In today’s Technical Tuesday installment, we highlight the various techniques and developments in the world of metal AM as it pertains to post-process heat treating. Check out the trivia quiz below to test your knowledge of the AM/3D industry, the processes, and the technology.
This feature was first released inHeat Treat Today’sJanuary 2025 Technologies To Watch in Heat Treating print edition.
Additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing, has a history marked by constant innovation for uses across the space, aerospace, medical, food, and manufacturing industries, to name a few. While AM is known to support, streamline, and customize part production, advanced materials paired with evolving AM techniques are creating new possibilities in materials engineering and industrial manufacturing. Due to the nature of this ever-developing technology, in-house heat treaters must continually learn about AM components and how thermal processing may enhance component properties.
Emanuel “Ely” Sachs
What was the original name for additive manufacturing (AM), circa 1980s? A) 3D printing B) Rapid prototyping (RP) C) Additive manufacturing (AM) D) Rapid tooling (RT)
What grade of stainless steel is most commonly used for AM to achieve varying levels of strength, hardness, and elongation when heat treated? A) 17-4 PH B) 316L C) 304 D) 430
Who is Emanuel “Ely” M. Sachs? A) An engineer at GE Aviation who combined multiple parts into one huge, complex design using a laser-based additive manufacturing method called direct metal laser melting B) An engineer at Stratasys Ltd., an American-Israeli manufacturer that began using a material extrusion based process with their FFF (fused filament fabrication) technology to print parts, patented in 1989 C) A professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Worchester Polytechnic Institute who evaluated the post process heat treating of DMLS titanium alloy parts D) An MIT engineering professor who patented the process of metal binder jetting technique in 1993
What do cast parts made from powder metallurgy methods and AM parts have in common? A) The same heat treatment cycles produce the best results B) Custom cycles are used in less than 2% of both applications C) Parts exhibit porosity D) None of the above
What are the most commonly adjusted parameters to achieve higher yield strength when heat treating AM parts? A) Cooling and heating rate B) Temperature and time C) Time and pressure D) Temperature and pressure
Why is HIP known as the “gold standard” for processing AM parts for space? A) Eliminates porous microstructures without compromising the part’s geometries and dimensions B) High level of control and uniformity C) Combines high temperature and pressure to improve a part’s mechanical properties D) All of the above
What is NOT a potential benefit of additive manufacturing? A) Immediate cost savings B) Fast part production C) Rapid prototyping D) Opportunity for increased automation and use of robotics
What are the two main categories for most 3D printing methods? A) Those that use liquid binding polymers, and those that don’t B) Binder jetting technology (a non-melt-based process) and melt-based processes C) Both A and B D) Neither A nor B
Which alloy was originally developed for aerospace applications but became one of the most common biomedical alloys? A) Inconel 718 B) Inconel 625 C) Ti-6Al-4V D) Hastelloy C22
What was the first rapid prototyping method to produce metal parts in a single process (and is one of the most widely used AM technologies to manufacture Ti-6Al-4V parts)? A) Powder-bed fusion (PBF) B) Directed energy deposition (DED) C) Sheet lamination (SL) D) Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)
In what way does high temperature processing — specifically HIP below the annealing temperature (1470°F/799°C) — improve DMLS Ti-6Al-4V parts? A) Preserves surface roughness and enhances osteointegration B) Reduces porosity and enhances corrosion resistance C) Both A and B D) Neither A nor B
What is the ideal way to process 3D printed parts made using liquid binder polymers? A) Print the parts in-house followed by debind and sinter. B) Have AM parts delivered in-house for heat treating when parts are at the “Green” stage C) Have AM parts delivered in-house for heat treating when parts are at the “Brown” stage D) None of the above
All the buzz in our industry seems to indicate that additive manufacturing (AM) and 3D printing are the next hot topics in heat treat, particularly in vacuum heat treat. Heat Treat Today decided to find out how these new technologies are shaping the industry. Read what five heat treat industry leaders had to say about how their companies are preparing for the next generation of AM and 3D printing.
This Technical Tuesday article bringing together the responses from these five companies was first published in Heat Treat Today‘s November 2022 Vacuum print edition.
What changes have you made to accommodate the AM/3D printing marketplace?
Dennis Beauchesne General Manager ECM USA, Inc.
