austenitizing temperature

Improving Hardening and Introducing Innovation for In-House Heat Treat

March 25, 2025 / HARDENING TECHNICAL CONTENT, VACUUM FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT

Digital tools lead the way in vacuum hardening operations to ensure energy efficiency and processing repeatability. In this Technical Tuesday installment, Paulo Duarte, project manager at Metalsolvus, examines various advantages of wrought versus cast alloys in heat treat operations.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today's March 2025 Aerospace print edition.

Vacuum hardening has been the chosen process for hardening tools used in plastic injection, die casting, and metal sheet stamping over the past few decades. Although widely used and accepted, there is still room for improvement in tool performance through quality driven procedures. By employing easy methods of measurement, study, and testing, it is possible to enhance part integrity and mechanical properties, while simultaneously reducing heat treatment time and energy consumption. Advanced metallurgical analyses of heat treatment cycles and equipment can introduce better tools on the market, as well as provide time and cost saving heat treatments.

Basics of Vacuum Hardening

Figure 1. Cooling parts in vacuum hardening furnaces — inert gas injection on the hot chamber during cooling

In vacuum hardening furnaces, temperature and time are carefully controlled at specific load locations to ensure optimal hardening. Optimal practices focus on heating and soaking the metal parts during heat treatment. The controlled introduction of vacuum and inert gases during the process ensures the right protective atmosphere for treatment, resulting in steel that is mainly free from oxidation and decarburization. This preserves the surface integrity of the tools.

Cooling is achieved through the injection of an inert gas into the heating chamber, with controlled pressure and adequate recirculation between the heat exchanger and the hot zone (Figure 1). Different gas injection directions are utilized depending on the load being treated, ensuring optimal cooling.

Hardening of Large Tools

Figure 2. Large molds positioned inside the vacuum hardening furnace, two parallel cavities

Heating and quenching large tools is one of the most challenging situations for vacuum hardening, as temperature control and part microstructure integrity are more difficult to obtain, which affects part quality. Large tools, typically made of hot work tool steels, are hardened in large furnaces. To minimize deformation, parts are preferably positioned vertically inside the furnace (Figure 2).

Surface soaking times for big tools can significantly exceed
standard austenitization and tempering times due to thermal gradients existing within the parts. Mold cores usually achieve the right soaking and tempering recommendation through accurate temperature control, monitored by well-positioned core thermocouples. A tool’s microstructure and performance will depend heavily on geometry, size, and temperature uniformity achieved during treatment. See Figure 3 for the core and surface typical hardening cycles for large tools.

Figure 3. Heating and soaking cycle for the hardening of large tools (“Heat Treatment of a AISI H11 Premium Hot-Work Tool Steel”)

The cooling phase is crucial in determining the final properties of both the surface and core of the tool. Higher gas injection pressures result in faster cooling and increased toughness, but this also introduces greater deformation risks, when directly cooled from austenitization temperature, so martempering done at low pressures is usually required.

Balancing cooling pressure is one of the most secret topics in vacuum hardening. With a variety of parameters and procedures used among heat treaters, measuring and testing is essential for achieving consistent quality for better controlling the hardening process and attaining the best part quality.

Figure 4. Microstructure and toughness obtained after the use of different hardening cooling rates (image from Transactions of the 15th NADCA Congress, 1989)

The use of higher or lower inert gas pressures directly affects the cooling rate, making it faster or slower, respectively. Regulating the gas injection pressure during the cooling phase significantly impacts the material’s toughness, even when cooling occurs within the bainitic-martensitic domain commonly observed in vacuum hardening practices. Faster cooling leads to finer microstructures, which in turn results in tougher materials. However, fully martensitic microstructures are rarely achieved in industrial vacuum hardening furnaces and are typically limited to smaller loads composed of small parts. In larger parts, the risk of pearlite formation increases, especially when cooling rates fall around 3°C/min (5°F/min) at the core, as illustrated in Figures 4 and 5.

In industrial heat treatments of large tools, accurately monitoring core temperature is challenging, as it is difficult to position a thermocouple hole exactly at the innermost location or a nearby region. This makes it harder to control the hardening process and prevent pearlite formation. Therefore, studying the process to establish effective control measures is essential for achieving the highest possible
quality.

