s into a precision-driven force that transformed combustion technology and modern manufacturing.

This editorial was first released in Heat Treat Today’s November 2025 Annual Vacuum Heat Treating print edition.

Let’s think about how young the industrial gas industry really is.

A Short Pipeline in Time

The first real industrial usage was way back in the 1800s somewhere. But there was no infrastructure, no supply other than bottled gas for industrial applications. The gas industry, as far as we recognize it, did not really take off until somewhere around the early 1920s when the first welded pipeline was installed. Then, as usage increased, it became apparent that safety was going to be a concern. The addition of mercaptan (rotten egg smell) was not until the late 1930s.

With the growth of commercial and residential usage, the demand for gaseous fuels grew by 50 times the original market size anticipated between 1910 and 1970! What does that demand look like? Today there are over 3 million miles of gas distribution lines connected to 300,000 miles of big transmission pipelines in the U.S. alone. All that growth in a span of 100 years, essentially. That means the transmission pipeline system in the U.S. could stretch around the planet 12 times!

USS coke gas pipeline in the foreground with the Conrail Port Perry Bridge spanning the Monongahela River, Port Perry, Allegheny County, PA (Lowe, 1994)
Source: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division

Most of that construction occurred during the post-war 1940s to 1960s timeline. That’s one busy industry! And it dragged all the thermally based markets and industries along with it. Now, we have come to accept the availability of natural gas as so commonplace that we cannot imagine life without it.

Responding with Precision

So, now you ask yourselves, “Why this history lesson, Jim?” Well, because we are supposed to be learning about combustion and the era of major combustion advancements — and if I would quit veering off into side topics we might actually get there. But it is all interconnected.

If you recall the story of the heat treater with the bedpost burners (October 2025 edition), he had no inspiration to improve efficiency or performance because those darn bedposts would burn gas just fine. So, what changed? Firstly, the world had been through a couple of military conflicts during this rise of the gas industry. And sadly, sometimes the best technological advances occur in times of conflict; engineering becomes more precise. All of a sudden, instead of hammering out horseshoes for the cavalry, we were heat treating gun barrels and crankshafts for airplanes. We needed to be more than precise — actually, we had to be perfect. So, we stepped away from the old heat treatment ways and developed systems that we could control to within a couple of degrees.

As a result, burners became specialized. Each process became unique and precise. Instead of pack carburizing components, a company called Surface Combustion developed a piece of equipment called an Endothermic generator. This device made carbon-based atmosphere out of natural gas or propane- and nickel-based catalysts. All of a sudden, we could do very precise non-scale covered heat treating. And the burners from companies like North American Combustion, Eclipse Combustion, Maxon, Hauck, Pyronics, Selas, W.B. Combustion, and on and on, all scrambled to develop the specific types of burners that the heat treaters and iron and steel makers needed.

Another important milestone hit around 1963: the Government got involved (gasp!). The Clean Air Act of 1963 essentially said we needed to burn our fuels cleanly and not spit smoke into the air. Those laws got reviewed again in 1970, 1977, and again in the updated Clean Air Act of 1990 with some of the biggest revisions.

With all of these changes, we had several drivers for innovation in the combustion world. Again, precision became a must. Heat treating became a very standards-driven industry. Metallurgists roamed the planet inventing both new materials and the processes to achieve them. Gas companies themselves became huge drivers of innovation and developed think tanks, like the GRI (Gas Research Institute), where people learned and laboratories hummed with development projects investigated in conjunction with burner and furnace companies. Academia became involved with industry in the form of organizations like The Center for Heat Treating Excellence (CHTE) and the Metal Treating Institute (MTI). Suddenly, the industry was more than just blacksmiths.

We’ll talk about how burner companies became design specialists and system efficiency experts and what that meant to various burner styles in next month’s offering.

References

Lowe, Jet. 1994. Panorama of Industry (Conrail Port Perry Bridge, Spanning Monongahela River, Port Perry, Allegheny County, PA). Historic American Engineering Record, HAER PA,2-POPER,1-2. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division.

About The Author:

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition

Jim Roberts president at U.S. Ignition, began his 45-year career in the burner and heat recovery industry focused on heat treating specifically in 1979. He worked for and helped start up WB Combustion in Hales Corners, Wisconsin. In 1985 he joined Eclipse Engineering in Rockford, IL, specializing in heat treating-related combustion equipment/burners. Inducted into the American Gas Association’s Hall of Flame for service in training gas company field managers, Jim is a former president of MTI and has contributed to countless seminars on fuel reduction and combustion-related practices.