The most important changes relate to the build plate size and how it connects to our standard size systems. Build plates are ever-changing, it seems, as customers have new applications and mostly larger build plates are being requested. In addition, the process parameters – such as temperature and time at temperature and quantity of material – are important. These two items have the most to do with reconfiguring equipment for the AM market. We have also been able to implement our wide range of automation and robotics skills into this equipment as the market scales up for high production.
How will your products and/or services change to accommodate this marketplace?
We are/will be introducing equipment that is in line with standard-build plate dimensions along with reducing operating costs.
Share how 3D printing or AM products/services help heat treaters.
Contact us with your Reader Feedback!
Recent debind and sinter applications have involved, as previously mentioned, complete robotics to handle parts after printing, to debind, to sinter, and then to process specialized by ECM, such as low-pressure carburizing. ECM has also provided equipment to provide all three processes in the same furnace without moving the load or requiring the furnace to cool and reheat. This reduces work processing time along with less handling and less utility cost.
What changes have you made to accommodate the AM/3D printing marketplace?
Mark Hemsath Vice President of Sales, Americas Nitrex Heat Treating Services
Nitrex Vacuum Furnaces, through its GM Enterprises acquisition, has moved heavily into additive manufacturing via large production MIM furnaces, which are able to both remove large amounts of powder binders and sinter the parts in the same process. We are in the process of installing and/or starting up five furnaces for these markets, and we have recently employed even more advanced concepts on high volume wax removal. A further trend is on higher value materials, like nickel and cobalt alloys and titanium, necessitating diffusion vacuum levels for processing. Nitrex Vacuum has had this experience already for many years, so moving to smaller scale 3D designs comes with years of experience.
How might your products and/or services change to accommodate this marketplace?
Smaller units are a trend to keep an eye on. We have over a decade of learning from the large units we offer, and this will allow us to compete in these lower volume markets (i.e., 3D) via our proven expertise. Several facts/ideas that we are keeping top of mind are:
Large potential in the future (whole new market starting to evolve)
Redesign the product to meet the new needs
Good for rapid prototyping and quick low volume parts
Furnaces need to be available with fast delivery 3D printing is finding a tremendous niche in fast part production, sourced internally or sourced quickly. These parts may cost more per piece, but having them fast is often more important, and 3D offers this ability to cut weeks or months off of supply chain sourcing.
Share how 3D printing or AM products/services help heat treaters.
The AM sector is still in growth mode. How we help is to give a full-service solution to those customers who want to really increase their volume yet use vacuum in the process. Vacuum helps to transport the binder vapors away from the parts and into the traps for removal. Full binder removal adds to the quality of the parts, as does vacuum sintering of the final parts. We have supplied a few systems over the years with higher, diffusion vacuum levels. As powder materials evolve to higher value materials, there is more interest in diffusion vacuum, and we recently supplied such a system.
What do readers need to know about AM/3D to make decisions today?
Vacuum is the proper way to debind and sinter. Additionally, 3D printing started slow and there were many technologies evolving. Now, it has started to really grow, and the need for smaller furnaces that can offer the same quality as MIM parts produced in high volumes will be a need for 3D part makers, in medium to low volume parts. This may involve furnaces for sinter only, debind and sinter, or even sinter and heat treat. We can see the need to both sinter 3D parts in a small furnace and also heat treat them with special added processes and surface treatments.
What changes have you made to accommodate the AM/3D printing marketplace?
Phil Harris Marketing Manager Paulo
Adding a hot isostatic press has been the most notable change Paulo has made to serve the growing AM market. It goes a step further than that though; heat treatment of AM parts has rapidly evolved, and the desire for custom cycles and more data has caused us to make instrumentation changes and do more R&D type work. Understanding the full production path of the parts and doing our part to reduce the time parts are spending in post-processing steps, including offering stress relief, HIP, EDM, and vacuum heat treatment in a one-stop-shop.
How might your products and/or services change to accommodate this marketplace?
As trials continue and boundaries are pushed for both additive and the accompanying thermal processing, we’re constantly keeping an eye on what’s next. Investing in equipment that’s capable while maintaining and instrumenting it to provide the data and reliability the market needs is the name of the game. Of course, open communication with additive manufacturers and printer designers makes this far easier. We value communication with printer manufacturers as it helps us understand demand for our services in terms of build plate size, since, as we all know, furnaces and HIP vessels aren’t one size fits all!