Figure 6. Mold temperature gradients during vacuum hardening: a) FEM mesh, b) gradients during heating at lower temperatures, c) gradients at the last pre-heating steps, and d) gradients during austenitization from Maia et al. “Study of Heating Stage of Big Dimension Steel Parts Hardening”; e) gradients during mold cooling from Pinho et al. “Modelling and Simulation of Vacuum Hardening of Tool Steels”

Heat treatment simulation simplifies this task by allowing the hardening process to be predicted, with thermal gradients estimated and compensated through furnace control parameter adjustments. Figure 6 presents a real case study, where the temperature distribution inside a large mold was fully characterized during the entire heat treatment cycle using FEM (finite element method) simulation and validated through actual thermocouple measurements. FEM simulation, as a proven and highly effective technique for predicting heat treatment cycles, enables heat treaters to implement optimized, computer-supported heat treatment practices.

Vacuum Hardening Standard Block Size and Cycle Forecast

When working with loads composed of small to medium-sized parts, the core temperature of the load can be monitored using dummy standard blocks. These blocks have a central hole to accommodate the thermocouple used to control the heat treatment cycle. The dummy block should be selected to closely match the size of the largest part in the load. However, in commercial heat treatment settings, part sizes can vary widely, making it difficult to maintain a comprehensive set of dummy blocks that represents all possible heat treatment scenarios.

Once again, simulation proves valuable in helping heat treaters gather useful data to anticipate the heat treatment cycle and determine the appropriate range of dummy blocks to have available on the shop floor. The procedure for selecting the dummy block range and forecasting the corresponding heat treatment times is outlined in the following equations. Ideally, the standard block should be made from the same material as the largest part in the load. If the materials differ, the characteristic length of the block can be calculated using the first of the equations to the right.

Table 1 lists a range of proposed dummy block sizes to be used for monitoring the load temperature during heat treatment. The time to end of soaking at higher temperature is also given by Table 1 for a typical 600 x 600 x 900 mm hardening furnace. Times were obtained by FEM simulation and can be used to forecast the end of austenitization in a hardening process of each dummy block.

Table 1. Proposed dimensional distribution range for cubic and cylindrical standard blocks and expected cycle times in a typical 600 x 600 x 900 mm hardening furnace (data from Figueiredo et al., “Study of a Methodology for Selecting Standard Blocks for Hardening Heat Treatments”)

The simulated times were validated by using real parts temperature measurement by thermocouples. These were the calculated errors based on simulation and heat treat validation trial:

Optimizing the Vacuum Hardening of Tools

Figure 7. Effect of selecting different temperature (ΔT) range for starting to control the isothermal stage time. a) ΔT criteria and respective cycle time reduction; b) surface mechanical properties obtained by using different ΔT; and c) core properties after tempering at different ΔT range (Miranda et al., “Heat Treatment of a AISI H11 Premium Hot-Work Tool Steel,” MSC)

FEM simulation can also be used to optimize the heat treatment process, but metallurgical testing remains crucial for providing reliable insights into safely reducing cycle time and energy consumption. Typically, for setting the isothermal stage time, a tolerance of -5°C relative to the temperature setpoint is used, leading to savings in both heat treatment duration and power consumption, as shown in Figure 7a. However, Figure 7b demonstrates that higher tolerance values (ΔT) can be considered. Tolerances of up to -10°C or even -20°C can be applied for controlling the soaking time without significantly affecting the hardness and toughness of the parts. Naturally, these results depend on the desired setpoints for the isothermal stages, but Figure 7c reflects the worst-case scenario for ΔT, referring to the use of lower austenitizing and tempering temperatures commonly applied in the hardening of hot-work tool steels.

Future Trends of Vacuum Hardening

Innovations like digitalization, automation, and resource reduction, as part of Industry 5.0 initiatives, are expected to drive advancements in heat treatment processes. Long martempering, a heat treatment under development for hardening hot-work tool steels, shows promise as an alternative to traditional quenching and tempering. This process offers a balance of high hardness and toughness in significantly less time, providing energy savings and faster turnaround.

New Vacuum Hardening Process — Long Martempering

Figure 8. New long martempering heat treatment cycle: AISI H13 premium toughness for two different long martempering temperatures (“Study of The Bainitic Transformation of H13 Premium Steel”)

Long martempering is a heat treatment under development that can be used to harden hot-work tool steels. Long martempering is a process somewhat similar to austempering but is applied to steels rather than cast irons. Performed at temperatures within the martempering range, long martempering corresponds to an interrupted bainitic heat treatment with a specific process window (Figure 8) where high toughness is achieved at hardness levels exceeding those obtained through traditional quenching and tempering. Table 2 lists the mechanical properties attained for 5Cr hot-work premium tool steels.

