Cleveland Electric Laboratories

Heat Treat Boot Camp — Record Attendance

Heat Treat Today publishes twelve print magazines annually and included in each is a letter from the publisher, Doug Glenn. This letter is from the November 2025 Annual Vacuum Heat Treating print edition.

Feel free to contact Doug at doug@heattreattoday.com if you have a question or comment. 


Heat Treat Boot Camp has become a popular gathering place for individuals who are either new to the North American heat treat/thermal processing market or who have been around a good while but would like to learn more. This year, on September 15–17 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the industry gathered over 60 learners at the 4th annual Heat Treat Boot Camp. By all practical measures, it was an extremely successful event.

Attendance

2025 Heat Treat Boot Camp attendees

The magic number, 63, was more than any previous year by 50% and double the number that we had last year. Of those 60-some, we had roughly:

  • 11 captive heat treaters (18%)
  • 7 commercial heat treaters (12%)
  • 1 investment company (<1%)
  • 44 suppliers (70%)

The number of years that these attendees had been in the industry varied from as little as several weeks or months to over 30 years. The mix was ideal, allowing the newbies to learn from the industry veterans and for industry veterans to be energized by the enthusiasm and energy of the newbies.

It was also good to have multiple companies sending people for the 2nd or 3rd year in a row. Obviously, they like what their employees are learning.

Speakers

As with the previous three events, Thomas Wingens of Wingens Consulting and I were the only two speakers. Between the two of us, we have well over 50 years of industry experience. Thomas covered the technical side of the conversations dealing with both the materials and processes of heat treat, while I covered the markets, products, and players. Thomas also discussed emerging technologies, and I concluded with a short session on resources to help keep current.

Activities

We kicked off the event on Monday evening, September 15, with a reception on the scenic outdoor patio of the Drury Plaza Hotel in downtown Pittsburgh. The hotel had purchased and renovated this historic building, the former location of the Pittsburgh Federal Reserve. In fact, all of the training sessions took place in The Main Vault. It was a “safe place.”

Tuesday was a full day in the classroom. It was grueling, but attendees were rewarded with a school bus ride to the historic Duquesne Incline where we were elevated to the top of Pittsburgh’s Mt. Washington. From there we could overlook the city from well above the tops of the skyscrapers. It was a beautiful evening. We then walked two blocks to LeMont Restaurant where we continued to overlook the city until the evening hours brought out the city lights. Again, beautiful.

Wednesday was a half day of classes and then an optional tour of Penna Flame Heat Treating in Zelienople, Pennsylvania, less than one hour north of Pittsburgh.

Sponsors

A big “thank you” goes to the industry sponsors — many of whom returned from last year — who helped us underwrite the costs of the boot camp. Idemitsu was our sole Title Sponsor. Can-Eng Furnaces was our sole Social Sponsor helping with the expenses of some of our networking functions and the putt-putt contest. Our two lunch sponsors were Cleveland Electric Labs (who have sent at least two people to all four of the boot camps since 2022) and Newton Heat Treating. Other corporate sponsors included ECM USA Vacuum Furnaces, Gasbarre Thermal Processing Systems, Super Systems, Honeywell, Chiz Bros, and I Squared R who had the popular Triple-Dipped Malted Milk Ball sponsorship. All of these companies were super helpful in making Boot Camp a success.

You’re Invited

Next year, we encourage you or someone from your company to attend. To see what past recipients have said and for more information about the 2026 Boot Camp, please visit www.heatttreatbootcamp.com. See you there.

Doug Glenn
Publisher
Heat Treat Today
For more information: Contact Doug at
doug@heattreattoday.com

Heat Treat Boot Camp — Record Attendance Read More »

Heat Treat Boot Camp 2024 — and That’s a Wrap!

Doug Glenn welcomes boot camp trainees at Monday evening’s meet- and-greet reception.

Heat treat industry players from across a spectrum of facilities, suppliers, and manufacturing specialties landed in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on Monday, September 24, 2024, to kick off Heat Treat Boot Camp 2024. Attendees networked, gained new practical knowledge, and participated in a tour of a local commercial heat treating facility. It wasn’t all work; an opportunity to get to know one another at a meet-and-greet reception upon arrival and later on a trip up Pittsburgh’s Duquesne Incline allowed boot campers to relax and connect, balancing work with fun.

