Why Normalize, and Is a ‘Still Air’ Cool Really Important? Part 1
The Heat Treat Doctor® has returned to offer sage advice to Heat Treat Today readers and to answer your questions about heat treating, brazing, sintering, and other types of thermal treatments as well as questions on metallurgy, equipment, and process-related issues.
This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s February 2025 Air/Atmosphere Furnace Systems print edition.
People often ask two fundamental questions related to normalizing. First, is it necessary? Second, just what and how important is a “still air” cool to the end result? Let’s learn more.
Why Normalize?
Normalizing is typically performed for one or more of the following reasons:
- To improve machinability
- To improve dimensional stability
- To produce a homogeneous microstructure
- To reduce banding
- To improve ductility
- To modify and/or refine the grain structure
- To provide a more consistent response when hardening or case hardening
For example, many gear blanks are normalized prior to machining so that during subsequent hardening or case hardening dimensional changes such as growth, shrinkage, or warpage will be better controlled.
Normalizing imparts hardness and strength to both cast iron and steel components. In addition, normalizing helps reduce internal stresses induced by such operations as forging, casting, machining, forming or welding. Normalizing also improves chemical non-homogeneity, improves response to heat treatment (e.g., hardening), and enhances dimensional stability by imparting into the component part a “thermal memory” for subsequent lower temperature processes. Parts that require maximum toughness and those subjected to impact are often normalized. When large cross sections are normalized, they are also tempered to further reduce stress and more closely control mechanical properties.
Soak periods for normalizing are typically one hour per inch of cross-sectional area but not less than two hours at temperature. It is important to remember that the mass of the part or the workload can have a significant influence on the cooling rate and thus on the final microstructure. Thin pieces cool faster and are harder after normalizing than thicker ones. By contrast, after furnace cooling in an annealing process, the hardness of the thin and thicker sections is usually about the same.
When people think of normalizing, they often relate it to a microstructure consisting primarily of pearlite and ferrite. However, normalized microstructures can vary and combinations of ferrite, pearlite, bainite, and even martensite for a given alloy grade are not uncommon. The resultant microstructure depends on a multitude of factors including, but not limited to, material composition, part geometry, part section size, part mass, and cooling rate (affected by multiple factors). It is important to remember that the microstructure achieved by any given process sequence may or may not be desirable depending on the design and function of the component part.
The microstructures produced by normalizing can be predicted using appropriate continuous cooling transformation diagrams and this will be the subject of a subsequent “Ask The Heat Treat Doctor” column.
In this writer’s eyes, industry best practice would be to specify the desired microstructure, hardness, and mechanical properties resulting from the normalizing operation. Process parameters can then be established, and testing performed (initially and over time) to confirm/verify results.
In many cases, the failure of the normalizing process to achieve the desired outcome centers around the lack of specificity (e.g., engineering drawing requirements, metallurgical and mechanical property call outs, testing/verification practices, and quality assurance measures). Failure to specify the required microstructure and mechanical properties/characteristics can lead to assumptions on the part of the heat treater, which may or may not influence the end result.
“Normalizing is the heat treatment that is produced by austenitizing and air cooling, to produce uniform, fine ferrite/pearlite microstructures in steel … In light sections, especially in alloy hardenable steels, air cooling may be rapid enough to form bainite or martensite instead of ferrite and pearlite.”
What Is Normalizing?
The normalizing process is often characterized in the following way: “Properly normalized parts follow several simple guidelines, which include heating uniformly to temperature and to a temperature high enough to ensure complete transformation to austenite; soaking at austenitizing temperature long enough to achieve uniform temperature throughout the part mass; and cooling in a uniform manner, typically in still air” (Herring, 2014).
It is also important to remember that normalizing is a long-established heat treatment practice. As far back as 1935, Grossmann and Bain wrote:
Normalizing is the name applied to a heat treatment in which the steel is heated above its critical range (that is, heated to make it wholly austenitic) and is then allowed to cool in air.