Table 2. Mechanical properties of the new hardening process — long martempering

The transformation during long martempering is not yet fully characterized in terms of microstructure, however, curved needles of bainitic ferrite are observed without carbide precipitation. This phenomenon is generally not associated with steel but rather with ausferrite in cast irons. Nonetheless, it is evident in at least H11 and H13 premium steel grades. This one day martempering treatment could potentially replace the traditional two- to three-day heat treatment cycle for large tools, offering significantly faster lead times and reduced energy consumption. Moreover, the mechanical properties achieved through long martempering are notable, as high levels of both hardness and toughness are obtained simultaneously, as demonstrated in Table 2.

Industry 5.0

Figure 9. Heat treatment plant supervision solution

The integration of heat treatment equipment with management software enhances furnace utilization, quality control systems, and maintenance practices. Industry 5.0 can be implemented in heat treatment plants through the connection of databases that collect inputs from furnaces (e.g., temperature, time, pressure, heating elements, and auxiliary equipment performance) and production data (e.g., batch numbers, order details, operator information, cycle setup, and load weight). This data is analyzed by software to generate valuable insights for plant management, process optimization, predictive maintenance, and quality control.

A supervision interface for a 5.0 solution can monitor furnaces and control them remotely in real time (Figure 9). Operators receive updates on tasks, alerts, and production schedules. Additionally, plant productivity, efficiency, and maintenance can be tracked through the same supervision software, whether on site or remote. Automatic reporting is also possible, enabling the approval or rejection of cycles based on criteria that are not typically used in heat treatment plants. This not only improves quality but also facilitates process optimization and cost reduction.

Conclusion

Acquiring a full understanding of furnaces in operation through data measurement and analysis allows full control over the heat treatment process. This facilitates process development, enabling cycle optimization and improvement in part quality. Additionally, testing and simulation practices can lead to cost reduction and shorter lead times.

The introduction of long martempering and Industry 5.0 will significantly enhance heat treatment processes, leading to improved delivery times and reduced operational risks. Automation and digitalization bring more data to the shop floor, improving plant management and resulting in greater efficiency, higher quality parts, and simplified task execution.

Finally, current personnel are busy with routine operations that are based on long established practices and may be limiting opportunities for innovation. Therefore, new teams or external consultants can be leveraged to focus on designing, studying, testing, and implementing each new heat treatment solution.

References

Fernandes, José, Laura Ribeiro, and Paulo Duarte. “Study of the Bainitic Transformation of H13 Premium Steel.” MSC thesis, Faculty of Engineering of Oporto University, 2021.

Figueiredo, Ana, Paulo Coelho, José Marafona, and Paulo Duarte. “Study of a Methodology for Selecting Standard Blocks for Hardening Heat Treatments.” MSC thesis, Faculty of Engineering of Oporto University, 2022.

Kind & Co. “Vacuum Hardening with Highest Levels of Precision.” Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.kind-co.de/en/company/technologies/vacuum-hardening.html.

Maia, Pedro, Paulo Coelho, José Marafona, and Paulo Duarte. “Study of Heating Stage of Big Dimensions Steel Parts Hardening.” MSC thesis, Faculty of Engineering of Oporto University, 2013.

Metaltec Solutions. “Brochure Presentation.” Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.metalsolvus.pt/en/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/plant-supervision-brochure-V3.pdf.

Miranda, Isabel, Laura Ribeiro, and Paulo Duarte. “Heat Treatment of AISI H11 Premium Hot-Work Tool Steel.” MSC thesis, Faculty of Engineering of Oporto University, 2024.

Pinho, José Eduardo, Gil Andrade Campos, and Paulo Duarte. “Modelling and Simulation of Vacuum Hardening of Tool Steels.” MSC thesis, Aveiro University, 2017.

Ramada. “New Hardening Furnace up to 4 Tons.” Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.ramada.pt/pt/media/noticias/novo-forno-de-tempera-vacuo---ate-4-tons-.html.

Schmetz. “Schmetz Heat Treatment Furnaces.” Accessed January 30, 2025. https://edelmetal.com.tr/en/heat-treatment-furnaces.

Schmetz. Sketch of the Cooling Process in the Vacuum Hardening Furnace: Schmetz Commercial Proposals Drawing – Metalsolvus Training Courses Documentation.

Seco/Warwick. Vector 3D Hardening Furnace Commercial Brochure.

