Rob Simons

AM/3D Trivia

In today’s Technical Tuesday installment, we highlight the various techniques and developments in the world of metal AM as it pertains to post-process heat treating. Check out the trivia quiz below to test your knowledge of the AM/3D industry, the processes, and the technology.

This feature was first released in Heat Treat Today’s January 2025 Technologies To Watch in Heat Treating print edition.


Additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing, has a history marked by constant innovation for uses across the space, aerospace, medical, food, and manufacturing industries, to name a few. While AM is known to support, streamline, and customize part production, advanced materials paired with evolving AM techniques are creating new possibilities in materials engineering and industrial manufacturing. Due to the nature of this ever-developing technology, in-house heat treaters must continually learn about AM components and how thermal processing may enhance component properties.

Emanuel “Ely” Sachs
  1. What was the original name for additive manufacturing (AM), circa 1980s?
    A) 3D printing
    B) Rapid prototyping (RP)
    C) Additive manufacturing (AM)
    D) Rapid tooling (RT)
  2. What grade of stainless steel is most commonly used for AM to achieve varying levels of strength, hardness, and elongation when heat treated?
    A) 17-4 PH
    B) 316L
    C) 304
    D) 430
  3. Who is Emanuel “Ely” M. Sachs?
    A) An engineer at GE Aviation who combined multiple parts into one huge, complex design using a laser-based additive manufacturing method called direct metal laser melting
    B) An engineer at Stratasys Ltd., an American-Israeli manufacturer that began using a material extrusion based process with their FFF (fused filament fabrication) technology to print parts, patented in 1989
    C) A professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Worchester Polytechnic Institute who evaluated the post process heat treating of DMLS titanium alloy parts
    D) An MIT engineering professor who patented the process of metal binder jetting technique in 1993
  4. What do cast parts made from powder metallurgy methods and AM parts have in common?
    A) The same heat treatment cycles produce the best results
    B) Custom cycles are used in less than 2% of both applications
    C) Parts exhibit porosity
    D) None of the above
  5. What are the most commonly adjusted parameters to achieve higher yield strength when heat treating AM parts?
    A) Cooling and heating rate
    B) Temperature and time
    C) Time and pressure
    D) Temperature and pressure
  6. Why is HIP known as the “gold standard” for processing AM parts for space?
    A) Eliminates porous microstructures without compromising the part’s geometries and dimensions
    B) High level of control and uniformity
    C) Combines high temperature and pressure to improve a part’s mechanical properties
    D) All of the above
  7. What is NOT a potential benefit of additive manufacturing?
    A) Immediate cost savings
    B) Fast part production
    C) Rapid prototyping
    D) Opportunity for increased automation and use of robotics
  8. What are the two main categories for most 3D printing methods?
    A) Those that use liquid binding polymers, and those that don’t
    B) Binder jetting technology (a non-melt-based process) and melt-based processes
    C) Both A and B
    D) Neither A nor B
  9. Which alloy was originally developed for aerospace applications but became one of the most common biomedical alloys?
    A) Inconel 718
    B) Inconel 625
    C) Ti-6Al-4V
    D) Hastelloy C22
  10. What was the first rapid prototyping method to produce metal parts in a single process (and is one of the most widely used AM technologies to manufacture Ti-6Al-4V parts)?
    A) Powder-bed fusion (PBF)
    B) Directed energy deposition (DED)
    C) Sheet lamination (SL)
    D) Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)
  11. In what way does high temperature processing — specifically HIP below the annealing temperature (1470°F/799°C) — improve DMLS Ti-6Al-4V parts?
    A) Preserves surface roughness and enhances osteointegration
    B) Reduces porosity and enhances corrosion resistance
    C) Both A and B
    D) Neither A nor B
  12. What is the ideal way to process 3D printed parts made using liquid binder polymers?
    A) Print the parts in-house followed by debind and sinter.
    B) Have AM parts delivered in-house for heat treating when parts are at the “Green” stage
    C) Have AM parts delivered in-house for heat treating when parts are at the “Brown” stage
    D) None of the above

How Did You Do?

Click here for answers.

We would like to thank Dan Herring, Animesh Bose, Ryan Van Dyke, Rob Simons, and Phil Harris for contributing their expertise to this trivia feature.



AM/3D Trivia Read More »

FNA Week in Heat Treat Social Media

Welcome to a special edition of Heat Treat Today’s This Week in Heat Treat Social Media. We’ve discovered a furnace-full collection of posts that document the excitement of the past week at Furnaces North America (FNA). From the arrival of booth materials to the final speech at the MTI awards ceremony, they’re all here: check out these posts and videos for a roundup of FNA and heat treat social media.

As you know, there is so much content available on the web that it’s next to impossible to sift through all of the articles and posts that flood our inboxes and notifications on a daily basis. So, Heat Treat Today is here to bring you the latest in compelling, inspiring, and entertaining heat treat news from the different social media venues that you’ve just got to see and read! If you have content that everyone has to see, please send the link to editor@heattreattoday.com.


1. Lightening the Pre-Show Heavy Lifting

A good show is more than just what happens from curtain rise to curtain fall. Whether it’s a play on the stage or a trade show in a convention hall, there is a lot of work that goes into setting up and tearing down . . . sometimes back-breaking work. The advent of 3D printing has made that task a little easier, and ironically, at FNA 2024, that means models set out for display were processed with 3D printing to preserve the look of metal while making it easy for team to carry to the floor. Thanks to Sarah Jordan for bringing this post to the web.

2. Kudos and Awards from Beginning to End

We love it when social media is full of the faces of the heat treat industry, and this week is no exception. We found individual recognition posts, the celebration of Heat Treat Today’s 40 Under 40, and the Metal Treating Institute‘s honorees at the awards ceremony on the last night of the show.

