Vacuum Gas Cooling: Pressure vs. Velocity, Part 1 of 2

There is an age-old adage that exists in the heat treating world. That supposition states that “the smaller the vacuum furnace, the faster it will quench.” Is this adage true? Explore Solar Atmospheres’ journey as they designed an experiment to discover if pressure or velocity most affects cooling performance.

This Technical Tuesday was written by Robert Hill, FASM, president, and Gregory Scheuring, plant metallurgist, both from Solar Atmospheres. The article originally appeared in Heat Treat Today’s March 2022 Aerospace Heat Treating print edition.

Introduction

Our study compared the cooling rates of two distinctly sized High Pressure Gas Quenching (HPGQ) vacuum furnaces — a large 10-bar vacuum furnace equipped with a 600 HP blower motor versus a smaller 10-bar vacuum furnace equipped with a 300 HP motor. Both furnaces, one with a 110 cubic feet hot zone, the other with a 40 cubic feet hot zone, were exclusively engineered and manufactured by Solar Manufacturing located in Sellersville, PA.

History

High Pressure Gas Quenching in the heat treatment of metals has made tremendous strides over recent years. Varying gas pressures within the chamber have been shown to be more governable than their oil and water quenching counterparts. The number one benefit of gas cooling versus liquid cooling remains the dimensional stability of the component being heat treated. In addition, using gas as a quench media dramatically mitigates the risk of crack initiation in a component. This is primarily due to the temperature differentials during cooling. Gas quenching cools strictly by convection. However, the three distinct phases of liquid quenching (vapor, vapor transport, and convection) impart undue stress into the part causing more distortion (Figure 1).

There are multiple variables involved with optimizing gas cooling. These include the furnace design, blower designs, heat exchanger efficiency, gas pressure, gas velocities, cooling water temperatures, the gas species used, and the surface area of the workpieces. Whenever these variables remain constant, the relative gas cooling performance of a vacuum furnace typically increases as the volume of the furnace size decreases.

The Furnace

Solar Manufacturing has built multiple high pressure gas quenching furnaces of varying sizes over the years ranging from 2 to 20-bar pressure. We have learned that vacuum furnaces, rated at 20-bar and above, became restrictive in both cost constraints and diminishing cooling improvements. Therefore, Solar Manufacturing engineers began to study gas velocities to improve cooling rates. They determined increasing the blower fan from 300 HP to 600 HP, along with other gas flow improvements, would substantially increase metallurgical cooling rates. The technology was reviewed and determined to be sound. A 48” wide x 48” high x 96” deep HPGQ 10-bar furnace, equipped with this newest technology, was purchased by Solar Atmospheres of Western PA located in Hermitage, PA.

The Test

Once this new vacuum furnace was installed, a cooling test was immediately conducted. A heavy load would be quenched at 10-bar nitrogen in an existing HFL 50 sized furnace (36” x 36” x 48”). The same cycle was repeated in the newly designed vacuum furnace almost three times its size! (Images 1 and 2).

The load chosen for the experiment was 75 steel bars 3” OD x 17” OAL weighing 34 lbs each. The basket and grid system supporting the load weighed 510 lbs. The total weight of the entire load was 3060 lbs. Both test runs were identically thermocoupled at the four corners and in the center of the load. All five thermocouples were deeply inserted (6" deep) into ¼" holes at the end of the bars (Image 3). Each load also contained two 1" OD x 6" OAL metallographic test specimens of H13 hot working tool steel. These specimens were placed near the center thermocouple to ensure the “worst case” in terms of quench rate severity. All tests were heated to 1850°F for one hour and 10-bar nitrogen quenched.

Results

The comparative cooling curves between both HPGQ vacuum furnaces are shown in Chart 1. Table 1 reveals that in the critical span of 1850°F to 1250°F for H13 tool steel, the cooling rate in the larger furnace with more horsepower nearly matched the cooling rate of the furnace three times smaller in size.

Micrographs of the H13 test specimens processed in each load were prepared (Images 4 and 5). The microstructure of each test specimen is characterized by a predominantly tempered martensitic microstructure with fine, undissolved carbides. The consistency of the microstructure across both trial loads further demonstrates that while the larger furnace utilized the higher horsepower, both resulted in a critical cooling rate sufficient to develop a fully martensitic microstructure.

Conclusions

These tests prove that the greatest impact on the cooling performance in a vacuum furnace is to increase the gas velocity within that chamber. This was achieved primarily by increasing the horsepower of the blower fan. By doing this, the ultimate cost to the customer is significantly less than manufacturing a higher pressure coded vessel. This newly designed vacuum furnace has proven to be a game changer.

Part II of this article will discuss real life case studies and how both Solar and Solar’s customers have mutually benefited from this newest technology.

About the Author:
Robert Hill, FASM, president of Solar Atmospheres of Western PA, began his career with Solar Atmospheres in 1995 at the headquarters plant located in Souderton, Pennsylvania. In 2000, Mr. Hill was assigned the responsibility of starting Solar Atmospheres’ second plant, Solar Atmospheres of Western PA, in Hermitage, Pennsylvania, where he has specialized in the development of large vacuum furnace technology and titanium processing capabilities. Additionally, he was awarded the prestigious Titanium Achievement Award in 2009 by the International Titanium Association.

For more information contact Robert at bob@solaratm.com

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com