Overcoming Quality Challenges for Automotive T6 Heat Treating

August 13, 2024 / ALUMINUM PROCESSING TECHNICAL CONTENT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, INSTRUMENTATION TECHNICAL CONTENT

Three elements in the T6 aluminum heat treatment process — high temperature solution heat treatment, drastic temperature change in the water quench, and a long age hardening process — challenge accurate temperature monitoring. Thru-process technology gives in-house heat treaters the power to control these variables to overcome the unknowns. In the following Technical Tuesday article, Dr. Steve Offley, “Dr. O”, product marketing manager at PhoenixTM, examines the path forward through the challenges of aluminum heat treating.

This informative piece was first released in Heat Treat Today’s August 2024 Automotive print edition.

Aluminum Processing Growth

In today’s automotive and general manufacturing markets, aluminum is increasingly becoming the material of choice, being lighter, safer, and more sustainable. Manufacturers looking to replace existing materials with aluminum are needing new methodology to prove that thermal processing of aluminum parts and products is done to specification, efficiently and economically.

To add strength to pure aluminum, alloys are developed by the addition of elements dissolved into solid solutions employing the T6 heat treatment process (Figure 1). The alloy atoms create obstacles to dislocate movement of aluminum atoms through the aluminum matrix. This gives more structural integrity and strength.

FIgure 1. Critical temperature phase transitions of the T6 aluminum heat treatment process
Source: PhoenixTM

Process temperature control and uniformity is critical to the success of T6 heat treat to maximize the solubility of hardening solutes such as copper, magnesium, silicon, and zinc without exceeding the eutectic melting temperature. With a temperature difference of typically 9–15°F, knowing the accurate temperature of the product is essential. Control of the later quench process (Figure 1, Phase 3) is also critical not only to facilitate the alloy element precipitation phase but also to prevent unwanted part distortion/warping and risk of quench cracking.

T6 Process Monitoring Challenges

The T6 solution reheat process comes with many technical challenges where temperature profiling is concerned. The need to monitor all three of the equally important phases — solution treatment, quench, and the age hardening process — makes the trailing thermocouple methodology impossible.

Figure 2. Thru-process temperature monitoring of the three T6 heat treatment phases
Source: PhoenixTM

Even when considering applying thru-process temperature profiling technology, sending the data logger through the process, protected in a thermal barrier (Figure 2), the T6 heat treat process comes with significant challenges. A system will not only need to protect against heat (up to 1020°F) over a long process duration but also withstand the rigors of being plunged into a water quench. Rapid temperature transitions create elevated risk of distortion and warping which need to be addressed to give a reliable and robust monitoring solution.

Certain monitoring systems can provide protection to the data logger at 1022°F for up to 20 hours (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Thru-process temperature profiling system installed in the product cage monitoring the T6 heat treatment (solution treatment, quench, and age hardening) of aluminum engine blocks

Thermal Protection Technology

To meet the challenges of the T6 heat treat process, the conventional thermal barrier design employing microporous insulation is replaced with a water tank design, with thermal protection using an evaporative phase change temperature control principle. Evaporative technology uses boiling water to keep the high temperature data logger (maximum operating temperature of 230°F) at a stable operating temperature of 212°F as the water changes phase from liquid to steam. The advantage of evaporative technology is that a physically smaller barrier is often possible. It is estimated that with a like for like size (volume) and weight, an evaporative barrier will provide in the region of twice the thermal protection of a standard thermal barrier with microporous insulation and heat sink. The level of thermal protection can be adjusted by changing the capacity of the water tank and the volume of water. Increasing the volume of water increases the duration at which the T6 temperature barrier will maintain the data logger temperature of 212°F before it is depleted by evaporation losses.

The TS06 thermal barrier design (Figure 4) incorporates a further level of protection with an outer layer of insulation blanket contained within a structural outer metal cage. The key role of this material is to act as an insulative layer around the water tank to reduce the risk of structural distortion from rapid temperature changes both positive and negative in the T6 process.

Figure 4. TS06 thermal barrier design showing water tank, housing the data logger at its core, installed within structural frame containing the insulation blanket surface layer; water tank shown with traditional compression fitting face plate seal
Source: PhoenixTM

Obviously, the evaporative loss rate of water is governed by the water tank geometry. A cube shaped tank will provide the best performance, but this may need to be adapted to meet process height restrictions. A TS06 thermal barrier with dimensions 8.5 x 18.6 x 25.2 inches (H x W x L) offering a water capacity of 3.5 US gallons provides 11 hours of protection at 1022°F. A larger TS06 with approximately twice the capacity 12.2 x 18.6 x 25.2 inches (H x W x L) and 7.7 US gallons gives approximately twice the protection (20 hours at 1022°F).

Innovative IP67 Sealing Design

Passing through the water quench, the data logger needs to be protected from water damage. This is achieved in the system design by combining a fully IP67 sealed data logger case and water tank front face plate through which the thermocouples exit. Traditionally in heat treatment applications, mineral insulated thermocouples are sealed using robust metal compression fittings. Although reliable, the compression seals are difficult to use, requiring long set-up times. The whole uncoiled straight cable length must be passed through the tight fitting which, for the 10 x 13 ft thermocouples, takes some patience. Thermocouples can be used and installed for multiple runs, if undamaged. Unfortunately, as the ferrule in the compression fitting bites into the MI cable, removal of the cable requires the thermocouple to be cut, preventing reuse.

To overcome the frustrations of compression fitting, an alternative innovative thermocouple sealing mechanism has been designed for use on the T6 thermal barrier (Figure 5).

Figure 5. TS06 thermal barrier IP67 bi-directional rubber gasket seal; installation of mineral-insulated (MI) thermocouples and RF antenna aerial

Thermocouples can be slotted easily and quickly, tool free, into a precision cut rubber gasket without any need to uncoil the thermocouple completely. The rubber gasket has a unique bi-directional seal, allowing both sealing of each thermocouple but also sealing of the clamp face plate to the data logger tray, which is then secured to the water tank with a further silicone gasket seal. The new seal design allows thermocouples to be uninstalled and reused, reducing operating costs significantly.

Accurate Process Data considerations

The T6 applications come with a series of monitoring challenges which need to be considered carefully to guarantee the quality of the data obtained. Although the complete process time of the three phases can reach up to 10 hours, it is necessary to use a rapid sample interval (seconds) to provide a sufficient resolution. The data logger is designed to facilitate this with a minimum sample interval of 0.2 seconds over 20 channels and memory size of 3.8 million data points, allowing complete monitoring of the entire process. A sample interval of 0.2 seconds provides sufficient data points on the rapid quench cooling curve. The high resolution allows full analysis and optimization of the quench rate to achieve required metallurgical transitions yet avoid distortion or quench cracking risks.

Employing the phased evaporation thermal barrier design, the high temperature data logger with maximum operating temperature of 230°F will operate safely at 212°F. During the profile run, the data logger internal temperature will increase from ambient temperature to 212°F. To allow the thermocouple to accurately record temperature, the data logger offers a sophisticated cold junction compensation method, correcting the thermocouple read out (hot junction) for anticipated internal data logger temperature changes.

Data logger and thermocouple calibration data covering the complete measurement range (not just a single designated temperature) can be used to create detailed correction factor files. Correction factors are calculated by interpolation between two known calibration points using the linear method as approved by CQI-9 and AMS2750G. This method ensures that all profile data is corrected to the highest possible accuracy.

Addressing Real-Time, Thru-Process Temperature Monitoring Challenges

For a process time as long as the T6, real-time monitoring capability is a significant benefit. The unique two-way RF telemetry system used on the PhoenixTM system helps address the technical challenges of the three separate stages of the process. The RF signal can be transmitted from the data logger through a series of routers linked back to the main coordinator connected to the monitoring PC. The wirelessly connected routers are located at convenient points in the process (solution treatment furnace, quench tank, aging furnace) to capture all live data without any inconvenience of routing communication cables.

A major challenge in the T6 process is the quench step from an RF telemetry perspective. An RF signal cannot escape from water in the quench tank. To overcome this limitation, a “catch up” feature is implemented. Once the system exits the quench and the RF signal is re-established, any previously missing data is retransmitted guaranteeing full process coverage.

Process Quality Assurance and Validation

In the automotive industry, many operations will be working to the CQI-9 special process heat treat system assessment accreditation. As defined by the pyrometry standard, operators need to validate the accuracy and uniformity of the furnace work zone by employing a temperature uniformity survey (TUS).

The thru-process monitoring principle allows for an efficient method by which the TUS can be performed employing a TUS frame to position a defined number of thermocouples over the specific working zone of the furnace (product basket). As defined in the standard with particular reference to application assessment process Table C (aluminum heat treating), the uniformity for both the solution heat treatment and aging furnace needs to be proven to satisfy ±10°F of the threshold temperature during the soak time.

Complementing the TUS system, the Thermal View Survey software provides a means by which the full survey can be set up automatically allowing routine full analysis and reporting to the CQI-9 specification as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6. View of TUS for T6 aluminum processing in Phase 1 Solution Re-heat
Source: PhoenixTM

Interestingly, a significant further benefit of the thru-process principle is that by collecting process data for the whole process, many of the additional requirements of the process Table C can be achieved with reference to the quench. From the profile trace, key criteria such as quench media temperature, quench delay time, and quench cooling curve can be measured and reported with full traceability during the production run.

Summary

To fully understand, control, and optimize the T6 heat treat process, it is essential the entire process is monitored. Thru-process monitoring solutions, designed specifically, allow not only product temperature profiling of all the solution heat treatment, water quench, and age hardening phases, but also comprehensive temperature uniformity surveying to comply with CQI-9.

