Chris Pedder

Induction Through Heating + Intensive Quenching: A “Green Ticket” for Steel Parts

OCOn site at heat treat operations, gas-fired furnaces can be a significant source of carbon emissions. But depending on the desired heat treatment, an alternative approach that combines induction through heating and intensive quenching could be the “green ticket.” Learn about the ITH + IQ technique and discover how certain steels may benefit from this approach.

This Technical Tuesday article was composed by Edward Rylicki, Vice President Technology, and Chris Pedder, Technical Manager Heat Treat Products and Services, at Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp., and Michael Aronov, CEO, IQ Technologies, Inc. It appears in Heat Treat Today's May 2023 Sustainable Heat Treat Technologies print edition.


Introduction

Chris Pedder,
Technical Manager Heat Treat Products and Services, Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Induction heating is a green, environmentally friendly technology providing energy savings and much greater heating rates compared to other furnace heating methods. Other advantages of induction heating include improved automation and control, reduced floor space, and cleaner working conditions. Induction heating is widely used in the forging industry for heating billets prior to plastic deformation. Induction heating is also used for different heat treatment operations such as surface and through hardening, tempering, stress relieving, normalizing, and annealing. However, the amount of steel products subjected to induction heating in the heat treating industry is much less compared to that processed in gas-fired furnaces.

Contact us with your Reader Feedback!

Gas-fired heat treating equipment is a major source of carbon emissions in the industry. As shown in Reference 1, induction through heating (ITH) followed by intensive quenching (IQ) (an “ITH + IQ” technique) eliminates, in many cases, the need for a gas-fired furnace when conducting through hardening and carburizing processes — the two most widely used heat treating operations for certain steel parts. Eliminating gas-fired furnaces will result in significant reduction of carbon emissions at on-site heat treat operations.

Dr. Michael Aronov,
CEO, IQ Technologies, Inc.
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

The goal of this article is twofold: 1) to evaluate carbon emissions generated during through hardening of steel parts and carburizing processes when conducted in gas-fired furnaces, and 2) to discuss how these emissions can be reduced to zero using the ITH + IQ process.

Evaluation of Carbon Emissions for Through Hardening and Carburizing Processes

Ed Rylicki,
Vice President Technology, Ajax TOCCO Detroit Development & Support Center
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Most through hardening and carburizing operations for steel parts are conducted in batch and continuous integral quench gas-fired furnaces. Assumptions made for evaluating CO2 emissions produced by a typical integral quench furnace are presented in Table 1. Note: The values of carbon emissions presented Table 1 are conservative since they don’t consider the amount of CO2 produced by furnace flame screens and endothermic gas generators used to provide a controlled carburizing atmosphere in the furnace. Also, it’s assumed that the furnace walls are already heated through when loading the parts, so there are no heat losses associated with the thermal energy accumulated by the furnace walls.

Table 1. Assumptions for calculating of carbon emissions by integral quench furnace
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Emissions Generated During the Through Hardening Process

A furnace time/temperature diagram for the through hardening process considered is presented in Figure 1. Carbon emissions Ehard produced by the furnace considered during heating of the load to the austenitizing temperature prior to quenching are calculated by using the following equation,

 

(Equation 1)
Ehard = k • Qhard

where:

■ k = the emission coefficient (equal to 0.050 • 10-3 kg per 1 kJ of released energy when burning natural gas (see Reference 2)
■ Qhard = thermal energy required for heating up the above load from ambient to the austenitizing temperature

A value of Qhard is calculated by the equation below,

(Equation 2)

Qhard = M • C • (Ta -To) / Eff = 1,135 • 0.56 • (843 - 20) / 0.65 = 0.805 • 106kJ

where:

■ M = load weight, kg
■ C = steel specific heat capacity (kJ/kg°C)
■ Ta = part austenitizing temperature (°C)
■ To = part initial temperature (°C)
■ Eff = furnace thermal efficiency (a ratio of the furnace thermal losses to the gross heat input)