For more information: Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com.

Flame and Fire: History of the Industrial Gas Industry Read More »

Flame and Fire: Fuel Sources and Bedposts

/ BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content, OP-ED

In this Technical Tuesday installment, Jim Roberts of U.S. Ignition entertains readers in a Combustion Corner editorial about how fuel sources became more affordable over time and aspects of combustion burner design. Stick around for his side story on the “innovative” use of bedposts.

This editorial was first released in Heat Treat Today’s October 2025 Ferrous/Nonferrous print edition.

A furnace guy walks into a heat treat facility and sees burners everywhere. Furnace guy says to the faces in the room, “Why did you pick those types of burners?” Thinking this is a trick question, the heat treaters respond, cautiously, “To make things hot?” Of course, they are correct, because making fire and heat is the name of the game, right?

But as we have considered burner styles, designs, flame shapes, and air delivery types with our last couple of Combustion Corner columns, I suspect there was a good deal more analysis given to the selection of burners.

To appreciate the history of burner design, “furnace guy” should realize why burners evolved in the first place: fuel source. When the first burners were starting to be used on box furnaces, they used oil, kerosene, and fuel that had to be pumped. Over the years, many different fuels have been used. Yet, we have a tendency to think of gaseous fuels as the only option for burner performance.

Bedpost Burners

I recall the first time I got called into a facility to try and improve the performance of the furnaces (yep, I truly am a furnace/burner guy). It was a big box furnace that could handle 3-ton quench and temper loads. At that point, I was unaware of the multiple types of burners that were out in the market.

The owner of the shop opened the furnace door for me to see the combustion system. I stared. Sticking into the walls of this big box furnace were bedposts. These “burners” were purchased at 50¢ a post from some hotel auction, and they had about 50 spare posts to boot.

Grinder slots had been cut into the top of these posts. Refractory had been mudded into the mounting blocks to protect the fuel feed, which was being forced, or should I say blown, in through the bed posts and atomized by the pressure of being squeezed through these slots in the knob at the top of the posts!

The fuel? Diesel fuel. Regular, old, out-of-the-pump diesel fuel. Or kerosene, for that matter. I was told the system could also use fire pulverized coal, sucked into the bedpost by pitot feeds of compressed air. They lit the burners with burning oily rags tossed into the chamber and quickly opened the valves controlling the fuel.

I was there to sell new modern high-efficiency gas burners.

I declared that this was antiquated, unsafe, archaic, dirty, and said about a thousand other denigrating comments.

The owner of this heat treat said, “Yep, it’s all those things, and more!” He continued, “It’s also reliable, simple, and predictable.” He mused, “I suppose that that thing hasn’t really broken down or shut off in the 25 years since we built it!”

I’m a fairly quick study and surmised that I was not going to make this sale. Duh! This furnace had everything they needed. And the gas system I was going to propose was going to be expensive.

A Burgeoning Gas Industry and Our Next Column

That furnace was still running when I made a move to another city some 10 or so years later.

Eventually, the gas industry that cropped up made fuel cheap…and I mean cheap. I thought, “I bet that guy and his accursed bedpost burners will talk to me now!” So, I went back, and that fella said, “Yeah, we got out of the business that used that old process and moved on. We’d be glad to talk about modernization.” And we did.

That same outfit that operated bedposts for burners for 50 years became a vanguard for modern efficiency and process improvement.

Natural gas as a fuel source is quite modern. Nowadays, that is essentially the truth: natural gas and sometimes other gaseous equivalents tend to be the most widely used fuels in the industrial world.

When looking at the rapid developments of burner configurations and why they developed, it is best first to understand some of the history of these developments. See you in the next installment to talk about the history of the industrial gas industry.

About The Author:

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition

Jim Roberts president at U.S. Ignition, began his 45-year career in the burner and heat recovery industry focused on heat treating specifically in 1979. He worked for and helped start up WB Combustion in Hales Corners, Wisconsin. In 1985 he joined Eclipse Engineering in Rockford, IL, specializing in heat treating-related combustion equipment/burners. Inducted into the American Gas Association’s Hall of Flame for service in training gas company field managers, Jim is a former president of MTI and has contributed to countless seminars on fuel reduction and combustion-related practices.

For more information: Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com.