About the Author:

Dr Steve Offley (“Dr O”), Product Marketing Manager, PhoenixTM

Dr. Steve Offley, “Dr. O,” has been the product marketing manager at PhoenixTM for the last five years after a career of over 25 years in temperature monitoring focusing on the heat treatment, paint, and general manufacturing industries. A key aspect of his role is the product management of the innovative PhoenixTM range of thru-process temperature and optical profiling and TUS monitoring system solutions.

For more information: Contact Steve at Steve.Offley@phoenixtm.com.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Overcoming Quality Challenges for Automotive T6 Heat Treating Read More »

All About the Quench and Keeping Cool: Thru-process Temp Monitoring and Gas Carburizing

May 7, 2024 / ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT TECHNICAL CONTENT, CARBURIZING, CARBURIZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, CONTROLS, CONTROLS TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, QUENCHING TECHNICAL CONTENT

The future of heat treating requires new manufacturing solutions like robotics that can work with modular design. Yet so also does temperature monitoring need to be seamless to know how effectively your components are being heat treated — especially through being quenched. In this Technical Tuesday, learn more about temperature monitoring through the quench process.

Gas Carburization

Carburizing has rapidly become one of the most critical heat treatment processes employed in the manufacture of automotive components. Also referred to as case hardening, it provides necessary surface resistance to wear, while maintaining toughness and core strength essential for hardworking automotive parts.

Figure 1. Typical carburizing heat treat temperature profile showing the critical temperature/time steps: (i) carburization, (ii) quench, and (iii) temper. (Source: PhoenixTM)

The carburizing process is achieved by heat treating the product in a carbon rich environment (Figure 1), typically at a temperature of 1562°F–1922°F (850°C–1050°C). The temperature and process time significantly influence the depth of carbon diffusion and other related surface characteristics. Critical to the process is a rapid quenching of the product following the diffusion in which the temperature is rapidly decreased to generate the microstructure, giving the enhanced surface hardness while maintaining a soft and tough product core.

The outer surface becomes hard via the transformation from austenite to martensite while the core remains soft and tough as a ferritic and/or pearlitic microstructure. Normally, carburized microstructures following quench are further tempered at temperatures of about 356°F (180°C) to transform some of the brittle martensite into tempered martensite to enhance ductility and grindability.

Critical Process Temperature Control

As discussed, the success of carburization is dependent on accurate, repeatable control of the product temperature and time at that temperature through the complete heat treatment process. Important to the whole operation is the quench, in which the rate of cooling (product temperature change) is critical to achieve the desired changes in microstructure, creating the surface hardness. It is interesting that the success of the whole heat treat process can rest on a process step which is so short (minutes), in terms of the complete heat teat process (hours). Getting the quench correct is not only essential to achieve the desired metal microstructure, but also to ensure that the physical dimensions and shape of the product are maintained (no distortion/warping) and issues such as quench cracking are eliminated.

Obviously, as the quench is so critical to the whole heat treat process, the correct quench selection needs to be made to achieve the optimum properties with acceptable levels of dimensional change. Many different quenchants can be applied with differing quenching performances. The rate of heat transfer (quench rate) of quench media in general follows this order from slowest to quickest: air, salt, polymer, oil, caustic, and water.

Technology Challenges for Temperature Monitoring

When considering carburization from an industry standpoint, furnace heat treat technology generally falls into one of two camps, embracing either air quench (low pressure carburization) or oil quench (sealed gas carburization/LPC with integral or vacuum oil quench). Although each achieves the same end goal, the heat treat mechanisms and technologies employed are very different, as are the temperature monitoring challenges.

To achieve the desired carburized product, it is necessary to control and hence monitor the product temperature through the three phases of the heat treat process. Conventionally, product temperature monitoring would be attempted using the traditional trailing thermocouple method. For many modern heat treat processes including carburization, the trailing thermocouple method is difficult and often practically impossible.¹ The movement of the product or product basket from stage to stage, often from one independent sealed chamber to another (lateral or vertical movement), makes the monitoring of the complete process a significant challenge.

With the industry driving toward fully automated manufacturing, furnace manufacturers are now offering the complete package with full robotic product loading that includes shuttle transfer systems and modular heat treat phases to process both complete product baskets and single piece operations. Although trailing thermocouples may allow individual stages in the process to be measured, they cannot provide monitoring of the complete heat treat journey. Testing is therefore not under true normal production conditions, and therefore is not an accurate record of what happens in normal day to day operation.

Figure 2 shows schematic diagrams of two typical carburizing furnace configurations that would not be possible to monitor using trailing thermocouples. The first shows a modular batch furnace system where the product basket is transferred between each static heat treat operation (preheat, carburizing furnace, cooling station, quench, quench wash, temper furnace) via a charge transfer cart. The second shows the same heat treat operation but performed in a continuous indexed pusher furnace configuration where the product basket moves sequentially through each heat treat operation in a semi-continuous flow.

Figure 2.1. Modular batch furnace system (Source: PhoenixTM)

Figure 2.2. Continuous pusher furnace schematic (Source: PhoenixTM)

Thru-process temperature monitoring as a technique overcomes such technical restrictions. The data logger is protected by a specially designed thermal barrier, therefore, can travel with the product through each stage of the process measuring the product/process temperature with short, localized thermocouples that will not hinder travel. The careful design and construction of the monitoring system is important to address the specific challenges that different heat treat technology brings including modular batch and continuous pusher furnace designs (Figure 2).²

The following section will focus specifically on monitoring challenges of the sealed gas carburizing process with integral oil quench. Technical challenges of the alternative low pressure carburizing technology with high pressure gas quench have previously been discussed in an earlier publication.³

Monitoring Challenges of Sealed Gas Carburization — Oil Quench

Figure 3. “Thru-process” temperature monitoring system for use in a sealed carburizing furnace with integral oil quench — (3.1) Monitoring system entering furnace with thermocouple fixed to automotive gears, product test pieces (3.2) System exiting oil quench tank (3.3) System inserted into wash tank with product basket (Source: PhoenixTM)

Presently, the most common traditional method of gas carburizing for automotive steels is often referred to as sealed gas carburizing. In this method, the parts are surrounded by an endothermic gas atmosphere. Carbon is generated by the Boudouard reaction during the carburization process, typically at 1562°F–1832°F (850°C –1000°C). Despite the dramatic appearance of a sealed gas carburizing furnace, with its characteristic belching flames (Figure 3), from a monitoring perspective, the most challenging aspect of the process is not the heating, but the oil quench cooling. For such furnace technology, the historic limitation of “thru-process” temperature profiling has been the need to bypass the oil quench and wash stations, missing a critical process step from the monitoring operation. Obviously, passing a conventional hot barrier through an oil quench creates potential risk of both system damage from oil ingress and barrier distortion, as well as general process safety. However, the need to bypass the quench in certain furnace configurations by removing the hot system from the confined furnace space could create significant operational challenges, from an access and safety perspective.

Monitoring of the quench is important as ageing of the oil results in decomposition (thermal cracking), oxidation, and contamination (e.g. water) of the oil, all of which degrade the viscosity, heat transfer characteristics, and quench efficiency. Control of physical oil temperature and agitation rates is also key to oil quench performance. Quench monitoring allows economic oil replacement schedules to be set, without risk to process performance and product quality.

Figure 4. “Thru-process” temperature monitoring system oil quench compatible thermal barrier design: (1) Robust outer structural frame keeping insulation and inner barrier secure; (2) Internal thermal barrier — completely sealed with integral microporous insulation protecting data logger; (3) Mineral insulated thermocouples sealed in internal thermal barrier with oil tight compression fitting; (4) Multi-channel high temperature data logger; and (5) Sacrificial insulation blocks replaced after each run. (Source: PhoenixTM)

To address the process challenges, a unique thermal barrier design has been developed that both protects the data logger in the furnace (typically three hours at 1697°F/925°C) and also protects during transfer through the oil quench (typically 15 mins) and final wash station (Figure 3). The key to the barrier design is the encasement of a sealed inner barrier with its own thermal protection with blocks of high-grade sacrificial insulation contained in a robust outer structural frame (Figure 4).

Quench Cooling Phases

Monitoring the oil quench in carburization gives the operator a unique insight into the product’s specific cooling characteristics, which can be critical to allow optimal product loading and process understanding and optimization. From a scientific perspective, the quench temperature profile trace, although only a couple of minutes in duration, is complex and unique. From a zoomed in quench trace (Figure 5) taken from a complete carburizing profile run, the three unique heat transfer phases making up the oil quench cool curve can be clearly identified:

Figure 5. Oil quench temperature profile for different locations on an automotive gear test piece shows the three distinct heat transfer phases: (1) film boiling “vapor blanket”, (2) nucleate boiling, and (3) convective heat transfer. (Source: PhoenixTM)

Film boiling “vapor Blanket”: The oil quenchant creates a layer of vapor (Leidenfrost phenomenon) covering the metal surface. Cooling in this stage is a function of conduction through the vapor envelope. Slow cool rate since the vapor blanket acts as an insulator.
Nucleate boiling: As the part cools, the vapor blanket collapses and nucleate boiling results. Heat transfer is fastest during this phase, typically two orders of magnitude higher than in film boiling.
Convective heat transfer: When the part temperature drops below the oil boiling point. the cooling rate slows significantly. The cooling rate is exponentially dependent on the oil’s viscosity.

From a heat treat perspective, the quench step relative to the whole process (hours) is quick (seconds), but it is probably the most critical to the performance of the metallurgical phase transitions and achieving the desired core microstructure of the product without risk of distortion. By being able to monitor the quench step, the process can be validated for different products with differing size, form, and thermal mass. As shown in Figure 6, the quench curve profile over the three heat transfer phases is very different for two different automotive gear sizes.