Since this is one specific form of heat treatment, it will be realized that the structure and mechanical properties resulting from the normalizing treatment will depend not only on the precise composition of the steel but also on the precise way in which the cooling is carried out.
The term ‘normalizing’ is generally applied to any cooling ‘in air.’ But in reality, this may cover a wide range of cooling conditions, from a single small bar cooled in air (which is fairly rapid cooling) to that of a large number of forgings piled together on a forge shop floor … which is a rather slow cool, approaching an anneal. The resulting properties in the two cases are quite different.
In plain carbon steels and in steel having a small alloy content, the air-cooled (normalized) structure is usually pearlite and ferrite or pearlite alone … More rapid cooling gives fine pearlite, which is harder; slow cooling gives coarse pearlite, which is soft. In some few alloy steels, the normalized structure in part may be bainite.
The hardness of normalized steels will usually range from about 150 to 350 Brinell (10 to 35 Rockwell C), depending on the size of the piece, its composition and hardening characteristics.
Importance of Defining Cooling Rate
In 2005, Krauss underscored the importance of defining cooling rate when he wrote: “Air cooling associated with normalizing produces a range of cooling rates depending on section size [and to some extent, load mass]. Heavier sections [and large loads] air cool at much lower cooling rates than do light sections because of the added time required for thermal conductivity to lower temperatures of central portions of the workpiece.”
Microstructures Created by Normalizing
The microstructural constituents produced by normalizing for a particular steel grade can be ferrite, pearlite, bainite, or martensite. The desired microstructure from normalizing adds an important cautionary note, as addressed by Krauss in STEELS (1990 and 2005), namely: “Normalizing is the heat treatment that is produced by austenitizing and air cooling, to produce uniform, fine ferrite/pearlite microstructures in steel … In light sections, especially in alloy hardenable steels, air cooling may be rapid enough to form bainite or martensite instead of ferrite and pearlite.”
Next time: We define a “still air” cool and look at the state of normalizing in North America.
References
ASM International. “ASM Handbook, vol. 4, Heat Treating,” (1991): 35–41.
ASM International. “ASM Handbook Volume 4A, Steel Heat Treating, Fundamentals and Processes,” (2013): 280–288.
ASM International. “Metals Handbook, 8th ed., vol. 1, Properties and Selection of Metals,” (1961): 26.
ASM International. “Metals Handbook Desk Edition,” (1985): 28-11, 28-12.
Chandler, Harry, ed. Heat Treater’s Guide: Practices and Procedures for Irons and Steels. 2nd ed, ASM International, 1995.
Grossman, M. A., and E. C. Bain. Principles of Heat Treatment, 5th ed, ASM International, 1935, 197–198.
Herring, Daniel H. Atmosphere Heat Treatment, vol. I, BNP Media, 2014.
Herring, Daniel H. Atmosphere Heat Treatment, vol. II, BNP Media, 2015.
Herring, Daniel H. “The Importance of Normalizing,” Industrial Heating April 2008.
Krauss, George. STEELS: Heat Treatment and Processing Principles, ASM International, 1990. 463.
Krauss, George. STEELS: Processing, Structures, and Performance, ASM International, 2005. 253–256, 574.
Lyman, Taylor, ed. Metals Handbook, 1948 ed. ASM International, 1948. 643.
Practical Data for Metallurgists, 17th ed. TimkenSteel.
Totten, George E., ed. Steel Heat Treatment Handbook, vol. 2, 2nd ed., CRC Press, 2007. 612-613.
About the Author
“The Heat Treat Doctor”
The HERRING GROUP, Inc.
Dan Herring has been in the industry for over 50 years and has gained vast experience in fields that include materials science, engineering, metallurgy, new product research, and many other areas. He is the author of six books and over 700 technical articles.
For more information: Contact Dan at dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com.
For more information about Dan’s books: see his page at the Heat Treat Store.
Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com
Why Normalize, and Is a ‘Still Air’ Cool Really Important? Part 1 Read More »