Flame and Fire: Fuel Sources and Bedposts Read More »

Flames and Fire: Nozzle Shapes and Sizes

/ BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content, OP-ED

In this Technical Tuesday installment of Combustion Corner, Jim Roberts, president of U.S. Ignition, examines various burner nozzle shapes, sizes, and effects. Use this helpful resource to evaluate whether your own in-house heat treat burners are the right choice for your applications.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s September 2025 Annual People of Heat Treat print edition.

A furnace guy walks into a bar and shouts “Straighten UP!” The other furnace guys turn to furnace guy #1: “It won’t work!” Just like last month. Let’s continue this topic.

What would you say if I asked you, “What does fire look like?” How would you describe fire to me — color, size, smell, temperature? It’s kind of a weird thing to try and do.

Figure 1. Fives Group’s North American Tempest

Last month, we ended by talking about how “air staged” burner design can make the flame exit the nozzle at a whopping 270 mph. There’s a reason that trade names for some of these burners are “Therm-Jet” and “Tempest” and “Hot Shot.” In these instances, velocity and turbulence are the game. The flame appearance is almost always a pinpoint tip, not dissimilar to what we have all seen spitting out of the tail of a fighter jet aircraft.

And, as an interesting aside, these high-velocity industrial burners can be victims of the same phenomena as a jet engine: flameouts. A tremendous amount of design time and testing has been dedicated to keeping the flame “retained” on the nozzle. If the flame lifts off the nozzle, cup, etc., it risks being blown out by the high-velocity stream of gases being produced in the guts of the burner. At these speeds, you cannot count on the burner backlighting, so a flame failure is imminent.

More Burner Types

The other types of nozzle-mixing burners are flat flame burners. These are sometimes called wall huggers or radiant wall burners. In these designs the idea is to have as little forward momentum to the flame as possible and to run the burners in a fuel-rich or highly luminous state. The design features are such that the whole wall of the furnace will be glowing radiantly and using radiation from the glowing walls to heat the product.

There are also infrared burners, where the burners are like a porous foam or screen grid and flame just glows on these surfaces. Again, the intent is radiant heat as opposed to velocity gases. These are very prevalent continuous production processes where radiant, consistent heat is required.

There are also radiant tube burners, where the flames are fired through an alloy or ceramic tube, and the flame is isolated from the process completely. The idea here is that the tube does not allow the products of combustion to make contact with the parts. Also, in most radiant tube furnaces, some sort of process atmospheres — comprised of a variety of gases to protect the products in the furnace from oxidation or to impart a metallurgic property to those parts — have been introduced to the chamber and the process.

As such, burner design engineers have to figure out how to give a very uniform heat delivery to the tube they are firing into. Many times, a burner will need to mix the air and gas very slowly (compared to direct fired furnace burners) to ensure the flame releases its radiation at a very uniform rate, so as to not distort the radiant tube itself. And the users of these variety of burners range from flame hardening to direct fired to indirect fired atmosphere processes and many more.

Figure 2. Fighter jet aircraft

We will continue this discussion point in subsequent columns because understanding these burners is critical to using them correctly. As for the original idea that flame shapes can affect all sorts of process performance, we will revisit this topic and others, because it’s all important. Different flame shapes can significantly impact combustion performance by influencing factors like flame speed, stability, heat release, and certainly one of the big design goals now, emissions reductions. We’ll tackle these topics in future columns.

Until then, I would suggest that you take a walk into the plant and check out the variety of burners that you may have. Let’s endeavor to find more about them and consider, “What would make this burner the right choice for this application?” Then, discover what you can learn about them and their history. We will tie that all together when we discuss the next installment.

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition
Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com

Flames and Fire: Nozzle Shapes and Sizes Read More »

Flames and Fire: Straighten Up, Move Forward… Or Not?

/ BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, GUEST COLUMN

In this Technical Tuesday installment, Jim Roberts, president of U.S. Ignition, examines various flame profiles in heat treat operations. Today’s Combustion Corner compares gravitational lift, premix burners, fuel nozzle fixed air mixing burners, and nozzle mixing burners, while exploring design improvements to keep you well informed.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s August 2025 Automotive Heat Treating print edition.

A furnace guy walks into a bar and shouts, “Straighten UP!” The other furnace guys respond, “It won’t work!”