Figure 6. Oil quench temperature profile for different automotive gear sizes (20MnCr5 case hardening steel) with different thermal masses: Passenger Car Gear (2.2 lbs) and Commercial Vehicle Gear (17.6 lbs) (Source: PhoenixTM)

Summary

As discussed in this article, one of the key process performance factors associated with gas carburization is the control and monitoring of the product quench step. Employing an oil quench, the measurement of such operation is now very feasible as part of heat treat monitoring. Innovations in thru-process temperature profiling technology offer specific system designs to meet the respective application challenges.

References

[1] Dr. Steve Offley, “The light at the end of the tunnel – Monitoring Mesh Belt Furnaces,” Heat Treat Today, February 2022, https://www.heattreattoday.com/processes/brazing/brazing-technical-content/the-light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel-monitoring-mesh-belt-furnaces/.

[2] Michael Mouilleseaux, “Heat Treat Radio #102: Lunch & Learn, Batch IQ Vs. Continuous Pusher, Part 1,” interviewed by Doug Glenn, Heat Treat Radio, October 26, 2023, audio, https://www.heattreattoday.com/media-category/heat-treat-radio/heat-treat-radio-102-102-lunch-learn-batch-iq-vs-continuous-pusher-part-1/.

[3] Dr. Steve Offley, “Discover the DNA of Automotive Heat Treat: Thru-process Temperature Monitoring,” Heat Treat Today, August 2023, https://www.heattreattoday.com/discover-the-dna-of-automotive-heat-treat-thru-process-temperature-monitoring/.

About the Author

For more information: Contact Steve at Steve.Offley@phoenixtm.com.

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

All About the Quench and Keeping Cool: Thru-process Temp Monitoring and Gas Carburizing Read More »

Staying Safe on the Floor: 8 Safety Tips for Heat Treaters

April 5, 2022 / FEATURED NEWS, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT

We've assembled some of the top 101 Heat Treat Tips that heat treating professionals submitted over the years into today’s original content. Read on for 8 tips that will keep you and your team safe!

By the way, Heat Treat Today introduced Heat Treat Resources last year; this is a feature you can use when you're at the plant or on the road. Check out the digital edition of the September 2021 Tradeshow magazine to check it out yourself!

4 Reasons Not to Overlook Combustion System Maintenance

Anyone who has operated a direct fired furnace, especially one that relies on pressure balance ratio regulators for ratio control, knows that regular tuning is needed to keep the process running with the proper air to fuel ratio.

Here are 4 reasons not to skip regular combustion system tuning:

It can cost you money: Operating with more air than needed will reduce your furnaces efficiency and require you to burn more fuel. Conversely, operating air deficient, unless necessary for the process, results in unburned fuel being released with the exhaust gasses. In most cases the unburned fuel going up your stack is energy that you paid for.
It can decrease product quality and yield: For many ferrous metals too much excess air will result in excess scale formation at high processing temperatures. On the contrary other materials such as titanium need to be processed with excess air to prevent Hydrogen pickup.
It can reduce your furnace’s reliability: The burners on your direct fired furnace will have a defined range of acceptable air to fuel ratios for proper operation. If your system wanders outside of this range, which can be fairly tight with today’s ultra-low NOx burners, you could start to see flame failures that result in unplanned shutdowns.
It can be a safety hazard: Apart from the possibility of causing burner instability, running with too little air will increase CO emissions. Unless your furnace is designed to safety exhaust CO you could end up exposing personnel working near your furnace to this deadly gas.

(Bloom Engineering)

Alarm Your Eye Fountains & Deluge Showers

For emergency eye fountains and deluge showers, I recommend that each plumbed unit be equipped with an audio and visual alarm on a spring-loaded bypass. The purpose of the alarm is to alert others of the emergency. It is important that employees promptly respond to assist the employee who has been sprayed, splashed, or otherwise contacted by the dangerous substances. The bypass allows employees to easily test the units without setting off the alarm. If there is no bypass, employees might be reluctant to conduct the test, feeling it takes too much effort to alert all relevant persons that there is a test. As a result, an inadequacy of the flushing system could go undetected. With the bypass on a spring-loaded system, the person who conducts the test cannot fail to reset the alarm; it is reset automatically.

(Rick Kaletsky)

Gauge Those Gauges

It is quite common, in my experience during inspections, to find gauges that are missing bezels or have severely broken bezels. This can be a hazard if the stylus or general mechanism is damaged. I have found stuck styluses. A false reading may be given. Such a reading may result (for example) in an employee boosting air pressure, or the level of liquid in a tank or a temperature, far beyond the safe limit. I have also noted gauges where the stylus had been broken-off, and an employee merely made an assumption of what the proper “numbers” were. When conducting preventive maintenance tasks, check those gauges and replace missing or damaged bezels.

(Rick Kaletsky)

Check Your Quench Oil

Safety – Performance – Oxidation

Safety

Water content should not exceed a maximum of 0.1% in the quench oil.
Flash point should be checked to ensure no extraneous contamination of a low flash point material (i.e. kerosene) has been introduced into the quench tank.

Performance

Cooling curve analysis or GM Quenchometer Speed should be checked to confirm the quench oil is maintaining its heat extraction capabilities. Variances in heat extraction capabilities could possibly lead to insufficient metallurgical properties.

Oxidation

TAN (total acid number) and Precipitation Number should be checked to ensure the quench oil is thermally and oxidatively stable. Oxidation of the quench oil can lead to staining of parts and possible changes in the heat extraction capabilities.
Sludge content should be checked . . . filter, filter, filter . . . sludge at the bottom of the quench tank can act a precursors for premature oxidation of the quench oil.

Work with your quench oil supplier on a proactive maintenance program . . . keep it cool . . . keep it clean . . . keep it free of contamination to extend the life of your quench oil.

(Quaker Houghton)

Compliance Issues? Try On-Site Gas Generation

On-site gas generation may help resolve compliance issues. Growth and success in thermal processing may have resulted in you expanding your inventory of reducing atmosphere gases. If you are storing hydrogen or ammonia for Dissociated Ammonia (DA), both of which are classed by the EPA as Highly Hazardous Materials, expanding gas inventory can create compliance issues. It is now possible to create reducing gas atmospheres on a make-it-as-you-use-it basis, minimizing site inventory of hazardous materials and facilitating growth while ensuring HazMat compliance. Modern hydrogen generators can serve small and large flow rates, can load follow, and can make unlimited hydrogen volumes with virtually zero stored HazMat inventory. Hydrogen is the key reducing constituent in both blended hydrogen-nitrogen and DA atmospheres—hydrogen generation (and optionally, nitrogen generation) can be used to provide exactly the atmosphere required but with zero hazardous material storage and at a predictable, economical cost.

(Nel Hydrogen)

Use Fall Protection Systems to Reduce Construction-Related Falls

Most equipment used for thermal processing stands well over 10 feet tall and has the capacity to hold or process over 60 tons of molten metal. During refractory installation, repair and maintenance of this large equipment, refractory professionals often find themselves raised atop platforms, scaffolding, decking and work stations. Due to the fact that refractory employees regularly work at elevated heights, it is crucial to keep them safe from fall-related injuries, as well as to ensure the job site is free of safety violations. To accomplish this goal, it is essential to understand the hazards of falls and know the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rules.

According to OSHA, in 2017, almost 42% of all construction worker related deaths were attributed to falls. Thousands more were injured. Fall Protection infractions (OSHA 29 CFR 1926.501) also topped OSHA’s 2018 list of the Top 10 Safety Violations for the eighth consecutive year.

Incidents involving falls frequently involve a variety of factors, however, a common thread running through most is the absence of fall protection equipment. Even if you’re Nik Wallenda, the high wire aerialist of the famed Flying Wallendas family, OSHA requires protection when working on refractories at heights of six feet above a lower level:

Handrails, Guardrails and Toe-boards: serve as barriers between the employee and an open edge. Midrails or screens need to be installed between the top of the guardrail and the walking or working surface to prevent falls.

Personal Fall Arrest Systems: provide employees with an individual form of fall protection. For example, a body harness connected to a lanyard or retractable line secured to a fixed anchor. These types of systems are designed to go into action before contact with any lower level.

Personal Fall Restraint Systems: prevent employees from reaching the edge where a fall hazard is likely to occur. It tethers a worker in a manner that will not allow a fall of any distance. This system is comprised of a body belt or body harness, an anchorage, connectors, and other necessary equipment.

As a second line of defense or where fall prevention systems are not practical, for instance roof work, a warning line system consisting of ropes, wires, or chains is an approved solution if it is at least 6 feet from open edges around all sides of the work area. Fixed barriers can also be installed to prevent employee access to dangerous areas.

To address any hazardous areas that may have floor openings, color-coded covers should be used and marked with the word “Hole”. Covers should be secured tight to prevent workers from falling through floors or elevated areas.

OSHA clearly states employer requirements. OSHA mandates employers train workers on how to use personal fall protection equipment and how to work in hazardous situations. Employers must also assess the workplace to determine if walking or working surfaces have the necessary strength and structural integrity to safely support workers.

Before any work begins, conduct a hazard assessment to develop a comprehensive fall protection plan, to manage hazards and focus employee attention on prevention. Falls cause deaths and numerous serious injuries each year, many of which are preventable. Maintain the highest safety standards on your job site by installing or using fall protection systems – not all of us can be as sure footed as Nik Wallenda.

(Plibrico Company, LLC)

Container Clarity Counts!

Assure that container label wording (specifically for identifying chemical contents) matches the corresponding safety data sheets (SDS). Obvious? I have seen situations where the label wording was legible and accurate and there was a matching safety data sheet for the contents, but there was still a problem. The SDS could not be readily located, as it was filed under a chemical synonym, or it was filed under a chemical name, whereas the container displayed a brand name. A few companies label each container with (for instance) a bold number that is set within a large, colored dot. The number refers to the exact corresponding SDS.