From equations (1) and (2), the amount of carbon emissions produced by the above furnace during one hardening operation is 40.2 kg. To determine an annual amount of carbon emissions, calculate the number of hardening cycles per year (Nhard) run in the furnace. From Figure 1, a duration of one hardening cycle is 4 hours (3 hours for austenitizing of the parts plus 1 hour for quenching the parts in oil and unloading/loading the furnace). Thus, Nhard is equal to:

Nhard = 360 day • 24 hour • 0.85 / 4 hour = 1826

Figure 1
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Annual CO2 emissions from one integral quench batch gas-fired furnace are 40.2 • 1836 = 73,807 kg, or more than 73 t

Emissions Generated During Carburizing Process

A simplified furnace time/temperature diagram for the carburizing process considered is presented in Figure 2. Carbon emissions (Ecarb) produced by the above furnace during the carburizing process are calculated by the following equation,

(Equation 3)

Ecarb = k • Qcarb

where:

■ Qcarb = a thermal energy expended by the furnace during the carburizing process. A value of Qcarb amounts to two components: 

(Equation 4)

Qcarb = Qcarb1 + Qcarb2

Qcarb in the following equation is:

■ Qcarb1 = energy required for heating up the load to the carburizing temperature
■ Qcarb2 = energy needed for maintaining the furnace temperature during the remaining duration of the carburization process (for compensation of the furnace thermal losses since the parts are already heated up to the carburizing temperature)

A value of Qcarb1 is calculated using equation (2) where the part carburizing temperature Tc is used instead of part austenitizing temperature Ta (see Table 1):

Qcarb1 = 1,135 • 0.56 • (927 – 20) / 0.65 = 0.887 • 106 kJ

A value of Qcarb2 is a sum of the flue gas losses and losses of the thermal energy through the furnace walls by heat conduction. Qcarb2 is evaluated from the following considerations. Since the assumed furnace thermal efficiency is 65%, the furnace heat losses are equal to 35% of the gross heat input to the furnace. Hence, the furnace heat losses Qloss1 during the load heat up period (the first 3 hours of the carburizing cycle, see Figure 2) are the following:

Qloss1 = Qcarb1 • 0.35 = 0.887 • 106 • 0.35 = 0.31 • 106 kJ.

The furnace heat losses during the remaining 8 hours of the carburizing cycle Qloss2 are proportionally greater and are equal to:

Qloss2 = Qloss1 • 8 hr /3 hr = 031 • 106 • 8 /3 = 0.827 • 106 kJ

Thus, the total amount of the thermal energy expended by the furnace during the carburizing cycle is Qcarb = 0.887 • 106 + 0.827 • 106 = 1.71 • 106 kJ. The total amount of the CO2 emissions from carburizing of the load in the furnace considered according to equation (3) is: Ecarb = 0.050 • 10-3 • 1.71 • 106 = 85.7 kg. To determine an annual amount of carbon emissions from one carburizing furnace, calculate the number of carburizing cycles run in the furnace per year. Per Figure 2, a duration of one carburizing cycle is 12 hour (1 hour for the furnace recovery plus 10 hour for carburizing of parts at 927°C plus 1 hour for quenching parts in oil and for unloading and loading the furnace). Thus, the number of carburizing cycles per year Ncarb is:

Ncarb = 360 day • 24 hr • 0.85 / 12 hr = 612

Figure 2
Source: Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp.

Annual CO2 emissions from one integral quench batch carburizing furnace is about 85.7 • 612 = 52,448 kg, or more than 52 t.

Reducing Carbon Emissions Using the ITH + IQ Process

Reference 1 presents results of two case studies of the ITH + IQ process on automotive input shafts and drive pinions. The study was conducted with a major U.S. automotive part supplier. A two-step heat treating process was used for the input shafts, consisting of batch quenching parts in oil or polymer using an integral quench gas-fired furnace for core hardening followed by induction hardening. This two-step method of heat treatment is widely used in the industry for many steel products. It provides parts with a hard case and tough, ductile core.