Look these posts up on LinkedIn here: Dave Deiwert; JUMO Process Control; Paulo Heat Treating; Brazing and Metal Finishing; Solar Atmospheres, Inc.; and Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems.

3. Presenting . . .

Eyes and ears were open and trained on all that’s new in heat treating presented at FNA 2024, whether in technical sessions; impromptu, on-the-floor demonstrations; or new product reveals.

Look these posts up on LinkedIn here: Carlos Torres; Solar Atmospheres, Inc.; SAFECHEM; and Nitrex.

4. Sparkling Shoes and Aching Feet

‘Nuff said.

Look these posts up on LinkedIn here: Christina Tiell and Heather Falcone.

5. The Camera Turned on Us

What does Heat Treat Today do when at FNA? Here’s the link to the reel.

Look this post up on LinkedIn here.

Hope to see you next year at ASM Heat Treat Show and the year after at FNA 2026!


Find Heat Treating Products and Services When You Search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

FNA Week in Heat Treat Social Media Read More »

Part Failure Investigation & Resolution, a Case Study

A Chicago-area automotive part supplier encountered frequent cracking of variable valve timing plates that were sent to a third party for heat treatment. The problem resulted in the company spending lots of time and money on part testing as well as wasting lots of steel. After a thorough examination of the manufacture and heat treatment of the parts, Paulo metallurgists identified the cause of the cracking and recommended a custom solution to keep it from happening in the future. The following is a case study on the part failure investigation and resolution by Rob Simons.


Case study of a part failure investigation and resolution

Being an integral part of customers’ success means more than just regularly receiving parts and treating them according to spec.

Sometimes a customer approaches a heat treater in search of answers to a problem they can’t quite grasp.

In this case, a Chicago-area supplier of automotive components needed to know why parts it sent off for heat treating kept coming back cracked. They were spending too much time and resources on tests and throwing out too many failed parts.

Persistent cracks in variable timing plates

Our customer produces variable valve timing plates for domestic automobile models. Variable valve timing (VVT) plates are part of a system designed to optimize engine performance by changing the lift, duration, and timing of valve lift events.

Variable Valve Timing Plates (Photo credit: Underhood Service http://www.underhoodservice.com/variable-valve-timing/)

In this case, the life cycle of these parts began in a steel mill, where coils of AISI 1045 carbon steel were produced. The parts were then annealed in preparation for fine blanking at our customer’s facility. Then, the parts would be through hardened and sent to the automotive manufacturer.

But our customer noticed that many of the parts came back cracked. This was the source of two big problems:

  • The customer had to perform inspections on every part that was returned from the heat treater, which came at significant expense of time and resources.
  • To satisfy the terms of its contract with the automotive manufacturer, our customer had to make far more parts than it would have ordinarily needed to on the assumption that many of the parts would not be acceptable. It cost too much money, and too much steel was wasted.

The customer approached metallurgists at Paulo to figure out what was wrong and what could be done to make it right.

Forensic heat treatment analysis

Our first task was to figure out what the customer’s heat treater was doing to the parts.

Upon our inspection, we noticed the parts were quite brittle. A closer look at the microstructure of the parts’ surfaces revealed they had been carbonitrided.

Meanwhile, we consulted with personnel at the mill and steel processor where the steel originated. We learned that the coils of 1045 steel were annealed in a nitrogen environment. Annealing is an important process that spheroidizes carbides in the steel which aids in fine blanking. In the case of our customer, the VVT plates could not be formed to the specified tolerance if they weren’t first annealed.

But the nitrogen present in the anneal was a problem. 1045 steel includes aluminum as a grain refining element. When aluminum and nitrogen combine during annealing, aluminum nitrides form. Aluminum nitrides create a much finer grain on the part surface, which prevents the full hardening of the material. We suspected our customer’s heat treater attempted to overcome the defect by carbonitriding. But instead of hardening, the parts just got brittle. That’s because 1045 steel lacks the hardenability that would be required to overcome the fine grain size that resulted from the presence of aluminum nitrides.

To confirm our suspicion, we ordered the same material from the customer’s mill and then carbonitrided the parts as we believed the previous heat treater had. Our post-treatment analysis of the parts shows the successful recreation of the failure mode.

A custom-developed solution

We believed the most direct way to solve the problem was to eliminate the factors that caused it at the start. We again approached the mill, this time to see if they could anneal the steel in a different environment. They said they could not.

The next best thing would be to “spike” the 1045 steel with another alloying element that would add hardenability despite the fine grain sizes that result when nitrogen and aluminum interact during annealing. We pinpointed chromium as the ideal alloy, and after some trial and error, we identified a formula for the chromium spike that would result in fully-hardened parts without cracks after through hardening.

Today, the customer’s mill still produces the 1045 steel with our recommended chromium spike. And as of mid-2018, we’ve treated 25 million variable valve timing plates for this customer.

This case study illustrates the importance of a few key lessons suppliers should keep in mind. First, stay in touch with what’s going on further up the supply chain. You may be able to react to problems more quickly or stop them altogether.

Second, have a working knowledge of part materials and the chemistry at play during any manufacturing process. Armed with this knowledge, you can ask key questions as you vet potential heat treatment partners. It could end up saving you time and expense in the long run.

Finally, know where to get a second opinion, and have a backup heat treater ready in case your primary partner can’t do what you need them to do.


Rob Simons is a metallurgical engineer specializing in ferrous heat treatments with 35 years of experience in the industry. He earned a degree in metallurgical engineering from the University of Missouri – Rolla in 1982 and most recently was a featured presenter at the ASM Heat Treat 2017 conference. He has been at Paulo for over 30 years.

 

Submitted by Paulo

Part Failure Investigation & Resolution, a Case Study Read More »