(Rick Kaletsky)

A Products Eye View in the CAB Furnace Using Optical Profiling

Ever wished you could see what truly happens to your product as it travels through your conveyorized CAB furnace? Well now you can! Thru-process Optical profiling is similar to temperature profiling but instead of measuring the temperature of the product the system records a high-resolution video of the products journey through the furnace. It’s like running your car “Dash Cam” but through the furnace at over 1000°F. The resulting video “Optical Furnace Profile” shows process engineers so much more about how their process is operating without any need to stop, cool and dismantle the furnace. This allows safe routine furnace inspection without any of the problems of costly lost production and days of furnace down time. From the video evidence, the root cause of process problems, possibly already highlighted by running the temperature profile system, can be identified accurately and efficiently. Furnace structural damage or faulty furniture such as recirculating fans, control thermocouples or heater elements can be detected. Buildup of unwanted flux within the furnace can be monitored allowing accurate service and clean down schedules to be planned preventing future unplanned costly line stoppages. Damage or distortion of the conveyor belt compromising the safe smooth transfer of product through the furnace can be isolated with accuracy helping reduce corrective action turnaround times.

(PhoenixTM)

.

Search for heat treat services and products on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Staying Safe on the Floor: 8 Safety Tips for Heat Treaters Read More »

“The light at the end of the tunnel” — Monitoring Mesh Belt Furnaces

March 8, 2022 / ATMOSPHERE AIR FURNACES TECHNICAL CONTENT, BRAZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT

According to "Dr. O" – Dr. Steve Offley, product marketing manager at PhoenixTM – temperature control of the heat treatment application is critical to the metallurgical and physical characteristics of the final product, and hence its ability to perform its intended function. Explore today's Technical Tuesday article to find the light at the end of your mesh belt furnace tunnel.

This article first appeared in Heat Treat Today’s February 2022 Air & Atmosphere Furnace Systems print edition.

Introduction – The Need for Accurate Product Temperature Measurement

Even though modern furnaces are supplied with sophisticated control systems, they are still not always capable of truly giving an accurate picture of the actual product temperature as it passes through the process. Temperature sensors positioned along the furnace give a snapshot of what the environmental temperature is possibly zone by zone. Furnace controllers, as the name suggests, can give confidence that the process heating is performed in a controlled manner but will never give an accurate view of what the actual product temperature is. When monitoring, it is important to be able to distinguish between process and product.

The challenge to any process engineer is understanding how the product heating cycle relates to the operation of the furnace. A furnace environment may be well controlled, but very different product temperatures can be experienced with variation in key properties such as product material, size, shape, thermal mass, and position/orientation in the furnace. Infrared (IR) pyrometers and thermal imagers can provide surface temperature measurements only and require line of sight, so they limit the areas of the product that can be measured. Setup can sometimes be complex considering surface characteristics (emissivity) and process background/atmosphere compensation. As with air sensors, being fixed, typically IR sensors only give information at that specific furnace location which prevents accurate calculation of soak times at critical temperatures. Without additional information, soak times and temperatures may need to be extended well beyond the target to guarantee the heat treat process is completed with confidence with an obvious compromise to throughput and energy conservation.

Product Temperature Profiling

To fully understand the operational characteristics of the heat treat process it is necessary to measure both the environment and product temperature continuously as it travels through the process. Such technique provides what is referred to as a “temperature profile” which is basically a thermal fingerprint for that product in that furnace process. This thermal fingerprint will be unique but will allow understanding, control, optimization, and validation of the heat treat process.

Table 1. Table showing the numerous benefits of thru-process temperature monitoring over traditional trailing thermocouples methodology for a mesh belt furnace

Historically, trailing thermocouples have been the go-to technique for product temperature monitoring. A very long thermocouple is attached to the product in the furnace. The data logger measuring the live temperature reading is kept external to the furnace. Although possible for static batch processes, the technique has significant limitations in a continuous/semicontinuous process, especially mesh belt furnaces (See Table 1).

Fig 1. Robust multichannel data logger designed specifically for thru-process temperature profiling

In thru-process temperature profiling the data logger travels with the product through the furnace. The data logger (Figure 1) is protected by an enclosure, referred to as a thermal barrier, which keeps the logger at a safe operating temperature (Figure 2). Temperature readings recorded by the data logger from multiple short length thermocouples can be retrieved post run. Alternatively, if feasible, the data can be read in real time as the system passes through the furnace using a two-way radio frequency (RF) telemetry communication option. The resulting temperature profile graph (Figure 3) provides a comprehensive picture — product thermal fingerprint — of the thermal process.

Fig 2. Thermal barrier protecting the data logger safely entering the conveyor furnace during the temperature profile run. Barrier size is customized to suit process credentials.

Fig 3. Typical temperature profile recorded for an aluminum CAB brazing line giving a complete temperature history for a brazed radiator at different product locations.(1)

Monitoring Your Heat Treat Process Temperature at the Product Level

Applying thru-process temperature monitoring product temperature measurement can focus on the micro product level which at the end of the day is most important. Static control thermocouples give an environmental temperature of the furnace in a zone, but this only reflects the true temperature wherever the thermocouple is located. This may be some distance from the product and may give some bias to its position if located on one side of the furnace. The thru-process monitoring system allows simultaneous product and/or air temperature measurement directly at the mesh belt. Monitoring can be performed across the belt with thermocouple placement on and in the core of the product and can be made to identify areas of different thermal mass resulting in differing heating characteristics.

A useful strategy to use before looking at the product temperature is to thermally map the furnace. Thermocouples, connected to the data logger protected within the thermal barrier, are positioned across the mesh belt using a mount jig such as that shown in Figure 4. The jig guarantees reliable location of the measurement sensor run to run and adjustment means it can be adapted to different belt widths. Applying this principle, the thermal uniformity of air across the belt width through the entire furnace can be measured.

Fig 4. Thermocouple mount jig allowing accurate positioning of thermocouples (1) across the mesh belt width with adjustment to suit different belt dimensions (2).

Such data can be compared with zone control thermocouples to see what temperature differential the product may be experiencing at the belt level. Temperature imbalances across the belt and hot or cold spots along the process journey can be identified.

Furnace mapping can be further developed to satisfy either CQI-9/CQI-29 or AMS2750F pyrometry standards where a two-dimensional jig is constructed to perform the temperature uniformity survey (TUS).²Employing the plane method, a frame jig is constructed to match the furnace work zone with the necessary number of thermocouples to satisfy the furnace cross section dimensions. Temperatures recorded over the working zone are compared to the desired TUS levels to ensure that they are within tolerance as defined in the standards.

Discover the True Root Cause of Your Furnace Problems

When it comes to product quality and process efficiency in any mesh belt furnace applications, temperature monitoring is only part of the story. Gaining an insight into what is physically happening in the product’s furnace journey can help you understand current issues or predict issues in the future, which can be corrected or prevented. To allow true root cause analysis of temperature related issues, it is sometimes necessary to “go to Gemba” and inspect what the product is experiencing, directly in the furnace. This is not always possible under true production conditions.

For a classic mesh belt furnace application such as controlled aluminum brazing (CAB), internal inspection of the furnace is not a quick and easy task. Operating at 1000°F, the cool down period is significant to allow engineers safe access for inspection and corrective action and then further delay to get the furnace back up to a stable operating temperature. Such maintenance action may mean one or two days lost production, from that line, which is obviously detrimental to productivity, meeting production schedules, satisfying key customers, and the bottom line.

In addition to process temperature problems there are many other production issues that can be faced relating to the furnace operation and safe reliable transfer of the product through the furnace. In the CAB process a day-to-day hazard is the build-up of flux debris. Flux materials used to remove oxides from the metal surface and allow successful brazing can accumulate within the internal void of the furnace. These materials are most problematic at the back end of the muffle section of the furnace where, due to the drop in temperature entering the cooling zone, materials condense out. Flux buildup can create many different process issues including:

Physical damage to the conveyor belt or support structure requiring expensive replacement
Reduction in belt lubricity creating jerky movement and causing unwanted product vibration
Lifting of the mesh belt creating an uneven transfer of products causing possible excessive product movement, clumping, or clashing
Reduction in inner furnace clearance creating possible product impingement issues and blockages

To prevent such problems, regular scheduled inspection and clean out of the furnace is necessary. This is not a pleasant, quick operation, and requires chipping away flux debris with pneumatic tools. Often requiring a furnace down time of 1 to 2 days, this task is only performed when essential. Leaving the clean-up operation too long can be catastrophic, causing dramatic deterioration in product quality or risk of mid-production run stoppages.

Figure 5. PhoenixTM Optical profiling ‘Optic’ System - Optical Profile View. System adaptable for both temperature and optical profiling.

Figure 5.1. High temperature thermal barrier for aluminum brazing system protecting camera and torches through CAB furnace

Figure 5.2 Video image in inner CAB furnace showing condition of inner furnace, mesh belt and product transfer

Figure 5.3. Identification of flux debris at back end of muffle furnace prompting scheduling of clean down operation

Optical Profiling – The Efficient Alternative

Optical profiling is a new complementary technique to that of thru-process temperature profiling. The innovative technology allows for the first-time process engineers to view the inner workings of the furnace under normal production conditions. Traveling through the furnace with the products being processed, the optic system gives a product’s eye view of the entire heat treatment journey. A thermal barrier, similar in design to that used in temperature profiling, protects a compact video camera and torch that are used to record a video of what a product would see traveling through the furnace (Figure 5). The principle is just like your car’s dash cam, the only difference being that your journey is being performed in a furnace at up to 1000°F. The resulting video, “Optical Furnace Profile,” shows process engineers so much about how their process is operating without any need to stop, cool, and dismantle the furnace. This allows safe routine furnace inspection without any of the problems of costly lost production and days of furnace down time.