Thus begins another wander down combustion lane where we try to figure out what I’m talking about. We have discussed in other articles how various fuels and sources of air (and everything else) can affect the heating rates produced by our combustion equipment. We have talked about fire. We haven’t talked about what fire looks like.

So, in the following column and subsequent releases we are going to talk about flames and fire, and why there are a fairly substantial number of flame profiles available to heat treaters, steel makers, and all of you high-temp-type people. Why are there different flame shapes, and what does flame color do for you?

Burner Types

Figure 1. Nozzle-mixing burner ThermJet cutaway

Firstly, let’s start with the various types of burners commonly used in the art of high-temp processing work.

  1. Gravitational lift: This type of burner is exactly what it sounds like; it works just like a candle. The fuel/air mix is naturally rising with the thermal current of the flame and combusting as the flame rises, climbing the heat column.
  2. Premix burners: This is where the fuel and air are mixed together and then ignited. By controlling the percentages of fuel and air in the mixture, we control the characteristics of this flame.
  3. Fuel nozzle fixed air mixing burners: This is where a steady stream of oxidant (air) is flowing, and the fuel is throttled up and down to affect ignition and capacity of fuel.
  4. Nozzle mixing burner: Finally, and by far the most used in our industry, this is where the fuel and oxidant mix internally in the burner, and a flame configuration is determined by the burner outlet or the mixing nozzle. (See Figures 1 and 2.) You may hear burner nozzles referred to as a cup, a spinner, flame retainer, just about any type of reference. You may also hear them referred to as a danged hot thing — an accurate description as well — so don’t touch.

Design Improvements

With development of the nozzle mixing burner 60+ years ago, design improvements began in earnest. One of the first patents for nozzle mixing industrial burners was issued to Eclipse Fuel Engineering in 1967. Pretty soon there were all sorts of designs and patents, as burner companies raced to improve reliability, performance, and heat delivery characteristics.

Figure 2. Nozzle-mixing burner Eclipse Thermair

Some of the concepts that came along in the subsequent years were “air staged” burners. In this design feature, the fuel is delivered in the center of the flame nozzle. Progressively changing air holes in the nozzle stages the combustion of the fuel as it makes contact with the air. As the gas burns and the exhaust gas expands, it will often increase volumetrically by up to seven to eight times its cold state condition. That’s a lot of expansion, and it forces the pressure in the burner body to increase at an amazing rate. As the flame progresses through the burner and seeks the exit point (the part we see, you know, the fire), it can be moving along at — get this — flame speeds up to 400 feet per second!

That’s enough for today. We’ll pick this conversation back up next month.

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition
For more information: 
Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Flames and Fire: Straighten Up, Move Forward… Or Not? Read More »

Step Back from the Fire, Caveman, and Think

/ BURNERS COMBUSTION SYSTEM NEWS, HEAT TREAT NEWS, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT NEWS, OP-ED

Heat treatment is a hands-on science and it can be easy to forget about continuing education. In today’s edition of Combustion Corner, Jim Roberts, president of U.S. Ignition, encourages readers to continue cultivating their own heat treat learning and offers specific and practical educational resources to do just that.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s June 2025 Buyers Guide print edition.

So, a furnace guy walks into a heat treating facility and says, “What’s that?”

The Flame and Man

Since the invention of fire, we as upright, walking, opposing-thumb-equipped critters have been learning to control it. We have learned at the elemental level that we can change the properties of just about anything on the planet simply by exposing that item or material to the flames. Certainly, we hold fire as one of our most fascinating benefits of our existence.

Yet, in the grand scheme of things, we are just now really learning to control at levels that our Neanderthal cousins would never have conceived, and they didn’t! Conceive the possibilities, that is. I mean, for the first 400,000 years of our human existence, (that’s a mindblower, isn’t it?), fire had four basic purposes: warmth, light to see in the dark, protection from predators/enemies, and to cook our food. Later, we discovered that by heating up the tip of certain sticks, you could make the stick useful over a longer time. It didn’t wear out as fast. And from there we figured out ways to change other materials at our behest by using the flame. Weapons and tools followed.

In the bigger picture, we only have figured out the really cool uses in the last 5,000 years — and the really, really cool stuff in the last 300 years. So, the learning curve for us has been relatively late when it comes to the heat and the flame and the ability to understand it — to really control it.