A day and a half of sessions led by instructors Doug Glenn, publisher and founder of Heat Treat Today, and Thomas Wingens, president/CEO and founder of WINGENS International Industry Consultancy, brought the 39 trainees up-to-speed on “Processes & Materials,” “Heat Treat Players,” “Latest Heat Treat Developments,” and more. Questions and discussion were encouraged during the formal sessions, and heat treaters had plenty of informal, additional learning time through interactions with each other and the instructors.

At the end of the first day of lectures, nearly all of the attendees boarded a school bus to visit the Duquesne Incline on Mount Washington and enjoy the view of Pittsburgh. Following another day packed with training and resources, attendees had the option to visit Solar Atmospheres in Hermitage, Pennsylvania, to tour the in-house vacuum heat treating and brazing facility.

Ike Okoh
Product Engineer
Dry Coolers

“I’ve enjoyed talking about the different types of heat processes and the types of furnaces — vacuum and atmosphere air systems,” said Ike Okoh, a product engineer with Dry Coolers, Inc, based in Michigan. “The questions I had before the course started were answered during the course, and the most beautiful part of the program was that it’s not always you get to see CEOs and or business owners in the training sessions with you. It’s wonderful to get to meet them and find out more about them and their companies.

“The instructors, Doug and Thomas, were really nice, went through the course and broke down some of the issues, took questions and answered them,” Okoh added. “All in all, it’s been an enlightening experience.”

“Every group that’s been here is different,” said Glenn. “This group has been really fantastic; it’s an engaging group, and overall, we’ve heard positive feedback that the sessions and networking have been helpful. So, thanks to everyone who has come, and we look forward to seeing others next year.”

Highlights of the Event

HTBC 2024 team and attendees

Heat Treat Today thanks everyone for their participation in Heat Treat Boot Camp 2024, including our sponsors. Title Sponsors for this year’s event were Aerospace Testing & Pyrometry, Inc. and Control Concepts Inc.. Social Sponsors were CAN-ENG Furnaces International Ltd. and Cleveland Electric Labs. Additional sponsors were Algas-SDI, AFC-Holcroft, Chiz Bros: Refractory and Insulation Specialists, GASBARRE, Ipsen USA, Super Systems Inc., and I Squared R Element Co.

Keep your eyes open for your invitation to join us in 2025 for our fourth year of training up heat treaters of the future. Be sure to register early and bring friend and coworkers! 

Find Heat Treating Products And Services When You Search On Heat Treat Buyers Guide.Com


 

Heat Treat Boot Camp 2024 — and That’s a Wrap! Read More »

How Things Work: Thermocouples

OCHeat Treat Today is launching a How Things Work periodic content series. The first topic is the basics of thermocouples. Thermocouples are the bread and butter of the heat treating world. How many of the following questions are news to you? Take a deep dive into the topic and read this question and answer session between Doug Glenn, publisher and founder of Heat Treat Today, and Eric Yeager, director of Corporate Quality at Cleveland Electric Laboratories.

This Technical Tuesday discussion on thermocouple basics will be published in Heat Treat Today's November 2022 Vacuum Heat Treating digital edition.


What is a thermocouple?

Doug Glenn (DG): In this industry, and I suppose in a lot of industries, they often refer to thermocouples as T/Cs.

Let’s start off with one of the very most basic questions: What is a thermocouple?

Eric Yeager (EY): A thermocouple is a device that measures temperature. It contains no moving parts, has no power source and it does not contain any hazardous materials like liquid mercury or anything like that.

DG: Right. That’s interesting you say that, and it’s actually good that you say that, because some of our residential consumer thermometers (which a thermocouple is kind of like a thermometer in one sense) do have hazardous materials like mercury.

EY: Absolutely, absolutely.

How does a thermocouple tell temperature?

DG: So, there are no moving parts or anything of that sort. How, exactly, does a thermocouple tell the temperature?

EY: All metals that exist, when introduced to a temperature gradient (so, if you had the length of metal A and you introduce it to a temperature gradient, which would be a difference from one end to the other) will produce a microvoltage. That microvoltage is the potential that is known as the "absolute Seebeck effect" and that’s the basis on which the single thermocouple element functions.