Summary

Monitoring your mesh belt furnace from a temperature and optical perspective allows you to fully understand what truly happens in that black box. Understanding leads to better control, which helps you get the optimal performance out of your heat treat process from a quality, productivity, and energy efficiency perspective.

Don’t get left in the dark. Consider the power of temperature and optical profiling which will literally provide a light at the end of your furnace tunnel!

References:

[1] Steve Offley, “Unveiling the Mystery of Your Al Brazing Furnace with ‘Thru-Process’ Temperature Profiling," Heat Treat Today Magazine, June 2020, p40.

[2] Steve Offley, “Applying ‘Thru-process’ Temperature Surveying To Meet the TUS Challenge of CQI-9.” HeatTreatToday.com. June, 2019. https://www.heattreattoday.com/heat-treat-news/automotive-heattreat-news/applying-thru-processtemperature-surveying-to-meet-thetus-challenges-of-cqi-9/

About the Author:

Dr. Steve Offley, “Dr. O,” has been the product marketing manager at PhoenixTM for the last 4 years after a career of over 25 years in temperature monitoring focusing on the heat treatment, paint, and general manufacturing industries. A key aspect of his role is the product management of the innovative PhoenixTM range of ‘thruprocess’ temperature and optical profiling and TUS monitoring system solutions.

For more information, contact Dr. O at Steve.Offley@phoenixTM.com.

“The light at the end of the tunnel” — Monitoring Mesh Belt Furnaces Read More »

Three Hot Tips You Don’t Want to Miss

October 22, 2020 / CONTROLS TECHNICAL CONTENT, MANUFACTURING HEAT TREAT

One of the great benefits of a community of heat treaters is the opportunity to challenge old habits and look at new ways of doing things. Heat Treat Today’s 101 Heat Treat Tips is another opportunity to learn the tips, tricks, and hacks shared by some of the industry’s foremost experts.

For Heat Treat Today’s latest round of 101 Heat Treat Tips, click here for the digital edition of the 2020 Heat Treat Today fall issue (also featuring the popular 40 Under 40).

Today’s selection includes tips from Nutec Bickley on how to meet temperature uniformity requirements, and PhoenixTM on how to use “dash cam” tech in your furnace and address the technical challenges in thru-process temperature monitoring.

Heat Treat Tip #6

A Products Eye View in the CAB Furnace Using Optical Profiling

(PhoenixTM)

Heat Treat Tip #7

3 Tips to Meet Temperature Uniformity Surveys

Adjust the burners with some excess air to improve convection.
Make sure that the low fire adjustment is as small as possible. Since low fire will provide very little energy, it will make the furnace pulse more frequently and this will improve heat transfer by convection and radiation.
Increase internal pressure. This will “push” heat to dead zones allowing you to increase your coldest thermocouples (typically near the floor and in the corners of the furnace).

(Nutec Bickley)

Heat Treat Tip #12

Temperature Monitoring When the Pressure is On!

PhoenixTM Thermal Barrier used for Low Pressure Carburizing furnace monitoring. Shown fitted with a unique
high-performance gas quench deflector.

Increasing in popularity in the carburizing market is the use of batch or semi-continuous batch low pressure carburizing furnaces. Following the diffusion, the product is transferred to a high-pressure gas quench chamber where the product is rapidly gas cooled using typically N2 or Helium at up to 20 bar pressure.

In such processes, the technical challenge for thru-process temperature monitoring is twofold. The thermal barrier must be capable of protecting against not only heat during the carburizing but very rapid pressure and temperature changes inflicted by the gas quench. From a data collection perspective to efficiently perform temperature uniformity surveys at different temperature levels in the furnace it is important that temperature readings can be reviewed live from the process but without need for trailing thermocouples.

During the gas quench, the barrier needs to be protected from Nitrogen N2(g) or Helium He(g) gas pressures up to 20 bar. Such pressures on the flat top of the barrier would create excessive stress to the metal work and internal insulation / logger. To protect the barrier therefore a separate gas quench deflector is used. The tapered top plate deflects the gas away from the barrier. The unique Phoenix design means the plate is supported on either four or six support legs. As it is not in contact with the barrier no force is applied directly to the barrier and the force is shared between the support legs. The quench shield in addition to protecting against pressure, also acts as an additional reflective IR shield reducing the rate if IR absorption by the barrier in the vacuum heating chamber.

(PhoenixTM)

Three Hot Tips You Don’t Want to Miss Read More »

Unveiling the Mystery of Your Al Brazing Furnace with ‘Thru-Process’ Temperature Profiling

July 28, 2020 / AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT, BRAZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS

Dr. Steve Offley, Product Market Manager, PhoenixTM

Knowing the precise temperature from within your continuous heat treat process is now possible. In this Heat Treat Today Technical Tuesday article, Steve Offley, “Dr. O,” Product Marketing Manager at PhoenixTM identifies how this innovative temperature profiling system can help you with your continuous aluminum brazing or other processes.

This article appeared in the edition June 2020 edition of Heat Treat Today’s Automotive Heat Treating magazine.

In the automotive industry, aluminium brazing is key to many of the manufacturing processes used to produce radiators, condensers, evaporators, etc. The quality of the brazing process is important to the performance and product life for its intended function. A critical requirement of the brazing process is the optimization and control of the product temperatures during the complete brazing process. A valuable tool to achieve such requirements is the use of ‘Thru-process’ temperature profiling as a direct alternative to the traditional trailing thermocouples as discussed in the following article. Obtaining the product temperature profile through the brazing furnace gives you a picture of the product/process DNA.

The Basic Brazing Principle and its Temperature Dependence

Aluminium brazing employs the principle of joining aluminium metal parts by means of a thinly clad soldering ‘filler’ alloy, whose melting point is lower than the base/parent metal.

As part of the brazing process, control of the product temperature is critical to achieve selective melting of the filler alloy 1076°F-1148°F (580°C -620°C) to allow it to flow and fill the joints between the parent metal substrate without risk of melting the substrate itself. Often the difference between the melting points of the two materials is small, so accurate temperature monitoring through the entire furnace is critical to the success of the brazing process.

[spacer color="3366ff" icon="fa-lightbulb-o"]

PhoenixTM works with major automotive radiator manufacturer customizing a brazing barrier solution to meet their specific application needs.

PhoenixTM was approached by a major automotive radiator manufacturer in the USA. The manufacturer had a specific need for a reliable CAB brazing monitoring system that would withstand heavy use, approximately 45 runs per week. The two companies collaborated to design a unique barrier solution which was adopted for standard profiling use.

“The new barrier is great; the operators love them. All those design iterations paid off.”

It is estimated that barriers supplied back in 2014, which have seen routine use over five years and are still operational, have accumulated in excess of 2,500 successful profile runs without damage or any wear problems. Over the same period, many conventionally designed barriers have been scrapped due to HF acid damage of cloth and microporous insulation. The customer for this reason has now standardized the TS08 design for all their CAB profiling activity.

[spacer color="3366FF" icon="Select a Icon"]

Critical Challenges of the Brazing Process

The system enters the continuous aluminum brazing furnace with product being monitored.

Prior to any brazing process, it is important that the substrate surface is prepared correctly to allow the brazing process to work correctly. Surface preparation before brazing may involve thermal degreasing where the substrate temperature is elevated to drive off lubricants. A second more important procedure is the removal of any surface oxide layer to allow wetting, and therefore flow of the brazing filler alloy over the parent substrate. Unfortunately, aluminium is easily oxidized and the resulting aluminium oxide (Al₂O₃) prevents such wetting processes. Therefore, prior to brazing, the oxide layer needs to be eliminated. In most cases, cleaning of the substrate layer is achieved by the application of a corrosive flux, which in a molten state, dissolves the oxide layer.

A data logger with 10 thermocouple channels.

The type of flux used must be matched to the application substrate and filler alloy composition. A common brazing process used today is that of the Nocolok Process® in which the flux is potassium fluoroaluminate K _1-3 AlF_4-6,a white powder deposit.

For the reasons discussed above, elimination of oxygen - and especially water - from the brazing process is a critical requirement, so the furnace is generally run under a nitrogen atmosphere (Controlled Atmosphere Brazing ‘CAB’ Oxygen < 100 ppm, Humidity < -40°F /-40°C). The design and construction of monitoring systems needs to be carefully considered, as discussed later, to ensure that the furnace atmosphere is not contaminated (by oxygen and water), in any way.

Design Principles and Challenges of a "thru-process" Brazing Furnace Monitoring System

The ‘thru-process’ profiling system concept is based on the principle of sending a data logger through the brazing furnace which is protected from the heat and harsh brazing environment by a thermal barrier. Multiple thermocouples connected to the product test piece (radiator), which are connected directly to the data logger, measure the product temperature (and furnace) as it travels through the furnace storing the information in the data logger memory. The resulting temperature profile can be reviewed, analyzed, and a validation report generated. As the system is compact and travels with the product, there is no need to use the cumbersome and potentially hazardous challenge of feeding (and retrieving) long thermocouples through the furnace, as required in the use of traditional trailing thermocouples.

Innovative Thermal Barrier Design

The thermal barrier has the job of providing thermal protection to the data logger. Although this is the case for aluminium brazing, the barrier also needs to be designed in such a way as to avoid damage to itself from potentially hostile corrosive chemicals generated in the furnace, and prevent contamination of the CAB atmosphere from barrier outgassing materials.

Traditionally, thermal barriers are manufactured employing micro-porous block insulation wrapped in high-temperature glass cloth. During use, moisture trapped in the insulation block is released within the barrier cavity where it can form hydrofluoric (HF) acid in combination with chemicals in the brazing flux. Over only a short period of time, the highly corrosive HF acid can cause significant damage to both the barrier cloth and insulation. This compromises the integrity of the barrier, reduces its thermal performance, and potentially creates a dust contamination risk to the process.