Solar Manufacturing. “Solar Vacuum Hardening Furnace.” Accessed January 30, https://solarmfg.com/vacuum-furnaces-horizontal-iq-vacuum-furnaces.

Wallace, J.F., W. Roberts, and E. Hakulinen. “Influence of Cooling Rate on the Microstructure and Toughness of Premium Grade H13 Die Steels.” Transactions of the 15th NADCA Congress (1989).

About The Author:

Paulo Duarte, project manager at Metalsolvus, is a researcher and consultant on heat treat technologies. His education and expertise in metallurgy has culminated in several articles and patents. He was a former technical manager within bohler-uddeholm group for the Portuguese market and heat treatment manager with the same group. Currently, Paulo focus on helping heat treaters by providing innovative, more efficient, and profitable heat treatment services to companies.

For more information: Contact Paulo Duarte at paulo.duarte@metalsolvus.pt.

Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Improving Hardening and Introducing Innovation for In-House Heat Treat Read More »

Elevate Your Knowledge: 5 Need-to-Know Case Hardening Processes

October 12, 2021 / Uncategorized

Your parts need heat treated to herculean surface hardness but with a soft, ductile core. That is to say, you are looking at case hardening processes, most likely one of these: gas carburizing, low-pressure carburizing, carbonitriding, gas nitriding, and ferritic nitrocarburizing.

Mike Harrison at Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems brings us a Technical Tuesday article about what case hardening is and how five of the most common processes vary by (1) comparing the specific guidelines for each temp and time, (2) identifying equipment used to perform each process, and (3) providing a chart (at the end!) to understand different process considerations.

Mike Harrison
Engineering Manager of Industrial Furnace Systems Division
Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems

Case hardening falls into a class of heat treatment processes that typically involve the addition of carbon and/or nitrogen to the material through solid-gas reactions at the surface followed by diffusion. These processes are performed for any number of reasons that generally include increasing strength and wear resistance, but in all cases the end result is a harder, higher-strength surface with a softer, more ductile core.

Case hardening processes can be divided into two subsets: those that include quenching to harden, such as gas carburizing, low-pressure carburizing (LPC), and carbonitriding; and those that do not include quenching, such as gas nitriding and ferritic nitrocarburizing (FNC). This article will provide a brief look into each process, the types of equipment used, and considerations for implementation.

Diffusion + Quenching Processes

These processes involve heating the workload to austenitizing temperature, which is above the upper critical temperature for the material in question, then supplying and allowing the desired element(s) to diffuse into the part surface, followed by rapid cooling (quenching) to create a phase change to martensite that strengthens the material. Tempering is then performed to create a material that has the desired final strength and ductility properties. The result is a high concentration of added elements on the surface that continually decreases through diffusion until eventually matching the same concentration as the base material; this gradient similarly produces a hardness that is higher at the surface, gradually diminishing until reaching the core. Higher alloyed steels may also see a microstructural change in the core from quenching that produces a core with higher hardness than the previously untreated material, but lower than the surface hardness produced.

Atmosphere Gas Carburizing

Gas carburizing is a process where carbon is added to the material’s surface. The process is typically performed between 1550-1750°F, with carburizing times commonly between 2-8 hours; of course, these values can vary depending on the material, process, and equipment. The most common atmosphere used for atmosphere gas carburizing is endothermic gas with additions of either natural gas or propane to increase the carbon potential of the furnace atmosphere. Common case depths achieved are around 0.005-0.040”, with deeper cases possible through a combination of longer treatment times and/or higher temperatures.

The atmosphere gas carburizing process can be performed both in batch and continuous equipment. On the batch side, traditionally an integral quench (IQ) furnace is used (Fig. 1); it consists of a heating chamber where the workload is heated and exposed to the carburizing atmosphere, then the workload is transferred to an attached quench tank for cooling. The entire furnace system is sealed and under protective atmosphere to preserve the part surface and maintain safe control of any combustible gases. For batches of large product, a pit furnace can be used for carburizing with the workload being transferred via an overhead crane into and out of the furnace to a quench tank.

For continuous processing, a belt furnace can be used. The product is placed on a belt and then progresses through the furnace at the desired temperature and atmosphere composition; the carburizing time can be varied by adjusting the belt speed through the furnace. At the end of the furnace, the parts drop off the belt into the quench tank. Then, a conveyor pulls the parts out of the tank and drops them on another belt to be washed and tempered. For continuous processing of heavier loads pusher furnaces, rotary retort, rotary hearth, and roller hearth furnaces can be used.