DG: So, when you say the single thermocouple element, what do you mean by that?

Eric Yeager
Director of Corporate Quality
Cleveland Electric Laboratories

EY: That would be one leg — either your positive leg or your negative leg — or it could be any actual wire that exists, and as long as you introduce a temperature gradient, it will produce some microvoltage. With thermocouples, there are set standards for what those materials are manufactured from, but any wire will create a microvoltage or an EMF output.

DG: So, let’s say we took a copper wire from our house, and we put one end on top of a candle (just for heat’s sake); you’re saying that within the span of that wire, there is going to be a voltage of some sort.

EY: Correct. And that’s actually called the "absolute Seebeck effect" or EMF.

DG: EMF, electromotive force. And Seebeck, if I understand correctly, he was the guy that discovered this stuff, right?

EY: He’s one of them. Peltier was involved and I think a gentleman named Thompson. But it was all around the same time — they kind of all collaborated with one another.

DG: You mentioned, with a thermocouple, if you have a section of wire material, add heat to one end, there’s going to be a voltage of some sort, a millivoltage in this case, a very small voltage, but a voltage, nonetheless. But you mentioned one leg. Explain more about the one leg; because, typically, isn’t there just one piece of wire in there?

EY: Right, correct. A thermocouple consists of two dissimilar metals, two dissimilar wires. For example, in a type K thermocouple, one leg would be chromel and the other leg would be alumel, and when you join those two dissimilar metals together, the net voltage between the two combined dissimilar metals is what is used to measure the output of the thermocouple. [blockquote author="Eric Yeager" style="1"]This conversion of thermal energy to electrical energy is known as the Seebeck effect.[/blockquote]

DG: So, let’s say you stick a piece of copper wire over a candle that’s burning at 400 degrees, or whatever the candle might be burning at, you’re going to get a certain voltage across there or within the wire.

EY: Along the length of that wire, yes.

DG: So, if the temperature of that candle is twice the temperature (let’s say you double the temperature of the candle) the voltage across the length of that wire is now different, yes?

EY: It’s proportional. So, the greater amount of heat energy you apply, the greater amount of EMF will be generated.

DG: And that wire, typically, for the useful life of the wire, does not change? It’s always the same? If it’s at a 100 or 1000 °F, that voltage is one; if it’s 2000, it’s that; it doesn’t ever dissipate over time, does it?

EY: No. It only degrades when a contaminate is introduced to the material.

DG: Gotcha. Because it then prevents the flow, I assume.

EY: Correct. And it’s not as pure. So, that’s one of the effects as you see something that’s called "drift" over time, over use.

Why do dissimilar materials/metals produce a millivolt signal?

DG: Now, you said, though, that in a type K, and I know that in almost all thermocouples we’ve got two dissimilar metals. If one wire can tell you an output of the voltage, why do you need two dissimilar metals in order to get a different type of voltage?

EY: It’s basically the sum of the two materials; combine the voltage generated from the entire length of the wire of the two thermal conductors.

You have to have a signal path. You have to have a source for your voltage to start and a voltage for it to end into your instrumentation. You have to have some way to read that temperature gradient and it’s typically done with two dissimilar metals to create a greater and more stable EMF.

When a lot of the cable or wire manufacturers create, say, a melt of chromel, they test that, and actually test it against a pure platinum wire so as to return the voltage back to the instrument to measure the actual EMF for the single leg output.

How important is the joining of these dissimilar metals?

DG: Now, you talked about the joining of the two dissimilar metals. How exactly how does that need to be done? Can they be welded together, and if they’re welded together, doesn’t the metal that’s used in the weld mess it up? And does it have to be just at a point, or can it be along a length that they are joined together?

Eric Yeager
Source: LinkedIn

EY: It’s important to have the purest, most secure junction when joining the two dissimilar metals. It’s typically done by welding the metals together without adding any filler material. That’s especially important when you have something that has a very low EMF output, which is like your noble metal thermocouples. That’s where purity is essential. Loose connections from twisted or crimped junctions also might cause intermittencies under thermal expansion and affect the thermocouple output signal.