Furthering the Science of Heat

How did we get to this stage of significant control over temperatures and systems that would melt a Cro-Magnon’s noodle right there in his big ol’ skull? We used our ever-developing brains. We used intelligence to advance the art of using the flame. Others before us thought their way into our present-day future. Shouldn’t we keep the ball rolling? Isn’t this ever-evolving commitment to responsible use of the flame what we need to do? We accept the gift of those before us and strive to improve on it for the upcoming iterations of humankind. Idealistic? I think not.

The premise of temperature is basically fixed. We can put it in a furnace, we can put it in a vacuum, we can melt the very rocks our planet is made from. So, let’s use the very latest available knowledge to further the science of heat. Let’s improve the situation, both at work and personally, by using our brains and by learning about what is going on with the furnaces, the parts, the fuels, and all the methods of heating. Let’s keep learning about the latest technologies. Let’s actually control this wondrous element.

To do that, we must embrace the knowledge, we have to know what we are looking at. We need to know the history and have a vision for the future. We need to teach and be taught.

Learning the Industry

If you or your reports need to get up to speed with our industry, indeed our very science — GO TO SCHOOL! The fact you are even reading this publication shows that you are open to learning. Let’s ace the test!

Heat Treat Today runs a drink-from-the-firehose learning experience called Heat Treat Boot Camp. You can learn the latest and greatest technologies and new technologies on the horizon in heat treating. Send yourself, send your people.

The Metal Treating Institute (MTI) runs an online certification school that teaches the ins and outs of the heat treating industry. The Industrial Heating Equipment Association (IHEA) runs an annual Combustion Seminar. Almost all the major furnace and equipment suppliers offer seminars on their specialty niche.

Educational Opportunities Include:

  • Ipsen Global has “Ipsen U”
  • Surface Combustion offers Virtual Learning Applications
  • SECO/WARWICK produces a Global Training Seminar on continuous improvement and heat treating
  • Can-Eng offers analysis of specific inquiries
  • Ajax Tocco will come to your facility to conduct the latest schooling on your equipment

All you must do is decide that you are going to continue to learn more. How can you not with these kinds of services around you?

Don’t forget Safety. National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) seminars are available from NFPA themselves. Industry experts who have certified trainers, like Rockford Combustion, also offer multi-day seminars on equipment safety.

I can attest to the effectiveness of these kinds of learning commitments. I have been both a student and a teacher at some of the aforementioned seminars. The scope of learning can be broad or focused. It’s up to us to keep mentally expanding, so that the lessons learned don’t get lost, and the future technologies get a fair review.

I have been watching with interest how over the last 25 or so years precise control over combustion has been evolving. The major controls and process monitoring companies have been striving to gain precise control and safety on furnace equipment for years. I might add, they have been successful in varying degrees, and safety and maintenance have improved greatly.

I just spoke recently with a company in Erie, Pennsylvania. They have developed a program that monitors each individual burner. Not only does it tell if the burner is running, but if there has been a component failure, if the burner is out of tune, it can self-correct, and if there is a failure, they shut it off. Oh, and they do that for you, from THEIR office. The technology just grows and grows, doesn’t it?

So, I know some of you were wondering where I was going with the Caveman intro, and some of you probably would have preferred that I kept going up to the point where we were cooking mammoth steaks on sizzling rocks with our Cro-Magnon buddy. But we are better than him, and we need to keep proving that. Don’t you think?

Besides, this is the final month before school is out for the summer. Let’s give education a nod here.

I am sorry if I did not mention your company, no slight intended. If so, contact your customer base to alert them to any learning experiences that may be available.

Keep learning. Until next time…

About the Author

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition

For More Information: Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Step Back from the Fire, Caveman, and Think Read More »

The Future Is Coming Three Times Faster Than You Think

/ BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, GUEST COLUMN, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT TECH, OP-ED

In this Technical Tuesday installment featuring Combustion Corner by Jim Roberts, president of U.S. Ignition, readers are enlightened about how upcoming policies might impact their burner systems, fuel mixtures, and equipment. Could certain policies impact technical requirements of heat treating? Find out more below.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s July 2025 Super Brands print edition.

A furnace guy goes into a bar and says, “This looks like a fast crowd… and all the players nod in agreement.”

Where are we? It’s the future! And in heat treating and combustion circles, the changes that will occur in the next several years will be very impactful to our industry. We’ve all heard these things, and we have some of the very best experts in the world working for us in this industry to make sure that we continue to grow and to be a leader in the legislation and rules that could cripple the wonderful world of heat treating and metals.