Substituting the “ITH + IQ” method for the two-step heat treating process not only eliminates the batch hardening process, but also requires less alloy steel for the shafts that don’t require annealing after forging. Thus, in this case, applying the ITH + IQ technique eliminates two furnace heating processes for the input shafts, resulting in the reduction of the CO2 emissions to zero for the shafts’ heat treatment. Per client evaluation, as mentioned in Reference 1, the hardness profile in the intensively quenched input shafts was similar to that of the standard shafts. Residual surface compressive stresses in the intensively quenched shafts were greater in most cases compared to that of the standard input shafts, resulting in a longer part fatigue life of up to 300%.

Per Reference 1, the environmentally unfriendly  carburizing process can be fully eliminated in most cases for automotive pinions when applying the ITH + IQ method and using limited hardenability (LH) steels that have a very low amount of alloy elements. A case study conducted for drive pinions with one of the major U.S. automotive parts suppliers demonstrates the intensively quenched drive pinions met all client’s metallurgical specifications and passed both the ultimate strength test and the fatigue test. It was shown that the part’s fatigue resistance improved by about 150% compared to that of standard carburized and quenched in oil drive pinions. In addition, distortion of the intensively quenched drive pinions is so low that no part straitening operations were required.

Conclusion

Coupling Ajax TOCCO’s induction through heating method with the intensive quenching process creates a significant reduction of CO2 emissions produced during heat treatment operations for steel parts. For the through hardening process, eliminating just one batch integral quench gas-fi red furnace will reduce carbon emissions by more than 73 ton per year. For the carburizing process, eliminating just one batch carburizing furnace will reduce carbon emissions by more than 52 ton per year. Note that for continuous gas-fired furnaces, the carbon emission reduction will be much greater due to higher continuous furnaces production rates (hence a much higher fuel consumption).

Per our experience, the ITH + IQ process can be applied to at least 20% of the currently through-hardened and carburized steel parts. Per two major heat treating furnace manufacturers in the U.S., there are thousands of atmosphere integral quench batch and continuous furnaces in operation in the U.S. That means hundreds of gas-fired heat treating furnaces can be potentially eliminated, drastically reducing carbon emissions in the U.S., supporting a lean and green economy.

 

References

[1] Michael Aronov, Edward Rylicki, and Chris Pedder, “Two Cost-Effective Applications of Intensive Quenching Process for Steel Parts,”Heat Treat Today, October 2021, https://www.heattreattoday.com/processes/quenching/quenching-technical-content/two-cost-effective-applications-for-intensive-quenching-of-steel-parts/.

[2] U.S. Energy Information Administration.

About the Authors:

Ed Rylicki has been in the induction heating industry for over 50 years. He is currently Vice President Technology at Ajax TOCCO Detroit Development & Support Center in Madison Heights, Michigan.

Mr. Chris Pedder has over 34 years of experience at Ajax Tocco Magnethermic involving the development of induction processes in the heat treating industry from tooling concept and process development to production implementation.

Dr. Michael Aronov has over 50 years’ experience in design and development of heating and cooling equipment and processes for heat treating applications. He is CEO of IQ Technologies, Inc. and a consultant to the parent company Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic.

For more information: Contact info@ajaxtocco.com or 800.547.1527

 

 


Find heat treating products and services when you search on Heat Treat Buyers Guide.com


 

Induction Through Heating + Intensive Quenching: A “Green Ticket” for Steel Parts Read More »

Two Cost-Effective Applications for Intensive Quenching of Steel Parts

OCThe Intensive Quench (IQ) process is an alternative way of quenching steel. It involves a very rapid and uniform cooling of steel products in water with cooling rates several times greater than that of conventional quenching in agitated oil or polymer. Through this interesting article, explore the unique method and its use in the automotive industry.