DG: So, typically, they are welded together without a filler; they’re just welded together.

EY: Correct. You just bring a TIG torch in, give it a quick zap, and it melts the two wires together. Once you get that nice little joint or junction, you can run and complete the assembly.

DG: Okay. We already talked about why there are different millivolt readings at different temperatures, because basically it’s the difference in the heat.

EY: Correct. As the temperature increases, there’s a direct correlation to the microvoltage output from that particular wire or wire pair.

DG: And I asked about how important are the joining of these materials. Typically, you don’t want it over a wide section, right? Does it matter if it’s a spot weld, instead? What would happen if you had one that was an inch or two inches long? Is that a big deal?

EY: It’s best to keep it as small and concise as possible, because it could form a heat sink later on when you’re in application; typically you just want a small nice round junction. For example, you want the junction to be about twice the diameter of the single thermal element. So, if it was a 20 thousandths-diameter wire, you want it 40 thousandths in diameter.

Thermocouples welded to a workload; wouldn’t that weld introduce some “interference” in the millivolt signal?

DG:  Aren’t some T/Cs welded? I think I’ve heard that sometimes they’ll take thermocouple wire that will be joined and then welded to, or in some way applied right to, a load. If you were applying it directly to a workload, wouldn't that extra metal kind of mess up the millivolt?

EY: You would think so, but as long as they’re kept as close as possible, and the workpiece that you’re welding to is kept isothermal or actually uniform in temperature between the two welded junctions, it won’t have a detrimental effect on the thermoelectric output. [blocktext align="right"]But you want to make sure that the workpiece is uniform in temperature because you have a temperature gradient across where those two junctions are welded to the material, and it can have a slight effect.[/blocktext] That’s essential to basically ensure that your workpiece is isothermal.

DG: What do you mean by isothermal?

EY: Uniform in temperature across the entire workpiece between the welded beads. The workpiece will become the welded bead, but it won’t create any additional EMF output to the combination because it’s the combination of the length — it measures the temperature across the entire length of the wire not necessarily at the bead.

It’s kind of a common misconception that the bead creates all the EMF, but it’s actually along the length of the wire.

DG: It is along the length of the wire. I always thought that the temperature was measured basically at the bead, at the joint.

EY: Well, that’s where it starts, but it’s combined along the length of the wire.

In the heat treating world, what is the most popular T/C and what are the materials from which it is made?

DG: So, in the heat treat world, what’s the most popular T/C and what are the materials it’s made from?

EY: I would say it’s definitely the type K and those two materials are chromel and alumel as we previously discussed. It’s probably the most popular due to the low cost and the wide temperature range capability. Basically, you can go from 32°F all the way up to 2450°F. It won’t last very long at those temperatures, but it’s the most common and the most versatile. I would say type K is the most popular.

How long do type K thermocouples last in a furnace/application?

DG: The factors: you were talking about them not lasting all that long. This is probably a loaded question, but if you’re in an average heat treat application, what’s a typical lifespan of a type K?

EY: To be honest with you, that’s the question that everybody wants to know. And truthfully, it depends on the application. It depends on thermal cycling, it depends on how well the thermocouple thermoelements are protected from the environment, for example, whatever protection tube you put it in, if it’s an MGO, or an exposed bead. All of those things are contributing factors. Really, it’s very, very application dependent. For example, I’ve seen type K control thermocouples last for 5 years but that’s basically at a stable temperature without any thermocycling and a constant, nice, clean environment. But I’ve seen units that get consumed rapidly at the elevated temperatures, like I mentioned, 2450°F. They don’t last very long there but they do measure.

DG: So, the undesirable conditions for those things would be a lot of thermocycling up and down, so, it’s going to fail faster, I assume?

EY: Correct. And temperature of course: the higher temperature, the greater degradation in the material. That pretty much stands for any thermocouple type.

DG: I want to ask a couple questions that aren’t on here just because I’m curious about this. A lot of times, you’ll have the spot weld where you put them together, that’s called the bead?

EY: Yes. Or junction. Either/or.

DG: So, the bead or the junction — that’s obviously bare wire, right? Assuming we’re actually using to put it on a workpiece. You’ve got the bead and then you’ve got, obviously, a little bit of bare wire at least. Is the rest of that wire covered or is it often not covered?