We are lucky to have industry associates at the Metal Treating Institute (MTI) who understand the impact of some of these new regulations. In this year’s Air & Atmosphere issue of Heat Treat Today magazine, Michael Mouilleseaux (Erie Steel LTD) provided updates on the proposed decarbonization initiatives. I have seen presentations by Michael and his committee composed of Heather Falcone (Cook Induction Heating Company) and Ben Gasbarre (Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems). This is critical knowledge for us all, and we should be staying as vigilant and supportive as we can. Michael’s interview is a must-read in that February issue – if you missed it, go back and read it. Please.

And then you say, “What’s this got to do with combustion equipment and the stuff that this Roberts guy is normally talking about?”

Well, not only does the decarbonization mandate mean the possibility of costs through government burdens and penalties, but the equipment and process change requirements are going to be staggering if we don’t prepare.

As long as I’m in a name-dropping mood, I’m going to mention Brian Kelly of Honeywell. Brian is a degreed aerospace engineer, and yet he decided to come play in the mud with us furnace guys for a career. Brian has several detailed presentations online about some of the prime initiatives for all the combustion equipment companies — hydrogen Combustion. Yep, the “H” word. The holy grail of zero pollution. One of those presentations includes fascinating detailed data on hydrogen and other emission initiatives, given by Brian Kelly and Todd Ellerton on YouTube regarding future combustion technology requirements.

“So, what does the “three times faster” thing mean, Jim?”

Well, all major combustion equipment companies, like Honeywell, understand that hydrogen requires three times the amount of fuel to generate the same amount of available heat as natural gas. Hydrogen also burns with seven to eight times the “flame speed” of natural gas. It burns, on average, about 400 degrees hotter (F) than natural gas. And so, from an engineering standpoint, there are a fantastic number of variations that must be considered as we look forward, especially when addressing CO₂ and other emissions. Add propane, butane, methane, producer gas, landfill gas, and anything else that is presently being utilized in the heat treat circles, and that provides a lot of possible variations!

Now, it needs to be said that a good many burners can burn hydrogen already. The anticipation of this level of scientific and ecological requirements was seen a long time ago. Conversely, many cannot. Brian Kelly explains that 17% of the present pre-mix/blended fuel systems cannot utilize this fuel. It also bears mentioning that there are three different grades of hydrogen production levels.

So, let’s start doing the math on how many iterations it will take. But here is the biggest tidbit of hydrogen science in the combustion world – hydrogen is the smallest molecule and the lightest in a molecular sense. Helium is smaller and lighter, for fact-checker purposes, but we aren’t trying to burn helium, are we? So, as we blend hydrogen with our other fuels (i.e., the most practical way to maintain some of the infrastructure and equipment), we need to have our combination equipment suppliers test and verify that which exists will work.

Obviously, if it takes three times the fuel volume, existing gas delivery lines will be an issue. At the molecular level, smaller and lighter means that many existing seals, connections, and control valves may no longer be gas-tight and may leak. That’s not good! If the flame speed of these fuels is five to eight times that of existing fuels, temperature profiles within the process will need to be reviewed and re-calibrated. And if it burns 400 to 500 degrees hotter, certainly that will require a review of the former materials of construction.

So, how does this tie into the original theme of “The future is coming fast?” Well, we have just touched briefly on one possible fuel transition that is on the horizon. Carbon points/credits are already being taxed in Europe. We can bet that these global decarbonization efforts will be moving ahead. We will need a review so that a “head in the sand” mentality does not catch any of us in the thermal processing community flatfooted and ill-prepared.

It’s easy to think that it won’t affect you. When I mentioned “three times as fast,” of course, I was alluding to the fuel references, and the best way to be prepared for the future is to see it coming. Be alert and stay current, and we will adapt as an industry, as we have so many times before. Until next time …

About The Author:

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition

Jim Roberts president at U.S. Ignition, began his 45-year career in the burner and heat recovery industry focused on heat treating specifically in 1979. He worked for and helped start up WB Combustion in Hales Corners, Wisconsin. In 1985 he joined Eclipse Engineering in Rockford, IL, specializing in heat treating-related combustion equipment/burners. Inducted into the American Gas Association’s Hall of Flame for service in training gas company field managers, Jim is a former president of MTI and has contributed to countless seminars on fuel reduction and combustion-related practices.