Fig. 2 – Endothermic gas generator: "To achieve a carburizing atmosphere endothermic gas is typically used, which is produced by an endothermic gas generator that heats a combination of natural gas and air to create a mixture that is approximately 40% hydrogen, 40% nitrogen, and 20% carbon monoxide."

To achieve a carburizing atmosphere endothermic gas is typically used, which is produced by an endothermic gas generator (Fig. 2) that heats a combination of natural gas and air to create a mixture that is approximately 40% hydrogen, 40% nitrogen, and 20% carbon monoxide. This mixture is generally considered carbon-neutral, meaning it will neither add nor deplete carbon from the surface. To increase the carbon concentration the endothermic gas needs to be enriched with a gas (typically natural gas or propane) that will help produce additional carbon monoxide, which will “boost” the carbon potential and drive carbon diffusion into the material.

A less common carburizing atmosphere comes from a nitrogen-methanol system, where nitrogen gas and liquid methanol are combined and injected into the furnace. Upon exposure to the high furnace temperature the methanol will decompose to hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Natural gas or propane additions are still required in order to provide carbon for absorption into the surface of the steel.

Low-Pressure Carburizing

Low-pressure carburizing (LPC), or vacuum carburizing, is a variation of carburizing performed in a vacuum furnace. Instead of the atmospheres mentioned previously, a partial pressure of hydrocarbon gas (such as propane or acetylene) is used that directly dissociates at the part surface to provide carbon for diffusion. After LPC, the workload is transferred to a quench system that could use oil or high-pressure gas, typically nitrogen. LPC with gas quenching can be an attractive option for distortion prone complex geometries as the cooling rates are slower than oil quenching; however, given the slower cooling rate, it becomes very important to choose a higher alloyed steel that will achieve the desired hardness.

LPC typically provides faster carburizing times when compared to traditional gas carburizing. This can be attributed to a more efficient reaction of the hydrocarbon gas used and to the option of using higher carburizing temperatures, typically up to 1900°F. This is made possible by the type of internal furnace construction of vacuum furnace design, although care must be taken at higher temperatures to avoid undesirable grain growth in the material. LPC also has the benefit of eliminating the potential for intergranular oxidation, since it is running in a vacuum system.

LPC is typically performed in a single-chamber vacuum furnace, with oil quenching or high-pressure gas quenching done in a separate chamber (Fig. 3). Continuous vacuum furnaces can also be used in applications that require increased throughput (Fig. 4).

Carbonitriding

Despite its name, carbonitriding is more closely related to carburizing than it is to nitriding. Carbonitriding is a process where both carbon and nitrogen are added to the material surface. This process is typically performed in a range of 1450-1600°F and generally produces a shallower case depth than carburizing. Carbonitriding is used instead of carburizing for plain carbon steels that do not contain enough alloying content to respond well to quenching, as the added nitrogen can provide a higher hardenability in the case to allow for proper hardness development.

Atmosphere carbonitriding can be performed in the same equipment as is used for carburizing. The furnace atmosphere is still typically endothermic gas-based and includes the addition of ammonia to provide the nitrogen. Vacuum carbonitriding with both hydrocarbon and ammonia additions can also be performed in the same equipment as used for vacuum hardening and low pressure carburizing.

Diffusion Only Processes

These processes involve heating the workload to a temperature below the austenitizing temperature, allowing the desired element(s) to diffuse into the part surface, then slow cooling. The increase in hardness at the material surface comes only from the addition of the diffused element(s), and not from a phase change due to quenching. As these processes are performed below the lower critical temperature (i.e., below the austenitizing range), the desired core hardness and microstructure need to be developed through a separate heat treatment prior to case hardening. Generally, the process temperature selected should be at least 50°F below any prior treatment temperatures to avoid impact to the core properties.

Gas Nitriding

Gas nitriding is a process where nitrogen is added to the material surface. The process is typically performed between 925-1050°F; cycle times can be quite long as the diffusion of the nitrogen is slow at these temperatures, with nitriding times typically ranging from 16 - 96 hours or more depending on the material and case depth required. Nitriding can be performed in either a single or two-stage process and has the potential to produce two types of case, the first being a nitrogen-rich compound layer (or “white layer”) at the surface that is extremely hard and wear-resistant but also very brittle. This compound layer depth is dependent on processing time. In the more traditional two-stage process, the case depth produces a gradient of hardness from surface to core that commonly ranges from 0.010-0.025”, with minimal white layer, typically between 0-0.0005”. Nitriding is typically performed on higher alloyed steels or steels specifically designed for the nitriding process (e.g., Nitralloy®) as it relies on the formation of nitrides to create the increased hardness, which is achieved through the use of nitride-forming alloys such as aluminum, molybdenum and chromium. Pre and post oxidation treatments can be incorporated into the cycle to achieve certain benefits. Since the process does not require quenching to harden, it has the potential of producing a product that is more dimensionally stable and may not require any post-process finishing.