EY: It must be covered because it could short somewhere along the length of the wire. It could be either a soft wire insulation, like a ceramic fiber or a REFRASIL® or even a fiberglass-type insulation depending upon the temperatures.[blockquote author="Eric Yeager" style="1"]What I actually prefer is an MGO-style thermocouple where it has a metallic outer sheath surrounded by a magnesium oxide insulator that prevents it from shorting out.[/blockquote] So, for example, if you just ran straight wire and had any kind of airflow or thermal expansion, it could short out somewhere along the length of the wire. Basically, a thermocouple will measure from the closest measuring junction to the instrumentation. Therefore, if it’s shorted out, you’d get a false reading.

DG: So, if you had it attached to the load and it runs over here but it touches something else just before it goes out to the outside of the furnace or whatever, you’re going to measure that spot closest to the temperature wall, so it doesn’t give you anything on the load.

EY: What’s very common is people will run the software thermocouples through a door of a furnace where it closes on the door, that’s where it shorts out.

What are some of the factors that will affect the longevity of a T/C? What is the most common cause of failure?

DG: What are the most common causes of failure? Did you have any others besides that we just talked about the door one?

EY: For control thermocouples, like your type R, S, or B, those are subject to contaminates more than the other types. They’re more susceptible to carbon, graphite, silica, and those type of things. So, when you have an assembly like that, like a control thermocouple in a furnace, you have to ensure that it’s properly protected from the environment to which it’s exposed to allow it to have the greatest longevity. There are different sheath materials that you can put the thermocouples in: alumina, it could be silicon carbide tubes, all kinds of different varieties.

DG: You want to keep the environment, the atmosphere out of it and all that good stuff.

EY: Real quick, Doug: You mentioned control thermocouples. If you had like a type R or S control thermocouple and it was exposed to something that was going to contaminate it, what typically happens when a thermocouple fails? The EMF output of the thermocouple is degraded. What that would actually cause is it would cause your furnace to call for more heat because the EMF was degraded. Even if it’s a few degrees, that might cause an overtemp condition when you have very tight requirements on a thermal process.

DG: Right. And then, hopefully, your overtemp thermocouple would kick in and say, “Wait a minute!”

EY: Yes, that’s exactly right. Hopefully, you don’t have it set too high.

How can you tell when your T/C is going bad? Drift, etc.?

DG: How can you tell when your T/C is going bad and could you talk about drift?

EY: The best way to determine if your thermocouple is going bad is to perform regular system accuracy tests. Those tests, will allow you to track the lifecycle of the thermocouples and determine when they begin to drift and when it’s time to remove them from service. Unfortunately, when a thermocouple drifts, there is not adjustment knob on it; you can’t fix it. Once it starts going, it goes, and you just have to replace the assembly.

When thermocouples drift, they typically drift negative. They will see less of a temperature due to the contaminates getting into the material and altering the EMF output of the thermocouple. So, your control will essentially ask for more heat, and that’s where you end up having the problem. That’s why it’s essential to perform your SATs and maybe set up a little PM schedule for your system to know that you're experiencing "x" many life cycles out of the thermocouples before they fall out of your requirements, and so maybe every "x" months you have to replace the assemblies and install new ones.

Because of the drift, the best thing you can do is perform a system accuracy test with a thermocouple that has not been subject to long exposure at temperature.

Dissimilar metals and EMF?

DG: I want to go back to the two-wire thing because I don’t quite understand that. I’m not an engineer guy so see if you can explain. You’ve got the one wire that has an EMF in it, but I still don’t quite get why we use dissimilar metals to create the EMF.

EY: The summation of the voltage between the two thermocouples that provides the set EMF. The set EMF, is determined by the international temperature scale ITS-90 scale; that sets all the microvoltages for the thermocouples. It’s designed as a paired thermocouple group not as a single element. With a single element, you really would not have a good way to return the signal to your instrument.

Both wires conduct the voltage back to the instrument; one is a positive and one is a negative. Since it is a direct current (DC) voltage, one leg provides the negative path and one leg provides the positive path.