For more information: Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

The Future Is Coming Three Times Faster Than You Think Read More »

The Cost of Furnace Insulation Failure

/ BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content, OP-ED

You see a little orange light coming from your furnace while it’s operating. What if that was a clue that you were losing over $7,000 annually on one furnace? In today’s Combustion Corner installment Jim Roberts, president of US Ignition, shares more details about the long term costs of furnace insulation failure.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s May 2025 Sustainable Heat Treat Technologies print edition.

A furnace guy walks into a bar and smells burning hair! A sure indication of wasted resources…  

Normally, I would not concern myself, as a burner guy, with heat loss issues. But as a furnace guy, this is one of the biggest culprits when it comes to running an energy-efficient operation. Burner guys take it as an affront when the burners get blamed for being inefficient or hard to keep balanced. It’s the ultimate slap in the face when the burners (and sometimes the whole furnace) get labeled as a “gas hog.” The seasoned furnace guys who just read that are shrinking back in horror at the mention of a gas hog because they know there are many ways to waste fuel, and some of them are hard to rectify if equipment is not up to snuff.  

This installment will provide an example of what can be done to avoid wasting fuel and why you should prioritize this problem.  

Insulation and Energy Loss 

The aforementioned smell of burning hair, of course, was rather dramatic and hopefully unlikely, but we have all walked into a heat treat facility and been hit in the face with some sort of otherworldly blast of heat. I know, you’re thinking, “Well, duh, Captain Obvious, we are in the business of making things really hot in here.” I get it. However, we all know that if the furnace insulation has broken down, or worse yet, failed completely in spots, energy loss is imminent and will affect the bottom line. And it never seems to be one big issue, but it’s a compounded effect that will add up to serious energy dollar loss.  

A Tale of Two Furnaces 

Our example today is the retelling of my own experience. I got called to a shop in the Northwest geo-zone a while ago (okay, a long while ago). There were two furnaces sitting side by side with matching load profiles. The manager of the operation walked me out into the work area, and staring at a pair of furnaces said, “One is using almost twice as much fuel. Same everything from an equipment standpoint but almost double the fuel usage.” I looked and observed that the furnace in question had visible orange around the door seams, around the burner flanges, and around the flue. The other furnace had a completely dark exterior. The work associates in this plant were all suffering from radiation blindness — they could not see this very visible damage because the insulation on this furnace had deteriorated slowly enough they were accepting it as normal. Only, it’s not.  

Let’s Run the Numbers 

If you can see any type of color around doors, the energy loss is massive. At 2000°F Flue gas temperatures, the heat loss from radiation alone is already around 40,000 BTU/hr per square foot of visible radiation.  

If you consider that there are probably outside air ingresses through these gaps as well, you can estimate that will result in 10,000 BTU/hr per square foot of additional loss. Those numbers combine for a 50,000 BTU/hr per square foot of loss from the big orange leaks. That’s 50 cubic feet of natural gas every hour for every square foot. You might say, “Well, nobody would have a square foot of glowing furnace shell.” However, if you take it a 10-foot door opening, and the gap is 1 inch all the way around, the square foot of exposed area is leaking heat off at 4 times that square footage because it’s really just a ribbon of heat pouring out.  

So now, I was witnessing 200 cubic feet of fuel leaking out every hour that this furnace was heating all day, every day. That is 200 cubic feet × 24 hours/day × 6 days/week × 50 weeks/year = 1,440,000 cubic feet of gas wasted on a single door.  

If we estimate that gas is averaging around $5.25/1,000 cubic feet of industrial grid price, that leaky door costs $7,560.00 per year in fuel. If we consider that the gas that was being blown into the room was really intended to heat the load, we can argue there are production losses as well.  

Become an Energy Hero 

In the case of the client I was helping, I recommended refractory repairs to ensure there was no orange showing outside the furnace. The manager thought I had invented heat — I was his energy hero — and all of a sudden, the burners weren’t gas hogs, and the furnace was up to speed with its twin.  

You, too, can be a burner/furnace/energy hero for your facility by not allowing yourself to become radiation blind. Look around, feel the heat that is there, and don’t accept it as the norm. When you see it, fix it. The money you save will almost always pay for the repairs many times over.  

Be safe always, and we’ll chat more next month.

About The Author:

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition

For More Information: Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com. 