Fig. 5 – Horizontal retort nitriding furnace: "Traditionally, pit furnaces have been used for nitriding as they can accommodate larger load sizes and can be easier to seal as gravity helps keep the lid sealed; however, horizontal designs have gained in popularity in recent years."

This process is most commonly performed in batch equipment; while it is possible to use a continuous furnace, keeping the ends of furnace sealed to contain the atmosphere can be challenging. Traditionally, pit furnaces have been used for nitriding as they can accommodate larger load sizes and can be easier to seal as gravity helps keep the lid sealed; however, horizontal designs have gained in popularity in recent years (Fig. 5). In either case, the furnaces are usually a single-chamber design with the load sealed inside an Inconel or stainless steel retort.

To achieve a nitriding atmosphere, ammonia (not nitrogen) is used to supply the atomic nitrogen necessary for diffusion. At the process temperatures used, ammonia does not readily dissociate on its own; rather, it dissociates when exposed to a heated steel surface (iron acting as a catalyst) into atomic nitrogen and hydrogen. To control the amount of nitrogen available for nitriding, the dissociation rate of the ammonia can be measured with high dissociation rates (high hydrogen content) providing a lower nitriding potential and low dissociation rates (low hydrogen content) leading to more nitriding potential. The depth of the compound layer can be varied through control of the nitriding potential, with higher nitriding potentials producing a thicker compound layer.

For more precise atmosphere control, an ammonia dissociator can be used to provide gas to the furnace that has already been split to dilute the atmosphere with hydrogen to more quickly achieve a high dissociation rate in the furnace. The ammonia dissociator is a heated box with a small retort inside; the ammonia is passed through this retort that contains a catalyst to promote the dissociation of the ammonia, and the resulting gas mixture is cooled and then injected into the furnace.

Ferritic Nitrocarburizing

In the author’s opinion, just like with carbonitriding, ferritic nitrocarburizing (FNC) is named incorrectly as it is more closely related to nitriding than it is with carburizing. FNC is a process that is still mostly nitrogen-based but with a slight carbon addition as well. The added carbon helps promote compound layer formation, particularly in plain carbon and low alloy steels that do not contain significant nitride-forming alloys. This process is typically performed in a range of 1025-1125°F with cycle times much shorter than nitriding, typically 1-4 hours. The compound layer produced is usually much deeper than nitriding at 0.0005-0.0012”, with case depths reaching up to 0.025”, although in many applications a case depth may be difficult to measure. FNC is usually performed instead of nitriding in applications where the deeper compound layer is needed to increase wear resistance, but the added strength of a deep case depth is not as critical.

FNC can be performed in the same equipment used for nitriding, as long as a hydrocarbon gas is available to the furnace such as carbon dioxide or endothermic gas. FNC can also be performed in an IQ furnace using a mixture of ammonia and endothermic gas; for cooling, the parts can be oil quenched or slow cooled in a top cool chamber (if equipped).

Considerations

Case hardening processes are some of the most common heat treatments performed, but each process has its own unique needs. The table below provides a summary of the considerations that need to be made when selecting the optimum process. This list is by no means exhaustive; it is encouraged to work with a furnace manufacturer familiar with each process to help select the correct process and equipment needed.

About the Author: Mike Harrison is the engineering manager of the Industrial Furnace Systems division at Gasbarre. Mike has a materials science and engineering degree from the University of Michigan and received his M.B.A. from Walsh College. Prior to joining Gasbarre, Mike had roles in metallurgy, quality, and management at both captive and commercial heat treat facilities, gaining nearly 20 years of experience in the thermal processing industry. Gasbarre provides thermal processing equipment solutions for both atmosphere and vacuum furnace applications, as well as associated auxiliary equipment and aftermarket parts & service.

For more information: Contact Mike at mharrison@gasbarre.com

Elevate Your Knowledge: 5 Need-to-Know Case Hardening Processes Read More »