Air trapped in the micro-porous insulation block and within the barrier cavity during heating can expand and escape from the barrier into the furnace. Obviously, being made up of 21% Oxygen (O₂ (g)), the air will contaminate the CAB environment, and potentially create a risk of aluminium oxide formation resulting in wetting/brazing problems.

To eliminate the damage to barriers, extend operational life expectancy, and minimize outgassing of air (O₂(g)) or moisture, PhoenixTM developed a unique new TS08 specifically for the demands of CAB brazing.

As shown in figure 1, the logger draw loading mechanism significantly reduces the amount of insulation cloth that is exposed to the aggressive flux. Prior to supply, the insulation block is preheated in a high vacuum and back flushed with nitrogen (N₂(g)) to drive out any air trapped in the porous insulation structure. For processes where any air outgassing is a significant contamination risk, it is possible, with specific barrier configurations, for customers to purge the small barrier cavity of any remaining air with a supply of low-pressure Nitrogen (N₂(g)).

Figure 1: The brazing barrier is designed to give low height thermal protection to the data logger. Designed with front loading logger tray and metal construction to limit exposure of insulation and cloth materials to corrosive HF. Available with nitrogen purge facility option to remove any risk of O2 (g) outgassing into the furnace.

PhoenixTM Datalogger with 6, 10 or 20 Channels
Front loading logger tray with encapsulated thermal insulation protecting from HF
Thermal breaks reduce heat conduction to logger
Heat sinks provide additional thermal protection employing phase change technology
Mineral Insulated Thermocouple inserted into radiator fins
Rear barrier optional Nitrogen feed nozzle for pre-run purging of insulation and barrier cavity of air (0₂(g))

Unveiling the Mystery of your Brazing Furnace with a ‘thru-process’ Temperature Profile Trace

The key temperature transitions/phase of the brazing process are clearly shown on a typical temperature profile as in figure 2.

Figure 2. Thru-process temperature profile of a typical CAB brazing furnace showing critical temperature transitions.

Thermal profile graph displayed in the Thermal View Plus software package.

The brazing system is supplied with Thermal View Plus software, which is designed to provide full analysis and reporting tools for monitoring the brazing process against the monitoring requirements detailed in Table 1.

Below in Table 1 is a summary of the target temperature transitions in the CAB brazing process, the impact on process, and possibly, the quality of the brazed final product.

The PhoenixTM brazing system is supplied with Thermal View Plus software, which is designed to provide full analysis and reporting tools for monitoring the brazing process against the monitoring requirements detailed in Table 1.

Table 1. Critical monitoring requirements for the CAB brazing process.

Overview

The PhoenixTM ‘Thru-process’ brazing system provides a rugged, reliable, and clean solution for performing product temperature profiling of Automotive CAB brazing furnaces. Providing the means to Understand, Control, Optimize and Certify the brazing heat treat process.

About the author: Steve Offley, “Dr. O,” the product marketing manager at Phoenix TM, is an experienced global marketing manager with a demonstrated history of working in the industrial temperature monitoring industry over the last 25 years.

For more information, contact Steve at Steve.Offley@phoenixtm.com.

Unveiling the Mystery of Your Al Brazing Furnace with ‘Thru-Process’ Temperature Profiling Read More »

Applying “Thru-Process” Temperature Surveying To Meet the TUS Challenges of CQI-9

June 11, 2019 / AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT NEWS, FEATURED NEWS, THERMOCOUPLES TECHNICAL CONTENT

CQI-9 Heat Treat System Assessment

A critical part of the CQI-9 HTSA (AIAG) standard is the requirement to perform temperature uniformity surveys (TUSs). The TUS is performed to validate the temperature uniformity characteristics of the qualified work zones and operating temperature ranges of furnaces or ovens used. (See Figure 1.)

Fig 1: Schematic showing TUS principle. Thermocouple measurement from the field test instrument, of the furnace’s actual operational temperature, against a setpoint to check that it is within tolerance. Setpoints and tolerances are defined in CQI-9 Process Tables A-H to match each heat treat process.

The “Thru-Process” TUS Principle

Traditionally, TUSs are performed by using a field test instrument (chart recorder or static data logger) external to the furnace with thermocouples trailing into the furnace heating chamber. This technique has many limitations, especially when the product transfer is continuous such as in a pusher or conveyor-type furnace. The trailing thermocouple method is often labor-intensive, potentially unsafe, and can create compromises to the TUS data being collected (e.g., number of measurement points possible, thermocouple damage, and physical snagging of the thermocouple in the furnace).

Fig 2: PhoenixTM thermal barrier being loaded into a batch furnace with a survey frame as part of the TUS process.

The “Thru-Process” TUS principle overcomes the problems of trailing thermocouples as the multi-channel data logger (field test instrument) travels into and through the heat treat process protected by a thermal barrier (Figure 2). The short thermocouples are fixed to the TUS frame. Temperature data is then transmitted live to a monitoring PC running TUS analysis software, via a 2-way RF telemetry link.

Data Logger Options

To comply with CQI-9, field test equipment needs to be calibrated every 12 months minimum, against a primary or secondary standard. The data logger accuracy needs to be a minimum +/-0.6 °C (+/-1.0 °F) or +/-0.1% (TABLE 3.2.1).

Fig 3: PhoenixTM PTM1220 20 Channel IP67 data logger comes calibrated to UKAS ISO/IEC17025 as an option with an onboard calibration data file allowing direct data logger correction factors to be applied automatically to TUS data.

The data logger shown in Figure 3 has been designed specifically to meet the CQI-9 TUS requirements offering a +/- (0.5°F (0.3°C) accuracy (K & N). Models ranging from 6 to 20 channels can be provided with a variety of noble and base metal thermocouple options (types K, N, R, S, B) to suit measurement temperature and accuracy demands (AMS2750E and CQI-9).

Mixed thermocouple inputs can be provided to support the process specific requirements and also allow the use of the data logger to perform system accuracy testing (SAT) to complement the TUS.

Innovative Thermal Barrier Design

Fig 4: “Octagonal” thermal barrier fitted to product/survey tray.

CQI-9 covers a wide range of thermal heat treatment processes and as such the thermal protection for the data logger will vary significantly. A comprehensive range of thermal barrier solutions can be provided to meet specific process temperature requirements and space limitations. Figure 4 shows a unique octagonal thermal barrier designed to fit within the boundaries of the product tray/survey frame used to perform a TUS using the “plane method” (See “Thermocouple Measurement Positions (TUS)” below in this article.). The design ensures maximum thermal performance within the confines of a restricted product tray/basket.

Live Radio TUS Communication

Fig 5: Schematic of LwMesh 2-way RF Telemetry communication link from data logger TUS measurement back to an external computer.

The data logger is available with a unique 2-way wireless RF system option allowing live monitoring of temperatures as the system travels through the furnace. Analysis of process data at each TUS level can be done live allowing full efficient control of the TUS process. Furthermore, if necessary, by using the RF system, it is possible to communicate with the logger installed in the barrier to reset/download at any point pre-, during, and post-TUS. In many processes, there will be locations where it is physically impossible to transmit a strong RF signal. With conventional systems, this results in process data gaps. For the system shown in Figure 2, this is prevented using a unique fully automatic “catch up” feature.

Any data that is missed will be sent when the RF signal is re-established, guaranteeing 100% data transfer.

Thermocouple Options (TUS)

In accordance with the CQI-9 standard (Tables 3.1.3 / 3.1.5), thermocouples supplied with the data logger, whether expendable or nonexpendable, meet the specification requirements of accuracy +/-2.0°F (+/-1.1°C) or 0.4%. Calibration certificates can be offered to allow the creation of thermocouple correction factor files to be generated and automatically applied to the TUS data within the PhoenixTM Thermal View Survey Software. Care must be taken by the operator to ensure that usage of thermocouples complies with the recommended TUS life expectancies and repeat calibration frequencies. Before first use, thermocouples must be calibrated with a working temperature range interval not greater than 250°F (150°C). Replacement or recalibration of noble metal (B, R or S) thermocouples is required every 2 years. For non-expendable base metal (K, N, J, E), thermocouples replacement should be after 180 uses <1796°F (980°C) or 90 uses >1796°F (980°C). For expendable base metal (K, N, J, E), thermocouples replacement should be after 15 uses <1796°F (980°C) or 1 use >1796°F (980°C). Note that base metal thermocouples should not be recalibrated.

Thermocouple Measurement Positions (TUS)

To perform the TUS survey, a TUS frame needs to be constructed to locate the thermocouples over the standard work zone to match the form of the furnace. The TUS may be performed in either an empty furnace in which case thermocouples should be securely fixed as shown in Figure 6. A heat sink (thermal mass fixed to thermocouple tip) can be used to create a thermal load to match the normal product heating characteristics. Alternatively, the thermocouples should be buried in the load/filled product basket. See Figure 6 to see schematics of TUS Frames for a box and cylindrical batch furnace with CQI-9-quoted number of thermocouples required to match void volume (Volumetric Method Table 3.4.1).

Fig 6: TUS Thermocouple Test Rigs. Required number of thermocouples: 1) Work Volume < 0.1 m³ (3 ft³) = 5; 2) Work Volume 0.1 to 8.5 m³ (3 to 300 ft³) = 9; 3) Work Volume > 8.5 m³ one thermocouple for every 3 m³ (105 ft³). (Click on the images for larger display.)

Fig. 7.1, 7.2. PhoenixTM system showing 9 Point TUS survey rig and Thermal View Software TUS frame library file showing as part of TUS report exactly where thermocouples are positioned. (Click on the images for larger display.)