This article first appeared in Heat Treat Today’s August 2021 Automotive print edition Edward Rylicki, vice president of Technology, and Chris Pedder, technical manager of Heat Treat Products and Services, at Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp., as well as Michael Aronov, CEO of IQ Technologies, Inc.


Introduction

The Intensive Quench (IQ) process is an alternative way of quenching steel parts that originated with Dr. Nikolai Kobasko of Ukraine in 1964.1 It involves a very rapid and uniform cooling of steel products in water with cooling rates several times greater than that of conventional quenching in agitated oil or polymer. The IQ process is interrupted at an optimal time when the surface compressive stresses reach their maximum value, and the part-hardened layer reaches its optimal depth. A proprietary computer program is used for determining an optimal dwell time for steel parts of different shapes and dimensions.

Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corporation has recently acquired assets of IQ Technologies, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio. Over the last 20 years, IQ Technologies has been commercializing an intensive quenching (IQ) process for steel parts in the U.S. and overseas.

Figure 1. IQ system for processing gun barrels and long shafts

The IQ process is conducted in IQ water tanks (a batch IQ technique) and in single-part processing high-velocity water flow IQ units when parts are quenched one at a time. Steel parts are austenitized prior to intensive quenching in heat treating furnaces or using an induction through heating (ITH) method.2 As an example, Figures 1 and 2 present two production IQ systems. Each includes a single-part processing high-velocity water flow unit built by IQ Technologies. The IQ unit in Figure 1 is equipped with a single-shot low frequency ITH station built by Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic. It is designed for processing gun barrels and shafts of up to 36” long and up to 2” in diameter. The IQ unit in Figure 2 is equipped with a box atmosphere furnace and is designed for processing gear products of up to 8” in diameter and shafts of up to 15” long.

Figure 2. IQ system for processing gear products and shafts installed at Euclid Heat Treating Co.

Coupling of the single-part processing IQ technique with the ITH method (ITH + IQ) is the most effective way of IQ process implementation. It allows conducting of heat treating operations within a manufacturing cell in line with a steel parts production process. This paper focuses on two applications of the ITH + IQ process:

  1. Elimination of a costly, energy and time-consuming carburization process
  2. Substitution of a one-step ITH + IQ process for a two-step heat treatment consisting of batch quenching parts in oil or polymer for part core hardening followed by induction hardening

Elimination of Carburizing Process

The carburizing process is the most expensive and time-consuming heat treatment process. Elimination of the carburizing process by implementing the IQ method requires the use of limited hardenability (LH) steels. LH steels are medium to high carbon steels having exceptionally low content of alloy elements. When quenched intensively, LH steels provide a hard, martensitic case, tough, ductile core, and high residual surface compressive stress mimicking a carburized condition without carburization.

Figure 3. Side pinion

Two IQ case studies were conducted with two major U.S. automotive parts suppliers for evaluating the IQ process when applied to side pinions and drive pinions made of LH steel. Results obtained were compared to the same parts made of alloy steel, carburized and quenched in oil.

Side Pinions

Figure 3 presents a picture of the evaluated side pinion having the outside diameter (OD) of 80mm and inside diameter (ID) of 27mm. Standard pinions were made of alloy 8620 steel, carburized, quenched in oil, and shot peened. Pinions made of LH steel (acquired from Russia) were quenched intensively in the high-velocity water flow single-part processing IQ unit. The LH steel pinions were not shot peened after heat treatment. A chemical composition of the LH steel used is presented in Table 1.