Share how 3D printing or AM products/services help heat treaters.
Additive parts have become commonplace and we’re now regularly providing HIP, stress relief, and solution treating for them. A more interesting example is for parts printed in Inconel 718; we’ve developed a combined HIP and heat treat (or High Pressure Heat Treat) cycle which was able meet material properties specifications when the traditional processing techniques were not. This is where we feel the real cutting edge is when it comes to heat treatment of additive parts; the slow cooling HIP cycles developed for casting decades ago aren’t always optimal for today’s additive parts.
What changes have you made to accommodate the AM/3D printing marketplace?
Trevor Jones President Solar Manufacturing, Inc. Source: Solar Manufacturing, Inc.
There are several methods for 3D printing and we as heat treaters and vacuum furnace manufacturers generally classify those methods into two basic groups: those that use liquid binding polymers and those that do not.
For the group who does not use liquid binding polymers, there are no changes thus far to the design of the vacuum furnace that must be made. One significant caution is insuring there is no loose powder on the surface or cavities of the parts. Residual powder on or in the parts could have adverse effects on the parts themselves and to the vacuum furnace. The loose powder can liberate from the part during the heat treat or quench steps during the process and contaminate the vacuum furnace. The powder in the furnace is then considered FOD (foreign object debris) for subsequent heat treatments processed in that furnace. The powder could also accumulate over time and cause an electrical ground the heating elements or the quench motor, clog the heat exchanger, contaminate vacuum gauges and hot zone insulation, among other issues.
For the group that does contain liquid binding polymers, in addition to the comments about avoiding loose powder on or in the parts, care must also be taken to accommodate for the vaporization of the binder that occurs during heating of the parts. The binder, in its vapor form, will condense at cooler areas in the vacuum furnace. The condensed areas are potential contamination points and could have all the same issues and concerns of loose powder as described above. The binder collection locations, whether at intentional or non-intentional places, will also have to be routinely cleaned to maintain ideal binder collection, optimum vacuum pumping, and overall furnace performance.
How might your products and/or services change to accommodate this marketplace?
With the growth of 3D printing using liquid binder polymers, Solar Manufacturing has taken what was learned from the furnace modified at Solar Atmospheres of Western PA for MIM and AM processing and applied it to a new furnace product line specific for the debind and sinter applications. Solar Manufacturing collaborated with our affiliate company, Solar Atmospheres of Western PA, in modifying an existing vacuum furnace to accommodate the debind and sintering processes. A modified hot zone was installed, and a dedicated binder pumping port was added that helps minimize and target the condensation of detrimental binders evaporating out of parts containing binders. The modified Solar Atmospheres furnace is extremely valuable in gaining knowledge about various aspects of the process and learning what works, and what does not work, in furnace and recipe design. Combining the knowledge and experience of process development of Solar Atmospheres with the advanced Engineering Design Team at Solar Manufacturing, we believe we have a furnace design that modernizes and simplifies the debinding process while minimizing traditional maintenance issues.
Share how 3D printing or AM products/services help heat treaters.
We developed a process of debinding and sintering stainless steel parts with our affiliate company Solar Atmospheres in Souderton PA. The project started out with our Research and Development group to develop the process for the client’s parts. As the trials scaled up, test coupons became test parts, eventually full-size loads. There are always challenges to scaling up from test parts to production loads and we were able to provide the support the customer needed through that transition. The R&D eff orts were successful, and the client ended up purchasing multiple furnaces, which was the end goal for both parties.
Additionally, Solar Atmospheres is currently vacuum stress relieving a 3D component for a major U.S.-based aerospace company that is in use in aircraft today. Also, numerous large-scale components destined for deep space.
What do readers need to know about AM/3D to make decisions today?
Bob Hill, president of Solar Atmospheres of Western PA, reminded us to “realize and acknowledge that AM is still in its infancy stage. Therefore, many metallurgical uncertainties still exist for the multiple printing processes that exist. Understanding this new kind of metallurgy for each printing process, while developing standards and specifications unique to additive manufacturing, is still a huge obstacle. Until this is accomplished, AM will not be the ‘disruptive’ technology that all the experts predict it will be.” If your business is printing parts with liquid polymer binders, you should seriously consider how you plan on debinding and sintering the parts ahead of time. Printed parts in the “Green” or even “Brown” state are fragile and if you are going to ship the parts somewhere else for the debind and sinter steps, extreme care must be taken to prevent the parts from fracturing during transit. Although the shipping can be safely and successfully accomplished, ideally a furnace is available at the print shop to immediately perform the debind and sinter process to avoid those potential shipping difficulties. The other forms of 3D printing that do not contain liquid polymers generally do have this issue.