For continuous conveyorized furnaces, it is recommended that an alternative thermocouple test rig is employed called the “plane method”. Since the system travels through the furnace it is only necessary to monitor the temperature uniformity over a 2-dimensional plane/slice of the furnace (Figure 8). The required number and location of thermocouples are shown in Table 1 (CQI-9 Table 3.4.2).

(Click on the images for larger display.)

Table 1: Required thermocouples and locations for differing work zones (Plane Method)

(1) 2 Thermocouples within 50 mm work zone corners 1 Thermocouple center. (2) 4 Thermocouples within 50 mm work zone corners. Rest symmetrically distributed.

“Thru-Process” Temperature Uniformity Survey (TUS) Data Analysis and Reporting

Operating the PhoenixTM System with RF Telemetry, TUS data is transferred from the furnace directly back to the monitoring PC where, at each survey level, temperature stabilization and temperature overshoot can be monitored live, with thermocouple and logger correction factors applied. The Thermal View Survey software generates TUS reports which comply with the requirements of AMS2750E/CQI-9 standards.

As defined in CQI-9 (Section 3.4) for furnace with an operating temperature range ≤ 305°F (170°C), one setpoint temperature (TUS level) within the operating temperature range is required. If the operating temperature of the qualified work zone is greater than 305°F (170°C), then the minimum and maximum temperatures of the operating temperatures range shall be tested.

The TUS levels can be automatically set up in the TUS analysis software. Figure 9 shows both the TUS level file and TUS levels applied against the TUS survey trace.

Fig 9.1, 9.2 PhoenixTM Thermal View Survey Software showing TUS Level set-up and application to TUS trace.

Within CQI-9, there is a very prescriptive list of what should be contained in the TUS report (Section 3.4.9).

To comply with all said requirements, the software package provides a comprehensive reporting package as shown below.

Fig 10.1, 10.2, 10.3. TUS Report showing a TUS profile at three set survey temperatures (graphical and numerical data). The probe map shows exactly where each thermocouple is located and easy trace identification. A detailed TUS report is generated, meeting full CQI-9 reporting requirements. (Click on the images for larger display.)

Overview

The PhoenixTM Thru-Process TUS System provides a versatile solution for performing product temperature profiling and furnace surveying in industrial heat treatment meeting all TUS requirements of CQI-9 within the automotive manufacturing industry, providing the means to understand, control, optimize and certify the heat treat process.

Applying “Thru-Process” Temperature Surveying To Meet the TUS Challenges of CQI-9 Read More »

A Baker’s Dozen Quick Heat Treat News Items to Keep You Current

March 15, 2019 / FEATURED NEWS, HEAT TREAT NEWS INDUSTRIES

A Baker’s Dozen Quick Heat Treat News Items to Keep You Current

Heat Treat Today offers News Chatter, a feature highlighting representative moves, transactions, and kudos from around the industry.

Personnel and Company Chatter

Kestrel Company, an investment corporation founded by Shelby Ray, has purchased the remaining assets of Eagle Steel Products from Shirley Ohta, who founded Eagle in 1982. The new ownership, led by Ray, expects to maintain its woman- and minority-owned business status. Eagle operates a steel and metal products warehousing and distribution facility in Louisville, Kentucky.Kestrel Company will be doing business as Eagle Steel & Metal Products.
Jerram Dawes has recently joined Phoenix Temperature Measurement (PhoenixTM) as Sales Manager, bringing 20 years experience of working for a well-known temperature profiling equipment supplier.
Kimberly A. Fields recently joined Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) as Executive Vice President with full P&L responsibility for the Flat-Rolled Products Group, succeeding Robert S. Wetherbee, who held this role until becoming ATI’s President and CEO. Ms. Fields brings 20 years of global experience with a focus on growth and operational excellence.
After almost 9 months away from the company, Ed Valykeo has recently returned to Pelican Wire as the company’s thermocouple specialist. With almost four decades of experience in the wire manufacturing space, Ed is recognized as an industry expert within the thermocouple wire manufacturing world. In his career, Ed has been an active member of ASTM for over twenty-five years and spent almost two decades in various technical positions at Hoskins Manufacturing, an industry pioneer.
American Posts LLC has acquired Ohio-Kentucky Steel, which provides slitting of steel and aluminum. American Posts, LLC was established in March 2005 and is the last manufacturer of steel u-posts in the United States.
Brelie Gear Co, Inc. has announced plans to build a new 36,800 sq. ft. facility on a recently purchased 4.3-acre site in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Brelie will be moving from their current plant in Milwaukee to the new, larger plant. The new larger space will continue to run as a full-service gear manufacturing facility that houses the latest in equipment technology and automation.
Sage Metals Private Ltd., a portfolio company of Delos Capital and a manufacturer of specialty metal products, has acquired Jayco Manufacturing. Based in Grand Prairie, Texas, Jayco is involved in the assembly, integration, and production of precision custom metal-formed components for a variety of industrial and consumer end markets.

Kestrel Company purchased the assets of Eagle Steel Products. The company is now Eagle Steel & Metal Products.

Jerram Dawes has recently joined Phoenix Temperature Measurement (PhoenixTM) as Sales Manager.

Kimberly A. Fields recently joined Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) as Executive Vice President.

Ed Valykeo has recently returned to Pelican Wire as the company’s thermocouple specialist.

Brelie Gear Co, Inc. has announced plans to build a new 36,800 sq. ft. facility in Waukesha, Wisconsin.

Sage Metals Private Ltd. has acquired Jayco Manufacturing.

Equipment Chatter

A 2-zone indirect gas-fired heavy duty walk-in furnace was recently shipped to a global manufacturer in the composite industry. Wisconsin Oven Corporation announced that this project passed the stringent temperature uniformity requirements to meet BAC 5621 Class 1 Furnaces and Instrumentation Type D specifications.
A vacuum purge semi-continuous Active Only® CAB furnace was recently commissioned by SECO/WARWICK for a North American automotive aftermarket manufacturer.
Nucor Steel Marion, Inc., based in Marion, Ohio, granted SMS group the Final Acceptance Certificate (FAC) of the supplied walking beam furnace shortly after successful commissioning. The NOx content of this furnace is close to 25 parts per million. The furnace is designed according to innovative pre-fabrication methods and features proprietary SMS ZEROFlame burners.
Five Blue M Standard mechanical convection ovens were recently shipped to a global manufacturer of automotive parts by Thermal Product Solutions.

A 2-zone indirect gas-fired heavy duty walk-in oven shipped to a global manufacturer in the composite industry.

A vacuum purge semi-continuous Active Only® CAB furnace was delivered to a North American automotive aftermarket manufacturer.

Final Acceptance Certificate (FAC) was issued for a walking beam furnace shortly after successful commissioning.

Five Blue M Standard Mechanical Convection Ovens were recently shipped to a global manufacturer of automotive parts.

Kudos Chatter

The Powder Coating Institute (PCI) recently introduced the third video in the Powder Coating, A Better Kind of Paint consumer video series. Powder Coating: A Stronger Kind of Paint rounds out the “Stronger, Greener, Better” portion of the series. PCI also introduced a PCI Certification Program promotional video, which features three PCI certified companies sharing the benefits of certification and their experience with the process.
The HPC4Manufacturing (HPC4Mfg) Program recently awarded nearly $3.8 million for thirteen projects designed to stimulate the use of high-performance supercomputing in U.S. manufacturing. These projects will address key challenges in U.S. manufacturing proposed in partnership with companies and improve energy efficiency across the manufacturing industry through applied research and development of energy technologies. Each of the thirteen newly selected projects will receive up to $300,000 to support work performed by the national lab partners and allow the partners to use HPC compute cycles. Awardees include: (1) Arconic Inc. will partner with ORNL to model rolling processes to observe the evolution of porosity in a project titled “Computational Modeling of Industrial Rolling Processes Incorporating Microstructure Evolution to Minimize Rework Energy Losses”. (2) United Technologies Research Center (UTRC) will partner with ORNL to understand microstructure evolution during heat treatment of additively manufactured parts in a project titled “Predictive Tools for Customizing Heat Treatment of Additively Manufactured Aerospace Components”. (3) Steel Manufacturing Simulation and Visualization Consortium (SMSVC) and ArcelorMittal USA will partner with ANL to improve the efficiency of the reheat furnace process in steel manufacturing in a project titled “Application of High-Performance Computing (HPC) to Optimize Reheat Furnace Efficiency in Steel Manufacturing”.

Heat Treat Today is pleased to join in the announcements of growth and achievement throughout the industry by highlighting them here on our News Chatter page. Please send any information you feel may be of interest to manufacturers with in-house heat treat departments especially in the aerospace, automotive, medical, and energy sectors to the editor at editor@heattreattoday.com.

A Baker’s Dozen Quick Heat Treat News Items to Keep You Current Read More »

Temperature Monitoring and Surveying Solutions for Carburizing Auto Components: Thermal Barrier Design

March 12, 2019 / AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT NEWS, CARBURIZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS, INSULATION TECHNICAL CONTENT

This is the third in a 4-part series by Dr. Steve Offley (“Dr. O”) on the technical challenges of monitoring low-pressure carburizing (LPC) furnaces. The previous articles explained the LPC process and explored general monitoring needs and challenges (part 1) and the use of data loggers in thru-process temperature monitoring (part 2). In this segment, Dr. O discusses the thermal barrier with a detailed overview of the thermal barrier design for both LPC with gas or oil quench. You can find Part 1 here and Part 2 here.

Low-Pressure Carburizing (LPC) with High-Pressure Gas Quench – the Design Challenge

A range of thermal barriers is available to cover the different carburizing process specifications. As shown in Figure 1 the performance needs to be matched to temperature, pressure and obviously space limitations in the LPC chamber.