To evaluate the side pinion structural and stress conditions during heat treatment, DANTE computer simulations were conducted by DANTE Solutions, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio, for standard carburized side pinions and for intensively quenched pinions made of LH steel.3 It was shown that the microstructure of the carburized and quenched-in-oil side pinion consists of martensite formed within the part carburized case and bainite in the remaining part cross section (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Microstructure distribution

Figure 5. Minimum principal stress

A microstructure distribution in the intensively quenched side pinion made of LH steel consists of a martensitic structure in the part surface layer, a bainitic structure beneath the martensitic case, and a perlitic structure in the part core. The martensitic case is generally deeper in the intensively quenched LH steel pinion compared to that of the standard pinion.

Figure 5 presents calculated values of the minimum principal stress that represent residual surface compressive stresses. As seen from the figure, the intensively quenched LH steel side pinion has residual surface compressive stresses greater than that of the carburized side pinion quenched in oil.

Figure 6. Experimental microhardness data for LH steel side pinion (PL – pitch line, RR – tooth root, TOT – tooth tip)

Figures 6–8 present experimental data obtained by the customer for the intensively quenched side pinions made of LH steel. Figure 6 shows hardness profiles at the pinion pitch line, tooth root, and tooth tip. Figure 7 presents an etched pinion tooth sample showing a martensitic case. As seen from the above figures, the IQ process provided the hard case and the ductile core that mimics a hardness distribution after carburizing.

Figure 7. Hardened case in intensively quenched side pinion made of LH steel

Figure 8 shows a residual surface compressive stress distribution for the LH steel side pinion root area. Residual surface compressive stresses for the intensively quenched side pinion made of LH steel were greater than that of the standard carburized and shot peened pinion. Fatigue testing has proven that intensively quenched side pinions made of LH steel have a longer service life compared to the standard pinions.

Figure 8. Residual stress distribution in intensively quenched side pinion made of LH steel

Drive Pinions

An IQ case study was conducted for drive pinions with one of the major U.S. automotive parts suppliers. Drive pinions were made of LH steel produced by a U.S. steel mill (the LH steel chemistry is proprietary information). Figure 9 presents a picture of the evaluated drive pinion. The drive pinions were quenched in the high-velocity water flow single-part processing IQ unit. Per customer evaluation, the hardness profile in the intensively quenched drive pinions made of LH steel mimics the hardness distribution in the standard carburized and oil quenched drive pinions, while the values of the residual surface compressive stresses are greater for the intensively quenched LH steel pinions compared to that of the standard drive pinions. (This information is also not presented in the paper due to its proprietary nature.)

Figure 9. Drive pinion

The intensively quenched drive pinions met all the customer’s metallurgical specifications and passed both the ultimate strength test and the fatigue test. It was shown that the part fatigue resistance improved by about 150% compared to that of standard carburized and quenched in oil drive pinions. In addition, distortion of the intensively quenched drive pinions is so low that no part straightening operations are required.

Application of the ITH + IQ process and LH steels for side pinions and drive gears will result in the following major benefits:

  • Less energy usage due to elimination of the long carburization process
  • Lower overall part costs
  • Cleaner parts and work environment due to use of water instead of quench oil or polymers
  • Lower work-in-process inventories and shortened lead times, due to possibility of running heat treat operations in part manufacturing cell

Substitution of One-Step Heat Treating Process for Two-Step Heat Treatment

A two-step heat-treating process consisting of batch quenching of parts in oil or polymer for core hardening, followed by induction hardening, is used in the industry for many steel products. This heat-treating process provides parts with a hard case and tough, ductile core that is similar to the carburizing process. A substitution of the ITH + IQ method for the two-step heat-treating process is another attractive possibility for steel part makers in reducing the part cost.

Figure 10. Typical input shaft

One of the major U.S. automotive parts suppliers applied this approach to the manufacturing of input shafts (Figure 10). The input shafts are currently made of high-alloy medium-carbon steel that requires annealing after forging. The intensively quenched input shafts were made of plain medium carbon steel that did not require annealing after forging. The shafts were quenched at the Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Detroit Development & Support Center.