What changes have you made to accommodate the AM/3D printing marketplace?
Ben Gasbarre Executive Vice President Sales & Marketing Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems
From our inception, Gasbarre has had expertise in the powder metallurgy industry, which requires debind and sinter applications similar to that in the AM and 3D printing markets. Our ability to supply equipment for both powder and parts producers has set us up for quick adoption into this market. While considerations need to be made specific to AM, our focus has been on technical support and helping the market grow to higher volume applications.
How might your products and/or services change to accommodate this marketplace?
As adoption of these technologies grow, the volume at which parts need to be produced will grow. Our line of continuous processing equipment in both vacuum and atmosphere applications are well suited. Whether it be debind and sinter, annealing, or stress relieving, we have equipment and expertise that can grow from early production to high volumes.
Share how 3D printing or AM products/services help heat treaters.
Overall, Gasbarre is here to be a resource and support the growth of the additive market. Whether that be through new equipment, servicing existing equipment, or involvement in the industry organizations, we have the expertise to drive success today and into the future!
What do readers need to know about AM/3D to make decisions today?
Additive manufacturing is such a dynamic technology, it is difficult to state one specific item. There is the potential for significant growth opportunities for new applications, but also the potential replacement of traditional manufacturing methods. We also know there is substantial backing for the technology by both private industry and government entities. Like other emerging technologies in the automotive and energies sectors, additive manufacturing isn’t a matter of if, but when it’ll achieve wide scale adoption and high-volume applications.
It is amazing how the list of materials being utilized with this technology is growing. While metals and alloys have not been the majority of the market, it is rapidly growing. With that growth, there is a wide variety of applications and thermal processing requirements for those materials. As well, the different additive and 3D printing processing methods (i.e., binder jetting, powder bed fusion, etc.) leads to a similar diversity in thermal processing requirements.
Welcome to Heat TreatToday’s This Week in Heat TreatSocial Media. As you know, there is so much content available on the web that it’s next to impossible to sift through all of the articles and posts that flood our inboxes and notifications on a daily basis. So, Heat TreatToday is here to bring you the latest in compelling, inspiring, and entertaining heat treat news from the different social media venues that you’ve just got to see and read!
We’re looking at the holiday posts, origami metal, and dad jokes about aluminum this week. Check it out!
“This technique uses lasers to apply highly localized heat treatment to temper-rolled stainless steel. It focuses on softening areas where material will need to bend. Robots then form the temper-rolled sheets into complex 3D shapes. The final forming hardens the structure in order to regain the original flat sheet’s strength.” (Thomas.net)
Click the image to watch or read about the heat treatment
2. Fascinating Heat Treat Comments and Discussions
I didn’t know social media could foster such in-depth content and comments! Have you seen these posts/shares from across social media?
3Din30: The Scary Truth About Heat Treatment Innovation
.
Hyundai Heat Treat Case Study
.
Nitriding Layers, from Pro Microstructure Photographer
3. And What Did You Do for New Year’s?
We saw a lot of you hard-working heat treaters posting on LinkedIn and Twitter during the break. Tsk tsk. Take the break! But we get it: we’re excited for 2022 with you, too!
4. What to Read
Want to have a heavier read for the weekend? Well okay. . .
An Overview of Heat Treatment in the Refining, Power, and Petrochemical Industry – Part 2: The Importance of Heat Treatment to Mechanical Integrity.
.
Heat Treat Radio Special Videos
Did you watch the videos or just listen to these two podcasts? There is something different about when you watch something versus just listening. Sometimes, one is better than the other! Other times, you’re scratching your head waiting for the transcript to load. . .
Take a look at these two widely shared podcasts from 2021.
Heat Treat Tomorrow – Hydrogen Combustion: Our Future or Hot Air?: Click to –>Watch | Listen | Learn
The Future of Heat Treat, a Conversation with Piotr Zawistowski: Click to –>Watch | Listen | Learn
.
“Industry 4.0 Implementation for Small and Medium-Sized Shops”