DG: Ok, so there’s a millivoltage signal being sent back to the instrument, which is reading that millivolt and then converting it based on what type of thermocouple is out there; and it’s recording that reading and turning it into a temperature.

 

About our expert:

Eric Yeager is the director of Corporate Quality at Cleveland Electric Laboratories. He's been with Cleveland Electric Labs for 17 years and is working on year 18. In that time, he has been director of quality and runs their accredited thermocouple calibration laboratory. Eric is involved with ASTM and is a subcommittee chairman for E2011, which is the calibration section of the thermocouple standards. He also was technical consultant on some of the rewrite of the latest AMS2750.


Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com


 

How Things Work: Thermocouples Read More »

Reader Feedback: Measuring Junction Construction in AMS2750 Rev. G

Readers are checking out recent AMS2750 Rev. G changes and want some more information from Heat Treat Today about a specific clarification. Read the correspondence about the implications of AMS2750 Rev. G paragraph 3.1.1.5 about how to measure junction construction.

Douglas Shuler, lead auditor at Pyro Consulting, has written numerous articles with Heat Treat Today about AMS2750 standards. Check them out by searching "Doug Shuler" at www.heattreattoday.com.

Submit your question, comments, thoughts, or queries here or email Bethany Leone at editor@heattreattoday.com.


READER QUESTION: After combing the new AMS2750 Rev. G, I found that paragraph 3.1.1.5 no longer allows thermocouples to be tack welded directly to parts, OR to representative dummy parts. This has been standard practice for decades. So I dug into it further with the folks from PRI and it turns out to be true. They’re now expecting load thermocouples to be either placed inside of a part (ends twisted and inserted), or inside the hole of a dummy block.

I’d done some searching online and there isn’t a single source talking about this major change. This could lead to a lot of failed upcoming Nadcap audits.

Doug Shuler
Lead Auditor
Pyro Consulting

Douglas (Doug) Shuler (Pyro Consulting) for Heat Treat Today: Historically (i.e. prior to Rev. F), AMS2750 was silent on measuring junction construction. In Rev. F, the construction of the measuring junction was as follows:

Measuring junctions shall be made by any combination of twisting and/or welding the thermal elements provided there is no addition of filler metal.

This raised concerns about both the use of quick tips and spot welding to make the measuring junction. The AMEC AMS2750 revision team engaged with Cleveland Electric Laboratories to perform testing on these measuring junctions as compared to the twisting/welding combinations.

The conclusion of the tests were that both quick tips and spot welding to a part/heat sink became unstable at temperatures above 2000°F. The quick tip crimping point and the spot welds showed rapid oxidation and increased errors in a short period of time. Based on the results of these tests the AMEC AMS2750 revision team put forth the following update in Rev. G:

Measuring junctions shall be made by either of the following methods:

        • Any combination of twisting and/or welding the thermoelements provided there is no addition of filler metal (including ungrounded and grounded MIMS).
        • Spot welding the thermoelements directly to a part, simulated part, or heat sink is permitted for temperatures ≤2000°F or 1100°C.

This allows spot welding measuring junctions for process temperatures at or lower than 2000°F. The team and AMEC members decided that quick tips were to unstable to permit their use going forward.

READER FOLLOW-UP: Our current method that we’re using is to twist the thermocouple using a set of Twister Pliers, then tack-weld that twist onto the part (first photo below). We’ve been doing this for parts up through brazing temperatures (~2150°F) without issue. We recently ran a furnace run around 2100°F with parts tack-welded as I’ve described AND had T/Cs that were just twisted with no tack weld. We noticed there was no significant difference in the temperature the TCs were reading. This was also our technique that we used at my previous company.

The way I read AMS2750 Rev. G was: You may twist and weld thermocouples to a part, but only for temperatures less than or equal to 2000°F.

To comply with Rev. G, we have gone ahead and made heatsink blocks to make sure we’re in compliance. Our new method of temperature measurement is twisting the wires and sticking the twisted end down inside of a block of solid metal (like the one I’ve shown below).

Source: Heat Treat Today Reader


We welcome your inquiries to and feedback on Heat Treat Today articles. Submit your questions/comments to editor@heattreattoday.com.

Reader Feedback: Measuring Junction Construction in AMS2750 Rev. G Read More »

Skip to content