Per customer evaluation, the hardness profile in the intensively quenched input shafts was similar to that of standard shafts. Residual surface compressive stresses in the intensively quenched shafts are greater compared to that of the standard input shafts resulting in longer part fatigue life of up to 300%. (Per the customer’s request, the actual data on the part hardness profile, microstructure distribution, and values of residual surface compressive stresses are not presented in the paper.)

Figures 11 and 12 present current and improved input shaft production flow charts accordingly. As seen, an introduction of the ITH + IQ process allows elimination of the following input shaft manufacturing steps: annealing after forging, batch oil quenching, and shaft straightening. In addition, part shipping and material handling operations will be significantly reduced. In summary, the application of the ITH + IQ process provides the following major benefits in this case:

  • Less energy usage due to the elimination of two heat treating processes: annealing after forging and batch quenching in oil
  • Less material cost due to substitution of plain carbon steel for high alloy steel
  • Lower overall part costs due to the use of less expensive steel, reduction of heat treatment cost, elimination of all expenses associated with the use of quench oil, reduced cost of shipping and material handling, and elimination of part straightening operations
  • Cleaner parts and work environment due to use of water instead of quench oil or polymer
  • Lower work-in-process inventories and shortened lead times, due to possibility of running heat treat operations in part manufacturing cell

Figure 11. Drive pinion current production flow chart

Figure 12. Drive pinion improved production flow chart

Conclusion

Implementation of the ITH + IQ process and the use of LH steels will make possible the conducting of heat treat operations in a steel part manufacturing cell, reducing work-in-process inventories and shortening lead time. At the same time, tremendous energy savings, significant reduction of a carbon footprint, and overall part cost can be achieved due to eliminating the carburizing process and the use of quench oil, and due to the substitution of plain carbon steel for high alloy material. Improved work environment is also a bonus.

IQ Facility at Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Detroit Development & Support Center

Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic has set up an IQ facility at its Detroit Development & Support Center (Figure 13). The facility includes a single-part processing IQ unit and an induction heating station. The IQ unit is capable of processing gear products, shafts, etc. of up to 8” in diameter and 15” long. The IQ unit controls monitor the following parameters: water temperature, water flow velocity, pump pressure, and dwell time. The induction heating fixture consists of a pneumatic horizontal indexing heat station used for power supply load matching and inductor positioning. The load matching station can be fed by numerous power supplies capable of various operating frequencies and power levels up to 600 kW.

The Detroit Development & Support Center also houses a large area for the manufacture and repair of induction tooling, along with engineers needed for the design of prototype and production tooling. There is also a metallurgical lab with the equipment and staff necessary to support the ITH + IQ process development. The metallurgical lab contains macro and micro hardness testers, cut-off wheels, polishing equipment and a metallograph for analyzing microstructures.

 

References

[1] N.I. Kobasko and N.I. Prokhorenko, “Quenching Cooling Rate Effect on Crack Formation of 45 Steel,” Metalloved. Term. Obrab., Met., No. 2, 1964, p. 53-54 (in Russian).

[2] M.A. Aronov, N.I. Kobasko, J.A. Powell, “Intensive Quenching of Steel Parts,” ASM Handbook, Volume 4A. Steel Heat Treating Fundamentals and Processes, 2013, p. 198-211.

[3] B.L. Ferguson, Zhichao Li, N.I. Kobasko, M.A. Aronov and J.A. Powell, “Limited Hardenability Steels and Intensive Quenching,” Proceedings of ASM Heat Treating Conference, Indianapolis, 2009.

About the Authors: Edward Rylicki is the vice president of Technology and Chris Pedder is the technical manager of Heat Treat Products and Services, at Ajax TOCCO Magnethermic Corp. For more information, contact info@ajaxtocco.com or 800.547.1527

Michael Aronov is the CEO at IQ Technologies, Inc. For more information, contact Michael at m.a.aronov@sbcglobal.com.

Two Cost-Effective Applications for Intensive Quenching of Steel Parts Read More »

Skip to content