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

The Cost of Furnace Insulation Failure Read More »

Is It Stuffy in Here? Exhaust Systems

/ ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, BURNERS & COMBUSTION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONTENT, GUEST COLUMN, Manufacturing Heat Treat Technical Content, OP-ED

In each installment of Combustion Corner, Jim Roberts, president of U.S. Ignition, reinforces the goal of the series: providing informative content to “furnace guys” about the world of combustion. The previous column examined the air supply inlet — the inhale, and this month, Jim is examining the exhaust system — the exhale, and how to inspect it, maintain it, and manage it.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s March 2025 Aerospace print edition.

A guy walks into a room full of furnace guys and says, “Is it just me, or is it a tad stuffy in here?”

We have all been able to imagine that it is hard to focus and do your job in an environment where it seems like it’s hard to breathe. Well, our hard workin’ buddy, the furnace, is continually stuck in a cycle of trying to breathe in, breathe out — and then somewhere in between, the magic of combustion and heat happens! We talked last month about the “breathe in” part of the combustion process. This month, we are going to remind you that if you take a really good, productive, inhaled, life giving breath, you are probably going to want to exhale at some point, too!

Tip 2: Ensure Exhaust Systems Are Properly Functioning and Clean

Inhale, exhale. It makes sense that if we were earlier having issues with the air supply inlet, the exhaust should also be checked. Today’s combustion equipment is sophisticated and sensitive to pressure fluctuations. If the exhaust is restricted, the burners will struggle to get the proper input to the process. I used to use the example of trying to spit into a soda bottle. Try it. It’s tough to do and invariably will not leave you happy. Clean exhaust also minimizes any chance of fire. Read on for three examples.

A. Check the Flues and Exhausts for Soot

If you are responsible for burners that are delivering indirect heat (in other words, radiant tubes), you have a relatively easy task ahead to check the flues/exhausts. Each burner usually has its own exhaust, and one can see if the burners are running with fuel-rich condition (soot/carbon). Soot is not a sign of properly running burners and will signal trouble ahead. Soot can degrade the alloys at a chemical level. Soot can catch fire and create a hot spot in the tubes. Soot obviously signals you are using more fuel than needed (or your combustion blower is blocked, see the first column in this series).

As a furnace operator or floor person, it should be normal operating procedure to look for leakage around door seals.

Here’s a sub tip: If you cannot see the exhaust outlets directly, look around the floor and on the roof of the furnace up by the exhaust outlets. Light chunks of black stuff is what is being ejected into the room when it breaks free from the burner guts (if it can). That will tell you it’s time to tune those burners. If you do not have a good oxygen/flue gas analyzer, get one. It can be pricey, but it will pay for itself in a matter of months in both maintenance and fuel savings.

B. Seriously … Check the Flues and Leakage Around Door Seals

If you are running direct-fired furnace equipment, or furnaces that have the flue gases mixed from multiple burners, it gets a little trickier. All the same rules apply for not wanting soot. Only now, it can actually get exposure to your product, it can saturate your refractory, and it can clog a flue to the point that furnace pressure is affected. An increase in furnace pressure can test the integrity of your door seals. It can back up into the burners and put undue and untimely wear and tear on burner nozzles, ignitors, flame safety equipment, etc. As a furnace operator or floor person, it should be normal operating procedure to look for leakage around door seals.

C. Utilize Combustion Service Companies

Ask the wizards. Combustion service companies can usually help you diagnose and verify flue issues if you suspect they exist. It’s always a great idea to set a baseline for your combustion settings. Service companies can help you establish the optimum running conditions. Again, money well spent to optimize the performance of your furnaces. I’m sure you already have a combustion service team; some are listed in this publication. Otherwise, consult the trade groups like MTI and IHEA for recommended suppliers of that valuable service.

Check flues monthly. It should be a regular walk around maintenance check.

Don’t let the next headline be your plant. See you next issue.

About The Author:

Jim Roberts
President
US Ignition

Jim Roberts, president at US Ignition, began his 45-year career in the burner and heat recovery industry directed for heat treating specifically in 1979. He worked for and helped start up WB Combustion in Hales Corners, Wisconsin. In 1985 he joined Eclipse Engineering in Rockford, IL, specializing in heat treating-related combustion equipment/burners. Inducted into the American Gas Association’s Hall of Flame for service in training gas company field managers, Jim is a former president of MTI and has contributed to countless seminars on fuel reduction and combustion-related practices.

Contact Jim Roberts at jim@usignition.com.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Is It Stuffy in Here? Exhaust Systems Read More »

Skip to content