Fig 1: Thermal Barrier Designed Specifically for LPC with Gas Quench.

(i) TS02-130 low height barrier designed for space limiting LPC furnaces with low-performance gas quenches (<1 bar). Only 130 mm/5.1-inch high so ideal for small parts. Available with Quench Deflector kit. (0.9 hours at 1740°F/950°C).

(ii) Open barrier showing PTM1220 logger installed within phase change heatsink.

(iii) TS02-350 High-Performance LPC barrier fitted with quench deflector capable of withstanding 20 bar N2 quench. (350 mm/13.8-inch WOQD 4.5 hours at 1740°F /950°C).

(iv) Quench Deflect Kit showing that lid supported on its own support legs so pressure not applied to barrier lid.

The barrier design is made to allow robust operation run after run, where conditions are demanding in terms of material warpage.

Some of the key design features are listed below.

I. Barrier – Reinforced 310 SS strengthened and reinforced at critical points to minimize distortion (>1000°C / 1832°F HT or ultra HT microporous insulation to reduce shrinkage issues)

II. Close-pitched Cu-plated rivets (less carbon pick up) reducing barrier wall warpage

III. High-temperature heavy duty robust and distortion resistant catches. No thread seizure issue.

IV. Barrier lid expansion plate reduces distortion from rapid temperature changes.

V. Phase change heat sink providing additional thermal protection in barrier cavity.

VI. Dual probe exits for 20 probes with replaceable wear strips. (low-cost maintenance)

LPC or Continuous Carburizing with Oil Quench – the Design Challenge

Although commonly used in carburizing, oil quenches have historically been impossible to monitor. In most situations, monitoring equipment has been necessarily removed from the process between carburizing and quenching steps to prevent equipment damage and potential process safety issues. As the quench is a critical part of the complete carburizing process, many companies have longed for a means by which they can monitor and control their quench hardening process. Such information is critical to avoid part distortion and allow full optimization of hardening operation.

When designing a quench system (thermal barrier) the following important considerations need to be taken into account.

Data logger must be safe working temperature and dry (oil-free) throughout the process.
The internal pressure of the sealed system needs to be minimized.
The complexity of the operation and any distortion needs to be minimized.
Cost per trial has to be realistic to make it a viable proposition.

To address the challenges of the oil quench, PhoenixTM developed a radical new barrier design concept summarized in Figure 2 below. This design has successfully been applied to many different oil quench processes providing protection through the complete carburizing furnace, oil quench and part wash cycles.

Fig 2: Oil Quench Barrier Design Concept Schematic

(i) Sacrificial replaceable insulation block replaced each run.

(ii) Robust outer structural frame keeping insulation and inner barrier secure.

(iii) Internal completely sealed thermal barrier.

(iv) Thermocouples exit through water/oil tight compression fittings.

In the next and final installment in this series, Dr. O will address AMS2750E and CQI-9 Temperature Uniformity Surveys, which often prove to be challenging for many heat treaters. "To achieve this accreditation, Furnace Temperature Uniformity Surveys (TUS) must be performed at regular intervals to prove that the furnace set-point temperatures are both accurate and stable over the working volume of the furnace. Historically the furnace survey has been performed with great difficulty trailing thermocouples into the heat zone. Although possible in a batch process when considering a semi-batch or continuous process this is a significant technical challenge with considerable compromises." Stay tuned for the next article in the series of Temperature Monitoring and Surveying Solutions for Carburizing Auto Components.

Temperature Monitoring and Surveying Solutions for Carburizing Auto Components: Thermal Barrier Design Read More »

Temperature Monitoring and Surveying Solutions for Carburizing Auto Components: The Data Logger

February 12, 2019 / AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT, AUTOMOTIVE HEAT TREAT NEWS, CARBURIZING TECHNICAL CONTENT, FEATURED NEWS

This is the second in a 4-part series by Dr. Steve Offley (“Dr. O”), Product Marketing Manager at PhoenixTM, on the technical challenges of monitoring low-pressure carburizing (LPC) furnaces. The previous article explained the LPC process and explored general monitoring needs and challenges. In this segment, Dr. O talks about the data logger and its monitoring capabilities.

The Range of the PhoenixTM Data Logger

Figure 1: PhoenixTM PTM1220 20-Channel IP67 Datalogger

A data logger, an electronic device that records data over time or in relation to locatio, can be useful in a variety of configurations and modified to suit the specific demands of the process being monitored. A range of models are on the market. At PhoenixTM they include 6 to 20 channels with a variety of thermocouple options (types K, N, R, S, B) to suit measurement temperature and accuracy demands (AMS2750 & CQI-9). Provided with Bluetooth wireless connection for short-range localized download and reset (direct from within the barrier) the logger memory of 3.8M allows even the longest processes to be measured with the highest resolution to deliver the detail you need. An optional unique 2-way telemetry package offers live real-time logger control and process monitoring with the benefits detailed in a later section.

Live Radio Communication

Figure 3: Schematic of RF telemetry real-time monitoring network

The logger is available with a unique 2-way RF system option allowing live monitoring of temperatures as the system travels through the carburizing processes. Furthermore, if necessary using the RF system it is possible to communicate with the logger, installed in the barrier, to reset/download at any point pre, during and post-run.

Provided with a high performance “Lwmesh” networking protocol the RF signal can be transmitted through a series of routers linked back to the main coordinator connected to the monitoring PC. The routers are located at convenient points in the process, positioned to maximize signal reception. Being wirelessly connected they eliminate the inconvenience of routing communication cables or providing external power as needed on other commercial RF systems.

In many processes, there will be locations where it is physically impossible to transmit a strong RF signal. In carburizing obviously within the oil quench, the RF signal is not capable of escaping when the system is submerged. With conventional systems, this results in process data gaps. For the PhoenixTM system, this is prevented using a unique fully automatic ‘catch up’ feature. Any data that is missed will be sent when the RF signal is re-established post-quench guaranteeing in most applications 100% thru-process data review.

Thru-Process Data Analysis and Temperature Uniformity Surveys (TUS)

Figure 3: Thermal view SW displaying the temperature profile from a carburizing with gas quench process

In thru-process temperature monitoring, the data logger collects raw process data directly from the product or furnace as it follows the standard production flow. To understand the data to allow process control and optimization, a Thermal View software analysis is used.

Using a range of analysis tools, the engineer can interpret the raw data. Key analysis calculations can be performed such as:

Max / Min — Check maximum and minimum product temperature over whole product or product basket through phases of process carburizing, diffusion and quench.
Time @Temp — Confirm that the soak time above required carburizing temperature is sufficient for correct carbon diffusion and surface properties.
Temperature Slopes —Measure the quench rate of the product to ensure that the hardening process is performed correctly.

Next up in the series: Designing an Innovative Thermal Barrier — The carburizing process by its nature is very demanding when considering protection of the datalogger from high temperatures and rapid temperature and pressure changes experienced in either the gas or oil quench.

Temperature Monitoring and Surveying Solutions for Carburizing Auto Components: The Data Logger Read More »

PhoenixTM

Aluminum Processing Growth

T6 Process Monitoring Challenges

Thermal Protection Technology

Innovative IP67 Sealing Design

Accurate Process Data considerations

Addressing Real-Time, Thru-Process Temperature Monitoring Challenges

Process Quality Assurance and Validation

Summary

About the Author:

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

Gas Carburization

Critical Process Temperature Control

Technology Challenges for Temperature Monitoring

Monitoring Challenges of Sealed Gas Carburization — Oil Quench

Quench Cooling Phases

Summary

References

About the Author

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com

4 Reasons Not to Overlook Combustion System Maintenance

Alarm Your Eye Fountains & Deluge Showers

Gauge Those Gauges

Check Your Quench Oil

Compliance Issues? Try On-Site Gas Generation

Use Fall Protection Systems to Reduce Construction-Related Falls

Container Clarity Counts!

A Products Eye View in the CAB Furnace Using Optical Profiling

Search for heat treat services and products on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com

Introduction – The Need for Accurate Product Temperature Measurement

Product Temperature Profiling

Monitoring Your Heat Treat Process Temperature at the Product Level

Discover the True Root Cause of Your Furnace Problems

Optical Profiling – The Efficient Alternative

Summary

Heat Treat Tip #6

A Products Eye View in the CAB Furnace Using Optical Profiling

Heat Treat Tip #7

3 Tips to Meet Temperature Uniformity Surveys

Heat Treat Tip #12

Temperature Monitoring When the Pressure is On!

The Basic Brazing Principle and its Temperature Dependence

Critical Challenges of the Brazing Process

Design Principles and Challenges of a "thru-process" Brazing Furnace Monitoring System

Innovative Thermal Barrier Design

Unveiling the Mystery of your Brazing Furnace with a ‘thru-process’ Temperature Profile Trace

Overview

Sponsored content

CQI-9 Heat Treat System Assessment

The “Thru-Process” TUS Principle

Data Logger Options

Innovative Thermal Barrier Design

Live Radio TUS Communication

Thermocouple Options (TUS)

Thermocouple Measurement Positions (TUS)

Table 1: Required thermocouples and locations for differing work zones (Plane Method)

“Thru-Process” Temperature Uniformity Survey (TUS) Data Analysis and Reporting

Overview

A Baker’s Dozen Quick Heat Treat News Items to Keep You Current

Personnel and Company Chatter

Equipment Chatter

Kudos Chatter

Low-Pressure Carburizing (LPC) with High-Pressure Gas Quench – the Design Challenge

LPC or Continuous Carburizing with Oil Quench – the Design Challenge

The Range of the PhoenixTM Data Logger

Live Radio Communication

Thru-Process Data Analysis and Temperature Uniformity Surveys (TUS)

Our Brands

Company